http://www.iisc.ernet.in/
Sequential Maximum a Posterior (SMAP) Algorithm for Classification of Urban Area using Multi-resolution Spatial Data with Derived Geographical Layers
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
Uttam Kumar1,2,3          Anindita Dasgupta3          Chiranjit Mukhopadhyay1           T.V. Ramachandra2,3,4,*
1Department of Management Studies, 2Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra), 3Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES],
4Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
*Corresponding author:
cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
STUDY AREA AND DATA

The study area selected for urban classification is a part of Greater Bangalore having dense builtup, parks, roads, streets, flyovers, walk ways, open land, etc. Dense and medium urban areas have high surrounding temperature compared to vegetation patches, parks and lakes [6]. The undulating terrain in the city ranges from 735 to 970 m with varying textures due to different urban structures.

IKONOS data (700 x 700 dimension) and Landsat ETM+  MS data pertaining to a part of Greater Bangalore were used for urban classification. Ancillary layers such as elevation and its derived layers such as slope and aspect along with NDVI (Normalised Difference Vegetation Index), EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index) and textures (ASM - angular second moment, contrast, entropy and variance) were used in separate experiments during classification as summarised in table 1 (for IKONOS data) and table 2 (for Landsat ETM+ data), respectively. Figure 1 shows False Colour Composite (FCC), NDVI, EVI, DEM (Digital Elevation Model), slope and aspect for the study area. EVI values were rescaled from 0 to 1. It is seen from figure 1 that EVI index highlight vegetation better than NDVI (in green colour) compared to FCC. The elevation in this area ranges from 883 to 940 m. Slope and aspect are represented in degrees.


Figure 1. FCC, NDVI, EVI, DEM, slope and aspect added in IKONOS data classification as additional layers.

Table 1. Details of geographical layers used for IKONOS classification

Classification No. RS data and ancillary geographical layers used Total number of input layers in the classification
1 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4 4
2 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, and NDVI 5
3 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, and EVI 5
4 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, and DEM 5
5 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, EVI, DEM 6
6 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, DEM, slope and aspect 7
7 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, DEM, slope, aspect and EVI 8
8 IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4, DEM and Texture (ASM, contrast, entropy, variance) at 0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees for IKONOS bands 1, 2, 3, 4 5+(4 x 4 x 4) = 69

Table 2. Details of data and ancillary layers used for Landsat ETM+ MS classification

Classification No. RS data and ancillary geographical layers used Total number of input layers in the classification
1 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 at 30 m 6
2 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and Temperature 7
3 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, NDVI, EVI, elevation, slope and aspect 11
4 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, Temperature, NDVI, EVI, elevation, slope and aspect 12
5 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, Temperature, NDVI, EVI, elevation, slope and aspect,texture (ASM, contrast, entropy, variance) at 0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees for ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 108
6 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, Temperature, NDVI, EVI, elevation, slope and aspect,texture (ASM, contrast, entropy, variance) at 0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees for ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 109
7 ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, Temperature, NDVI, EVI,ETM+ PAN, texture (ASM, contrast, entropy, variance) at 0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees for ETM+ bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and ETM+ PAN elevation, slope and aspect 125

BACK   «   TOP   »   NEXT
Citation : Uttam Kumar, Anindita Dasgupta, Chiranjit Mukhopadhyay and Ramachandra. T.V., 2012, Sequential Maximum a Posterior (SMAP) Algorithm for Classification of Urban Area using Multi-resolution Spatial Data with Derived Geographical Layers., Proceedings of the India Conference on Geo-spatial Technologies & Applications, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB), April 12-13, 2012 , pp. 1-13.
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503-extn 107,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail