Figures
Fig 2.1. Energy recovery potential (MW electrical ) of different wastes from urban and industrial sectors
Fig 2.2. Pathways for solid waste treatment for recovery and recycling process.
Fig 2.3. Pathways available for organic wastes to recover energy
Fig 2.4.1. Hierarchy of technological options for OFUSW
Fig 2.4.2. Overall scheme of anaerobic digestion process
Fig 2.5. Anaerobic breakdown of complex organic matter
Fig 2.6. One-step digestion
Fig 2.7.Two-step digestion
Fig 2.8. Selected types of methane yielding wastes
Fig 3.1. Sketch of SSB reactor
Fig 3.2. Sketch showing gas measurement by downward displacement of water
Fig 3.3. Overall experimental protocol
Fig 3.4. Sketch of BMP vial
Fig 3.5. Sketch showing the set-up used for measurement of gas production from BMP vials
Fig 3.6. Sketch of laboratory scale DFFBR
Fig 3.7. Sketch of DFFBR showing gas measured by downward displacement of water
Fig 4.1. Feed rates achieved for dry feedstocks
Fig 4.2. Feed rates achieved for fresh feedstocks in run 1
Fig 4.3. Daily biogas production rates from dry feedstocks
Fig 4.4. Daily biogas production rates from fresh feedstocks
Fig 4.5. Feed rate Vs volumetric efficiency in dry feedstock
Fig 4.6. Feed rate Vs volumetric efficiency in fresh feedstock
Fig 4.7. Composition of biogas in dry feedstock
Fig 4.8. Composition of biogas in fresh feedstock
Fig 4.9. Changes in TS before and after fermentation in dry feedstocks
Fig 4.10. Changes in TS before and after fermentation in fresh feedstocks
Fig 4.11. TS and VS destruction of dry feedstock
Fig 4.12. TS and VS destruction of fresh feedstock
Fig 4.13.Volumetric efficiencies and gas production pattern of feedstocks in run 2 experiment
Fig 4.14. Cumulative gas production pattern of bagasse
Fig 4.15. Cumulative gas production pattern of paddy straw
Fig 4.16. Cumulative gas production pattern of sugarcane trash
Fig. 4.17. Cumulative gas production pattern of dry water hyacinth
Fig 4.18. Cumulative gas production pattern of dry water hyacinth leaves
Fig 4.19. Cumulative gas production pattern of dry water hyacinth roots
Fig 4.20. Cumulative gas production pattern of photo copying paper
Fig 4.21. Cumulative gas production pattern of banana peel
Fig 4.22. Cumulative gas production pattern of watermelon rinds
Fig 4.23. Cumulative gas production pattern of orange peel
Fig 4.24. Cumulative gas production pattern of mosambi peel
Fig 4.25. Cumulative gas production pattern of mixed fruits and mosambi mixture
Fig 4.26. Cumulative gas production pattern of mixed fruits and orange mixture
Fig 4.27. Cumulative gas production pattern of fresh water hyacinth whole plants
Fig 4.28. Cumulative gas production pattern of fresh water hyacinth leaves
Fig 4.29. Cumulative gas production pattern of fresh water hyacinth roots
Fig 4.30. Cumulative gas production pattern of paper mulberry
Fig 4.31. Feed rate Vs Gas production and COD degradation for bagasse
Fig 4.32. Feed rates Vs Gas production and COD degradation for spirals
Fig 4.33. Feed rates Vs Gas production and COD degradation for bagasse + biomass
Fig 4.34: COD reduction in DFFBR reactor
Fig 4.35. Composition of biogas in DFFB reactor
Tables
Table 2.1: Status of urban solid waste generation in metro cities
Table 2.2: Physical characteristics of solid waste from some cities in India (in per cent)
Table 2.3: Comparative study of waste production (as percentages of total weight) in India and Developed Countries
Table 2.4: Different categories of urban, municipal and industrial wastes and their quantities
Table 2.5: Power generation potential of urban and industrial wastes (MWe )
Table 2.6: Solid waste potential of world countries
Table 2.7: Biogas potential in India
Table 3.1: Feedstock used for the study
Table 3.2: Sources of feedstock chosen for study
Table 3.3: Characteristics of inocula used for study
Table 4.1: Observed Vs theoretical gas yield (based on ideal gas laws)