CES Technical Report 126, April 2012
ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE AND PEOPLE'S LIVELIHOOD ASPECTS IN THE VICINITY OF COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANT AT YELLUR PANCHAYAT, UDUPI DISTRICT
RESULTS & DISCUSSION

6.1 Observations during field visits

  • Due to transport of coal in Open Type Box (BOBRN) wagons, spillage of coal and coal dust were occuring in the vicinity of TPP.
  • Improper liners and coal stockyard without shelter has led to leaching during heavy monsoon, contaminating nearby land, ground water and surface water bodies.
  • Corrosion of railway tracks (parts of Konkan Railway and coal track to TPP)
  • Corrosion of fencing of the green belt (of TPP), tin sheets (within TPP complex)
  • Corrosion of transmission lines (could be dangerous to life as there are chances of severe hazards due to heavy precipitation)
  • Corrosion of iron pillar, silver plated door frame and door of the main entrance of Subramanya (Padabetu) and Durgaparameshwari temples (Nandikur village).
  • Corroded dish antennas, agriculture implements, vehicle chassis, tin roofs, well pulleys, mesh cover to wells, etc. in nearby houses
  • Salt accumulation on roof tiles and walls (distemper palletisation) adjacent to TPP
  • Intentional disruption of public pathways by TPP (to restrict nearby Yellur village or a mechanism to pressurize villagers to dispose off their lands)
  • Improper confinement of soil in TPP complex leading to large scale erosion of soil and subsequent depositionin nearby agricultural fields.
  • Sacred grove in dilapidated state due to the negligence of the TPP management, hence hurting the local sentiment.
  • Direct discharge of coal mix water to nearby streams
  • Illegal use of natural drains/streams for transporting TPP effluents to Arabian Sea. As the stream passes through agriculture fields there is a contamination of land and biotic elements (humans, livestock, fishes, poultry, pets, etc.)
  • Hydrocarbons oozing out from the TPP complex is contaminating nearby surface water sources (northwestern side of TPP, Yellur village, Mr. Kariya Shetty house)
  • Contaminated tubewell (yellow colour with oily film)
  • Black dust deposition on vegetation (sacred grove, etc.)
  • Salt deposition evident from saline taste of mist (deposited on foliage)
  • Stunted growth of jasmine plants
  • Chlorosis, necrosis and leaf burn (coconut, arecanut, banana, jackfruit, mango, and other vegetation)
  • Reduced population of avifauna (dwindling peafowl population) indicator of enhanced pollution levels in the environment as birds are bioindicators.
  • Skin rashes, lesions, nail deformation (Onychodystrophy) in humans (children as well as adults)
  • Higher instances of coughing among local people (respiratory ailments such as asthma  and bronchitis, impact of minute fly ash dust in mucus membrane in superior and inferior concha)  
  • Higher instances of miscarriage (livestock)
  • Abandoned agriculture and horticulture fields
  • Enhanced aggressive behaviour among humans due to psychological stress (which is more evident in TPP affected areas)
  • Labour colony with poor basic amenities (sanitation, drinking water, etc.)
  • Open defecation and contamination of nearby streams has led to mosquito breeding resulting in higher instances of malaria and chikungunya among the residents in and nearby labour colony.
  • Higher instances of crime due to illegal drugs and liquor (labour colony)
  • Indiscriminate disposal of solid waste – coal ash (fly ash and bottom ash) 
  • Non-functional slurry mixer (sluicer) near the ash pond
  • Lack of scientific management of coal ash; direct dumping of dry ash to the ash pond
  • Absence/poor liner in ash pond, contaminating nearby ground water sources and soil due to leaching from the ash pond
  • Leaching from temporary confinement pond (TPP complex) and ash pond to nearby agriculture fields
  • Indiscriminate disposal of polymer used for outer coating of GRP (Glass-fiber Reinforced Plastic) pipeline in the forest land.
  • Collection of drinking water from faraway places (as ground water and surface water sources are contaminated)
  • Insensitive TPP and district administration (provision of drinking water, maintenance of roads, health issues of local residents)
  • Lack of adequate environment regulatory mechanism in the district.
  • Poor post-project environment monitoring and non-compliance of environmental norms as per MoEF, GoI guidelines.
  • Inadequate compliance of environment management plan suggested during environmental clearance.
  • Absence of environment management cell at TPP for regular monitoring of environmental parameters related to air, water, soil, land and health (human, livestock).
  • Arrogant behavior of the security staff  including TPP officials with the local people
  • Implication of local people in false criminal cases by local police as well as district administration
  • Deliberate weakening of local institutions (gram panchayats) and Civil Society Organizations
  • Reduced fish yield in the ocean, higher instances of sea shore erosion where TPP effluents are discharged (liability to the district exchequer for TPPs misdeeds)
  • Inadequate and inappropriate compensation to affected families
  • Cascaded environmentally hazardous activities due to TPP (proposal for cement industry, etc.)
  • Forced emigration of local people due to the prevailing adverse environmental conditions

Coal feedstock -transport and storage issues: The TPP in Yellur village is a coastal Ultra Mega Power Project (UMPP) with installed capacity of 600 MW, being upgraded to 1200 (2X600) MW capacity with further proposed capacity addition in different phases. As mandated by the MoP, UMPPs must use imported coal. The TPP imports coal from Indonesia and handles it in a coal stock yard at New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) captive coal jetty. It is transported in open type 60T Bottom Opening Type Box (BOBRN) wagons via Konkan Railway to the plant located nearly 37 km away from Mangalore. Coal spillages and coal dust were observed on the tracks leaching to nearby water bodies (Figure 16).

The TPP coal yard stocks coal for 45 days (Figure 17). Improper liners and coal stockyard without shelter has led to leaching during heavy monsoon, contaminating nearby land, ground water and surface water bodies. Open storage and exposure of coal to air and water (due to precipitation) leads to oxidation of pyrites (in coal) to sulphates and sulphuric acid resulting in acid mine drainage. Coal mix effluents were observed to be released (Figure 18) into nearby surface water sources at northwestern, southwestern and southern sides of TPP (Yellur village).

Coal samples were collected from the TPP complex. Based on analysis by Central Power Research Institute (CPRI) (Table 19-20), Gross Calorific Value (GCV) was reasonably good (5590-6090 kcal/kg). The expected range of ash content for Indonesian coal is ~13%.

Table 19: Proximity analysis of the coal procured from TPP

Moisture Volatile matter Fixed Carbon Gross Calorific Value (kcal/kg)
First test 17.7 44.7 36.8 5590
Second test 13.3 45 40 6090

Table 20: Ultimate analysis of the coal procured from TPP

Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen Sulphur Oxygen
First test 60.8 4.43 0.23 0.29 15.75
Second test 64 4.5 0.55 0.58 15.37

Contamination due to salt water intake: The TPP extracts water from Arabian Sea through Glass-fiber Reinforced Plastic (GRP) pipeline at the rate of 10045 m3/hour. Indiscriminate soil contamination due to pipeline construction activities were observed during the field visit. Disposal of polymer used for outer coating of GRP (Glass-fiber Reinforced Plastic) pipeline also has a tendency to leach to water resources during high precipitation (Figure 19). Leakages from existing GRP pipelines since December 2009 were reported by local people and no effective tangible remedial action has been taken either by TPP or district administration. Discussion with local people revealed that, out of the 17 wells within 100 m of the pipeline (which are being continually monitored), 16 had higher TDS beyond permissible limits. Also, 14 wells were dewatered during March-April 2011 and 4 were reported to have higher salinity even after cleaning and monsoon rainfall. Salt water intrusion into ground water resources apart from higher salinity level in soil has deprived local residents their fundamental right of clean water and livelihood.

Saline mist discharge from TPP cooling towers: Supersaturated saline mist released from the cooling towers of TPP was observed in the immediate surroundings and regions upto 2 km (Figure 20). Saline mist dispersion from cooling towers is localised in the valley region during upwind and downwind flows as shown by the Figure 21. This improper siting of TPP without taking into account the altitudinal gradient and wind regime of the region has resulted in deposition of saline mist over regions in the vicinity.

The saline mist deposit has resulted in chlorosis, necrosis and leaf burn (Figure 22; observed in banana, coconut, arecanut, jasmine, etc.), reduced productivity of plants (Figure 23; paddy, banana, jasmine, arecanut, beetlenut leaves, coconut, etc.),corrosion of metallic objects (Figure 24; tin sheets, dish antennas, railway tracks, transmission lines, fencing wires, vehiclechassis, well pulleys, mesh on the well, etc.), soil salinity, etc. The salt deposition on vegetation has stunted its growth. Also, deposition of dust (with salt) has altered the phenology apart from changes in the characteristics of pollens. Due to this the population of pollinators (such as bees) has drastically reduced which has affected the ecosystem services evident from reduced pollination and declined productivity of crops.

Figure 21: Altitudinal gradient of the TPP and localised dispersion of saline mist from cooling towers

Flue gas emissions (SOx, NOx, COx, trace elements): The flue gas stack has a height of 275 m which was verified using clinometer during field visit. As per the reports, about 25% of flue gas passes through FGDs (Flue Gas Desulphurisation) which has an efficiency of 85% and can lower the SO2 emission rate. Reports also reveal that about 75% of the flue gas is let out directly without desulphurisation (apart from 85% efficiency of FGD) into the surrounding environment which has resulted in enhanced SOx levels. There are no evidences of effort to de-NOx by TPP.

Coal ash handling: Coal ash (fly ash and bottom ash) collected in different hoppers are carried to ash silos within the plant. This is transported to the ash pond site through open trucks. Improper handling of ash in open trucks and also dumping of dry ash to ash pond has contributed to the particulate dispersion and fugitive dust in the neighborhood. Mismanagement of ash is primarily responsible for degrading the environment affecting the livelihood and health of local population (Figure 25). Inadequate or absence of impervious layer in the ash pond has led to seepage of contaminated water to the surrounding water sources. Apart from this, it was observed during the field visit that, ash pond effluents were discharged to a nearby perennial stream (which is being used for domestic activities by the residents of Santhur village) that joins Shambhavi river, a tributary to Mulki river which finally reaches the Arabian Sea. This has also contaminated the agriculture and horticulture lands.

Effluent discharges: Major effluent discharges from the TPP are: 1) Condensate Polishing Unit (CPU) neutralization wastewater, 2) boiler drain, 3) HVAC plant waste, 4) service waste including floor washing, 5) FGD/lime are runoff (assuming FGD is installed), 6) oily wastewater, 7) ash silo area wastewater, 8) coal stockyard drain, 9) Reverse Osmosis (RO) reject, 10) pre-treatment plant sludge, 11) cooling tower blowdown, and 12) sanitary waste. It has been observed that coal mix effluents were drained to nearby streams which eventually mixed with other perennial streams. This has also affected the nearby pond and well waters. One of the streams flowing westward of the TPP towards the sea carried effluents through the villages of Padebettu and Nadsal. This has polluted coastal agricultural lands and water bodies even at a distance of over 4 km from the TPP site (Figure 26). The hydrocarbon rich oily effluents were observed to have infiltrated to low lying areas particularly in the northwestern side of TPP. This has affected the nearby wells and agricultural fields (Figure 27).

Soil erosion from TPP complex: Large scale mud slides were observed in the northern side of TPP subsequent to monsoon due to lack of appropriate soil conservation measures in the TPP complex. Heavy rainfall eroded the soils anddepositedthem in nearby paddy fields (Figure 28). This had resulted in damage to crops and also decline in soil fertility affecting the dependent population’s only livelihood.

Inadequate green cover around TPP and ash pond: As per the environmental policy 2006 and also EIA notification, TPP is supposed to maintain at least 33% green cover. However, poor green cover in the TPP site (Figure 29) as well as ash pond site and lack of appropriate buffer, highlight non-compliance of the environmental norms. Appropriate vegetation in the green belt as well as buffer region would have attenuated the pollution of air and noise.

Unhygienic conditions in labour colony: The housing colony constructed for migrant labourers near to the TPP was observed to have unsafe drinking water, unhygienic toilet facilities and inadequate sewage treatment (Figures 30). Open defecation and contamination of nearby streams has led to mosquito breeding resulting in higher instances of malaria and chikungunya among the residents in and nearby labour colony. Also, higher instance of crimes due to illegal drugs and liquor was reported.

Figure 16: Open wagons transporting coal to the TPP via Konkan Railway and coal spillages
Figure 17: Open coal stockyard at TPP complex Figure 18: Coal mix effluents released into a natural stream near to coal stockyard
Figure 19: Soil contamination due to disposal of syntheticmaterial used for outer coating of sea water intake GRP pipeline
Figure 20: Saline mist discharge from cooling tower of TPP and deposition on leaves
Figure 22: Leaf burn due to deposition of saline mist
Figure 23: Reduced productivity of jasmine, banana, coconut, areca, etc.
Figure 24: Corrosion of metallic objects (dish antenna, roof tops, transmission wire, railway track)
Figure 25: Ash pond site (open truck, non-functional ash sluicer, ash pond)
Figure 26: Effluents mixing with a perennial stream in southwestern side of TPP (Yellur village) – health impacts
Figure 27: Hydrocarbon rich oily effluents infiltrating to northwestern side of TPP affecting the nearby wells and agricultural fields (Mr. Kariya Shetty house, Yellur)
Figure 28: Soil erosion from northern side of TPP complex and deposition in nearby paddy fields, Yellur
Figure 29: Glimpse of poor vegetation cover at TPP complex
Figure 30: Unhygienic conditions in labour colony adjacent to TPP

6.2 Land use and land cover Analysis

Land cover analysis: Land cover analysis of the study region was done by computing Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) which shows the percentage of area under vegetation and non-vegetation. NDVI is based on the principle of spectral difference based on strong vegetation absorbance in the red and strong reflectance in the near-infrared part of the spectrum. Vegetation index differencing technique was used to analyze the amount of change in vegetation (green) versus non-vegetation (non-green) with the two temporal data (considering 1973 and 1989 as base). Figure 31 illustrates the spatiotemporal change in the land cover of the study area. The vegetation cover 87.32% (2003) has decreased to 59.76% (2011) (Table 21). Temporal change explains the degradation rates with respect to 2003 and 2011.

Figure 31: Land cover classification

Table 21: Land cover analysis

Year % Vegetation % Non-vegetation
2003 (before setting up thermal power plant) 87.32 12.68
2011 59.76 40.24

Land use analysis: The spatiotemporal land use changes of the study area are shown in the Figure 32 at the whole landscape level from 2003 to 2011 carried out by using RS data. Table 22 illustrates the changes in the area of land use with respect to time.The built-up land increased from 5.26% (2003) to 8.1% (2011) andvegetation decreased from 8.1% (2003) to 4.24% (2011). The results evidence industrial and cascaded developmental activities as major driving forces for the degradation in the region.

Figure 32: Land Use classified image

Table 22: Spatiotemporal land use dynamics

Year  2003 2011
Category Ha % Ha %
Built-up 691.466 6.26 1402.81 12.7
Water 117.085 1.06 104.934 0.95
Cropland 7546.47 68.32 5901.762 53.43
Vegetation 894.70 8.1 468.34 4.24
Others 1796.044 16.26 3167.93 28.68
Total area (Ha) 11045.784

Accuracy of land use analysis: Accuracy assessment and kappa statistics included in Table 23 are used to evaluate the strength of each category as well as classification as a whole. Kappa statistics summarizes the overall results and measures the difference between the actual agreements in the error matrix which is ranging from 93% to 95%.

Table 23: Kappa statistic and accuracy assessment

Year Overall Accuracy Kappa value
2003 93.515 0.898
2011 95.010 0.906

6.3 Field sampling and analyses

Water samples collected from the locations were analysed for physical and chemical integrity as per the standard protocol (discussed in materials and methods section). The results of water analysis are listed in tables 24, 25 and 26 corresponding to samples from buffer zone (collected in August 2011), core zone (collected in October and November 2011).  Table 27 summarises parameter wise ranges of measured values.

Table 24: Water quality analysis of samples collected during August 2011 in the buffer zone (6 km) of the TPP

Sampling location code 46 47 48 50 54 56(1) 56(2) 57 58 59 60 63 BIS standard levels WHO drinking water standards
Village Nandikur Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur - Kolachur Yellur - Kolachur Yellur- Kolachur Yellur- Kolachur Yellur- Kolachur Yellur- Kolachur Yellur - Kolachur
Parameters Unit Well- Raghuram Shetty Well- Vimal Mogerti Well-Jayanth Bhat Well- Christian Fernandis Well- Brijith D'souza Stream with coal mix effluent Stream with mudwater Well- Bujanga Shetty Well- Jagannath Mulya Coal mix effluent from TPP Well- Varija Shetty (Keshava Shetty) Well- Anantharam Bhat
DO ppm 4.24 1.73 1.06 3.9 3.3 5.01 3.24 0.74 3.04 1.18    
Water temp °C 28.6 27.7 27.6 28 27.7 28 28.4 29.6 28.3 27.8    
pH 4.8 4.5 4.4 5.4 5.6 3.8 4.1 6.1 4.6 4.9 6.5-8.5 6.5-9.2
Turbidity NTU 2.74 1.65 0.72 104 9.81 2.2 3.61 176 1.26 2.49 5  
TDS ppm 53 51 465 352 1200 947 2304 78 167 500 500
ORP mV 214 205 215 60 25 245 235 165 155 153    
ChlorideS (Cl-) ppm 14.2 19.9 258 34.1 11.4 1385 193 593 556.6 1746.6 36.92 90.88 250 200
Sodium (Na+) ppm 7.2 13.1 169 22.5 8.6 595 96 542 26 1755 31.6 60.4 200 200
Potassium (K+) ppm 1 1.3 7 1.3 1.2 10 3 4 6 32.5 1.2 1.7    
Alkalinity ppm 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 2 0.8 0.8 200  
Total hardness ppm 16 20 80 28 12 516 76 168 132 636 32 44 300  
Ca ppm 4.81 3.21 14.4 6.41 1.60 59.3 4.81 40.08 19.24 81.76 3.21 12.83 75 75
Ca Hardness ppm 12.0 8.01 36.0 16.0 4.00 148 12.0 100.1 48.04 204.16 8.01 32.03    
Mg ppm 0.97 0.97 10.7 2.92 1.95 89.7 15.6 16.57 20.47 105.26 5.85 2.92 30 50
COD ppm 6 8 2 2 2 36 10 2 2 18 4 4    
Nitrates ppm 0.18 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.10 0.07 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.05 0.11 45 45
Phosphates ppm 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.13 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 5  

 

Sampling location code   64 65 67(1) 67(2) 69 70 74 76(1) 76(2) 77(1) 77(2) 78 79 BIS standard levels WHO drinking water standards
Village   Yellur-Kolachur Yellur-Kolachur Santhur Santhur Padebetu Padebetu Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur Yellur
Parameters Unit Well- Ithappa Poojari Well- Damodar Suvarna Well- Sundari Shetty* Borewell- Sundari Shetty * Well- Balakrishna Shetty Well- Kamala Mulya Kamala V. Jogi Well- Kariya Shetty Effluent Discharge into stream Well- Calestine D'souza Borewell- Calestine D'souza Well- Jaya
Poojari
Well- Yogesh Poojari
DO ppm 2.96 2.68 2.96 2.94 8.81 3.4 5.38 5.88 7.6 5.58 7.4 3.93 2.83
Water Temp °C 28.5 27.4 27.3 26.4 26.1 27.6 27.4 27.6 26.7 28.1 27 28 28.5
PH 4.7 5.1 4.7 6.6 5.7 5.3 5.4 3.6 6.2 4.9 5.7 4.3 3.9 6.5-8.5 6.5-9.2
Turbidity NTU 0.89 4.69 7.59 65.6 22 0.65 0.65 21.4 1.12 21.4 0.46 0.35 5  
TDS ppm 142 197 29 156 118 78 96 1804 850 43 56 43 63 500 500
ORP mV 175 173 173 -15 105 165 177 365 65 198 140 249 282    
Chlorides (Cl-) ppm 73.84 105.1 8.52 5.68 28.4 17.0 28.4 766.8 51.12 5.68 11.36 5.68 14.2 250 200
Sodium (Na+) ppm 47.5 64.2 7.3 25 27.2 25.7 27.8 300 915 3.5 7.7 2.8 9.5 200 200
Potassium (K+) ppm 1.7 1.4 0.9 0 18.1 1.5 1.4 10 30 0.2 1.7 0.4 1.1    
Alkalinity ppm 0.8 1.2 0.6 3.2 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.2 0.04 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.4 200  
Total hardness ppm 36 44 12 88 40 44 12 252 392 16 16 24 12 300  
Ca ppm 8.02 9.62 3.21 3.21 14.43 8.02 3.21 36.87 57.72 1.60 4.81 1.60 3.21 75 75
Ca Hardness ppm 20.02 24.02 8.01 8.01 36.03 20.0 8.01 92.07 144.1 4.00 12.01 4.00 8.01    
Mg ppm 3.90 4.87 0.97 19.49 0.97 5.85 0.97 38.98 60.42 2.92 0.97 4.87 0.97 30 50
COD ppm 6 4 8 4 8 6 4 4 68 4 6 2 4    
Nitrates ppm 0.14 0.11 0.17 0.26 0.13 0.16 0.22 0.08 0.13 0.15 0.22 0.15 0.15 45 45
Phosphates ppm 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.01 5  
* near Ash pond
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits
Sampling location code   80 81 82 82 83 84 84 85 85 86 87 89 89 BIS standard levels WHO drinking water standards
Village   Belman Santhur Santhur Karnire Karnire Kabattar Kabattar Nandikur Nandikur Nadsal (Tenka) Nadsal (Tenka)
Para meters Unit Well- Alen D'souza Well- Venkat ramana Prabhu Well- Hillary Fernandis Algae sample Well- Bhaskar Shenoy Well- Santhosh Shambhavi river Well- Sundara Poojary Paddy field Railway track coal leachate Dhananjay Public well near pipeline Paddy field near Lalitha's house, pipeline leak
DO ppm 5.11 4.8 2.52 3.42 3.73 7.7 3.57 2.37
Water temp °C 27.7 28 28.1 28.8 27.7 28.7 30 30.6
pH 4.8 4.9 5.3 4.1 5.9 6.7 4.8 4.8 6.5-8.5 6.5-9.2
Turbidity NTU 0.68 0.77 1.15 1.45 1.35 6.62 0.87 0.52 5  
TDS ppm 58 37 51 81 145 55 35 41 500 500
ORP mV 218 222 212 252 185 142 195 218    
Chlorides (Cl-) ppm 8.52 8.52 14.2 31.24 11.36 28.4 8.52 11.36 8.52 8.52 17.04 167.56 31.2 250 200
Sodium (Na+) ppm 8.5 2.2 5.3 1.7 7.6 14.8 5 3.3 4.9 7.8 7.2 92.5 25.6 200 200
Potassium (K+) ppm 1.2 0.9 1.3 1 0.9 4.8 1 1 1.2 1.7 1.7 2.5 0.9    
Alkalinity ppm 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.4 1 200  
Total Hardness ppm 20 20 16 48 16 60 16 12 12 44 20 72 28 300  
Ca ppm 4.81 6.41 4.81 4.81 3.21 19.24 4.81 3.21 3.21 9.62 6.41 17.64 3.21 75 75
Ca Hardness ppm 12.01 16.01 12.01 12.01 8.01 48.04 12.01 8.01 8.01 24.02 16.01 44.04 8.01    
Mg ppm 1.95 0.97 0.97 8.77 1.95 2.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 4.87 0.97 6.82 4.87 30 50
COD ppm 4 6 6 6 4 4 2 2 4 16 18 2 2    
Nitrates ppm 0.37 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.26 0.14 0.14 45 45
Phos phates ppm 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.19 0.14 0.04 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.11 0.02 0.04 0.01 5  
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Table 25: Water quality analysis of samples collected during October 2011 in the core zone (2 km) of the TPP

