|
Insights to Urban Dynamics through Landscape Spatial Pattern Analysis |
|
Ramachandra T V a,b,c,* Bharath H. Aithal a,b Durgappa D. Sanna b
a Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Center for Ecological Sciences [CES],
b Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra),
c Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP],
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India
*Corresponding author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
|
|
Introduction
Urbanization and Urban Sprawl: Urbanisation is a dynamic process involving changes in vast expanse of land cover with the progressive concentration of human population. The process entails switch from spread out pattern of human settlements to compact growth in urban centres. Rapidly urbanising landscapes attains inordinately large population size leading to gradual collapse in the urban services evident from the basic problems in housing, slum, lack of treated water supply, inadequate infrastructure, higher pollution levels, poor quality of life, etc. Urbanisation is a product of demographic explosion and poverty induced rural-urban migration. Globalisation, liberalization, privatization are the agents fuelling urbanization in most parts of India. However, unplanned urbanization coupled with the lack of holistic approaches, is leading to lack of infrastructure and basic amenities. Hence proper urban planning with operational, developmental and restorative strategies is required to ensure the sustainable management of natural resources.
Urban dynamics involving large scale changes in the land use depend on (i) nature of land use and (ii) the level of spatial accumulation. Nature of land use depends on the activities that are taking place in the region while the level of spatial accumulation depends on the intensity and concentration. Central areas have a high level of spatial accumulation of urban land use (as in the CBD: Central Business District), while peripheral areas have lower levels of accumulation. Most economic, social or cultural activities imply a multitude of functions, such as production, consumption and distribution. These functions take place at specific locations depending on the nature of activities – industries, institutions, etc.
Unplanned growth would involve radical land use conversion of forests, surface water bodies, etc. with the irretrievable loss of ground prospects (Pathan et al., 1989, 1991, 1993, 2004). The process of urbanization could be either in the form of townships or unplanned or organic. Many organic towns in India are now influencing large scale infrastructure development, etc. due to the impetus from the National government through development schemes such as JNNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission), etc. The focus is on the fast track development through an efficient infrastructure and delivery mechanisms, community participation, etc.
The urban population in India is growing at about 2.3% per annum with the global urban population increasing from 13% (220 million in 1900) to 49% (3.2 billion, in 2005) and is projected to escalate to 60% (4.9 billion) by 2030 (Ramachandra and Kumar, 2008; World Urbanization Prospects, 2005). The increase in urban population in response to the growth in urban areas is mainly due to migration. There are 48 urban agglomerations/cities having a population of more than one million in India (in 2011).
Urbanisation often leads to the dispersed haphazard development in the outskirts, which is often referred as sprawl. Thus urban sprawl is a consequence of social and economic development of a certain region under certain circumstances. This phenomenon is also defined as an uncontrolled, scattered suburban development that depletes local resources due to large scale land use changes involving the conversion of open spaces (water bodies, parks, etc.) while increasing carbon footprint through the spurt in anthropogenic activities and congestion in the city (Peiser, 2001, Ramachandra and Kumar, 2009). Urban sprawl increasingly has become a major issue facing many metropolitan areas. Due to lack of visualization of sprawl a priori, these regions are devoid of any infrastructure and basic amenities (like supply of treated water, electricity, sanitation facilities). Also these regions are normally left out in all government surveys (even in national population census), as this cannot be grouped under either urban or rural area. Understanding this kind of growth is very crucial in order to provide basic amenities and more importantly the sustainable management of local natural resources through decentralized regional planning.
Urban sprawl has been captured indirectly through socioeconomic indicators such as population growth, employment opportunity, number of commercial establishments, etc. (Brueckner, 2000; Lucy and Phillips, 2001). However, these techniques cannot effectively identify the impacts of urban sprawl in a spatial context. In this context, availability of spatial data at regular interval through space-borne remote sensors are helpful in effectively detecting and monitoring rapid land use changes (e.g., Chen, et al., 2000; Epstein, et al., 2002; Ji et al., 2001; Lo and Yang, 2002; Dietzel et al., 2005). Urban sprawl is characterised based on various indicators such as growth, social, aesthetic, decentralisation, accessibility, density, open space, dynamics, costs, benefits, etc. (Bhatta et al., 2009a, 2009b, 2010). Further, Galster et al. (2001), has identified parameters such as density, continuity, concentration, clustering, centrality, nuclearity, proximity and mixed uses for quantifying sprawl. Urbanisation and sprawl analysis would help the regional planners and decision makers to visualize growth patterns and plan to facilitate various infrastructure facilities. In the context of rapid urban growth, development should be planned and properly monitored to maintain internal equilibrium through sustainable management of natural resources. Internal equilibrium refers to the urban system and its dynamics evolving harmony and thus internally limiting impacts on the natural environment consequent to various economic activities with the enhanced growth of population, infra-structure, services, pollution, waste, etc. (Barredo and Demicheli, 2003). Due to globalisation process, the cities and towns in India are experiencing rapid urbanization consequently lacking appropriate infrastructure and basic amenities. Thus understanding the urban dynamics considering social and economic changes is a major challenge. The social and economic dynamics trigger the change processes in urban places of different sizes ranging from large metropolises, cities and small towns. In this context, the analysis of urban dynamics entails capturing and analyzing the process of changes spatially and temporally (Sudhira et al., 2004; Tian, et al., 2005; Yu and Ng, 2007).
Land use Analysis and Gradient approach: The basic information about the current and historical land cover and land use plays a major role in urban planning and management (Zhang et al., 2002). Land-cover essentially indicates the feature present on the land surface (Janssen, 2000; Lillesand and Keifer, 2002; Sudhira et al., 2004). Land use relates to human activity/economic activity on piece of land under consideration (Janssen, 2000; Lillesand and Keifer, 2002; Sudhira et al., 2004). This analysis provides various uses of land as urban, agriculture, forest, plantation, etc., specified as per USGS classification system (http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf) and National Remote Sensing Centre, India (http://www.nrsc.gov.in). Mapping landscapes on temporal scale provide an opportunity to monitor the changes, which is important for natural resource management and sustainable planning activities. In this regard, “Density Gradient metrics” with the time series spatial data analysis are potentially useful in measuring urbanisation and sprawl (Torrens and Alberti, 2000). Density gradient metrics include sprawl density gradient, Shannon’s entropy, alpha and beta population densities, etc. This paper presents temporal land use analysis for rapidly urbanizing Bangalore and density gradient metrics have been computed to evaluate and monitor urban dynamics. Landscape dynamics have been unraveled from temporally discrete data (remote sensing data) through spatial metrics (Crews-Meyer, 2002). Landscape metrics (longitudinal data) integrated with the conventional change detection techniques would help in monitoring land use changes (Rainis, 2003). This has been demonstrated through the application in many regions (Kienast, 1993; Luque et al., 1994; Simpson et al., 1994; Thibault and Zipperer, 1994; Hulshoff, 1995; Medley et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 1997; Palang et al., 1998; Sachs et al., 1998; Pan et al., 1999; Lausch and Herzog, 1999).
Further, landscape metrics were computed to quantify the patterns of urban dynamics, which helps in quantifying spatial patterns of various land cover features in the region (McGarigal and Marks, 1995) and has been used effectively to capture urban dynamics similar to the applications in landscape ecology (Gustafson, 1998; Turner et al., 2001) for describing ecological relationships such as connectivity and adjacency of habitat reservoirs (Geri et al., 2009; Jim and Chen, 2009). Herold et al. (2002, 2003) quantifies urban land use dynamics using remote sensing data and landscape metrics in conjunction with the spatial modelling of urban growth. Angel et al. (2007) have considered five metrics for measuring the sprawl and five attributes for characterizing the type sprawl. Spatial metrics were used for effective characterisation of the sprawl by quantifying landscape attributes (shape, complexity, etc.). Jiang et al. (2007) used 13 geospatial indices for measuring the sprawl in Beijing and proposed an urban sprawl index combining all indices. This approach reduces computation and interpretation time and effort. However, this approach requires extensive data such as population, GDP, land-use maps, floor-area ratio, maps of roadways/highways, urban city centre spatial maps, etc. This confirms that landscape metrics aid as important mathematical tool for characterising urban sprawl efficiently. Population data along with geospatial indices help to characterise the sprawl (Ji et al., 2006) as population is one of the causal factor driving land use changes. . These studies confirm that spatio-temporal data along with landscape metrics, population metrics and urban modelling would help in understanding and evaluating the spatio temporal patterns of urban dynamics.
|
|
Citation : Ramachandra. T.V., Bharath H. Aithal and Durgappa D. Sanna, 2012. Insights to Urban Dynamics through Landscape Spatial Pattern Analysis., International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 18, Pp. 329-343.
|
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group,
Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Tel: 91-080-22933099/23600985,
Fax: 91-080-23601428/23600085
Web: http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy
Bharath H. AithalEnergy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India
E-mail:
bharath@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Durgappa D. SannaCentre for Sustainable Technologies (astra), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India
E-mail:
durgappa@astra.iisc.ernet.in
Citation: Ramachandra. T.V., Bharath H. Aithal and Durgappa D. Sanna, 2012. Insights to Urban Dynamics through Landscape Spatial Pattern Analysis., International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 18, Pp. 329-343.
Pathan, S.K., Jothimani, P., Pendharkar, S.P. and Sampat Kumar, D., 1989. Urban land use mapping and zoning of Bombay Metropolitan Region using Remote Sensing data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, 17(3), 11-22.
Pathan, S.K., Shukla, V.K., Patel, R.G., Mehta, K,S., 1991. Urban land use mapping - A case study of Ahmedabad city and its environs. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing, 19(2), 95- I 12.
Pathan, S.K., Sampat Kumar D., Mukund Rao., Sastry S.V.C., 1993. Urban growth trend analysis using GIS techniques-A case study of the Bombay Metropolitan Region., Int. J Remote Sensing, 14(17), 3169 - 3179
Pathan, S.K., Patel, J G., Bhanderi. R.J., Ajai, Kulshrestha, Goyal, V.P., Banarjee. D.L., Marthe, S., Nagar, V.K., Katare, V., 2004. Urban planning with specific rel;erence to master plan of lndore city using RS and GIS techniques. Proc. of GSDI-7 International Conference on Spatial Data Infrastructure for Sustainable Development, held at Bangalore from Feb, 2-6, 2004.
Ramachandra T. V., Kumar, U., 2008. Wetlands of Greater Bangalore, India: Automatic Delineation through Pattern Classifiers. Electronic Green Journal, Issue 26, Spring 2008 ISSN: 1076-7975.
World Urbanization Prospects, 2005, Revision, Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affaris, UN.
Peiser, R., 2001. Decomposing urban sprawl. Town Planning Review, 72(3), 275–298.
Ramachandra, T. V., Kumar, U., 2009. Land surface temperature with land cover dynamics: multi-resolution, spatio-temporal data analysis of Greater Bangalore, International Journal of Geoinformatics, 5 (3), 43-53
Brueckner, J. K., 2000. Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23(2), 160–171.
Lucy w. and Philips D., 2001. Suburbs and the Census: Patterns of Growth and Decline, Survey Series, Washington D C: Brookings Instituition, Centre on Urban and Metropolitan Policy
Chen, S., Zeng, S., Xie, C., 2000. Remote Sensing and GIS for urban growth analysis in China. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(5), 593–598.
Epstein, J., Payne, K., Kramer, E., 2002. Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(9), 913 – 918.
Ji, C. Y., Lin, P., Li, X., Liu, Q., Sun, D., Wang, S., 2001. Monitoring urban expansion with remote sensing in China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(8), 1441–1455.
Lo, C.P., Yang, X., 2002. Drivers of land-use/land-cover changesand dynamic modelling for the Atlanta, Georgia MetropolitanArea. Photogrammetr. Eng. Remote Sens. 68(10), 1062–1073.
Dietzel, C., Herold, M., Hemphell, J.J., Clarke, K.C., 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics in California's central valley: Empirical links to urban theory. Int. J. Geographic Information Science, 19(2): 175-195.
Bhatta, B., 2009a. Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Kolkata, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(18):4733–4746.
Bhatta, B., 2009b. Modeling of urban growth boundary using geoinformatics. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2(4):359–381.
Bhatta, B., 2010. Analysis of urban growth and sprawl from remote sensing data. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Galster G., Hanson R., Ratclfee., M R, 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept, Housing Policy Debate, 12(4):681-717
Barredo, J.l., Demicheli, L., 2003. Urban sustainability in developing countries mega cities, modeling and predicting future urban growth in lagos. Cities, 20(5): 297-310.
Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V., and Jagadish, K.S., 2004. Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using G1S. Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 29-39.
Tian, G., Liu, J., Xie, Y., Yang, Z., Zhuang, D., and Niu, Z. 2005. Analysis of spatio temporal dynamic pattern and driving forces of urbanland in China in 1990s using TM images and GIS. Cities 22(6), 400-410.
Yu, X. J., and Ng, C. N. 2007. Landscape and urban planning. Spatio and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: A case study of Guamgzhou, China 79, 96-109.
Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Peng, X., Gang, R., Shi, P., 2002. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multi- temporal Landsat TM data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 23(15), 3057-3078.
Janssen L.L.E, 2000. Principles of remote sensing, First Edition, The international institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Science(ITC). ISBN 90-61-64-183-7:132-133.
Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer. R. W., 2002. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 9971-51-427-3.Pages:215-216
Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V., and Jagadish, K.S., 2004. Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using G1S. Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 29-39.
Janssen L.L.E, 2000. Principles of remote sensing, First Edition, The international institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Science(ITC). ISBN 90-61-64-183-7:132-133.
Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer. R. W., 2002. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 9971-51-427-3.Pages:215-216
Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V., and Jagadish, K.S., 2004. Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using G1S. Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 29-39.
Torrens P. M., and Alberti M., 2000. Measuring sprawl. Working paper no. 27, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College, London.
Crews-Meyer, K.A., 2002. Characterizing landscape dynamism using paneled-pattern metrics. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68(10), 1031-1040.
Rainis, R., 2003. Application of GIS and landscape metrics in monitoring urban land use change. In N. M. Hashim, & R. Rainis (Eds.), Urban ecosystem studies in Malaysia: A study of change, 267 – 278.
Kienast, F., 1993, Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System – a methodological outline, Lands. Ecol. 8(2), 101–118.
Luque, S. S., Lathrop, R. G., Bognar, J. A., 1994, Temporal and spatial changes in an area of the New Jersey Pine landscape, Lands. Ecol. 9(4), 287–300.
Simpson, J. W., Boerner, R. E. J., DeMers, M. N., Berns, L. A., 1994, Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes, Lands. Ecol. 9(4), 261–270
Thibault, P. A. and Zipperer, W. C., 1994, Temporal changes of wetlands within an urbanizing agricultural landscape, Lands. and Urban Plann. 28, 245–251.
Hulshoff, R. M., 1995. Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape, Lands. Ecol. 10(2), 101–111.
Medley, K. E., Okey, B. W., Barrett, G. W., Lucas, M. F., Renwick, W. H., 1995, Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A., Lands. Ecol. 10(3), 161–176.
Zheng, D., Wallin, D. O. and Hao, Z., 1997. Rates and patterns of landscape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Changbai Mountain area of China and North Korea, Lands. Ecol. 12, 241–254.
Palang, H., Mander, Ü., Luud, A., 1998. Landscape diversity changes in Estonia, Lands. and Urban Plann. 41, 163–169.
Sachs, D. L., Sollins, P., Cohen, W. B., 1998. Detecting landscape changes in the interior of British Columbia from 1975 to 1992 using satellite imagery, Can. J. Forest Res. 28, 23–36.
Pan, D., Domon, G., de Blois, S., Bouchard, A.: 1999, ‘Temporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes’, Lands. Ecol. 14, 35–52.
Lausch, A., Herzog, F., 1999. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Paper presented at the International Conference, in St.-Petersburg, Russia.
McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351.
Gustafson, E.J., 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art?, Ecosystems 1, 143–156.
Turner, M.G., Gardner R.H., O'Neill, R.V., 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process, Springer, New York.
Geri, F., Amici, V., Rocchini, D., Human activity impact on the heterogeneity of a Mediterranean landscape. Applied Geography, doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.006, (in press).
Jim, C.Y.. and Chen, W.Y., 2009. Diversity and distribution of landscape trees in the compact Asian city of Taipei, Applied Geography, 29(4), 577–587.
Herold, M., Scepan, J., Clarke, K. C., 2002. The use of remote sensing and landscape-metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environment and Planning , 34, 1443–1458.
Herold, M., Goldstein, N., C., Clarke, K., C., 2003. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 86, 286–302.
Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D., 2007. Urban sprawl metrics: an analysis of global urban expansion using GIS. Proceedings of ASPRS 2007 Annual Conference, Tampa, Florida May 7–11. URL: http://clear.uconn.edu/publications/research/tech_papers/Angel_et_al_ASPRS2007.pdf
Jiang, F., Liu, S., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., 2007. Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 17, 469-478.
Ji, W., Ma, J, Twibell R. W., Underhill, K., 2006. Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 861–879.