References

1. Atazadeh, I. Sharifi, M. Kelly, M. G., 2007. Evaluation of the Trophic Diatom Index for assessing water Quality in River Gharasou, western Iran. Hydrobiologia 589:165–173.
2. Barbour, M.T. Gerritsen, J. and White, J.S., 1996. Development of the Stream Condition Index (SCI) for Florida. A Report to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Management Section, Tetra Tech, Inc., Owing Mills, Maryland, USA .
3. Berger, W.H. Parker, F.L., 1970. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea.
4. Cemagref, 1982. Etude des methods biologiques d’appré- ciation quantitative de la qualitédes eaux. Rapport Q. E. Lyon, Agence de l’eau Rhöne-Me´diterrane´e-Corse-Cemagref, Lyon, France.
5. Cholnoky, B. J., 1968. Die Ökologie der Diatomeen in Binnengewassern, p. 699. J. Cramer, Braunschweig.
6. Coste, M. and Ayphassorho, H., 1991. Étude de la qualité deseaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie àl’aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (application des indices diatomiques). Rapport Cemagref. Bordeaux-Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai.
7. Cox, E. J, 1991. What is the basis for using diatoms as monitors of river quality? In B .A. Whitton, E. Rott & G.Friedrich (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers. E. Rott, Innsbruck: 33-40.
8. Dakshini, K. M. M. and Soni, J. K., 2006. Diatom distribution and status of organic pollution in sewage drains. Hydrobiologia 87, 205-209.
9. Dell’Uomo, A., 1996. Assessment of water quality of an Apennine river as a pilot study. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Institut fu¨ r Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, 65–73.
10. Descy, J.P. and Coste, M., 1991. A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 24: 2112–2116.
11. Directory of Indian Wetlands, 1993. Compiled by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), India in collaboration with the Asian Wetland Bureau.
12. Dixit, S.S. Smol, J.P. Kingston, J.C. and Charles, D.F., 1992. Diatoms: Powerful indicators of environmental change. Environmental Science and Technology. 26 23-33.
13. Fore, L. S. and Grafe, C., 2002. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (U.S.A.). Freshwater Biology. 47, 2015–2037.
14. Galatowitsch1, S. M. Whited, D.C. and Tester, J.R., 1999. Development of community metrics to evaluate recovery of Minnesota wetlands. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 6: 217–234, 1999.
15. Gandhi, H.P., 1957. A contribution to our knowledge of the diatom genus Pinnularia. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 54: 845—853.
16. Gandhi, H.P., 1959. Freshwater diatoms from Sagar in the Mysore State. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 38: 305—331.
17. Gandhi, H.P., 1959. Notes on the Diatomaceae from Ahmedabad and its environs-II. On the diatom flora of fountain reservoirs of the Victoria Gardens. Hydrobiologia 14: 130—146.
18. Gandhi, H.P., 1961. Notes on the Diatomaceae of Ahmedabad and its environs. Hydrobiologia 17: 218—236.
19. Gandhi, H.P., 1962. Notes on the Diatomaceae from Ahmedabad and its environs-IV ­The diatom communities of some freshwater pools and ditches along Sarkhej Road. Phykos 1: 115—127.
20. Gandhi, H.P., 1964. The diatom flora of Chandola and Kankaria Lakes. Nova Hedwigia 8: 347—402.
21. Gandhi, H.P., 1967. Notes on Diatomaceae from Ahmedabad and its environs. VI. On some diatoms from fountain reservoirs of Seth Sarabhai's Garden. Hydrobiologia 30: 248—272.
22. Gandhi, H. P., 1998. Freshwater Diatoms of Central Gujarat. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh. Dehra Dun.
23. Gernes, M.C. and Helgen, J.C., 1999. Indexes of biotic integrity for wetlands, section B: wetland vegetation IBI for depressional wetlands. Final Report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency Assistance Number CD995525-01, April 1999. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
24. Gómez, N. and Licursi, M., 2001.  The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina. Aquatic Ecology 35: 173–181.
