Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation
T. V.Ramachandra1, 2, 3,  Divya Soman1  Ashwath D. Naik1  M. D. Subash Chandran1  
1Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences (CES)
2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies (ASTRA)
3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP) Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, Karnataka, India
Telephone: 91-80-23600985, 22932506, 22933099, Fax: 91-80-23601428, 23600085, 23600683
*Corresponding Author: tvr@iisc.ac.in,energy.ces@iisc.ac.in

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson T, Bojo J 1992. The economic value of forests. In: Anil Agarwal (Ed.): The Price of Forests. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment, pp. 14-26.
  2. Anitha V, Muraleedharan PK 2006. Economic Valuation of Ecotourism Development of a Recreational Site in the Natural Forests of Southern Western Ghats. KFRI Research Report, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi.
  3. Arnold JEM, Pérez MR 2001. Can non-timber forest products match tr opical forest conser vation and development objectives? Ecol Econ, 39(3): 437447.
  4. Atkinson G, Gundimeda H 2006. Accounting for India’s forest wealth. Ecol Econ, 59(4): 462-476.
  5. Bhat DM, Murali KS, Ravindranath NH 2003. Carbon stock dynamics in tropical rain forest of Ut tara Kannada district, Western Ghats, India. Int J Environ Pollut, 19(2): 139-149.
  6. CBD 2001. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, The Value of Forest Ecosystems. CBD Technical Series No. 4, Montreal.
  7. Champion HG, Seth SK 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Govt. of India Publication.
  8. Chandran MDS 1993. Vegetational Changes in the Evergreen Forest Belt of the Uttara Kannada District of Karnataka State. PhD Thesis submitted to Karnataka University. Dharwad, India: Karnataka University.
  9. Chandran MDS, Rao GR, Gururaja KV, Ramachandra TV 2010. Ecology of the swampy relic forests of Kathalekan from Centr al Wester n Ghats, I ndi a. Biorem Biodiv Bioavail (Special Issue), 4(1): 5468.
  10. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin R G Sutton P, van den Belt M 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.
  11. Daily GC, Matson PA 2008. Ecosystem services: From theor y t o i mpl ement ati on. Proc Nat l Acad Sci, 105(28): 9455–9456.
  12. Daniels RJR 1989. A Conservation Strategy for the Birds of Uttara Kannada District. PhD Thesis. Bangalore, India: Centre for Ecological Science, Indian Institute of Science.
  13. Database of Medicinal Plants 2015. Database of Medicinal Plants. From http://www.medicinalplantskr.org/ECONOMIC_VALUE_OF_ MEDICINAL.HTM (Retrieved on 17 April 2016).
  14. de Gr oot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ, 41(3): 393–408.
  15. DEFRA 2007. An Introductory Guide to Valuing Ecosystem Services. London: Department for Environment , Food and Rural Affai rs, pp. 66. From https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69192/pb12852-eco-valuing-071205.pdf (Retrieved on 3 April 2016; 9 July 2017).
  16. Djafar F 2006. Cultural Services of Forests: A Case Study in Garhwal Hills, Uttaranchal, India. NETFOP Report 07. Alt erra, Wageningen UR. From http://edepot.wur.nl/385797 (Retrieved on 28 April 2016).
  17. EEC 2012. European Energy Exchange. From https://www.eex.com (Retrieved on 17 April 2016).
  18. Falconer J, Koppell CRS 1990. The Major Significance of ‘ Minor’ Forest Products: The Local Use and Value of Forest in the West African Humid Forest Zone. Community Forestry Note 6, Rome: FAO.
  19. FAO 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment-2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163. Rome: FAO.
  20. Gera M, Yadav AKR, Bisht NS, Mohan G 2008. Valuation of recreational benefit s from the valley of flowers National Park. Indian For, 134(1): 26-35.
