ENVIS Technical Report: 114,  July 2016
http://www.iisc.ernet.in/
WATER SITUATION IN BENGALURU
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
   T.V. Ramachandra*       Vinay S      Durga Madhab Mahapatra      Sincy Varghese      Bharath H. Aithal  
Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
*Corresponding author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Water Sustainability

Water balance assessment carried out is depicted in figure 7.1, in order to understand the water availability and capability of catering current domestic demands catchment wise for Bangalore.

Figure 7.1: Method involved in water balance assessment


Domestic water demand is about 20.05 TMC (Section 6). Water availability in the catchments and sub catchments in Bangalore is quantified based on the rainfall yield, (Section 5) and by quantifying sewage generated. Sewage generated at ward level and at watershed level was quantified as 80% of the total water demand, is depicted in Figure 7.2. Total water demand in the catchment is about 20.05 TMC and sewage generated is 16.04 TMC (1258 MLD). Cumulative sewage generated is quantified at select points is depicted in Figure 7.3. Sewage generated across the major valleys shows that Vrishabhavathi valley catchment generates sewage of 522 MLD (41.5%), followed by Koramangala and Challaghatta valley of 410 MLD (32.6%), Hebbal Nagavara valley of 242 (18.8%) and the remaining 84 MLD (7.1%) is in Arkavathi and Suvarnamukhi valleys.


On an average 1.67 TMC of water is required every month for domestic purposes and about 1.34 TMC could be met just by treating sewage. Sewage treatment with complete removal of nutrients and chemical contaminants happens by adopting decentralized treatment plants similar to the success model (secondary treatment plant integrated with constructed wetlands and algae pond) at Jakkur Lake. In addition to this, water available with efficient rainwater harvesting is about 14.8 TMC. This means that total of 30.85 TMC of water is available annually to cater the demand of 20.08 TMC, provided the city administration opts for decentralized optimal water management through (i) rainwater harvesting by rejuvenating lakes. The best option to harvest rain water is through interconnected lake systems that exists in Bangalore, (ii) treatment of sewage generated in households in each locality (opting the model at Jakkur lake – STP (Sewage Treatment Plant) integrated with constructed wetlands and algal pond; (iii) conservation of water by minimizing the pilferages (due to faulty distribution system); (iv) ensuring water supply 24x7 and (v) ensuring all sections of the society get equal quantity and quality of water.  Rejuvenating lakes in the region helps in retaining the rain water. Treating sewage and options to recycle and reuse would minimize the demand for water from outside the region. Figures 7.4  to 7.7 and Tables 7.1 to 7.4 depicts the city and catchment wise sewage generated and domestic water demands. The analysis shows that the city has at least 30 TMC (Bangalore city) of water higher than the existing demand if the city adopts 5R’s (Retain,  Rejuvenate, Recycle, Reuse, Retain and Responsible citizens).


Table 7.1: Water balance assessment for Bangalore city


Month

Rainfall (mm)

Rainfall TMC

Runoff (TMC)

Sewage Water (TMC)

Water Available (TMC)

Domestic Demand (TMC)

Difference (available – demand)

Water Availability to Demand Ratio

Water Balance

May

93

2.5

2.0

1.36

3.35

1.70

1.63

1.97

1.63

June

62

1.6

1.3

1.32

2.65

1.65

0.98

1.60

2.61

July

81

2.1

1.7

1.36

3.09

1.70

1.37

1.82

3.99

August

104

2.8

2.2

1.36

3.59

1.70

1.88

2.11

5.87

September

153

4.1

3.3

1.32

4.60

1.65

2.94

2.79

8.81

October

152

4.0

3.2

1.36

4.61

1.70

2.90

2.71

11.71

November

47

1.2

1.0

1.32

2.32

1.65

0.65

1.41

12.36

December

17

0.4

0.0

1.36

1.36

1.70

-0.36

0.80

12.00

January

9

0.2

0.0

1.36

1.36

1.70

-0.36

0.80

11.64

February

28

0.8

0.0

1.23

1.23

1.54

-0.32

0.80

11.32

March

20

0.5

0.0

1.36

1.36

1.70

-0.36

0.80

10.96

April

38

1.0

0.0

1.32

1.32

1.65

-0.34

0.80

10.62

Annual

804

21.29

14.80

16.04

30.85

20.05

10.62

           

Figure 7.2: Domestic sewage generated

Figure 7.3: Domestic sewage generated – valley wise in Bangalore

Figure 7.4: Water balance in Bangalore city (BBMP)


Table 7.2: Water balance assessment for KC valley


Month

Rainfall (mm)

Rainfall TMC

Runoff (TMC)

Sewage Water (TMC)

Water Available (TMC)

Domestic Demand (TMC)

Difference (Available – Demand)

Water Availability to Demand Ratio

Water Balance

May

87

0.80

0.68

0.57

1.25

0.71

0.54

1.75

0.54

June

58

0.53

0.45

0.55

1.00

0.69

0.31

1.45

0.85

July

79

0.73

0.62

0.57

1.19

0.71

0.48

1.67

1.32

August

98

0.89

0.76

0.57

1.33

0.71

0.62

1.87

1.94

September

142

1.30

1.11

0.55

1.66

0.69

0.97

2.41

2.91

October

158

1.45

1.23

0.57

1.80

0.71

1.09

2.53

4.00

November

47

0.43

0.36

0.55

0.92

0.69

0.23

1.33

4.22

December

12

0.11

0.00

0.57

0.57

0.71

-0.14

0.80

4.08

January

8

0.08

0.00

0.57

0.57

0.71

-0.14

0.80

3.94

February

33

0.30

0.00

0.51

0.51

0.64

-0.13

0.80

3.81

March

18

0.17

0.00

0.57

0.57

0.71

-0.14

0.80

3.67

April

38

0.35

0.00

0.55

0.55

0.69

-0.14

0.80

3.53

Annual

778.78

7.12

5.20

6.70

11.91

8.38

3.53


Figure 7.5: Water balance in KC valley

Table 7.3: Water balance assessment for Vrishabhavathi valley


Month

Rainfall (mm)

Rainfall TMC

Runoff (TMC)

Sewage Water (TMC)

Water Available (TMC)

Domestic Demand (TMC)

Difference (Available – Demand)

Water Availability to Demand Ratio

Water Balance

May

100

0.86

0.74

0.64

1.37

0.80

0.58

1.72

0.58

June

66

0.58

0.49

0.62

1.11

0.77

0.34

1.44

0.91

July

84

0.73

0.62

0.64

1.26

0.80

0.46

1.58

1.37

August

118

1.03

0.87

0.64

1.51

0.80

0.71

1.90

2.08

September

173

1.51

1.28

0.62

1.90

0.77

1.13

2.46

3.21

October

148

1.29

1.09

0.64

1.73

0.80

0.93

2.17

4.14

November

43

0.38

0.32

0.62

0.94

0.77

0.17

1.22

4.31

December

22

0.19

0.00

0.64

0.64

0.80

-0.16

0.80

4.15

January

9

0.07

0.00

0.64

0.64

0.80

-0.16

0.80

3.99

February

19

0.17

0.00

0.58

0.58

0.72

-0.14

0.80

3.85

March

21

0.18

0.00

0.64

0.64

0.80

-0.16

0.80

3.69

April

40

0.34

0.00

0.62

0.62

0.77

-0.15

0.80

3.54

Annual

843.38

7.32

5.41

7.50

12.90

9.37

3.54

 


Figure 7.6: Water balance in Vrishabhavathi valley

Table 7.4: Water balance assessment for Hebbal valley


Month

Rainfall (mm)

Rainfall TMC

Runoff (TMC)

Sewage Water (TMC)

Water Available (TMC)

Domestic Demand (TMC)

Difference (Available – Demand)

Water Availability to Demand Ratio

Water Balance

May

93

0.68

0.58

0.22

0.80

0.27

0.52

2.90

0.52

June

62

0.45

0.39

0.21

0.60

0.27

0.33

2.25

0.86

July

79

0.58

0.49

0.22

0.71

0.27

0.44

2.60

1.29

August

97

0.71

0.61

0.22

0.83

0.27

0.55

3.01

1.85

September

144

1.06

0.90

0.21

1.11

0.27

0.85

4.18

2.69

October

149

1.09

0.93

0.22

1.15

0.27

0.88

4.19

3.57

November

50

0.36

0.31

0.21

0.52

0.27

0.26

1.97

3.82

December

17

0.12

0.00

0.22

0.22

0.27

-0.05

0.80

3.77

January

9

0.07

0.00

0.22

0.22

0.27

-0.05

0.80

3.71

February

33

0.24

0.00

0.20

0.20

0.25

-0.05

0.80

3.66

March

21

0.15

0.00

0.22

0.22

0.27

-0.05

0.80

3.61

April

36

0.26

0.00

0.21

0.21

0.27

-0.05

0.80

3.56

Annual

791.12

5.79

4.20

2.59

6.79

3.23

3.56


Figure 7.7: Water balance in Hebbal valley

 




 


 

 


 
TOP
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |    CES    |    CST    |    CiSTUP    |    IISc    |    E-mail