Framework for Integration of Agent-based and Cellular Automata Models for Dynamic Geospatial Simulations
LIST OF FIGURES
:
1.Introduction
Figure 1.1: Framework for the Simulations Integrating the CA and Agent-based Models
Figure 1.2: Outline of the Research Approach
2.Cellular Automata
Figure 2.1: Cells and Neighbourhood
Figure 2.2: Canonical View of an Agent-based System
Figure 2.3: Agent Typology (Nwana, 1996)
3.Development of the Integration
3.1 Relations Between Cell-Based GIS, CA Modelling, and MAS
3.2 Figure 3.2: Time Advancement Mechanism for CA and Agent-based Models
3.3 Functional View of an HLA Federation
3.4 Framework of the overall simulations
4
.Application of Framework
Figure 4.1: Forms of Sprawl
Figure 4.2: Location of Study Area, Mangalore City in India
Figure 4.3: Details of Study Area
Figure 4.4: Conceptualization of CA Model
Figure 4.5: Classified Image of Landsat MSS 1973
Figure 4.6: Classified Image of Landsat MSS 1973
Figure 4.7: Land Use of Mangalore Region in 1973
Figure 4.8: Land Use of Mangalore Region in 1987
Figure 4.9: Land Use Change in Mangalore Region from 1973 to 1987
Figure 4.10: Feedback Loops between CA Transitions and Agent-based State Transit.
Figure 4.11: Scheme for Agent-building in Geo-spatial Domain
5
.Calibration and Validation
Figure 5.1: Initialised Model for Simulating Radial Urban Sprawl
Figure 5.2: Simulation of the Model for Demonstrating Radial Urban Sprawl
Figure 5.3: Prototype of the Agent Builder Interface
Figure 5.4: Interactions of the Agents with the CA Transition Rules
Figure 5.5: Example of Creation of Agent Extents using the Agent Builder Interface
Figure 5.6: Actual Built-up of 1999
Figure 5.7: Simulated Built-up for 1999
Figure 5.8: Simulated Built-up for 2000
Figure 5.9: Simulated Built-up for 2001
Figure 5.10: Simulated Built-up for 2002
Figure 5.11: Simulated Built-up for 2003
Figure 5.12: Simulated Built-up for 2004
Figure Figure 5.13: Simulated Built-up for 2005
Figure 5.14: Simulated Built-up for 2006
Figure 5.15: Simulated Built-up for 2007
Figure 5.16: Simulated Built-up for 2008
Figure 5.17: Simulated Built-up for 2009
Figure 5.18: Simulated Built-up for 2010
Figure 5.18: Simulated Built-up for 2011
TABLES
3.Development of the Integration
Table 3.1: Key Comparisons of OpenGIS, HLA and FIPA (Adapted from Schulze, et al., 2002)
Table 4.1: Percentage Change of Built-up Area, Population, and Built-up Density from 1972 to 1987
Table 4.2: Factors and Constraints
Email
Sahyadri
ENVIS
GRASS
Energy
CES
IISc
Email