Sampling location code 58(1) 58(2) 76(3) 76(2) 76(1) 48 91

BIS standard levels

WHO drinking water standards

Village Yellur
Parameters Units Pond-Jagannath Mulya Well-Jagannath Mulya Pond-Kariya Shetty Effluent discharge to stream-Kariya Shetty Well-Kariya Shetty Jayanth Bhat Well-Siraj
pH 4.10 3.80 2.90 5.40 2.40 4.40 5.80 6.5-8.5 6.5-9.2
Turbidity NTU 3.44 3.60 36.20 26.00 4.79 5
ORP mV 58.00 168.00 305.00 34.00 278.00 230.00 145.00
DO ppm 4.34 2.70 4.62 2.84 2.29 2.54 3.71
W.temp °C 30.60 29.00 31.90 30.40 33.60 30.50 28.00
A.temp °C 33.00 32.00 31.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 32.00
Total hardness ppm 86.00 44.00 1400.00 580.00 580.00 58.00 60.00 300
Ca ppm 15.23 4.81 104.21 24.05 72.14 9.62 23.25 75 75
Ca hardness ppm 38.03 12.01 260.21 60.05 180.13 24.02 58.06
Mg ppm 11.69 7.80 277.76 126.69 97.46 8.28 0.49 30 50
Chloride ppm 482.80 357.84 3294.40 3862.40 3237.60 266.96 36.92 250 200
Na ppm 299.00 227.00 5065.00 2505.00 1940.00 146.00 35.10 200 200
K ppm 2.00 5.00 35.00 25.00 25.00 3.00 6.40
Sulphate ppm 0.00 10.00 140.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200 200
Nitrate ppm 0.20 0.60 4.60 3.30 5.80 0.70 4.50 45 45
Phosphates ppm 1.77 1.69 2.40 1.69 2.37 1.27 1.70 5
TSS ppm 376 334 574 688 460 184 56 100
TDS ppm 540 400 8976 4928 4120 352 116 500 500
TS ppm 916 734 9550 5616 4580 536 172
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Table 26: Water quality analysis of samples collected during November 2011 majorly in the core zone of the TPP

Sampling location code 90 92 93 76(1) 76(3) BIS standard levels WHO drinking water limits
Village Nadsal- Tenka Santhur Yellur Yellur Yellur
Parameters Unit Pond- Sheik Abdulla Ash pond Effluent discharge from TPP Well- Kariya shetty Pond- Kariya shetty
Alkalinity ppm 1.8 1.4 0.6 0 0
Total hardness ppm 68 108 228 760 1520 300
Ca ppm 20.04 36.87 64.13 88.18 160.32 75 75
Ca hardness ppm 50.04 92.06 160.13 220.18 400.32
Mg ppm 5.36 4.87 17.54 141.3 282.6 30 50
Chlorides ppm 93.72 51.12   2612.8 4671.8 250 200
Na ppm 13.4 6.9 119.9 280 380 200 200
K ppm 12.9 7.2 15.6 40 30
Sulphates ppm 7 100 58 5 250 200 200
Nitrates ppm 0.3 0.5 0.1 7 9.3 45 45
Phosphates ppm 2.3 1.07 0.34 1.69 1.18 5
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Table 27: Various parameters analysed and range of their values in the collected water samples of study region

PARAMETERS RANGE
TEMPERATURE (ºC) 26 to 36.1
DO (ppm) 0.74 to 8.81
pH 2.4  to 6.7
TURBIDITY (NTU) 0.35 to 176
TDS (ppm) 29 to 8970
ORP 15 to 365
CHLORIDES (ppm) 5 to 4670
SODIUM (ppm) 1.7 to 5065
POTASSIUM (ppm) 0.2 to 40
ALKALINITY (ppm)) 0.04 to 3.4
TOTAL HARDNESS (ppm) 12 to 1520
CALCIUM- Ca (ppm) 1.6 to 160
MAGNESIUM- Mg (ppm) 0.97 to 282
NITRATE(ppm) 0.05 to 9.3
PHOSPHATE (ppm) 0.01 to 2.4
SULPHATE (ppm) 0 to 250

Turbidity: Clarity of water is a very important aspect for human consumption. Turbidity in water is caused by suspended and colloidal matter such as clay, silt, finely divided organic and inorganic matter, plankton and other microscopic organisms, waste discharge and sediments from erosion. The maximum permissible limit of turbidity as per BIS and World Health Organization (WHO) is 5 NTU. Turbidity values ranged from 0.35 to 176 NTU in most of the samples. Among the collected samples, 8 samples mostly found in the immediate vicinity of the TPP were above the acceptable range. The sampleof Mr. Kariya Shetty’s well [Sampling location code -76] was having lower transparency and clarity. Itwas observed to bea finely suspended red colour solution with  turbidity values of 26 NTU while the nearby stream was having a turbidity value of 36 NTU. This is due to the direct discharge of effluents to streams and subsequent leaching to ground water resources. The turbidity of well and borewell water samples of Ms. Sundari Shetty [67] near to the ash pond was about 65 and 7 respectively due to leaching of ions from ash pond and sediments from erosion caused due to improper lining of ash pond. The stream water near Mr. Jagannath Mulya’s house [58] showed extremely high turbidity (176 NTU) due to direct disposal of black coal mix effluent.

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): TDS affect the water quality in myriad of ways impacting the domestic water usage for cleaning, bathing etc as well as drinking purposes. Total dissolved solids originate from organic sources such as leaves, silt, plankton, industrial waste and sewage. Other sources come from runoff from urban areas, road salts used on street, fertilizers and pesticides used on lawns and farms [APHA, 1995]. Surface as well as groundwater with high dissolved solids are of inferior flavor and induce an unfavorable physiological reaction to the dependent population. A limit of 500 ppm TDS is desirable for drinking waters. The TDS values in the samples analysed, ranged from 29 to 8970 ppm across all locations. Among them, 5 samples were above the BIS and WHO standards. The water sample of Mr. Kariya Shetty’s [76] well and pond which is in core region has maximum values ranging from 4120 - 8976 ppm. The stream near Mr. Kariya shetty had high TDS of 4928 ppm dueto effluents richsurface run off as well as salt deposits. This would eventually result in higher build up of total solids in surface and ground water making it more unpalatable and hard to be used for domestic purposes.

Chlorides: Chlorides are essentially potential anionic radical that imparts chlorosity to the waters. An excess of chlorides leads to the formation of potentially carcinogenic and chloro-organic compounds like chloroform, etc. Zafar (1964) and Kumar (1995) in their studies described chloride as a pollution indicator. Chloride values in samples ranged from 5 to 4670 ppm. Among the collected samples, 6 samples exceeded the permissible limits. Mr. Jayanth Bhat’s well[47], Mr. Kariya Shetty’s [76] well and pond, Mr. Jagannath Mulya’s [58] well and pond and the streams nearby Mr. Kariya Shetty [76] and Mr.Jagannath Mulya[58] showed very high chloride valuesdue to the discharge of hyper concentrated salt solutions and effluents from the TPP. High chloride content has deleterious effect on metallic pipes and agricultural crops. Certain areas within the core zone are affected by chloride contamination due to the discharge of effluents.

Sodium: Sodium (Na) is one of the essential cations that stimulates various physiological processes and functioning of nervous system, excretory system and membrane transport in animals and humans. Increase of sodium ions has a negative impact on blood circulation, nervous coordination, thence affecting the hygiene and health of the nearby localities. According to WHO guidelines the maximum admissible limit is 200 ppm. In this study the concentration of sodium ranged from 1.7- 5065 ppm. Samples at Mr. Kariya shetty [76], Mr. Jagannath Mulya [58] and Mr. Bujanga Shetty [57] were exceeding WHO standards. Most critical values (5065 ppm) for sodium were observed in Mr. Kariya Shetty’s pond [76].

Potassium: Potassium (K) is an essential element for both plant and animal nutrition, and occurs in ground waters as a result of mineral dissolution, decomposing of plant materials and also from agricultural runoff. Potassium ions in the plant root systems helps in the cation exchange capacity to transfer essential cations like Ca and Mg from the soil systems into the vascular systems in the plants in replacement with the potassium ions. Incidence of higher potassium levels in soil system affects the solute transfer (active and passive) through the vascular conducting elements to the different parts of the plants. The potassium content in the water samples ranges between 0.2-40 ppm.

