¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
ENVIS Technical Report 124,   October 2017
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS FOR TERTIARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER
T.V. Ramachandra        Sudarshan P. Bhat        Vinay S       
NUTRIENT AND METAL REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF DIFFERENT MACROPHYTES

Macrophyte

Removal efficiency

Reference

Type of waste water/method

N

P

COD/BOD

Heavy metals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eichhornia crassipes

(Water hyacinth)

65% (nitrate)

65% (phosphate)

75%

 

Shahabaldin et al., 2013

Domestic wastewater/batch method

50%(TN)

50%(TP)

50%

 

Costa et al., 2014

Piggery waste with 20 days HRT

21.78%-TN

23.02%-TP

64.44%-COD

 

Jianbo Lu et al., 2008

Duck farm

72%-N

63%-P

 

 

Tripathy et al., 2003

Dairy effluent

 

 

 

Cr (95%)

Mahmood et al., 2005

Textile wastewater

 

 

 

Hg-119ng /g
Cd-3992µg/g
Cu-314 µg/g
Cr-2.31mg/g
Ni-1.68 mg/g

 

Molisani et al., 2006
KK Mishra et al., 2007
Hu et al., 2007
Verma et al., 2008

 

 

 

 

Cr-2.36 mg/g

Ankur Gupta and Chandrajit Balomajumder, 2015

photosynthesis chamber under controlled condition

2161 mg N/m2/day or
7887 kg N/ha/yr

542 mg P/m2/day or
1978 kg P/ha/yr

 

 

K.R Reddy and J.C.Tucker, 1983

microcosm
aquaculture system

Summer-1278 mg N/m2/day

Winter-254 mg N/m2/day

Summer-243 mg P/m2/day

Winter-49 mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

 

 

 

Zinc-95% (3.542 mg/g)
Chromium-84% (2.412 mg/g)

Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2009

1.0,5.0,10.0 & 20.0 mg/l metal solutions , 11 days incubation period

 

 

 

Cd-81%
Cr-85%
Cu-95%
Zn-92%
Fe-85.7%

Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008

15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals

 

 

 

 

Cr-65%
Cu-65%

Lissy et al., 2011

Wastewater from simulated wetland

Eichhornia crassipes

1980 kg/ha/year

320 kg/ha/year

 

(kg/ha/year )
Ca-750
Mg-790
Na-260
K-3190
Fe-19
Mn-300
Zn-4
Cu-1

FAO

 

 

 

 

Pistia stratiotes

Summer-985 mg N/m2/day=9.85kg/ha/day

Winter-258 mg N/m2/day

Summer-218 mg P/m2/day

Winter-72 mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

 

 

 

Hg-0.57mg/g
Cr-2.5mg/g
Cd-2.13mg/g
Ni-1.95mg/g

Mishra et al., 2009
Verma et al., 2008

Coal mining effluent

 

 

 

Cd-78%
Cr-81%
Cu-96%
Zn-90%
Fe-87%

Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008

15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals

 

Summer-292mg N/m2/day

Winter-70 mg N/m2/day

Summer-87mg P/m2/day

Winter-18 mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

retention ponds

 

 

 

 

Lemna minor

 

 

 

Ti-221 µg/g
Cu-400 µg/g
Pb-8.62 mg/g

Babic et al., 2009
Boule et al., 2009
Uysal and Taner 2009

 

194.9 ± 18.9 g TN/m2/yr

10.4 ± 1.7 g TP/m2/yr

3869 ± 352g COD/m2/yr

 

Umesh et al., 2015

Manure slurry from dairy farm, surface flow wetland

Summer-292mg N/m2/day=2.92kg/ha/day

Winter-70mg N/m2/day

Summer-87mg P/m2/day

Winter-18 mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

Lemna japonica

0.4g/m2/day

0.1g/m2/day

 

 

 

 

Lemna gibba

 

 

 

Ur-897 µg/g
As-1022 µg/g

Mkandawire et al., 2004

 

Spirodela polyrhiza

Summer-151mg N/m2/day

Winter-135mg N/m2/day

Summer-34mg P/m2/day

Winter-34 mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

 

 

 

Cd-63%
Cr-83%
Cu-91%
Zn-90%
Fe-83.5%

Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008

15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals

Azolla

Summer-108mg N/m2/day

Winter-48mg N/m2/day

Summer-33mg P/m2/day

Winter-10mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

 

 

 

Hg-0.44 mg/g

Mishra et al., 2009

Coal mining effluent

 

 

 

Hg-70.8-578mg/kg
Cr-91.1-356 mg/kg

R. Bennicelli et al, 2004

Aquarium with nutrient medium

Azolla pinnata

 

 

 

Fe-92.7%
Zn-83%
Cu-59.1%
Mn-65.1%
Co-95.0%
Cd-90%
Ni-73.1%

Elsharawy et al., 2004

Mixture of waste water

Salvinia

Summer-406mg N/m2/day

Winter-96mg N/m2/day

Summer-105mg P/m2/day

Winter-32mg P/m2/day

 

 

K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985

microcosm retention ponds

 

 

Typha aungustifolia

48-54 g/m2

 

 

 

Maltais-Landry et al., 2009

Mesocosm with daily total N loading rates 1.16 g/m2

 

 

 

Cr-20210 µg/g
Zn-16325 µg/g

Firdaus-e-Bareen and Khilji, 2008

 

922 kg N/ha

114 kgP/ha

 

 

Abdeslam Ennabili et al., 1998

Field study: Coastal wetlands (freshwater or brackish systems) were studied in three river mouth areas in the Tingitan Peninsula

 

 

 

 

Cr-66.2 %
Cu-68.3 %
Zn-99.3%
Ni-76.4%

Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012

Wetland microcosms

 

 

 

 

Cr-66.2 %
Cu-68.3 %
Zn-99.3%
Ni-76.4%

Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012

Wetland microcosms

Typha latifolia

N-2630 kg/ha/year

P-400 kg/ha/year

 

kg/ha/year )
Ca-1710
Mg-310
Na-730
K-4570
Fe-23
Mn-79
Zn-6
Cu-7

FAO

 

Combination of Water hyacinth,
duckweed and blue-green
algae

>90%(nitrate)

>90% (phosphate)

BOD-97%

20-100%

Sinha et al., 2000

Sewage water

Cyperus alternifolius

 

 

 

Cr-68.4%
Cu-72.7%
Zn-93.17%
Ni-83.6%

Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012

Wetland microcosms

Ipomea aquatica

TN-75.5%

TP-41.5%

BOD-88.5%
COD-84.5%

 

Hu et.al, 2008

horizontal-flow, Deep Flow Technique

Alternanthera philoxeroides

1780 kg/ha/year

200 kg/ha/year

 

(kg/ha/year )
Ca-320
Mg-320
Na-230
K-3220
Fe-45
Mn-27
Zn-6
Cu-1

FAO

 

HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION OF DIFFERENT MACROPHYTES

MACROPHYTE
SPECIES

HEAVY METALS (mg/kg)

REFERENCE

Cd

Cr

Pb

Zn

Cu

As

Mn

Hg

Ni

Potamogeton

Root

1.57

 

12

512

47.8

5.85

 

 

 

Edward A. Martinez and Chemanji Shu-Nyamboli, 2011

Shoot

0.46

 

1.1

116

11.5

0.79

 

 

 

Alternanthera philoxeroides

Whole plant

28.17±1.56

 

107.75±14.21

271.63±45.78

 

 

 

 

 

Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007

underground

96.66±10.82

 

477.94±41.61

597.82±79.27

 

 

 

 

 

aboveground

20.56±1.17

 

66.62±5.74

235.39±36.7

 

 

 

 

 

Alternanthera philoxeroides

Shoots

 

 

74 ±1.2

473 ± 2.0

 

 

 

 

 

H. Deng et al., 2006

Roots

 

 

