http://www.iisc.ernet.in/
Prediction of Shallow Landslide prone regions in Undulating Terrains
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
T.V. Ramachandra1,2,3,*               Bharath H. Aithal1,2               Uttam Kumar 1               Joshi N V1
1 Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES], 2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra),
3 Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
*Corresponding author:
cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in

Introduction

Landslides occur due to various triggering factors such as heavy rainfall, earthquakes, changes in land cover etc.  These hydro-geomorphic events depend on the combination of  i) predisposing factors (e.g. lithology and  morphology), ii) triggering factors (e.g. excessive and intense precipitations) and iii) accelerating (e.g. human activities altering natural slope stability) factors36 along with gravitational forces. Most common one is shallow landslide, occurring in steep, soil mantled landscapes in different climatic zones.4,26,28,53 This event has a significant role in an ability to change surface erosion patterns on a hill slope and sediment yields to nearby streams, triggered due to changes in topography, land cover and soil properties. The occurrence time and locations where landslides are likely to occur should thus be identified and modeled in advance in order to avoid or reduce the casualties. Casualties due to landslides caused by slope failures are significantly higher in the undulating terrains, resulting in huge economic losses due to higher value of endangered structures and the greater number of property and human casualties.
             
Landslides in mountainous terrain often occur during or after heavy rainfall, resulting in the loss of life and properties. Mapping or delineating areas susceptible to landslides is essential for moderating land use activities and implementing appropriate mitigation measures with management options in mountainous areas.16 Prediction of rainfall triggered hill slope disasters relied mostly on the valley slope8,20, rainfall intensity and duration that can cause hill slope failure.7,9 During the last decade, theoretical models have been developed to predict landslide susceptibility based on topographic, geologic and hydrological variables as well as changes in watershed’s land use using various parameters such as neural, fuzzy, object oriented, knowledge based etc.15,24,30,37,38,40,49,50,63

The availability of relatively detailed digital elevation data, coupled with simple slope-instability understanding and hill slope hydrological models, has led to refinements in physically-based modeling of shallow landslide hazards.22,62 Daia and Leeb16 illustrated slope instability modeling using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Casadei et al12 predict the time and location of landslides through a landslide warning system using a slope-instability analysis and  hydrological models, which was validated by using historical data of landslide events for the period 1953–199829.

The failure depth prediction model13 is based on geotechnical properties (cohesion, angle of internal friction and density) of the soil and the local slope topography. Combination of failures and the consequent transportation of the failed materials lead to the evolution of a new hill-slope. These changes are due to the slope gradient, depending on the location of landslides, quantity and their run-out distances. There are numerous studies pertaining to shallow landslides across the globe41,58,59 and  on landslide hazard zonation and modeling3,24,51,52.

Most of the hazard appraisal techniques make use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) along with temporal Remote Sensing data (RS) considering the complex spatial dynamics of the landslide process. Digital elevation models (DEMs) coupled with precipitation data at higher spatial and temporal resolution36 aid in the shallow landslide hazard modeling.5,6,38,48,49,54,62 Methods based on the infinite slope stability parameters31 along with hydrological models37,49,62, have been used for the estimation of soil wetness spatially.2,11,18,37

Modelling these dynamic processes with appropriate methods require incorporation of all mechanisms acting at different spatial and temporal scale levels. However there are difficulties in the context of models of longer term landscape such as work on rapid mass movements has concentrated on stability analysis, so that forecasting of destinations for slide debris is very inexact, even for an individual slide28, which has been addressed through various deterministic, heuristic and statistical based models to assess landslide incidence potential1,10,17,43. Deterministic methods deal with the estimation of quantitative values of stability variables namely soil strength, depth below the terrain surface, soil layer thickness, slope angle and water pressure, etc. of the landslide region with homogeneous intrinsic properties57,60 and are applicable at large scale over small areas. However, the drawback of these deterministic model techniques is high degree of simplification due to paucity of data and at times it is prohibitive to acquire the required data.

BACK   «   TOP  »  NEXT
Citation : Ramachandra. T.V., Bharath H. Aithal, Uttam Kumar and Joshi N. V., 2013. Prediction of Shallow Landslide prone regions in Undulating Terrains., Disaster Advances, Vol. 6(1) January 2013, pp. 53-63.
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503-extn 107,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail