|
Land Use Dynamics at Padubidri, Udupi District with the Implementation of Large Scale Thermal Power Project |
|
Ramachandra T V 1,2,3,* Bharath H. Aithal 1,2
1 Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Center for Ecological Sciences [CES],
2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra),
3 Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP],
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India
*Corresponding author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Human-induced land use changes and consequent enhanced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have been considered to be the prime driving force in the global warming and changes in the climate. In this context, understanding the process of land use changes has been vital towards mitigating the impacts of climate changes. Land use/ Land cover (LULC) dynamics and its effects on ecological and hydrological process and on human livelihood has constituted major concerns today, evident from the consideration of LULC change as an important climate forcing driver (NRC, 2005). Land management strategies involving the conversion of natural forests for agricultural and industrial activities (Hammett, 1992) are the causal factor for the changes in the land use. LULC changes are local and place specific, collectively they are features of global environmental change. Land use modification alter the structure of the landscape and hence the functional ability of the landscape. Continual, historical, and precise information about the LULC changes of the Earth’s surface is essential for evolving appropriate management strategies towards the sustainable development of the landscape (Abd El-Kawy et., al 2011). Environmental and ecological consequences of landscape transformation are more evident in natural ecosystems where their sustainability, multi-functional role and values are threatened (Narumalani et al., 2004; Schulz et al., 2010). Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System are main platforms of data acquisition and analysis of LULC changes (Eastman and Fulk, 1993; Ehlers et al., 1990; Harris and Ventura, 1995; Dewan and Yamaguchi, 2009). Multi-resolution (temporal, spatial and spectral) remote sensing data available since 1970’s aid in the analysis of long term environmental changes and impacts of human induced changes in the landscape (Xu et al., 2005; Berberoglu and Akin, 2009; Yu et al., 2011 ). Spatially explicit temporal data helps in the inventorying, mapping and monitoring spatio-temporal processes and changes. Understanding the causal factors with these changes is essential to develop mitigation and adaptation policies to minimize future disturbances while arresting further degradation (Marcucci, 2000).
Land use, Land cover and its change
Land cover (LC) refers to the features present on the earth surface. Land cover configuration is stated as a unified reflection of the existing natural resources and natural processes that are dynamic in nature. Mapping, quantifying, and monitoring the physical characteristics of land cover has been widely recognized as a key element for natural resource management and sustainable planning activities (Nemani & Running, 1996; Barlage et al., 2004). Land use refers to the human induced changes for agricultural, industrial, residential, recreational purposes. The main drivers of land use can be stated as land management policies, population, agricultural production and urban expansion. Land use change alters the homogeneous landscape into heterogeneous mosaic of patches. Almost 40 percent of Earth's land surface had been converted to cropland and permanent pasture by early 1990s,. This conversion has occurred largely at the expense of forests and grassland (Ramachandra and Shruthi, 2007).
LULC change influences the interaction of ecological, geographical, economic, and social factors (Zang and Huang, 2006; Geist and Lambin, 2006). The impacts of LULC changes on a landscape with respect to wind regime, temperature, soil moisture, water vapor, and cloud development has been accounted through numerous models (Adegoke et al., 2007; Narisma and Pitman, 2003; Gero and Pitman, 2006; Sen Roy et al., 2007; Sen Roy et al., 2011). The structure and composition of landscapes undergoes a rapid change as a result of human related activities. The changes in the mosaic of landscape elements are considered to influence significantly the processes and functions of ecological systems. Quantifying landscape spatial patterns and their changes provide important information for monitoring and assessing the effects of human induced changes on landscape.
LULC change detection
Multi resolution data acquired at regular intervals through sensors mounted on space borne platform has been useful in to mapping and monitoring the spatio temporal changes in LULC. The collection of remotely sensed data covering larger spatial extent enables the analyses of changes at local, regional and global scales over time. This also provides an important link between intensive, localized ecosystem management and sustainable planning (Wilkie and Finn, 1996) and it presents a synoptic view of the landscape at low cost (Lillesand and Kiefer, 1987). Remote sensing data along with GPS (Global positioning system) help in effective land cover analysis (Ramachandra and Kumar, 2004). Successful utilization of remotely sensed data for land cover and land use change detection requires careful selection of appropriate data set. Good quality of RS data, strict geometric registration and radiometric normalization, and suitable training data selection are important for successful implementation of the LULC change detection.
|
|
|
Citation : Ramachandra. T.V., and Bharath H. Aithal, 2012. Land Use Dynamics at Padubidri, Udupi District with the Implementation of Large Scale Thermal Power Project., International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 05, No. 03, June 2012, pp. 409-417.
|
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group,
Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Tel: 91-080-22933099/23600985,
Fax: 91-080-23601428/23600085
Web: http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy
Bharath H. AithalEnergy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India
E-mail:
bharath@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Citation:Ramachandra. T.V., and Bharath H. Aithal, 2012. Land Use Dynamics at Padubidri, Udupi District with the Implementation of Large Scale Thermal Power Project., International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 05, No. 03, June 2012, pp. 409-417.