Alkalinity: Alkalinity is a measure of the buffering capacity of water contributed by the dynamic equilibrium between carbonic acid, bicarbonates and carbonates in water. Sometimes excess of hydroxyl ions, phosphate, and organic acids in water causes alkalinity. High alkalinity imparts bitter taste. The acceptable limit of alkalinity is 200 ppm. The water samples analysed were having lower alkalinities because of higher acidic environment in the soil systems.

Total hardness: Hardness is the measure of dissolved minerals that decides the utility of water for domestic purposes. Hardness is mainly due to the presence of carbonates and bicarbonates. It is also caused by variety of dissolved polyvalent metallic ions predominantly calcium and magnesium cation although, other cations like barium, iron, manganese, strontium and zinc also contribute. In the present study, the total hardness ranged between 12 to 1520 ppm. According to WHO guidelines the maximum admissible limit is 300 ppm. Throughout the analysis in the due course of the study, 8 samples were observed to have exceeded the permissible limits as given by WHO. The samples of Mr.Kariya Shetty’s [76] well, pond and nearby stream consistently showed higher values across different sampling periods during the study.

Calcium: Calcium (Ca) is one amongst the major macro nutrients which are needed for the growth, development and reproduction in case of both plants and animals. The presence of Ca in water is mainly due to its passage through deposits of limestone, dolomite, gypsum and other gypsiferous materials (Manivasakam, 1989). Ca concentration in all samples analysed periodically ranged between 1.6 to 160 ppm. The stream containing coal mix effluents near Mr. Jagannath Mulya [58] together with Mr. Kariya Shetty’s well [76], pond and stream samples have Ca values beyond permissible levels.

Magnesium: Magnesium (Mg) in one of the most essential macro nutrients that helps as a co-factor in the enzyme systems and in the central metal ions that constitutes the chlorophyll moleculeessential for plant photosynthesis. According to WHO guidelines the maximum admissible limit is 50 ppm. In this study the concentration of Magnesium ranged from 0.97– 282 ppm.  This indicated Mg accumulation in the water systems resulting in the increase in overall hardness of water making it unpalatable and unsuitable for any domestic applications.

Dissolved Oxygen: Dissolved oxygen (DO) is the most essential feature in aquatic system that helps in aquatic respiration as well as detoxification of complex organic and inorganic mater through oxidation. The presence of organic wastes impose a very high oxygen demand on the receiving water leading to oxygen depletion with severe impacts on the water ecosystem. The effluentsalso constitute heavy metals, organic toxins, oils, volatile organics, nutrients and solids. Thermal Power Plant effluents cause temperature difference in the water and reduce the available oxygen. The DO of the analysed water samples varied between 0.74 to 8.81 ppm. The higher variations of DO especially lower DO values are indicative of fast oxidising chemicals in the immediate vicinity. DO in the surface waters were substantially low compared to the ground water systems,due to effluents released in natural surface streams. The impact was a reduced aquatic biodiversity in the nearby streams and ponds.

Nutrients (nitrates and phosphates): Nutrients essentially comprise of various forms of N and P which readily dissolve in solutions that are uptaken by microbes and plant root systems in the form of inorganic mineral ions. Accumulation of N as nitrates and P as inorganic P in aquatic ecosystems causes significant water quality problems due to higher net productivity. Together with phosphorus, nitrates in excess amounts in streams and other surface waters can accelerate aquatic plant growth causing rapid oxygen depletion or eutrophication in the water. Nitrates at high concentrations (10 mg/l or higher) in surface and groundwater used for human consumption are particularly toxic to young children affecting the oxygen carrying capacity of blood cells (RBC) causing cyanosis (methemoglobinemia). In the present study, nitrate values ranged from 0.05 to 9.3 ppm and phosphate values ranged between 0.01 to 2.4 ppm.

Sulphates: The incidence of higher sulphate levels imparts an overall acidity to water that becomes unsuitable for domestic usage and cultivation. The higher levels of sulphates affects the nature of the soil under cultivation and results in drastic decline incrop productivities. The SOx from the atmosphere gets dissolved in water and precipitates as acid rain contributing higher sulphates to the surface and running waters. In the present study sulphates ranged from 0 to 250 ppm. The samples from Mr. Kariya Shetty’s pond [76] consistently exceeded the WHO permissible limit of 200 ppm.

Heavy metal analysis: Heavy metals like cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, lead and zinc were detected in the water samples of the study region, particularly core zone (Table 28). Cadmium was also observed in the soil samples contaminated by TPP effluents (Table 29).

Table 28: Heavy metal analysis of water samples collected from the study region (mg/l)

Sample Ash pond 92 Coal mix effluent water 59 Kariya shetty stream 76(1) Kariya shetty well 76(2) Kariya shetty pond 76(3) Jayanth Bhat 48 BIS standards for effluent discharge BIS standards for drinking water
Cd 0.45 0.00 0.68 1.00 5.02 0.03 2.00 0.01
Co 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.06 0.09 0.00
Cr 0.13 0.08 0.09 0.19 0.28 0.09 2.00 0.05
Cu 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.19 3.00 0.05
Fe 2.89 4.39 11.86 14.85 94.14 1.22 3.00 0.3
Mn 0.06 0.27 3.53 3.73 8.49 0.20 2.00 0.1
Ni -0.02 0.01 0.13 0.14 0.01 0.01 3.00 0.02
Pb 0.02 0.07 0.06 0.10 0.16 0.83 0.10 0.05
Zn 0.53 7.42 0.37 0.26 0.15 4.27 5.00 5
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Table 29: Heavy metal analysis of soil samples collected from the study region (mg/kg)

Sample Kariya Shetty stream 76(2) Kariya Shetty field 76(3) Cristian Fernandis
50
Sheik Abdulla 89 Fly ash Bottom ash IS Permissible limits
Cd 8.03 0.04 0.02 0.51 0.44 0.05 0.03 3-6
Co 0.01 0.05 0.46 2.71 0.82 1.34 0.61
Cr 4.34 -0.12 0.50 32.98 39.85 0.47 -0.03 n/a
Cu 2.09 0.78 5.34 8.60 9.23 11.41 13.61 135-270
Fe 10.43 158.20 80.05 6427.50 6180.00 56.03 102.73
Mn 0.20 6.43 15.01 42.75 16.12 49.10 46.18 n/a
Ni 1.32 1.09 1.30 12.76 7.65 1.93 2.38 75-150
Pb -4.17 2.47 15.03 4.83 21.92 2.37 1.46 250-500
Zn 0.44 4.42 7.18 103.63 101.48 10.14 5.37 300-600
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Water analysis reports collected from PCB: Our study shows that the ground as well as surface waters in the 2 km core zone considered around the TPP havedeteriorated in quality. These are comparable with other water quality analyses during December 2010 to June 2011 as well asin February, May and October, 2011 collected from PCB. Table 30 shows the sampling locations with time of collection.

Table 30: Time periods and locations of water analyses by PCB (Pollution Control Board)

Time period Sampling locations
21/3/2011, 18/5/2011 1-open well water of Mr. Kishor kumar Ulloru west side of TPP premises, 2-Open well water of Mr. Bhoja poojari near Garadi South side of premises, 3-Open well water of Mr. Vittal Shetty near ash pond , 4-Open well water of Panduranga Bhajana Mandali Kermundelu Tadamaru, 5-Open well water of Mr. Sundar Bangera Hejamadi, 6-River water sample at Karnire, 7-Open well water of Ms. Kamala near Shambhavi river at Karnire,  8-Open well water of backside of universal brothers Nandikur,   9-Open well water of Mr. Sundar backside of Bappanadu temple Mulki, 10-open well water of Ms. Srilakshmi Simanthooru, Kinnigoli.
3/5/2011 1-Open well near Resma nursery Nadsal village, 2- Open well collected back side of universal brothers Nandikur, 3-Open well of Mr. Narendra near Mahaganapathi temple Nandikur,  4- Mulki river about 1.25 km east of sampling 5- Mulki river 2.5 km from confluence with sea
21/4/2011, 12/4/2011, 3/10/2011, 21/10/2011 1-Open well water of Mr. Damodar Suvarna Yellur (Kolachur),  2-Open well water of Mr. Ithappa poojari Yellur (Kolachur), 3-Open well water of Mr. Anantharam Bhat Yellur (Kolachur), 4- Open well water of Mr. Jayanth Bhat Yellur (Kolachur) 5- Open well water Mr. Vimal Mogerthi near Yellur (Kolachur)
29/4/2011 1-Open well water of Mr. Janardhana Acharya Nadsal (Yermal),   2- Open well water of Mr. Gopa Bhandary Nadsal (Yermal),   3-Open well water of Mr. Kishor Poojary Nadsal (Yermal), 4- Pond water of Mr. Kishor Poojary Nadsal (Yermal)
13/4/2010 1- Yellur Kuner Moolastan, 2- Ms. Mary Pinto residence openwell 3-Mr. Janmardhan Acharya residence open well , 4-Open drain near Mr. Shantharam shetty, 5- Mr. Kariya Shetty openwell,  6- Inside TPP premises borewell
18/2/2011, 25/2/2011, 1-Open well water of Mazzid E Nirma Trust, Nadsal (Yermal) , 2-Open well water of Ms. Kamala Tenka Moilthi, Nadsal (Tenka) 3-Borewell water of Ms. Sunidhi Moilthi Nadsal (Tenka), 4-Open well water of Ms. Radha Poojari Lachil house Nadsal (Tenka),   5-Openwell water of Mr. Anand Hegde Nadsal (Tenka),  6- Openwell water of Mr. Kishor Poojari Nadsal (Tenka)
Source: PCB

Yellur village
Location 1 – Openwell water of Mr. Jayanth Bhat Yellur [47]
Location 2 – Openwell water of Mr. Vimal Mogerthi near yellur
Location 3 – Openwell water of Mr. Kariya shetty Yellur [76]
Location 4 – Openwell water of Mr. Madhubala J.Shetty, Yellur
Location 5 – Openwell water of Mr. Karim Saheb,Yellur
Location 6 – Openwell water of Mr. Sunanda Tantri Mane,Yellur

TDS was above the permissible limits in all the samples. Well water samples at Mr. Kariya Shetty [76] and Ms. Madhubala Shetty residences had higher TDS during October. Samples were acidic and the value of pH ranged between 2.9- 5.6. Total hardness in well water samples of Mr. Jayanth Bhat [47], Mr. Kariya Shetty [76] and Ms. Madhubala Shetty were above the permissible limits. Calcium of well water samples at Ms. Madhubala Shetty and Mr. Jayanth Bhat [47] exceeded the WHO Limits. Magnesium ranged between 4-1090 ppm. Openwell water of Ms. Madhubala shetty had high magnesium value. Iron content in the samples of Mr. Jayanth Bhat and Mr. Kariya shetty were above the permissible limits. Total hardness and Chloride values of Mr. Jayanth Bhat, Ms. Madhubala Shetty and Mr. Kariya shetty exceeded the permissible limits. Thus in Yellur village, out of 6 samples 3 water samples exceeded WHO limits according to analyses conducted by PCB, due to effluents and leaching.

Table 31: Water quality analysis in Yellur village

Sampling location location 1 location2 location3 location 4 location 5 location 6
Paramaters unit 21-Apr-11 3-Oct-11 21-Apr-11 3-Oct-11 21-Oct-11 3-Oct-11 WHO limits
TDS mg/l 5972 590 422 752 7400 12000 90 620 500
pH 4.9 5.4 5.6 5.6 2.9 3.5 5.6 4.7 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 900 70 32 32 700 1400 18 142 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 132 6 6 2 44 124 1 6 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 139 14 4 7 143 1090 4 25 30
Iron as Fe mg/l 0.36 BDL BDL BDL 0.67 0.19 BDL BDL 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 12 2 3 2 2 7 2 2 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 2300 212 150 36 2800 4100 26 170 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 2 0.2 3 2 0.7 4 0.1 BDL 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.08 BDL 0.08 BDL 0.02 0.04 BDL BDL 1
DO mg/l 7.3 7 7.5 7 5.7 5.5 7.1 6.8
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Yellur (Kolachur) – Southern side of TPP
Location 1- Open well water of Mr. Damodar Suvarna, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 2- Open well water of Mr. Ithappa Poojari, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 3- Open well water of Mr. Anantharam Bhat, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 4- Openwell water of Mr. Subramanya Bhat, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 5- Open well water of Mr. Vishwanath,Yellur (Kolachur)

Table 32:  Water quality analysis in Yellur (Kolachur) village

Sampling locations 1 2 3 4 5
Paramaters unit 21-Apr-11 30-Sep-11 21-Apr-11 30-Sep-11 21-Apr-11 3-Oct-11 WHO Limits
TDS mg/l 418 318 1970 276 660 812 456 500
pH 4.9 6.2 4.4 6.8 4.9 6.3 5.4 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 66 52 192 56 18 118 48 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 10 2 26 4 12 19 2 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 10 12 31 11 10 17 9 30
Iron as Fe mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.13 0.1 0.2 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 2 2 4 2 35 15 2 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 180 96 760 80 220 348 168 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 2 BDL 2 0.9 2 7 BDL 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.06 BDL 0.06 BDL 0.05 BDL BDL 1
DO 6.8 6.8 6.5 6.9 6.5 6.9 7
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Location 1-Openwell water of Mr. Jaganath Mulya, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 2-Openwell water of Ms. Girija, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 3-Openwell water of Mr. Hussian Sahib, Yellur (Kolachur)
Location 4-Openwell water of Mr. Subramanya Bhat, Yellur (Kolachur)

Table 33:  Water quality analysis Yellur (Kolachur) village

Locations Units 1 2 3 4
Parameters 3-Oct-11 21-Oct-11 WHO limits
pH 5.8 2.1 6 5.9 6.5-8.5
Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 64 32 168 140 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 10 3 18 20 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 9 6 30 22 30
Chloride mg/l 232 32 600 498 250
Sulphate mg/l 11 330 11 18 200
Flouride mg/l BDL BDL 0.06 0.05 1
TDS mg/l 612 400 1500 1180 500
DO mg/l 6.9 7 6.4 5.7
Nitrate mg/l BDL BDL 5 0.5 45
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

The results of analysis of Yellur (Kolachur) showed TDS values in openwell water samples collected from Mr. Ithappa poojari, Mr. Anantharam Bhat, Mr. Subramanya Bhat, Mr. Jaganath Mulya, Mr. Hussian Sahib above the permissible limits as per WHO. The chlorides of water samples from Mr. Ithappa Poojari, Mr. Subramanya Bhat, Mr. HussianSahib exceeded the WHO limits. The pH was also not within range in all the samples. Thus the ground water of Yellur (Kolachur) village is contaminated. The high TDS and chloride values indicate exceeding salt content due to release of salt water or effluents.

Santhur village

 Table 34:  Water quality analysis in Santhur village

Sampling location 1 2 3 4 WHO Limits
Paramaters unit 21-Mar-11 18-May-11 4-Mar-11 21-Oct-11 21-Oct-11
TDS mg/l 116 142 86 368 272 500
pH 6.8 7.4 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 20 28 20 120 76 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 4 6 4 11 11 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 2 3 2 22 12 30
Iron as Fe mg/l 0.38 0.41 BDL 0.11 0.04 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 2 2 4 2 1 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 30 20 20 20 24 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 5 5 0.9 BDL 10 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.02 0.02 BDL 0.2 0.06 1

Location 1 – openwell water of Mr. Vittal Shetty near ash pond
Location 2 – openwell water of Mr. Bhaskar Shetty south side of ash pond
Location 3 – Test borewell water collected at chemical dosing area near ash pond
Location 4 – Test borewell water collected at south side near ash pond

Water samples of March and May 2011, showed higher iron content in openwell of Mr. Vittal Shetty near the ash pond exceeding the permissible limits. The pH of water samples at openwell of Mr. Bhaskar Shetty (at south side of ash pond) was acidic.

