¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
ENVIS Technical Report 125,   September 2017
Ecologically Sensitive Regions in the Kali River Basin, Karnataka:
Delineation based on Ecological Principles and People’s Livelihood
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India.
E Mail: tvr@iisc.ac.in; Tel: 91-080-22933099, 2293 3503 extn 101, 107, 113
RESULTS

Spatiotemporal land use analysis: The forests of Kali river basin are acting as a rich resource base in the Western Ghats of Uttara Kannada district and providing a livelihood for various people. The land use analysis of Kali river basin depicts the spatiotemporal changes in this biodiversity-rich region from year 1973 to 2016 (Figure 4 and Table 1). The evergreen forest cover was lost due to hydroelectric, infrastructure projects and monoculture plantations from 61.79 to 38.5 % (1973-2016). The natural forest cover has been replaced by the colonial forest department with exotic species such as Acacia, Eucalyptus, and Teak etc. This has led to change in major forest cover of Dandeli, Haliyal, and parts of Supa regions. The construction of series of dams and reservoirs have submerged large-scale forest land by affecting ecology. The transmission lines of Kaiga nuclear powerhouse have bisected greater forest patches across the basin. The land conversion is major problem noticed i.e. conversion of forest to agriculture; agriculture to coco/areca nut plantations. The rehabilitation due to river valley projects, reservoirs have altered interior forests by the creation of more edges. The major portion of deciduous forest cover (7.82-2.24 %) in the eastern portion of the basin has been transformed to agriculture area from 9 to 17.7 % by 2016.


SNO

Year

1973

2016

Category

Ha

%

Ha

%

1

Evergreen to semi evergreen forest

314265.07

61.79

195829.13

38.50

2

Moist deciduous forest

76713.55

15.08

72231.41

14.20

3

Dry deciduous forest

39765.85

7.82

11369.70

2.24

4

Scrub forest/grass land

12857.72

2.53

17138.54

3.37

5

Teak/Bamboo/Acacia/Eucalyptus/Other plantations

8383.26

1.65

76666.09

15.07

6

Crop land

46783.90

9.20

90086.56

17.71

7

Coconut/Areca nut /Cashew nut  plantations

54.26

0.01

8805.30

1.73

8

Open fields

5703.57

1.12

9449.90

1.86

9

Built-up

1985.22

0.39

8433.95

1.66

10

Water

2068.93

0.41

18570.75

3.65

Total

508581.33

Table 1: Temporal changes in land use of Kali river basin.

Figure 4: Land use dynamics in the Kali river basin.
Land uses in the KTR region (Figure 5) shows a forest loss from 91.5 to 71.85% due to protection and inaccessibility as compared to Kali river basin. The dense core forests were lost due to the construction of series of dams on river Kali and some area was replaced by plantations. The core forest remained, which is mostly concentrated Supa taluk and Kali river valley regions. Roads are another driver aid in the loss of core forest cover. The eastern portions of KTR region have major teal plantations constitute 7.6% of land mass. There is continuous pressure in the periphery area of KTR due to increase in the population of surrounding villages. The moist deciduous cover has gained by replacing semi-evergreen cover from 4.8 to 11.12 % due to degradation in northern portions. The core portion is still intact and supporting diverse flora and faunal species from extinction. If the de-notification of KTR has considered, then it will be a great loss to ecology.  Pre-independence era tigers and elephants were distributed across the forests of Uttara Kannada, now they are confined to only Kali river basin due to various other reasons. The entire basin is acting as the lifeline for wildlife to thrive as it is the only habitat for key species such as tigers and elephants in the district. The accuracy of classification has been verified with sample data collected from the field and google earth. The overall accuracy of classification is 89, 91 % respectively for 1973 and 2016.


SNO

Year

1973

2016

Category

Ha

%

Ha

%

1

Evergreen to semi evergreen forest

130660.7

91.5

102,558.63

71.85

2

Moist deciduous forest

6836.6

4.8

15,872.42

11.12

3

Dry deciduous forest

258.3

0.2

775.2

0.54

4

Scrub forest/grass land

2021.8

1.4

4297.06

3.01

5

Teak/Bamboo/Acacia/Eucalyptus/Other plantations

1202.8

0.8

10851.49

7.60

6

Crop land

895.2

0.6

4136.89

2.90

7

Coconut/Areca nut /Cashew nut  plantations

0.0

0.0

0

0.00

8

Open fields

463.0

0.3

3019.57

2.12

9

Built-up

42.6

0.0

304.75

0.21

10

Water

354.5

0.2

919.45

0.64

Total

142735.5

Table 2: Temporal changes in land use of KTR.

Figure 5: Land use analysis of ADTR (KTR).

 

 

 

 

E-mail     |     Sahyadri     |     ENVIS     |     GRASS     |     Energy     |     CES     |     CST     |     CiSTUP     |     IISc     |     E-mail