RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Water samples collected from Chamarajasagar reservoir and Madiwala Lake were assessed for physico-chemical and biological parameters. Biological parameter assessment also includes an experiment to arrive at a representative sampling volume of water to be filtered for phytoplankton analysis.
Different volumes (25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 litres) of samples were collected, filtered, concentrated and analysed to estimate the composition (species richness) and counts of phytoplankton. It was found that 100 litres of lake water was a more appropriate sampling volume as per the experiment listed in Table 5.1 and the figure 5.1.
Table 5.1: Standardisation of sampling volume for phytoplankton analysis
|
Phytoplankton |
Zooplankton |
Volume of water filtered (liters) |
Number of Species |
Total species count |
Species count |
25 |
8 |
265 |
10 |
50 |
10 |
317 |
32 |
75 |
11 |
314 |
28 |
100 |
11 |
520 |
28 |
125 |
11 |
527 |
26 |
As is evident from the data and graph, 100 litres seemed to be the most appropriate volume for the current study as further effort in sampling did not include new species and the number of species has reached the threshold (which initially showed increasing trend and was stabilised at 100 l). Consequently, this was taken as the standard amount of sample volume throughout the study.
Figure 5.1: Graph showing relation between species and volume of sample filtered
Physico-chemical analysis
Samples were collected from sites covering the inlets, centre and the outlets. Five sampling sites were selected for analysis of various parameters from Chamarajasagar reservoir and six sampling sites from Madiwala Lake. The results of the analysis are presented in this section.
Chamarajasagar reservoir
The physicochemical analysis of Chamarajasagar reservoir (table 5.2) reflects a fairly unpolluted nature of the water body. pH, is one parameter which varied between the range of 7.27 to 7.77, which is above the tolerance limits. The sampling was done post monsoons and thus the slightly higher value indicating mild alkalinity may be attributed to the agricultural runoff from the catchment and natural processes. Water temperature measured between 22.33°C and 23.90°C during the study.
Table 5.2: Chamarajasagar reservoir – physico chemical analysis
Chamarajasagar reservoir - Physico-chemical analysis |
Sampling sites |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
pH |
7.77 |
7.42 |
7.61 |
7.28 |
7.27 |
W. Temperature °C |
22.33 |
22.80 |
22.80 |
23.50 |
23.90 |
Conductance µS/cm |
289.33 |
288.67 |
307.33 |
293.67 |
284.67 |
TDS mg/L |
144.67 |
144.00 |
153.67 |
146.33 |
142.33 |
Transparency cm |
128 |
168 |
137 |
167 |
145 |
Hardness mg/L |
84.40 |
84.60 |
80.60 |
80.00 |
80.00 |
Ca Hardness mg/L |
20.68 |
18.28 |
20.68 |
19.96 |
19.56 |
Mg Hardness mg/L |
15.55 |
16.18 |
14.62 |
14.65 |
14.75 |
DO mg/L |
7.20 |
6.54 |
5.73 |
4.46 |
2.90 |
Alkalinity mg/L |
98.07 |
101.92 |
109.61 |
123.07 |
97.11 |
COD mg/L |
9.72 |
9.72 |
9.72 |
9.72 |
6.48 |
Nitrates mg/L |
0.022 |
0.013 |
0.019 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
Phosphates mg/L |
0.014 |
0.008 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.003 |
Sodium mg/L |
59.03 |
57.22 |
59.83 |
57.82 |
55.01 |
Potassium mg/L |
13.11 |
13.11 |
13.79 |
13.69 |
13.11 |
Electric conductivity was in the range of 284.67 – 307.33 µS/cm, indicating less dissolved solids and no major source of pollution from the catchment. Transparency was not too good given the drinking use value of the water source. Remarkably this drinking water source had relatively high density of algae (an average of 1300 organisms per litre) due to which the transparency was reduced. Dissolved oxygen is relatively higher than the desirable limits in the sampling points 1, 2, 3, which are located at the inlets of Kumudavati and Arkavati. DO at the sampling point 5; the centre of the reservoir is below the desirable limits. This may be due to the less turbulence in the centre, which has resulted in the less contact between the atmosphere and the water surface resulting in low DO content owing to the less solubility of oxygen in water. Relatively higher concentration of oxygen at other sampling points is due to enough turbulence created in the region. The other physico – chemical parameter values are well within the tolerance limits indicating that there is no major threat to the water quality of this waterbody.