Karnire village

Table 35:  Water quality analysis in Karnire village

Sampling location Site- 1 Site-2 WHO Limits
Paramaters unit 21-Mar-11 18-May-11 21-Mar-11 18-May-11
TDS mg/l 48420 964 102 162 500
pH 7.9 7.5 7.8 6.9 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 6250 230 36 36 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 460 44 10 8 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 1239 29 2 4 30
Iron as Fe mg/l 0.35 0.38 0.77 0.78 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 1960 26 13 12 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 18500 150 28 30 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 90 10 5 6 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 1
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

In Karnire village the analysis of water samples of river Shambhavi showed that TDS, calcium, magnesium, hardness, iron, sulphate and chlorides were above the WHO permissible limits.

Nadsal (Tenka Yermal) village

Table 36:  Water quality analysis in Nadsal (Tenka Yermal) village

Sampling location 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHO limits
Paramaters unit 25-Feb-2011 21-Oct-11
TDS mg/l 15424 22828 1334 3056 5988 920 500 500
pH 7.1 7.1 4.3 4.3 3.1 6.3 6.4 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 3050 3400 250 360 920 162 170 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 568 520 52 56 148 128 47 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 396 510 29 53 134 8 13 30
Iron as Fe mg/l 0.06 BDL 0.32 BDL 1.17 0.69 0.97 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 820 940 3 2 3 2 7 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 5780 10000 600 1450 3350 182 32 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 18 26 2 4 8 20 30 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.05 1
DO 6.5 5.8 7 7 6.5 5.2 6.2
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Location1 – Openwell water of Ms. Kamala Tenka Moilthi, Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 2 – Borewell water of Ms. Sunidhi Moilthi Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 3 – Openwell water of Ms. Radha poojari Lachil house Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 4 – Openwell water of Mr. Anand Hegde Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 5 – Openwell water of Mr. Kishor Poojari Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 6 – Pond water of Mr. Seetharama Shetty,Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)
Location 7 – Openwell water of Mr. Sheikh Abdulla,Nadsal (Tenka,Yermal)

The results of water analysis of Nadsal (Tenka Yermal) village showed high values for TDS, total hardness, chlorides, calcium and magnesium forall samples, exceeded permissible limits as per WHO. The sulphates in the open well water of Ms. Kamala and Ms. Sunidhi were above the limits. Thus there is a serious contamination in surface and ground water samples. The stream passing near these sites contains the effluents and salt water from the TPP. This is the reason for the contamination of surface and ground water samples nearby this stream.

Admar village

Table 37:  Water quality analysis in Admar village

Sampling locationà 1 2 WHO Limits
Parameters unit 21-Oct-11
pH 6.9 6.9 6.5-8.5
Hardness asCaCO3 mg/l 96 70 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 10 12 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 17 10 30
Chloride mg/l 18 22 250
Sulphate mg/l 1 2 200
Flouride mg/l 0.04 0.1 1
TDS mg/l 280 260 500
DO mg/l 5.2 5.6
Nitrate mg/l 7 20 45
Iron mg/l 0.05 0.09 0.3

Location 1- Test borewell water collected at R&R near Pipeline corridor, Admar village
Location 2- Test borewell water collected near Shrinivas Bhat , Admar village

The analysis of Admar village reported good quality of water during December 2010 to June 2011. The physical and chemical parameters were within permissible limits as per WHO.

Nandikur village

Table 38:  Water quality analysis in Nandikur village

Sampling location 1 2
Paramaters unit 21-Mar-11 3-May-11 18-May-11 3-May-11 WHO limits
TDS mg/l 346 264 310 192 500
pH 7.6 6 7.7 6.9 6.5-8.5
Total hardness mg/l 130 50 100 50 300
Calcium as Ca mg/l 18 15 20 14 75
Magnesium as Mg mg/l 20 3 12 3 30
Iron as Fe mg/l 0.98 BDL 0.9 0.83 0.3
Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 7 1 2 2 200
Chloride as Cl mg/l 26 100 40 30 250
Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 10 6 9 10 45
Fluoride as F mg/l 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.1 1
Numerals in Bold indicated values exceeding permissible limits

Location 1- Open well water of backside of Universal brothers Nandikur
Location 2- Open well water of Mr. Narendra near Mahaganapathi temple Nandikur

The results of analysis of water samples from Nandikur village are within permissible limits as per WHO standards except for the iron content.

Inferences from water quality studies

  1. Throughout the course of study it was observed that, the TDS levels in the samples were far above the permissible limits of WHO or BIS standards.
  2. The streams in the vicinity of the TPP were contaminated with coal mixedeffluents,resulting in the increase of ionic concentrationsof  surface water (nearby water bodies). This has resulted in the decline of cropyield and higher instances of human and livestock health issues.
  3. It was observed that the residents near TPP were affected by higher levels of salinity, fly ash dustand vaporized heavy metals has affected health,  infrastructures (metallic fixtures, T&D lines, fencing, etc.), plants, reduced crop productivity (agriculture, horticulture, etc.). Plants with phyto deformations and mottling of leaves. The chlorophyll content of the leaves near TPP in affected areas has reduced drastically resulting in poor photosynthesis and biomass accumulations. Apart from this, the dust deposition in floral parts has reduced the pollinators population. The reduced pollination has also added to the reduction in crop yield.
  4. Heavy metals leached from the plant complex have contaminated the nearby water and land resources rendering the people around the area with critical health implications.
  5. During the dryer periods (post monsoon), hydrocarbons (oil spills and thin oil films) rich effluents were directly diverted to the nearby natural streams. This causes local asphyxia and choking of water bodies, at the same time affecting the aquatic biodiversity in a great way. The nearby well and pond waters were also observed to be heavily contaminated.
  6. The synthesis of data from PCB records as well as outcome of our field experiments reveal that water is contaminated at Yellur (including Kolachur), Nadsal and Santhur villages mainly due to untreated effluent discharge from TPP, combustion of coal without proper pollution control mechanisms, improper ash handling and ash containment pond, etc.

6.4 Socioeconomic survey – Impact of the TPP on land, water, air, crops, livestock, biodiversity and human health

Residents of Yellur, Nadsal, Nandikur, Santhur, Padebetu and other villages within the study region were selected randomly to elicit the information corresponding to ecology, environmental status, crop productivity, socio-economic and health aspects. Contingency evaluation technique through a structured questionnaire was adopted to compile data from 30 households within 6 km buffer zone (20 households within 2 km core zone). In addition to this, four medical practitioners were interviewed mainly focusing on health related issues due to pollution or contamination of air, water and soil. Results of the survey reveal:

Impacts due tocontamination of water

  • Higher salinity in the wells in core zone (within 2 km)
  • Saltiness, greenish coloration and oily layer in well waters near to streams (carrying effluents discharged by TPP) at Nadsal (Tenka, western side of TPP)
  • Skin rashes, lesions, nail deformation (Onychodystrophy),
  • Skin itching in northern, southern and western sides due to contamination of stream water (consequent to effluent discharge)
  • Changes in groundwater table (due to excess drawl of groundwater at TPP site)

Impacts due to contamination of air environment

  • Transport (in open trucks) and dumping of dry coal ash
  • Blackish particles settle on leaves, clothes kept for drying, objects inside home, food kept open, etc. in the core zone
  • Salt deposits on leaves and roofing tiles in the core zone (deposits tasted salty)
  • Corrosion of tin roofing sheets, agriculture implements, dish antennas, iron fencing, vehicle chassis, etc. in the core zone
  • Drying of leaves and leaf burn associated with necrosis, chlorosis, etc
  • Respiratory ailments like asthma, alveolar infections, bronchitis, etc
  • Eye irritation and skin itching in southeastern side closer to silos (where fly ash is stored).

Impact on people’s livelihood

  • Reduced paddy yield in the core zone (in the 2 km radius) –  reduction by 57 to 66% 
  • Premature falling and reduced yield of areca and coconut
  • Reduction in banana yield
  • Livelihood of weaker section of the society is threatened with poor or no flowering of jasmine, etc.
  • Scarcity of water suitable for drinking and other domestic activities
  • Forced displacement without appropriate rehabilitation of native forest dwellers
  • Improper valuation of ecosystem goods and services while compensating the loss
  • Harassment (of the affected residents complaining/agitating against pollution) by the district administration (police and civil) 

Impact on livestock

  • Ailments related to skin, respiratory tract, etc
  • Miscarriages and decline in milk yield
  • Fodder – due to uptake of heavy metal has become non-palatable
  • Fodder – reduced grass productivity due to salt as well as ash dust deposition
  • Non-palatable grasses, and other herbs due to contamination
  • Poultry death due to consumption of effluent mixed stream water

Impact on biodiversity

  • Reduced population of peafowl, foxes, wild boar, etc. within core zone.
  • Disturbance in food chain due to reduced primary productivity and subsequent decline in species of fishes, crabs and frogs. 
  • Loss of snake habitat
  • Removal of sacred groves and dilapidated state of existing groves
  • Presence of pollution tolerant lichen species in the barks of vegetation closer to TPP further confirms pollution of air environment.
  • Displacement of native human population

Water: Residents of the region depend mostly on nearby streams, wells/borewells for domestic water requirements. Indiscriminate discharge of coal mix effluents clandestinely by TPP into natural drains is reported at southern, southwestern and northwestern sides of TPP.  Respondents in core zone of 2 km radius in the eastern (Santhur), northern (Yellur) and southern (Kolachur) sides reported salinity in well water during all seasons and higher levels during summer. Mr. Kariya Shetty [76] reported and showed yellowish/reddish coloration and oily layer in the well waters and pond on northern side. Also, respondents in southern side complained of similar problems. Respondents also reported of leakages from pipes, leaching and also overflow from fly ash pond (to groundwater sources), movement of contaminated surface water (to groundwater sources) due to direct discharge of effluents to nearby natural drains.This has increased salinity in well water. Respondent near the fly ash pond in Santhur reported of higher turbidity (change in appearance of well water)in addition to salinity. Respondent from western side (Nadsal-Tenka Yermal)also complained of non-potability of well and stream water. During the field investigations we noticed reddish coloration in stream water due to irresponsible action of sustained effluent discharge. Reddish colouration of well waters is also observed in open wells within 200 m of TPP. Nadsal (Tenka Yermal) village in the Western side of the TPP also reported saltiness, greenish coloration and oily layer in well waters near to streams which carried effluents. Fluctuations in ground water table were also reported by residents Yellur (including Kolachur), Nandikur, Nadsal due to over-extraction of ground water by TPP.

Air: Respondents in the core zone reported of blackish particle deposition on leaves, clothes kept for drying, objects inside home, food kept open etc. and salt deposits on leaves and roofing tiles. This was reported to be intense prior to monsoon, although similar instances were observed even during monsoon. Higher levels of salt content in the environment (higher than similar regions in the coastal Karnataka) has resulted in corrosion of tin roofing sheets, dish antennas, iron fencing, vehicle chassis, mirror frame, well pulleys, mesh cover for wells, etc. Higher levels of ash dust was reported and observed in the localities closer to fly ash pond due to dumping of dry ash. Salt deposits as well as ash dust has enhanced the pollution of air environment evident from drying of leaves, leaf burn, etc. in the core zone.

Crops: Economy of Yellur, Nandikur, Santhur, Nadsal (Tenka Yermal) and Padebetu villages are mainly agrarian and these villages grow paddy and horticultural crops like coconut, areca, sapota,banana and jasmine. Vegetables are also grown near houses to meet the respective family’s requirement.Interaction with local farmers reveals that paddy yield has declined drastically by 57-66%. Majority of respondents in the core zone as well as within the 4 km radius of TPP reported decrease in crop yield.Single women who were dependant on floriculture reported of jasmine famine consequent to changes in the air environment with dust and salt. Premature falling of arecanut and coconut, drying of leaves, leaf burn, are very common in the core zone.Instances of premature drop of arecanut and coconut is reported even beyond 2 km and upto 4 km.

Livestock: Livestockowners in the core zone reported ofailments related to skin, respiratory tract, and in some cases miscarriages. Respondents reported of decreased milk yield, less fodder availability, contaminated fodder (due to uptake of heavy metals), reduced fodder yield (due to salt and dust deposition), etc. Majority of respondents indicated non-palatability of fodder (grass and herbs) due to contamination. Also, they reported of poultry death due to consumption of stream water contaminated with effluents discharged by TPP.

Health: All respondents in the core zone complained of serious health problems due to the contaminated air, water and land environment. Ailments reported by the residents in this zone include respiratory (asthma, alveolar infection in superior and inferior concha, bronchitis), skin rashes, lesions, eye irritations, onychodystrophy (nail deformation), etc. Respiratory problems are very common and higher compared to skin and eye diseases among all age groups. Eye irritation and skin itching is reported by the respondents in eastern side of the plant closer to silos (where fly ash is stored), northern, southern and western sides due to contaminated domestic water from streams (Figure 33 and Figure 34).

Figure 33: Health problems of respondents

Figure 34: Skin lesions, nail deformations, etc observed in people

Biodiversity: The region is a haven for peacocks, foxes, wild boars (Figure 35). etc. Interviews with residents reveal the decline in their numbers in the recent past especially in the core zone. Due to changes in the environment with higher levels of dust and other pollutants there has been reduction in the population of peafoul, foxes, wild boars, etc. Disturbance in the food chain is evident with the reduced primary productivity (grasses on land, algae in water bodies) and this has led to the reduced population of native fishes, crabs and frogs. Reptiles have also lost their habitat due to removal of vegetation, rocky areas, etc. Discussion with elderly people in the locality revealed that the core zone had many sacred groves (patch of forests with native species worshipped by local people). Now, these sacred groves were either removed or in dilapidated state.  Presence of pollution tolerant lichen species in the barks of vegetation closer to TPP further confirms pollution of air environment. During public consultations, the discussions with the local people revealed that there has been a large scale displacement of native human population.

Figure 35: Biodiversity observed in the study area

Table 39 summarises the environmental impacts due to TPP

Table 39: Impact matrix of UPCL

Parameter Negative Impact No Impact Positive Impact Short Term Long Term
A. Impacts due to Project Location.          
     a)   Changes in land use/land cover l       l
     b)   Forced displacement of people       l  
     c)   Loss of trees/forests l     l l
     d)   Impact on wild fauna l       l
     e)   Animal movement paths l     l  
     f)   Drainage problems l       l
     g)   Risks due to landslides, mudslides l     l  
     h)   Contamination of land and water l     l l
     i)   Contamination of air l     l l
B. Impacts due to Project Construction          
     a)   Workforce colonies – without basic amenities (sanitation, fuel, education of children) l     l l
     b)   Pollution at construction sites l     l l
     c)   Soil removal (tunnels, etc.), erosion and sedimentation of streams and river, alterations in topography due to soil disposal l     l l
     d)   Soil disposal problem l     l  
     e)   Problems due to geological faults   l      
     f)   Health risk l     l  
     g)   Loss of habitat of wild animals l     l  
     h)   Blasting – impact on wild fauna l     l  
     j)   Loss of carbon sequestration ability – removal of tree vegetation l     l l
     i)   Groundwater over exploitation l     l l
C. Impacts due to Project Operation          
     a)   Transport of coal (open containers) l     l l
     b)   Storage of coal l     l l
     c)   Solid wastes (fly ash transport and disposal) l     l l
     d)   Contamination of water due to liquid waste l     l l
     e)   Super saturated saline mist l     l l
     f)   Oil pollution l     l l
     g)   Biodiversity loss (sacred groves) l     l l
     h)   Labour colonies with inadequate amenities and sanitation l     l l
     i)   Health (skin, respiratory, etc.)          
     j)   Landslides, mudslides l     l l
     k)   Economic viability  due to reduced horticultural and agriculture crop productivity l     l l
     l)   Accident hazards (poor road conditions) l     l  

 

E-mail     |     Sahyadri     |     ENVIS     |     GRASS     |     Energy     |     CES     |     CST     |     CiSTUP     |     IISc     |     E-mail