  21. Gonzalez P, Hassan R, Lakyda P, McCallum I, Nilsson S, Pulhin J, Rosenburg B, Scholes B 2005. Forest and woodland systems. In: R Hassan, R Scholes, N Ash (Eds.): Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Volume 1: Current State and Trends. Washington: Island Press, pp 68-77.
  22. Gunderson LH, Cosens B, Garmestani AS 2016. Adaptive governance of riverine and wetland ecosystem goods and services. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(2): 353-360. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2016. 05.024.
  23. Haripriya GS 2001. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: An appli cat ion to the forest resources in India. Environ Resour Econ, 19(1): 73-95.
  24. Haripriya GS 2002. Biomass carbon of truncated diameter classes in Indian forests. Forest Ecol Manage, 168(1-3): 1-13.
  25. Harsha VH, Shripathi V, Hegde GR 2005. Ethno veterinary practices in Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka. Indian J Tradit Know, 4(30): 253-258.
  26. Hebbar SS, Hegde G, Hegde GR 2010. Less known wild edible fruits and seeds of Uttara Kannada district. Indian For, 136(9): 1218-1222.
  27. Hegde HV, Hegde GR, Kholkute SD 2007. Herbal care for reproductive health: Ethnomedicobotany from Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 13(1): 38-45.
  28. Kamath SU 1985. Uttara Kannada District. Karnataka State Gazetteer. Bangalore: Government of Karnataka.
  29. KFD 2015. Karwar Division, Karnataka Forest Department. From http://www.aranya.gov.in/Static%20Pages/Karwar.aspx (Retrieved on 12 January 2015, 18 June 2017; 9 July 2017).
  30. KPCL 2016. Karnataka Power Corporation Limited. From http://www.karnatakapower.com(Retrieved on 17 April 2016).
  31. Kramer RA, Sharma N, Munasinghe M 1995. Valuing Tropical Forests: Methodology and Case Study of Madagascar. World Bank Environment Paper No. 13, Washington D.C.
  32. Kumar P, Ver ma M, Wood MD, Negandhi D 2010. Guidance Manual for the Valuation of Regulating Services. UNEP, Nairobi, 2010.
  33. Lal M, Singh R 2000. Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests. Environ Monit Assess, 60(3): 315327.
  34. Mace GM 2005. Biodiversity: An index of intactness. Nature, 434(7029): 32-33.
  35. Manoharan TR 1996. Economics of Protected Areas: A Case Study of Periyar Tiger Reserve. PhD Thesis. Dehra Dun: Forest Research Institute.
  36. Maudgal S, Kakkar M 1992. Evaluation of forests for impact assessment of development project. In: A Agarwal (Ed.): The Price of Forests. New Delhi: CSE, pp. 53-60.
  37. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  38. Mohandas TV, Remadevi OK 2011. A study on tourist visitations in protected areas of central Western Ghats in Karnataka. Indian For, 137(4): 403-410.
  39. Murthy IK, Bhat PR, Ravindranath NH, Sukumar R, 2005. Financial valuation of non-timber forest product flows in Uttara Kannada district, Western Ghats, Karnataka. Curr Sci India, 88(10): 1573-1579.
  40. Myers N 1984. The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton.
  41. NABARD (National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development) 2015. From http://www.nabard.org/modelbankprojects (Retrieved on 12 January 2015, 18 June 2017).
  42. Nasi R, Wunder S, Campos AJJ 2002. Forest Ecosystem Services: Can They Pay Our Way Out of Deforestation? Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR for the Global Environmental Facility (GEF).
  43. Newcome J, Provins A, Johns H, Ozdemiroglu E, Ghazoul J, Burgess D, Turner K 2005. The Economic, Social and Ecological Value of Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review. London: Economics for the Environment Consultancy.
  44. NPCIL (Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited) 2016. From http://www.npcil.nic.in/main/ProjectOperationDisplay.aspx?ReactorID=76&Page (Retrieved on 21 February 2016).