Madiwala Lake
pH of Madiwala was found to be slightly high, ranging 7.26 - 7.79 (table 5.3). This may be attributed to the domestic sewage entering the waterbody from the sewage treatment plant located on the southwest end of the lake. The temperature measured during the time of sampling varied from 21 – 23°C. Electrical conductivity of 590 – 620 µS/cm (5.90 – 6.20 milli Siemens / cm) indicates high dissolved solids. Low transparency indicates low light penetration. The Madiwala Lake water was greenish owing to the high plankton density, which manifested in its low transparency of 51.92 cm. The calcium and magnesium hardness of water are high indicating hard water. Dissolved oxygen is lower than the desirable limits, i.e. below 5 mg/L. The dissolved oxygen level in the sampling point 1 is relatively higher (4.39mg/L) compared to the other sampling points because of the turbulence created by the flow at the inlet.
Table 5.3: Madiwala lake– physico chemical analysis
Madiwala lake -Physico-chemical analysis |
Sampling sites |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
pH |
7.72 |
7.26 |
7.78 |
7.79 |
7.57 |
7.68 |
W. Temperature °C |
22.17 |
22.93 |
22.47 |
23.27 |
21.87 |
21.90 |
Conductance µS/cm |
601.33 |
608.00 |
589.67 |
591.00 |
620.33 |
594.33 |
TDS mg/L |
303.67 |
304.33 |
294.33 |
296.33 |
310.33 |
296.33 |
Transparency cm |
47.00 |
51.00 |
53.50 |
49.00 |
52.00 |
59.00 |
Hardness mg/L |
186.00 |
189.00 |
186.40 |
189.80 |
193.00 |
194.00 |
Ca Hardness mg/L |
70.22 |
48.10 |
56.03 |
56.91 |
73.83 |
58.44 |
Mg Hardness mg/L |
28.25 |
34.38 |
31.81 |
32.42 |
29.08 |
33.08 |
DO mg/L |
4.39 |
2.45 |
3.74 |
2.97 |
1.94 |
2.40 |
Alkalinity mg/L |
233.64 |
236.53 |
240.38 |
240.38 |
228.84 |
232.68 |
Nitrates mg/L |
0.074 |
0.085 |
0.083 |
0.081 |
0.084 |
0.081 |
Phosphates mg/L |
0.458 |
0.670 |
0.589 |
0.547 |
0.598 |
0.632 |
Sodium mg/L |
152.46 |
154.07 |
153.06 |
153.26 |
150.84 |
147.22 |
Potassium mg/L |
40.40 |
41.62 |
40.81 |
40.40 |
39.80 |
39.19 |
The sampling point 5 at the outlet has the lowest DO (1.94 mg/L), which, at the time of sampling was replete with weeds and water hyacinth. The other point 6, which is also another outlet, has a reduced DO owing to the washing activities at the dhobi ghat located on the banks. Overall, the DO content of the lake is low owing to the organic pollution due to sewage inflow, and high phytoplankton density. Alkalinity of Madiwala lake water was also found to be high, probably due to the increased inflow from the dhobi ghat (located on the southeastern side of the lake), anthropogenic activities and dissolved alkaline substances. A comparison of the physico chemical anlaysis of both the waterbodies is listed in the table 5.4.
Table 5.4: Chamarajasagar reservoir and Madiwala Lake – physico chemical analysis
Physico-chemical
parameters |
Chamarajasagar reservoir Mean ± S.D |
Madiwala Lake Mean ± S.D |
Tolerance limits* |
pH |
7.47 ± 0.22 |
7.63 ± 0.20 |
5.5 – 8.5 |
W. Temp °C |
23.07 ± 0.62 |
22.43 ± 0.57 |
40°C |
Conductance µS/cm |
292.73 ±8.76 |
600.78 ±11.79 |
- |
TDS mg/L |
146.20 ± 4.41 |
300.89 ± 6.22 |
200 - 500 |
Transparency cm |
149.00 ± 17.93 |
51.92 ± 4.15 |
|
Total hardness mg/L |
81.92 ± 2.37 |
189.70 ± 3.30 |
300 |
Ca Hardness mg/L |
19.83 ± 0.99 |
60.59 ± 9.62 |
75 |
Mg Hardness mg/L |
15.15 ± 0.69 |
31.50 ± 2.37 |
30 |
DO mg/L |
5.37 ± 1.71 |
2.98 ± 0.92 |
>5 |
Alkalinity mg/L |
105.96 ± 10.76 |
235.41 ± 4.57 |
< 200 |
Nitrates mg/L |
0.02 ± 0.005 |
0.08 ± 0.004 |
10 |
Phosphates mg/L |
0.01 ± 0.004 |
0.58 ± 0.074 |
5 |
Sodium mg/L |
57.78 ± 1.85 |
151.82 ± 2.50 |
200 |
Potassium mg/L |
13.36 ± 0.35 |
40.37 ± 0.83 |
- |
*Tolerance limit is as prescribed by the Indian Standards Institution (IS 10500-1989).
Phytoplankton analysis
The study revealed that the two tropical waterbodies under study, Chamarajasagar reservoir and Madiwala Lake sustain dense populations of phytoplankton. However, the density of phytoplankton is less in Chamarajasagar reservoir. In soft waters the population density is observed to be less and generally does not exceed a few thousands of organisms per litre, as is the case with Chamarajasagar reservoir. The formula for calculating the number of organisms per litre of the sample using the drop count method is as below:
Total plankton count per litre = A *(1/L)*(n/v)
A = number of organisms per drop
L = volume of original sample (l)
n = total volume of concentrated sample (ml)
v = volume of one drop (ml)
In the present study,
n = 30 ml
L = 100 litre
25 drops = 1 ml
v = 1/25 ml = 0.04 ml
Chamarajasagar reservoir
The sampling points 3 and 4 at the inlet of Arkavati show a higher density of phytoplankton, an average of 1328 and 2344 organisms per litre respectively, (table 5.5) which may be due to the anthropogenic activities on the banks, which adjoins a village. It was observed during the study, that the local villagers accessed the reservoir to wash cattle and clothes. On the other hand, at sampling points 1 and 2
Table 5.5: Chamarajasagar reservoir – phytoplankton counts at five sampling sites
Chamarajasagar reservoir |
Phytoplankton composition |
Sampling stations |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Class |
Species name |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
Cyanophyceae |
Microcystis aeruginosa |
26 |
29 |
70 |
81 |
150 |
170 |
314 |
300 |
216 |
215 |
Chlorophyceae |
Pediastrum duplex |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Order Ulotrichales |
3 |
2 |
- |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
1 |
|
unknown |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
- |
- |
10 |
6 |
Dinophyceae |
Ceratium hirundinella |
5 |
6 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
- |
- |
Bacillariophyceae |
Synedra species |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Rhopalodia gibba |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Unknown |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
Total plankton count / drop |
39 |
42 |
88 |
94 |
169 |
185 |
320 |
305 |
228 |
224 |
Total plankton count / liter |
293 |
315 |
660 |
705 |
1268 |
1388 |
2400 |
2288 |
1710 |
1680 |
Total average plankton count per station per liter |
304 |
683 |
1328 |
2344 |
1695 |
per litre respectively. The waters here are not influenced by any activities as in the cases of sampling points 3 and 4.
The algal population of the Chamarajasagar reservoir consists of five classes (fig 5.2, and table 5.6) including an unknown group that could not be identified due to the limitations of the study. Cyanophyceae (92.15 percent) dominated other algal forms
Table 5.6: Chamarajasagar reservoir – summary of phytoplankton counts and composition
Chamarajasagar reservoir |
Total phytoplankton counts |
|
|
Sampling stations |
Sl no |
Class |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Cyanophyceae |
28 |
76 |
160 |
307 |
216 |
2 |
Chlorophyceae |
8 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
Dinophyceae |
6 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
- |
4 |
Bacillariophyceae |
- |
2 |
1 |
- |
1 |
5 |
Unknown |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
Total plankton count per drop |
42 |
93 |
178 |
313 |
228 |
Total plankton count per liter |
304 |
683 |
1328 |
2344 |
1695 |
comprising of one single species of Microsystis aeruginosa. the next major class of algae is Chlorophyceae (3.75 percent) members followed by Dinophyceae (3.51 percent),
Figure 5.2: Graph indicating phytoplankton composition of Chamarajasagar reservoir
Bacillariophyceae (0.47 percent) and an unknown class (0.12 percent). The Chlorophyceae class includes Pediastrum duplex members of the order Chlorococcales. Dinophyceae consists of a single species Ceratium hirundinella. As compared to the other classes of algae, Bacillariophyceae sp. Synedra sp.. and Rhopalodia gibba were recorded as the least in number.