NRC, 2005. Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties, National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2005).
Hammett, J.E., 1992. The shapes of adaptation: historical ecology of anthropogenic landscapes in the southeastern United States.Landscape Ecol., 7, 121–135.
Abd El-Kawy, O.R., Rod, J.K., Ismail, H.A., Suliman, A.S., 2011. Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data, Applied Geography, 31 (2), 483-494.
Narumalani, S., Mishra, D. R., & Rothwell, R. G. (2004). Analyzing landscape structural change using image interpretation and spatial pattern metrics. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 41(1):25-44.
Schulz, J. J., Cayuela, L., Echeverria, C., Salas, J., & Rey Benayas, J. M. 2010. Monitoring land cover change of the dry land forest landscape of Central Chile (1975-20 08). Applied Geography, 30(3):436- 447.
Eastman, J.R., Fulk, M., 1993. Long sequence time series evaluation using standard-ized principle components. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59(8):991–996.
Ehlers, M., Jadkowski, M.A., Howard, R.R., et al., 1990. Application of SPOT data for regional growth analysis and local planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 56 (2):175–180.
Harris, P.M., Ventura, S.J., 1995. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61(8):993–998.
Dewan A.M., Yamaguchi, Y., 2009. Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl. Geogr., 29 (3), 390.
Xu, J., Ai, X., Deng, X., 2005. Exploring the spatial and temporal dynamics of land use in Xizhuang watershed of Yunnan, southwest China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 7:299–309.
Berberoglu, S., Akin, A., 2009. Assessing different remote sensing techniques to detect land use/cover changes in the eastern Mediterranean. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 11: 46–53.
Yu, W., Zang S., Wu, C., Liu, W., Na, X., 2011. Analyzing and modeling land use land cover change (LUCC) in the Daqing City, China. Applied Geography, 31 (2), 600–60.
Marcucci, D. J. (2000). Landscape history as a planning tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1-2):67-81.
Nemani & Running, 1996. Global vegetation cover changes from coarse resolution satellite data. Journal of Geophysical Research 101: 7157–7162.
Barlage, M., Zeng, X., 2004. The effects of observed fractional vegetation cover on the land surface climatology of the community land model. J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 823–830.
Ramachandra T.V. & Shruthi B.V. 2007. Spatial mapping of renewable energy potential, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(7):1460-1480
Zang, S & Huang X. 2006. An aggregated multivariate regression land-use model and its application to land-use change processes in the Daqing region (northeast China), Ecol. Model. 193:503–516.
Geist, H. & Lambin. E. F, 2001, What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate causes and underlying sources of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. LUCC Report Series No. 4.
Adegoke, J.O., Pielke R.A., Carleton, A.M., 2007. Observational and modeling studies of the impact of agriculture-related land use change on climate in the central U.S. Agric. For. Meteorol., 142, 203–215.
Narisma G.T., Pitman, A.J., 2003. The impact of 200 years of land cover change on the Australian near-surface climate. J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 424–436.
Gero A.F., Pitman, A.J., 2006. The impact of land cover change on a simulated storm event in the Sydney basin. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 45, 283–300.
Sen Roy, S., Mahmood, R., Niyogi, D.D.S., Lei, M., Foster, S.A., Hubbard, K.G., Douglas E., Pielke, R.A., 2007. Impacts of the agricultural Green Revolution induced land use changes on air temperatures in India. J. Geophy. Res., 112, D21108.
Sen Roy S., Mahmood, R., Quintanar, A.I., Gonazalez, A., 2011. Impacts of irrigation on dry season precipitation in India. Theor. Appl. Clim.
Wilkie, D.S, & Finn, J.T, 1996. Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resources Monitoring. Columbia University Press, New York. Page 295.
Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer. R. W., 2002.Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 9971-51-427-3.
Ramachandra T.V, Kumar U. 2004. Geographic Resources Decision Support System for land use, land cover dynamics analysis. Proceedings of the FOSS/GRASS Users Conference. 12-14, Bangkok, Thailand.