25. Gopal, B., 2005. Does inland aquatic biodiversity have a future in Asian developing countries?. Hydrobiologia 542:69–75.
26. Gosselink, J.C. and Turner, R.E., 1978. The role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Pp. 63-78 in freshwater wetlands. Ecological processes and management potential. New York. Acedemic press.
27. John, J., 1993. The use of diatoms in monitoring the development of created wetlands at a sandmining site in Western Australia. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 427-436.
28. Karthick, B. Krithika, H. and Alakananda, B., 2008. Short Guide to common freshwater Diatom Genera (Poster). Energy and Wetlands Research Group, CES, IISc, Bangalore.
29. Kelly, M. G. and Whitton, B. A., 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring Eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7:433-444.
30. Kelly, M. G. Cazaubon, A. Coring, E. Dell'Uomo, A. Ector, L. Goldsmith, B. Guasch, H. Hürlimann, J. Jarlman, A. Kawecka, B. Kwandrans, J. Laugaste, R. Lindstrøm, E.A. Leitao, M. Marvan, P. Padisák, J. Pipp, E. Prygiel, J. Rott, E. Sabater, S. Dam, V .H. and Vizinet, J., 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 215-224, 1998.
31. Kelly, M. G. Penny, C. J. And Whitton, B. A., 1995. Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices used to assess river water quality. Hydrobiologia 302: 179-188.
32. Kerans, B.L. and Karr, J.R., 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers in the Tennessee valley, Ecol. Appl. 4 (4), pp. 768–785.
33. Kolkwitz, R. and Marsson, M., 1908. Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien. Ber. Deutsche Bot. Gesellsch. 26: 505-5019.
34. Lavoie, I. Somers, K .M. Paterson, A. M. and Dillon, P .J., 2000. Assessing scales of variability in benthic diatom community structure. Journal of Applied Phycology 17: 509–513.
35. Leclerq, L. and Maquet, B., 1987. Deux nouveaux indices chimique et diatomique de qualite´ d’eau courante. Application au Samson et àses affluents (bassin de la Meuse belge). Comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques, bioce´notiques et diatomiques. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, documentde travail 28.
36. Lecointe, C., Coste M. and Prygiel, J., 1993. ‘‘Omnidia’’: Software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiology 269/270: 509–513.
37. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L., 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
38. Lenoir, A. and Coste, M., 1996. Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board network. In Whitton, B. A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Institut für Botanik. Universität Innsbruck, 29–43.
39. Lowe, R. L., 1974. Environmental requirements and pollution tolerance of freshwater diatoms. Environmental Monitoring Series, National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
40. Ludwig, John A. and Reynolds, J.F., 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer of methods and computing. Wiley Press, New York, New York. 337 pp.
41. Micacchion, M., 2004. Integrated Wetland Assessment Program. Part 7: Amphibian Index of Biotic Integrity (AmphIBI) for Ohio Wetlands. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2004-7. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Ecology Group, Division of Surface Water, Columbus, Ohio.
42. Mitsch, W.J. and Gosselink, J.G., 1986. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York. Pp.539.
43. O'Connell, T. J. Jackson, L. E. Brooks, R. P., 2008.A bird community index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands. Environmental monitoring and Assessment 51:145-156.
44. Panini, D., 2007. The Ramsar Convention and National Laws and Policies for Wetlands in India. Technical Consultation on Designing Methodologies to Review Laws and Institutions Relevant to Wetlands.
45. Patrick, R., 1986. Diatoms as indicators of changes in water quality. In M. Ricard (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Diatom Symposium. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein: 759–766.
46. Prasad, S.N. Sengupta, T. Alok KumarVijayan VS, Vijayan, L. Ramachandra, T.V. Ahalya, N. And Tiwari, A.K., 2003. Wetlands of India. Natural Aquatic Ecosystems of India. 6-25.
47. Prygiel, J. and Coste, M., 1993. The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia. 269/279 343-349.
48. Prygiel, J. Leveque, L. and Iserentant, R., 1996. Un nouvel indice diatomique pratique pour l’évaluation de la qualité des eaux en réseau de surveillance. Rev. Sci. Eau 1: 97-113.