165 ±16

444 ±16

 

 

 

 

 

Root

 

 

 

 

1.02-2.33

 

 

 

0.93-10.89

Gopeshwor Singh and Abhik Gupta,2015

Shoot

 

 

 

 

0.48-7.26

 

 

 

0.38-4.32

Leaf

19.46±3.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nimisha and Abhik Gupta, 2015

Stem

71.78±18.24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Root

13.35±3.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternanthera Philoxeroides

Whole plant

4.5

63.7

65.6

39.6

12.6

 

224.4

 

38.2

Aboud S. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012

Polygonum hydropiper

Whole plant

19.65 ± 1.88

 

90.42 ± 7.00

246.28 ± 27.51

 

 

 

 

 

Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007

underground

92.51 ± 4.86

 

410.90 ± 56.84

753.10 ± 77.65

 

 

 

 

 

aboveground

11.55 ± 1.28

 

54.81 ± 4.46

189.96 ± 26.60

 

 

 

 

 

Cyperus difformis

Whole plant

13.52 ± 0.90

 

84.04 ± 5.28

153.85 ± 5.06

 

 

 

 

 

Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007

underground

10.67±0.67

 

59.80 ± 1.93

129.67 ± 8.26

 

 

 

 

 

aboveground

14.24 ± 1.29

 

90.10 ± 6.12

159.89 ± 7.86

 

 

 

 

 

Cyperus rotundus

Whole plant

5.5

64.3

50.6

46

15.8

 

310.0

 

41.2

Aboud S. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012

Phragmites communis

Whole plant

4.98 ± 3.40

 

4.89 ± 1.71

47.31 ± 1.91

 

 

 

 

 

Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007

underground

2.52 ± 0.26

 

9.59 ± 0.27

62.95 ± 0.68

 

 

 

 

 

aboveground

5.60 ± 4.26

 

3.71 ± 2.20

43.40 ± 2.55

 

 

 

 

 

Phragmites australis

Root

1.13±  0.08

6.97 ± 0.19

16.54±  0.97

104.10±   9.28

14.98 ± 0.93

 

475.80±   11.91

5.22 ± 0.38

9.12 ±  0.20

G. Bonanno and R. Lo Giudice, 2010

Rhizome

1.00±  0.08

1.52  ±0.06

15.30±    0.93

32.67 ± 2.36

4.33± 0.32

 

37.51±   2.82

3.19 ± 0.26

1.67±   0.14

Stem

0.68±  0.06

0.40±  0.04

9.87±  0.80

10.04  ± 0.87

2.31± 0.2

 

27.92 ± 2.34

1.05  ±0.12

0.48 ± 0.08

leaf

1.05±  0.10

0.69 ±  0.04

13.20 ± 0.74

28.40  ±1.72

4.13± 0.19

 

308.30±  11.47

1.73  ±0.23

1.69 ± 0.15

Shoot

 

 

 

11.88-30.9

1.98-19.62

 

 

 

 

Tanja R. Maksimovic et.al, 2014

 

Whole plant

3.21

 

42.4

843.2

129.21

 

 

 

151.6

Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013

Cyperus alternifolius

Lateral roots

0.3

 

74

4570

15600

 

4850

 

 

S. cheng et.al, 2002

leaves

8.4

 

1.2

77.3

7.1

 

68.9

 

 

Typha latifolia

Root

<0.5-1.6

6.55-61.3

 

45.7-175

22.8-53.8

 

4961-20000

 

8.33-45.3

Zohra Ben Salem et.al, 2014

Rhizome

<0.5

1-1.92

 

9.68-26.59

1.81-6.28

 

334-1210

 

<1-4.12

Stem

<0.5

<1-3.78

 

7.85-41.48

<1-4.77

 

467-1460

 

<1-2.14

Leaves

<0.5

<1

 

<1-1.9

<1-7.46

 

55.4-2800

 

<1-1.03

Typha angustata

Whole plant

0.46

 

8.28

169.48

31.55

 

 

 

28.86

J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006

 

 

Shoot

 

 

 

9.51-19.76

2.69-8.28

 

 

 

 

Tanja R. Maksimovic et.al, 2014

Typha sp

Shoot

0.01

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

 

3.1

Severine Ladislas et.al, 2012

Root

0.09

 

 

47.3

 

 

 

 

6.8

Whole plant

1.38

 

23.87

862.4

153.2

 

 

 

91.55

Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013

Eichhornia crassipes

Shoot

 

0.7-1.14

 

 

4.79-6.99

 

 

 

 

A. Klumpp et al., 2002

Root

 

2.93-12.57

 

 

9.18-21.1

 

 

 

 

Eichhornia crassipes

Whole plant

1.8

 

37.26

1677

53.8

 

 

 

125.3

Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013

Whole plant

 

 

4.47-9.81

235.25-709.07

16.32-1617.21

 

 

 

4.81-28.83

Abida Begum et.al ,2010

Whole plant

5.1

75.4

80.5

36.6

10.1

 

216.6

 

41.3

Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012

Whole plant

0.72-21.53

1.2-160.85

22.0-98.5

27.4-58.3

BDL-20.95

 

100.5-306.8

 

26.0-65.32

Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2009

Pistia stratiotes

Whole plant

 

1.43-3.14

 

 

5.15-12.69

 

 

 

 

A. Klumpp et al., 2002

Shoot

0.07-0.87

 

2.27-14

27.03-120.97

4.83-7.5

 

471.77-984.7

 

0.92-1.54

T.m.Galal and E.A. Farahat, 2015

Root

0.83-2.6

 

10.7-21.67

55.67-434.67

14.57-30.77

 

6529.53-14503.53

 

12.62-14.94

Ceratophyllum demersum

Whole plant

4.46

53.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L. VahdatiRaad  and H. Khara, 2012

Whole plant

2.35

 

208.71

1172.8

96.3

 

 

 

48.09

Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013

Ipomea aquatica

Whole plant

0.21

 

2.67

639.04

7.41

 

 

 

7.95

J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006

Ipomea sp

Stem

59.01

775.62

 

141.42

126.01

 

182

 

 

Gupta S et.al, 2008

Root

48.2

364.13

 

149.7

118.39

 

196.83

 

 

leaves

54.08

434.79

 

129.03

97.07

 

204.13

 

 

Ipomea carnea

Whole plant

4.2

65.3

51.8

48.4

10.5

 

240.1

 

41.1

Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012

Hydrilla verticillata

Whole plant

0.44

 

6.2

155.18

21.8

 

 

 

20.09

J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006

Whole plant

 

 

6.85-131.84

9.05-745.35

18.55-1756.52

 

 

 

8.93-30.31

Abida Begum et.al , 2010

Nelumbo nucifera

Whole plant

0.59

 

5.28

221.03

23.2

 

 

 

20.5

J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006

Whole plant

 

 

5.58-10.55

246.75-743

17.65-1732.35

 

 

 

5.64-29.4

Abida Begum et.al , 2010

Azolla caroliniana

Whole plant

259

 

416

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rakhshaee et al., 2006

Lemna gibba

Whole plant

1.34

 

104

531.5

36.4

 

 

 

25.23

Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013

Polygonum glabrum

Whole plant

3.7

64.4

72.4

56.7

7.8

 

302

 

47.5

Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012

Vallisneria spiralis

Whole plant

1.28

 

9.2

239.17

66.26

 

 

 

28.75

J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006

Botanical glossary


Sl.No

Botanical term

Description

1

Auricle

Ear like appendage

2

Bract

a modified leaf or scale, typically small, with a flower or flower cluster in its axis

3

Campanulate

Bell shaped

4

Capsule

A dry dehiscent fruit that opens along 2 or more valves or teeth to release 2 or more seeds

5

Caudate

Long narrowly tipped

6

Cauline

Located at the base of a plant or stem; especially arising directly from the root or rootstock or a root-like stem.

7

Ciliate

Hairy

8

Cleistogamous

type of automatic self-pollination of certain plants that can propagate by using non-opening, self-pollinating flowers

9

Cordate

Heart shaped

10

Corm

A rounded underground storage organ present in plants consisting of a swollen stem base covered with scale leaves.

11

Crenate

having a round-toothed or scalloped edge

12

Culm

stem of any type of plant, specifically refers to the above-ground or aerial stems of grasses and sedges

13

Cuneate

Wedge shaped

14

Decussate

Intersected or crossed in the form of an X

15

Dimorphic

occurring in or representing two distinct forms

16

Dioecious

having the male and female reproductive organs in separate individuals

17

Disseminules

a part of a plant that serves to propagate it, such as a seed or a fruit

18

Distichous

Arranged in two opposite rows

19

Drupelet

one of the individual parts of an aggregate fruit

20

Elliptic

relating to or having the form of an ellipse

21

Ensiform

shaped like a sword blade; long and narrow with sharp edges and a pointed tip

22

Fimbriate

fringed

23

Fronds

the leaf or leaf-like part of a palm, fern, or similar plant

24

Fusiform

Spindle shaped, rod shaped gradually narrowing from the middle towards end

25

Glabrous

Without hairs

26

Glumes

 bract (leaf-like structure) below a spikelet in the inflorescence

27

Heterosporous

production of spores of two different sizes and sexes by the sporophytes

28

Inconspicous

not clearly visible

29

Inflorescence

Main flowering twig

30

Lanceolate

shaped like a lance head; of a narrow oval shape tapering to a point at each end

31

Megaprothalli

The development stage of megaspore

32

Megaspore

plant spores that develop into female gametophytes

33

Microspore

 plant spores that develop into male gametophytes

34

Monoecious

having both the male and female reproductive organs in the same individual

35

Orbicular

Circular and flat

36

Pedicel

a small stalk bearing an individual flower in an inflorescence

37

Peduncle

the stalk bearing a flower or fruit, or the main stalk of an inflorescence

38

Pendulous

Hanging

39

Perennial

A plant that lives for several years

40

Petaloid

Petal like

41

Pilose

Covered with soft, weak, thin and clearly separated hairs

42

Polygamous

Bisexual and unisexual flowers in same plant

43

Prostrate

growing closely along the ground

44

Serrate

Closely small toothed

45

Serrulate

Finely serrate

46

Sessile

Without stalk

47

Sinuate

having a wavy or sinuous margin; with alternate rounded notches and lobes

48

Solitary

single

49

Spathe

Large bract ensheathing an inflorescence

50

Spadix

a spike of minute flowers closely arranged round a fleshy axis and typically enclosed in a spathe

51

Spikelet

The basic unit of a grass flower, consisting of two glumes or outer bracts at the base and one or more florets above.

52

Spirodistichous

arranged alternately in two opposite vertical rows

53

Sporocarp

Specialised type of structure found in some ferns whose primary function is the production and release of spores

54

Staminodes

a sterile or abortive stamen

55

Stipule

A small leaf-like appendage to a leaf, typically borne in pairs at the base of the leaf stalk

56

Stolon

A creeping horizontal plant stem or runner that takes root at points along its length to form new plants

57

Stoloniferous

Plants with stolons

58

Translucent

Semi- transparent

59

Trioecious

 having male, female, and hermaphrodite flowers in three different plants

60

Umbel

An inflorescence which consists of a number of short flower stalks (called pedicels) which spread from a common point, somewhat like umbrella ribs

61

Undulating

Wavy

Source: Rao G R, Vishnu D. Mukri,  Subash Chandran M D, Ramachandra T V, 2017.  Forest Trees of Central Western Ghats – Field Manual, ENVIS Technical Report 121, Sahyadri Conservation Series 67, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012

 

REFERENCES

  1. Annelise Gerber, Carina J Cillers, Carin Van Ginkel and Rene Glen (2004). Easy Identification of Aquatic Plants, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria.
  2. Arias, C.A., Brix, H., (2005). Initial experience from a compact vertical flow constructed wetland treating single household wastewater. In: Vymazal, J. (Ed.), Natural and Constructed Wetlands: Nutrients, Metals and Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 52–64.
  3. Arvind Kumar (2015). Freshwater Plankton and Macrophytes of India, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.
  4. Biswas K and Calder C.C (1954).  Handbook of common water and marsh plants of India and Burma, Second edition, Government of India Press, Culcatta.
  5. Christopher D. K. Cook (1996). Aquatic and Wetland Plants of India- Oxford University Press New Delhi.
  6. Calvert G., Liessmann L. (2014). Wetland Plants of the Townsville–Burdekin Flood Plain. Lower Burdekin Landcare Association Inc., Ayr.
  7. Cooper P., Smith M. and Maynard H., (1996). The Design and Performance of a Nitrifiying Vertical Flow Reed Bed Treatment System; Water Science and Technology; Vol: 35 (5).
  8. Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C., and LaRoe, E.T. (1979). Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, 103 pp. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  9. Cronk, J. K., & Fennessy, M. S. (2001). Wetland plants: Biology and Ecology. CRC press.
  10. Denny P. (1997); Implementation of Constructed Wetlands in Developing countries; Water science and technology; Vol: 35; Oxford. 
  11. Encyclopedia of life: eol.org
  12. EPA, (2000); Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters; National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio.
  13. Faulkner, S.P., Richardson, C.J., (1989). Physical and chemical characteristics of freshwater wetland soils. In: Hammer, D.A. (Ed.), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, pp. 41–72.
  14. Global invasive species database: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/.
  15. Greenway M., Woolley A. (1999);Constructed wetlands in Queensland: Performance Efficiency and Nutrient Bioaccumulation; Ecological Engineering, Vol.: 12, Pg.: 39-55
  16. Handbook of utilization of aquatic plants, FAO, http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6862e/X6862E11.htm
  17. Holm et al (1997). World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. John Wiley, New York.
  18. Julien, M. H. and M. W. Griffiths (eds.). (1998). Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds, 4th ed. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  19. Julien M.H., Bourne, A.S. and V.H.K. Low. (1992). Growth of the weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Martius) Grisebach, (alligator weed) in aquatic and terrestrial habitats in Australia. Journal of Aquatic Botany (1992) 7: 102-108. 
  20. Kadlec, R.H., Wallace, S., (2008); Treatment Wetlands. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  21. Kadlec R. H., Knight R. L. (1996); Treatment Wetlands, Florida, America; CRC press.
  22. Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L., Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P. F., Haberl, R., (2000). Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control: Processes, Performance, Design and Operation, IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 8, London.
  23. Oosterhout, Elissa (2007). Weeds of National Significance: Alligator weed Control Manual. NSW Department of Primary Industries.
  24. Ramachandra, T. V., Mahapatra, D. M., Sudarshan P. B Asulabha, K. S., Sincy, V., and Bharath, H. A., (2014). Integrated Wetlands Ecosystem: Sustainable Model to Mitigate Water Crisis in Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 76, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012.
  25. Ramachandra, T.V., Mahapatra, D.M., Vinay, S., Sincy, V., Asulabha, K.S., Bhat, S.P., Aithal, B.H., 2017. Bellandur and varthur Lakes Rejuvination Blueprint, ENVIS Technical Report 116, Environment Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
  26. Ramaswamy, S.V., & Razi, B.A. (1973). Flora of Bangalore District.  Mysore University Press.
  27. Raja ChakrabortyBiplab DeN. Devanna, and Saikat Sen (2013). Antitussive, expectorant activity of Marsilea minuta L., an Indian vegetable, Journal of Advanced  Pharmaceutical Technology and  Research. 4(1): 61–64.
  28. Reed S. C., Middlebrooks E. J., Crites R. W., (1988). Natural system for Waste Management; McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  29. Sven Erik Jorgensen (2009). Applications of Ecological engineering, Academic Press.
  30. UN-HABITAT, (2008). Constructed Wetlands Manual, UN-HABITAT Water for Asian Cities Programme Nepal, Kathmandu.
  31. Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 380 (1–3), 48–65.
  32. Vymazal J., Brix H., Cooper P., Haberl R., Perfler R., Laber J. (1998). Removal Mechanism and Types of Constructed Wetlands; Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatments in Europe; Backhuys publishers; 17-66.
  33. Wetland plants of Queensland: A field guide: https://books.google.co.in.
  34. Wu S., Wallace S., Brix H., Kuschk P., Kirui W. K., Masi F., DongR. (2015). Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: Challenges, operational strategies and overall performance; Environmental Pollution 201 107-120.
  35. Zhang D-Q, Jinadasa K.B.S.N., Gersberg R. M., Liu Y., Tan S. K., Ng W. J (2015). Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in tropical and subtropical regions (2000–2013); Journal of Environmental Sciences 30: 30 – 46.

Related Publications (of Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES TE 15)

  1. Ramachandra T.V., Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Sudarshan P. Bhat, Asulabha K.S., Sincy Varghese, Bharath H. Aithal, 2014. Integrated Wetlands Ecosystem: Sustainable Model to Mitigate Water Crisis in Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 76, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  2. Ramachandra T V, Vinay S and Bharath H.Aithal, 2015.  Detrimental landuse changes in Agara-Belllandur wetland, ENVIS Technical Report 95, CES, IISc, Bangalore, India
  3. Ramachandra T V, Asulabha K S, Sincy V,  Vinay S,  Bharath H.Aithal, Sudarshan P. Bhat, and Durga M. Mahapatra, 2015. Pathetic status of wetlands in Bangalore: Epitome of inefficient and uncoordinated Governance, ENVIS Technical Report 93, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  4. Ramachandra T V, Asulabha K S, Sincy V, Sudarshan Bhat and Bharath H.Aithal, 2015.  Wetlands: Treasure of Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 101, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, IISc, Bangalore, India
  5. Ramachandra T V, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Asulabha K S, Sincy Varghese, 2017. Foaming or Algal Bloom in Water bodies of India: Remedial Measures - Restrict Phosphate (P) based Detergents,  ENVIS Technical Report 108, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  6. Ramachandra T V,  Vinay S, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Sincy Varghese, Bharath H. Aithal, 2016. Water situation in Bengaluru,  ENVIS Technical Report 114, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  7. Ramachandra T V, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Vinay S, Sincy V, Asulabha K S, Sudarshan Bhat, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Bellandur and Varthur Lakes Rejuvenation Blueprint,  ENVIS Technical Report 116, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  8. Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Asulabha K S, Sincy V, Sudarshan Bhat, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Bharath H. Aithal,  2017. Rejuvenation Blueprint for lakes in Vrishabhavathi valley,  ENVIS Technical Report 122, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  1. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath H. Aithal,and Durgappa, D. S.,  Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis, Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2012,18,329-343,.
  2. Ramachandra, T.V.,  Bharath, H. Aithal and Sreejith, K., GHG footprint of major cities in India, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44,473–495
  3. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H. Aithal, Vinay, S., et al., Trees of Bengaluru, ENVIS Technical Report 75, ENVIS, Centre for Ecological Sciences, IISc, Bangalore, 2014. 75p.
  1. Ramachandra T.V., Bharath H. Aithal, 2016. Bangalore’s Reality: towards unlivable status with unplanned urban trajectory, Current Science (Guest Editorial), 110(12):2207-2208, 25th June 2016.
  2. Ramachandra T V,  Vinay S, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Frequent Floods in Bangalore: Causes and Remedial Measures,  ENVIS Technical Report 123, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  3. Sudarshan Bhat, Mahesh M K and Ramachandra T V, 2017.  Macrophytes of Bangalore Wetlands, ENVIS Technical Report 126, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
  4. Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Koramangala Floods: Causes,  ENVIS Technical Report 131, Environmental Information System,  CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012