Madiwala Lake
The sampling point 1 which is located at the inlet shows a high density of phytoplankton (table 5.7). This inlet is the point where sewage is let into the lake after
Table 5.7: Madiwala Lake – phytoplankton counts at six sampling site
Madiwala Lake |
Phytoplankton compositioin |
Sampling stations |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Class |
Species |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
i |
ii |
Cyanophyceae |
Microcystis aeruginosa |
195 |
215 |
58 |
51 |
30 |
41 |
83 |
77 |
68 |
66 |
58 |
55 |
|
Spirulina sp. |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Chlorophyceae |
Chlorella spp. |
121 |
111 |
58 |
43 |
27 |
22 |
80 |
73 |
12 |
10 |
25 |
17 |
|
Pediastrum duplex |
12 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
17 |
5 |
5 |
14 |
19 |
|
Pediastrum simplex |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Pediastrum tetras |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
3 |
- |
1 |
|
Scenedesmus spp. 1 |
14 |
16 |
6 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
26 |
29 |
3 |
3 |
22 |
29 |
|
Scenedesmus spp. 2 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
3 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
Scenedesmus spp. 3 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
1 |
|
Actinastrum spp. |
1 |
- |
|
- |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
Unknown spp. |
5 |
1 |
5 |
- |
18 |
12 |
70 |
79 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
2 |
|
Tetraedron spp. |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
|
Crucigenia spp. 1 |
- |
- |
3 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
Crucigenia spp. 2 |
270 |
231 |
98 |
113 |
86 |
78 |
194 |
200 |
85 |
73 |
120 |
111 |
|
Desmids spp. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
|
1 |
- |
Bacillariophyceae |
Navicula spp. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
- |
- |
Euglenophyceae |
Phacus spp. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Unknown |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Total plankton count per drop |
622 |
593 |
237 |
218 |
177 |
176 |
474 |
486 |
179 |
168 |
258 |
241 |
Total plankton count per liter
= A *(1/L)*(n/v) |
4665 |
4448 |
1778 |
1635 |
1328 |
1320 |
3555 |
3645 |
1343 |
1260 |
1935 |
1808 |
Total average plankton count per station per liter |
4556 |
1706 |
1324 |
3600 |
1301 |
1871 |
primary treatment High numbers of Chlorophyceae species , (73.44 peercent) which, dominate the lake waters is an indication of organic pollution. The phytoplankton composition of Madiwala Lake consists of five classes (fig 5.3 and table 5.8) including
Table 5.8: Madiwala Lake – summary of phytoplankton counts and composition
Madiwala Lake |
Total phytoplankton counts |
|
|
Sampling stations |
Sl no |
Class |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
Cyanophyceae |
205 |
55 |
36 |
80 |
67 |
57 |
2 |
Chlorophyceae |
400 |
167 |
139 |
397 |
106 |
191 |
3 |
Bacillariophyceae |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
- |
4 |
Euglenophyceae |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
5 |
Unknown |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
Total plankton per drop |
|
605 |
221 |
174 |
480 |
173 |
247 |
Total plankton per liter |
|
4556 |
1706 |
1324 |
3600 |
1301 |
1871 |
species of an unknown class. Chlorophyceae species were dominated by Chlorella spp., followed by Pediastrum duplex, Pediastrum simplex, Pediastrum tetras, Scenedesmus spp., Actinastrum spp., Tetraedron spp., and Crucigenia spp. all mentioned in the order of dominance. The next major class of phytoplankton in Madiwala Lake was Cyanophyceae (26.20 percent), which was dominated by Microcystis aeruginosa. followed by Spirulina sp..This dominance again is noticeable at the sampling point 1 (Table 5.8), which is at the inlet, where sewage is let in from the Sewage treatment plant. Bacillariophyceae and Euglenophyceae consisted of a single species Navicula sp. and Phacus sp. respectively.
Figure 5.3: Graph indicating phytoplankton composition of Madiwala Lake
As compared to the other classes Euglenophyceae and Bacillariophyceae species were the lowest in numbers.
The species of phytoplankton common to both the waterbodies under study have been presented in the table 5.9. Similarly, species unique to Chamarajasagar reservoir and species unique to Madiwala Lake have been tabulated in tables 5.10 and 5.11 respectively.
Table 5.9: Species of phytoplankton common to Madiwala Lake and Chamarajasagar reservoir
Class |
Order |
Species name |
Cyanophyceae |
|
Microcystis aeruginosa |
Chlorophyceae |
Chlorococcales |
Chlorella sp. |
|
|
Pediastrum duplex |
|
|
Unknown |
|
Ulotrichales |
|
Table 5.11: Species unique to Madiwala Lake
Class |
Order |
Family/genus/species |
Chlorophyceae |
Chlorococcales |
Chlorella spp. |
|
|
Pediastrum simplex |
|
|
Pediastrum tetras |
|
|
Scenedesmus sp.. 1 |
|
|
Scenedesmus sp.. 2 |
|
|
Scenedesmus sp.. 3 |
|
|
Actinastrum sp.. |
|
Desmidiales |
|
Bacillariophyceae |
|
Navicula sp.. |
Euglenophyceae |
|
|
Unknown 1 |
|
|
Table 5.10: Species unique to Chamarajasagar reservoir
Class |
Family/genus/species |
Dinophyceae |
Ceratium hirundinella |
Bacillariophyceae |
Synedra sp.. |
|
Rhopalodia gibba |
Unknown 2 |
|
Zooplankton
Zooplankton by their heterotrophic activity play a key role in the cycling of organic materials in aquatic ecosystems. Zooplankton, like phytoplankton have long been used as indicators of water quality. Rotifers form an important cosmopolitan component of the zooplankton and they are one of the principal links in the food chain. Copepods and cladocerons are the principal planktonic groups of microcrustaceans present in waterbodies.
Due to the limitations of time and resources, a detailed analysis of zooplankton and the other organisms in the aquatic food chain was not possible. However, the list of other organisms observed during the study is presented in the tables below. The limited study reveals that the zooplankton community in surface waters of both the waterbodies is comprised of Rotifera, microcrustaceans – Cladocera and Copepoda.
Fish
The fisheries department at both the study lakes is in charge of the fishing operations. The fishes have been introduced by them for commercial fishing and therefore there are only a few types of fishes in the lake and are mentioned in the table 5.12.
Fish forms the upper trophic levels of an aquatic food chain. They feed on detritus, zooplankton, phytoplanakton, macroinvertebrates and other aquatic organisms and thus can
Table 5.12: Fish observed at the study areas
Fish observed at the study areas |
Sl no |
Madiwala Lake |
Chamarajasagar reservoir |
1 |
Tilapia |
Tilapia |
2 |
Rahu |
Catla |
3 |
Catfish |
Catfish |
4 |
Kacchu menu (local name) |
Common carp |
5 |
Common carp |
|
6 |
Mrigal |
|
be of use in indicating the cumulative effect of pollution on its habitat – water. For example, increase in temperatures can alter the population structure of fishes – increasing less desirable species and reducing the desirable species. Similarly, pH and DO of the environment is very important for the survival of fish.
Birds
Wetlands support a large diversity of avifauna. Wetland birds form an important link in the aquatic food chain depending on the wetland and other wetland associated organisms for foraging, breeding, resting, nesting, etc. Aquatic vegetation is a valuable source of food, especially for waterfowl. Birds have also been used as indicators of the health of a waterbody.
During the period of the investigation at the study area a few birds that were observed have been listed in table 5.13.
Table 5.13: Birds observed at the study areas
Birds observed at the study areas |
Sl no |
Madiwala Lake |
Chamarajasagar reservoir |
1 |
Little cormorant |
Little cormorant |
2 |
Great cormorant |
Great cormorant |
3 |
Grey heron |
Grey heron |
4 |
Medium egret |
Medium egret |
5 |
Cattle egret |
Cattle egret |
6 |
Pelican |
Indian peafowl |
7 |
Common myna |
Red wattled lapwing |
8 |
Jungle myna |
Lesser pied kingfisher |
9 |
House crow |
Common sand piper |
10 |
Pariah kite |
Brahminy kite |
11 |
Brahminy kite |
Spotted dove |
12 |
Pied kingfisher |
Rose ringed parakeet |
13 |
|
Asian koel |
14 |
|
House swift |
15 |
|
White breasted kingfisher |
16 |
|
Singing bush lark |
17 |
|
Little ringed plover |
18 |
|
Common swallow |
19 |
|
Black drongo |
20 |
|
Common myna |
21 |
|
Jungle myna |
22 |
|
House crow |
23 |
|
Red whiskered bulbul |
24 |
|
Indian robin |
25 |
|
Large pied wagtail |
26 |
|
Purple rumped sunbird |
27 |
|
Black kite |
|