  45. Panchamukhi PR, Trivedi P, Debi S, Kulkarni AK, Sharma P 2008. Natural Resource Accounting In Karnataka: A Study on Land and Forestry Sector (Excluding Mining). Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research, Dhar wad, p. 242. From http://docplayer.net/45191657-Natural-resource-accounting-in-karnataka-a-study-of-the-land-forestry-sector-excluding-mining.html(Retrieved on 28 September 2016; 9 July 2017).
  46. Pearce DW, Moran D, Biller D 2002. Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation: A Guide for Policy Makers. Paris and Washington, D.C.: OECD, p. 40. From http ://portals.wi.wur.nl/files/docs/File/nfp%20for%20all/FinancingMech/OECD Handbookon Biodiversity Valuation.pdf (Retrieved on 28 September 2016).
  47. Peters CM, Gentry AH, Mendelsohn RO 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature, 339: 655656.
  48. Pittini M 2011. Monetary Valuation for Ecosystem Accounting. Issue Paper Prepared for the UN/World Bank/EEA Expert Meeting on Ecosystem Accounts, London., p. 30. From https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaLES/egm/Issue10_UK.pdf (Retrieved on 28 September 2016; 9 July 2017).
  49. Prasad SN, Hedge M, Hedge MS 1987b. Fuel Consumption and Conservation Method in Urban Centres of Uttara Kannada. CES Technical Report 25. CES, IISc, Bangalore.
  50. Prasad SN, Hegde HG, Bhat DM, Hegde M 1987a. Estimates of Standing Biomass and Productivity of Tropical Moist Forest of Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka, India. CES Technical Report No. 19, CES, IISc, Bangalore.
  51. PSP 2016. Parrys Sugar Factory. From http://www.parrysugar.in/html/locations-Haliyal (Retrieved on 28 September 2016; 9 July 2017).
  52. Raghunath HM 2006. Hydrology: Principles, Analysis and Design. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Limited.
  53. Ramachandra TV, Nagarathna AV 2001. Energetics in paddy cultivation in Uttara Kannada District. Energ Convers and Manage, 42(2): 132-155.
  54. Ramachandra TV 1998. Energy utilisation in rural industries in Karnataka. Int J Ambient Energy, 19(2): 75- 92.
  55. Ramachandra TV, Subramanian DK, Joshi NV 1999. Hydroelectric resource assessment in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka State, India. J Clean Prod, 7(3): 195-211.
  56. Ramachandra TV, Joshi NV, Subramanian DK 2000. Present and prospective role of bioenergy in regional energy system. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 4(4): 375-430.
  57. Ramachandra TV, Kamakshi G, Shruthi BV 2004. Bioresource status in Karnataka. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 8(1): 1-47.
  58. Ramachandra TV, Ganapathy S 2007. Vegetation Analysis in Uttara Kannada District Using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques. ENVIS Technical Report No. 24, Environmental Information System, CES, IISc, Bangalore.
  59. Ramachandra TV, Chandran MDS, Gururaja KV, Sreekantha 2007. Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  60. Ramachandra TV, Alakananda B, Ali Rani, Khan MA 2011. Ecological and socio-economic assessment of Varthur wetland, Bengaluru, India. J Environ Sci Eng, 53(1): 101-108.
  61. Ramachandra TV, Chandran MDS, Joshi NV, Balachandran C 2012. Beekeeping: Sustainable Livelihood Option in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. ENVIS Technical Report No. 19, Environmental Information System, CES, IISc, Bangalore.
  62. Ramachandra TV, Subramanian DK, Joshi NV, Gunaga SV, Harikanta RB 2000. Domestic energy consumption patterns in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka state, India. Energ Convers Manage, 41(8): 775831.
  63. Ramachandra TV, Chandran MDS, Joshi NV, Karthick B, Mukri VD 2015. Ecohydrology of Lotic Systems in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats, India. Springer: Environmental Management of River Basin Ecosystems, Springer Earth System Sciences.