49. Ramachandra.T.V., Kiran Rajashekariah and Ahalya.N., 2002. Conservation and Mangement of Wetlands, Allied Publishers, Mumbai, India
50.  Reiss, K.C., 2006 Florida Wetland Condition Index for depressional forested wetlands. Ecological Indicators.Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 337-352.
51. Richards, C., L.B. Johnson, and Host, G.E., 1996. Landscape scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 53 (suppl. 1). 295-311.
52. Rott, E., 1991. Methodological aspects and perspectives in the use of periphyton for monitoring and protecting rivers. In Whitton, B. A., E. Rott & G. Friedrich (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Institut fur Botanik, Univ. Innsbruck, 9–16.
53. Round, F. E., 1991.Diatoms in River water monitoring studies. Journal of Applied Phycology 3: 129-145.
54. Schiefele, S. and Schreiner,C., 1991. Use of diatoms for monitoring nutrient enrichment acidification and impact salts in Germany and Austria. In Whitton, B. A., E. Rott and G. Friedrich (eds), Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Institüt für Botanik, Univ. Innsbruk.
55. Schoeman, F. R. and Archibald, R. E. M., 1976–1980. The Diatom Flora of Southern Africa. National Institute for Water Research, Pretoria.
56. Schulz, E.J. Hoyer, M.V. Canfield, D.E. 1999. An index of Biotic Integrity: A Test with Limnological and Fish Data from Sixty Florida Lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:564-577.
57. Sládeĉ¡ek, V., 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica 14: 555–566.
58. Soininen, J. Könönen, K., 2004. Comparative study of monitoring South-Finnish Rivers and streams using macroinvertebrate and benthic diatom community structure. Aquatic ecology 38: 63-75.
59.  Springe, G.  Sandin, L.  Briede, A. and Skuja, A., 2006. Biological quality metrics: their variability and appropriate scale for assessing streams. Hydrobiologia 566:153–172.
60. Stoermer, E.F. and Smol, J.P., 2001. The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Science. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge
61. Taylor, J.C., Harding W. R and Archibald, C.G.M., 2007. An Illustrated Guide to Some Common Diatom Species from South Africa. WRC Report TT 282/07. Water Research Commission. Pretoria
62. Watanabe, T. Asai, K. and Houki, A., 1986. Numerical estimation of organic pollution of flowing waters by using the epilithic diatom assemblage – Diatom Assemblage Index (DIApo). Science of the Total Environment 55: 209–218.
63. Winter J.G. Duthie H.C., 2000. Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquatic Ecology 34: 345-353.
64. Wu, J. A., 1999. Generic index of diatom assemblages as bioindicator of pollution in the Keelung River of Taiwan. Hydrobiologia 397: 79–87.
65. Zelinka, M. and Marvan, P., 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Arch.. Hydrobiol. 57 389-407.
66. D. Chapman, Water Quality Assessments (first ed.), Chapman and Hall Ltd., London (1992) p. 80–81.
67. Coste, M., Etude des méthods biologique quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon. Agence de l’Eau Rhône, 28., 1987.
68. Mohanraj, R.,   Sathishkumar, M., Azeez, P. A.  and Sivakumar R. 2000. Pollution Status of Wetlands in Urban Coimbatore,Tamilnadu, India Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (2000) 64:638-643
69. Taylor, J. C., P. A. de la Rey & L. van Rensburg, 2005. Recommendations for the collection, preparation and enumeration of diatoms from riverine habitats for water quality monitoring in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Sciences 30: 65–75.
70. Descy, J-P. 1979. A new approach to water quality estimation using Diatoms. Nova Hedwigia, Heft 64: 305 - 323.
71. Steinberg C, Schiefele S (1988) Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters. Z. Wasser-Abwasser-Forsch. 21: 227–234.
72. Eloranta, P. & Soininen, J. 2002. Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatom communities. Journal of Applied Phycology 14: 1-7.
73. Taylor JC (2004) The Application of Diatom-Based Pollution Indices in The Vaal Catchment. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom.