l
l

Ecohydrology of Lotic Ecosystems of Uttara Kannada,

 Central Western Ghats

Dr.T.V. Ramachandra, M.D. Subash Chandran, N.V. Joshi, B. Karthick and Vishnu D.Mukri

Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India
*Corresponding author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
Materials and Methods

Water Quality Monitoring:

Water samples were collected at each sampling locations (Table 1) from each source in clean polythene containers of 2.5 L capacity. The sample containers were labeled with a unique code and date of collection. pH, water temperature, Total Dissolved Solids, Salinity and Nitrates were recorded on spot using EXTECH COMBO electrode and Orion Ion Selective Electrode. Other parameters like chloride, hardness, magnesium, calcium, sodium, potassium, fluoride, sulphate, phosphates, and coliform bacteria were analyzed in lab. All analyses were carried out as per methodologies in Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater APHA (1998). Detailed methods to assess water quality are listed in Table 2.

 

Table 1: Details of the sampling sites (river basin-wise – marked in Figure 2-6)


SITES

CODE

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE

Aghanashini River Basin (ARB)

Sonda

A1

74.4834

14.4868

Nellimadke

A10

74.8431

14.5289

Neralamane

A11

74.8439

14.4554

Balur

A12

74.8098

14.4853

Baillalli

A13

74.7920

14.3013

Hulidevarakodlu

A2

74.6643

14.4040

Donehole

A3

74.5878

14.4330

Deevalli

A4

74.5584

14.4332

Ullurmatha

A5

74.5823

14.3844

Yanahole

A6

74.5355

14.5344

Jalagadde

A7

74.6127

14.5480

Kurse

A8

74.6900

14.5595

Sappurthi

A9

74.7562

14.5234

Bedthi River Basin (BRB)

Mathigadda

B1

74.5926

14.6730

Vajgadde

B10

74.6154

14.6213

Nycti.Site

B11

74.6120

14.6390

Angadibail

B12

74.5332

14.6067

Daanandhi

B13

74.8667

14.7358

Hemmadi

B14

74.8586

14.7510

Attiveri

B15

75.0357

15.0759

Yerebail

B16

74.9395

15.0470

Gunjavathi

B17

74.9140

14.9921

Chitgeri

B18

74.9834

14.8557

Karadrolli

B19

74.8356

14.9918

Kammani

B2

74.5958

14.7132

Dabguli

B20

74.6572

14.8508

Ramanguli

B21

74.6054

14.1238

Kalghatghi

B22

74.9785

15.1586

Manchiker

B23

74.7861

14.8910

Apageri

B3

74.5840

14.6389

Hasehalla

B4

74.5840

14.7551

Kaleswara

B5

74.6095

14.7587

Andhalli

B6

74.8016

14.6701

Makkigadde

B7

74.4299

14.7095

Kelaginkeri

B8

74.5926

14.6730

Devanahalli

B9

74.6635

14.6281

Kali River Basin (KRB)

Beegar

K1

74.5818

14.9163

Astolli

K10

74.5383

15.4289

Kervada

K2

74.6368

15.2454

Mavlangi

K3

74.5923

15.2561

Tatwala

K4

74.7466

15.0879

Sakathi

K5

74.3378

14.9185

Naithihole

K6

74.2593

14.8543

Kesrolli

K7

74.7412

15.3037

Kaneri

K8

74.4676

15.0247

Badapoli

K9

74.3560

15.0144

Sharavathi River Basin (SRB)

Nandiholé

S1

75.1245

14.0418

Haridravathi

S2

75.1084

14.0209

Mavinaholé

S3

75.1055

13.9735

Sharavathi

S4

75.0804

13.8532

Hilkunji

S5

75.0896

13.7730

Nagodiholé

S6

74.8839

13.9269

Hurliholé

S7

74.8428

13.9786

Yenneholé

S8

74.7268

13.9650

Venkatapura River Basin (VRB)

Badabhag

V1

75.6293

14.0588

Bachochodi

V10

74.6907

14.0901

Kelanur

V11

74.6959

14.0653

Undalakatle

V2

74.5900

14.0910

Midal

V3

74.5543

14.0888

Arkala

V4

74.6563

14.0415

Galibyle

V5

74.6085

14.1038

Nagoli

V6

74.6735

14.0946

Ondalasu

V7

74.6028

14.1213

Hegganamakki

V8

74.6848

14.1018

Kurandura

V9

74.6616

14.0227

 

Table 2: Methods used for analysing water samples


Parameters

Units

Methods

Section no. APHA,  1998.

pH

-

Electrode Method

4500-H+ B

Water Temperature

ºC

2550 B

Salinity

ppm

2520 B            

Total Dissolved Solids

ppm

 

2540 B                 

Electrical Conductivity

µS

2510B 
             

Dissolved Oxygen

mg/L

Iodometric method

4500-O B

Alkalinity        

mg/L

HCl  Titrimetric Method

2320 B

Chlorides

mg/L

Argentometric Method

4500-Cl- B

Total Hardness

mg/L

EDTA Titrimetric Method

2340 C

Calcium Hardness       

mg/L

EDTA Titrimetric Method

3500-Ca B

Magnesium Hardness

mg/L

Calculation Method

3500-Mg B

Sodium           

mg/L

Flame Emission Photometric Method

3500-Na B

Potassium

mg/L

Flame Emission Photometric Method

3500-K B

Fluorides

mg/L

SPADNS method

4500-F- D

Nitrates          

mg/L

Nitrate Electrode method and Phenol Disulphonic Acid Method

4500-NO3- D

Sulphates

mg/L

Turbidimetric method

4500-SO42- E

Phosphates     

mg/L

Stannous Chloride Method

4500-P D

Diatom Collection, Preparation and Enumeration: Figure 7 illustrates the habitat of diatoms – diatom colonies on stones, sand, etc. At each site, three to five stones were randomly selected across the stream and diatoms were scraped off the exposed surface of the stones using a tooth brush. Fresh samples were carefully checked to assure that majority of the diatom frustules were alive prior to acid combustion. A hot HCl and KMnO4 method was used to clean frustules of organic materials. The cleaned diatom samples were dried on 18x18 mm cover slips and mounted with Pleurax. A total of 400 frustules per sample were enumerated and identified using compound light microscope (Lawrence & Mayo LM-52-series, with 1000× magnification) following methods described by Taylor et al. (2005) and Karthick et al. (2010). Diatoms were identified primarily to the species level according to Gandhi, (1957a,b,c; 1958a,b; 1959a,b,c; 1960a,b,c); Krammer and Lange-Bertalot (1986–1991) and Taylor et al. (2007).

 

Figure 7: Diatoms on stone in streams

 

Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Analysis

The remote sensing data are processed to quantify the land use of respective basins broadly into 6 classes – forest and vegetation; agriculture and cultivated area; open scrub and barren; water bodies; built-up; and others (includes categories like rocky outcrop, etc.). The multi-spectral data of Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) LISS-III with a spatial resolution of 23.5m were analyzed using IDRISI Andes (Eastman, 2006; http://www.clarklabs.org) and GRASS (http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass).  Land use analysis involved i) generation of False Colour Composite (FCC) of remote sensing data (bands – green, red and NIR). This helped in locating heterogeneous patches in the landscape ii) selection of training polygons (these correspond to heterogeneous patches in FCC) covering 15% of the study area and uniformly distributed over the entire study area, iii) loading these training polygons co-ordinates into pre-calibrated GPS, vi) collection of the corresponding attribute data (land use types) for these polygons from the field . GPS helped in locating respective training polygons in the field, iv) supplementing this information with Google Earth (http://www.googleearth.com)  v) 60% of the training data has been used for  classification, while the balance is used for validation or accuracy assessment. Based on these signatures, corresponding to various land features, supervised image classification was carried out using Gaussian Maximum Likelihood Classifier (GMLC) to the final six categories.

Data Analysis :

Compiled data were tested for normality before performing statistical analyses. Statistical analyses comprised Kruskal-Wallis test (H), Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Non-Metric Multi Dimensional Scaling (NMDS).  All tests were performed using the R-software (R Development Core Team, 2006).Box plots are used throughout this report to visually summarize data. These graphs depict the following statistical measures: median, upper and lower quartiles. The box plot is interpreted as follows: The box itself contains the middle 50 percent of the data. The upper edge of the box indicates the 75th percentile of the data set, and the lower edge of the box indicates the 25th percentile. The line in the box indicates the median value of the data. If the median line within the box is not equidistant from the edges of the box, then the data are skewed. “Gridding” is the operation of spatial interpolation of scattered 2D data points onto a regular grid. Gridding allows the production of a map showing a continuous spatial estimate. The spatial coverage of the map is generated automatically as a square covering the data points. Non-metric multidimensional scaling is based on Bray-Curtis distance matrix was performed for classifying the sites across river basins. In NMDS, data points are placed in 2 or 3 dimensional coordinates system preserving ranked differences.

Data were tested for normality before performing statistical analyses. Statistical analyses comprised Kruskal-Wallis test (H), Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Non-Metric Multi Dimensional Scaling (NMDS).  All tests were performed using the R-software (R Development Core Team, 2006). The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess whether species richness, species diversity and turnover across water quality regimes were significantly different. Temporal variation in diatom assemblages in each site was analyzed by NMDS using absolute abundance data. NMDS is an ordination method well suited to data that are non-normal or are arbitrary or discontinuous and for ecological data containing numerous zero values (Minchin, 1987; McCune & Grace, 2002). Results were visualized showing the most similar samples closer together in ordination space (Gotelli & Ellison, 2004). A final stress value, typically between 0 and 15, was evaluated as a measure of fitted distances against the ordination distance, providing an estimation of the goodness-of-fit in multivariate space. Changes in species composition or percentage turnover (T) were used to indicate community persistence. T was calculated as T=(G + L)/(S1 + S2) times 100 where G and L are the number of taxa gained and lost between months respectively, and S1 and S2 are the number of taxa present in successive sampling months (Diamond & May, 1977; Brewin et al. 2000; Soininen & Eloranta, 2004). The relationship between local population persistence, local abundance in terms of relative abundances, and regional occupancy were examined using correlation analysis (Soininen & Heino, 2005). For the species distribution model the species were classified as core species as species that occurred in over 90% of sites, and satellite species as species that occurred in fewer than 10% of sites (McGeoch & Gaston, 2002, Soininen & Heino, 2005). Local occupancy of each diatom species was calculated by their percentage of occurrence at each site across the seasons. Seasonal diatom community was related to the water quality parameters using multiple linear regressions. Finally, water quality variables were used in PCA to elucidate the spatial water quality variation.