  64. Ramachandra TV, Bharath Setturu, Rajan KS, Chandr an MDS 2016a. Stimulus of Devel opment al Projects to Landscape Dynamics in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. From http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.09.001, pp.1-19.
  65. Ramachandra, TV, Vinay S, Aithal BH 2016b. Environmental flow assessment in a lotic ecosystem of Central Western Ghats, India. Hydrol Curr Res, 7: 1-14.
  66. Ramana P, Patil SK 2008. Marketing of value added products from Artocarpus species in Uttara Kannada district of Karnataka. My Forest, 44(1): 49-53.
  67. Rao GR, Mesta D, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV 2008. Wetland flora of Uttara Kannada. In: TV Ramachandra (Ed.): Environmental Education for Ecosystem Conservation. New Delhi: Capital Publishing Company, pp 140-152.
  68. Ray R, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV 2011. Sacred Groves in Siddapur Taluk, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka: Threats and Management Aspects. ENVIS Technical Report 38, Environmental Information System, CES, IISc, Bangalore.
  69. Ray R, Ramachandra TV 2011. Small sacred groves in local landscape: Are they really worth for conservation? Curr Sci India, 98(9): 1178-1180.
  70. Ray R, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV 2015. Hy- drological importance of sacred forest fragments in Central Western Ghats of India. Trop Ecol, 56: 87-99.
  71. Schaafsma M, Morse-Jones S, Posen P, Swetnam R.D, Balmford A, Bateman IJ, Burgess ND, Chamshama SAO., Fisher B, Freeman T, Geofrey V, Green RE, Hepelwa AS, Turner RK 2014. The importance of local forest benefits: Economic valuation of Non- Timber Forest Products in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 24(2014): 295-305.
  72. SCIL 2015. Solaris Chemtech Industries Limited, Binaga, Karwar. From http://www.solarischemtech.com/infra-falt.asp?links=falt (Retrieved on 17 June 2015) .
  73. Seema D, Ramachandra TV 2010. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Ecosystems in Uttara Kannada District, Western Ghats of Karnataka, India, In: TV Ramachandra (Ed.): Proceedings of Lake 2010: Conference on Wetlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change, 22-24 Dec. 2010, Bangalore, pp. 162-178 From http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/lake2010/Theme%201/seema_day.pdf.
  74. Simpson RD, Sedjo RA, Reid JW 1996. Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. The J of Polit Econ, 104(1): 163-185.
  75. TEEB 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Pushpam Kumar (Ed.). London and Washington: Earthscan, pp 31-224. From http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/ecological-andeconomic-foundations. (Retrieved on 21 February 2016)
  76. Tewari DD, Campbell JY 1996. Increased Development of Non-Timber Forest Products in India: Some Issues and Concern. Unasylva, 47(187) : 26-31. From http://www.fao.org/docrep/w2149e/w2149e06.htm#increaseddevelopmentofnontimberforestproductsinindia:someissuesandco (Retrieved on 17 January 2015).
  77. Verma M, Joshi S, Godbole G, Singh A 2007. Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Forest Governance: A Scoping Study from Uttarakhand, Leadership in Envir onment and Devel opment (LEAD-India), New Delhi. Pp 125. From http://www.leadindia.org (Retrieved on 21 February 2016)
  78. Villegas-Palacio C, Berrouet L, Connie L, Ruiz A, Upegui A 2016. Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country: Three case studies on ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosystem Services, 22(2016): 297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016. 10.017
  79. WCPM 2016. West Cosast Paper Mill, Dandeli. From http:// westcoastpaper.com/ index. php?q=node/23 (Retrieved on 22 October 2016).
  80.  

     

Citation :Ramachandra T. V, Divya Soman, Ashwath D Naik, Subash Chandran M D, 2017. Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Journal of biodiversity, 8(1):61-78
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503 [extn - 107],      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail :tvr@iisc.ac.in , emram.ces@courses.iisc.ac.in, energy.ces@iisc.ac.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail