http://www.iisc.ernet.in/
Land Surface Temperature responses to land use land cover dynamics
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
1Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES],
3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
2Lab of Spatial Informatics, IIIT-H, Hyderabad, India,
*Corresponding author:
cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in

Results and Discussion

Temporal land cover analysis was done through NDVI reveals the transition of vegetation from 96.13 % (1989) to 89.07 % (2009). The non-vegetated areas have increased by 10.93% (2009) from 3.87% (1989). The temporal variation of land cover is shown in table 2 and figure 3.

Table 2: land cover analysis

Year % vegetation % non-vegetation
1989 96.13 3.87
1999 94.33 5.67
2009 89.07 10.93


Figure 3: Temporal land cover analysis

Temporal land use analysis depicts land scape status and its transition from 1989 to 2009. The results show the primeval evergreen forest cover is reduced from 57.65% (1989) to 39.78% (2009) due to anthropogenic activities. Built-up area has increased from 1.13% (1989) to 2.00% (2009). The intensified agriculture activities have contributed to the decline of forests. Table 3 and figure 4 portray the transition of landscape during 1989 to 2009.

Table 3: temporal land use analysis

Year 1989 1999 2009
Land use Category Ha % Ha % Ha %
Built-up 11,569 1.13 15,991 1.56 20,616 2.0
Water 19,454 1.89 26,391 2.57 28190 2.73
Crop land 175,236 17.06 170,886 16.63 185,642 18.02
Open fields 40,336 3.93 19,116 1.86 19,042 1.8
Moist deciduous forest 85,087 8.28 208,677 20.31 207924 20.18
Evergreen to semi evergreen forest 592,238 57.65 447,475 43.56 409926 39.78
Scrub/grass lands 33,843 3.29 51,439 5.01 49003 4.75
Acacia plantations 46,963 4.57 55,292 5.38 67969 6.60
Teak/ Bamboo plantations 10,702 1.04 18,463 1.80 25242 2.45
Coconut_ Areca nut plantations 3001 0.29 10,839 1.06 14305 1.39
Dry deciduous forest 8831 0.86 2703 0.26 3121 0.30


Figure 4: supervised classification-land use analysis

The increase in plantation of exotic species led to the removal of primeval forest cover. Intensified cultivation and cash crop activities also aggregated the change. The accuracy assessment was included in table 4. The field data, vegetation map and Google earth data sets are used for analysing accuracy. It shows accuracy ranges as 84.53 % (1989), 92.22 % (1999) and 89.83 % (2009).

Table 4: Accuracy assessment

M
A
P
2

MAP 1 1989
Category Built-up Water Crop land Open land Moist deciduous Ever green to semi Scrub Acacia Teak Coco nut Dry deciduous Row sum % Commission % Omission PA UA
Built-up 110518 38 4234 617 172 89 733 372 139 786 154 117852 6.22 23.11 93.78 76.89
Water 652 183385 3747 1607 12 291 698 20631 1250 1603 93 213969 14.29 0.58 85.71 99.42
Crop land 23989 54 1267257 52420 97996 4407 128358 16069 25368 62569 18329 1696816 25.32 6.01 74.68 93.99
Open land 3318 294 23260 304600 2486 1588 2353 44103 2680 1969 405 387056 21.30 21.14 78.70 78.86
Moist deciduous 689 7 9410 3009 1008588 57697 19969 28545 52357 31852 46107 1258230 19.84 36.44 80.16 63.56
Ever green to semi 1884 617 25031 17998 455344 5824268 17713 117922 42901 122920 6849 6633447 12.20 1.43 87.80 98.57
Scrub 1219 23 10465 3588 7741 7271 289700 4714 4530 15208 947 345406 16.13 40.85 83.87 59.15
Acacia 975 24 1724 1499 6824 6356 8338 381337 14926 4422 6313 432738 11.88 38.36 88.12 61.64
Teak 169 2 151 310 3033 3163 2703 3196 91861 357 2109 107054 14.19 61.25 85.81 38.75
Coco nut 3 0 1705 67 4520 3479 30 652 203 113931 11 124601 8.56 67.98 91.44 32.02
Dry deciduous 324 4 1287 558 232 41 19155 1119 823 181 70171 93895 25.27 53.68 74.73 46.32
Column Sum 143740 184448 1348271 386273 1586948 5908650 489750 618660 237038 355798 151488 11411064
Overall accuracy 84.53 Kappa 0.78

M
A
P
2

MAP 1 1999
Category Built-up Water Crop land Open land Moist deciduous Ever green to semi Scrub Acacia Teak Coco nut Dry deciduous Row sum % Commission % Omission PA UA
Built-up 173333 0 0 2 0 0 14 180 974 10 73 174586 1.72 22.40 98.28 77.60
Water 118 289130 0 2 0 0 0 449 283 258 3 290243 0.38 4.47 99.62 95.53
Crop land 37396 0 1733799 1725 0 0 0 12436 14725 5676 3522 1809279 4.17 12.91 95.83 87.09
Open land 4167 0 0 193784 0 0 0 9124 3609 47 862 211593 8.42 6.16 91.58 93.84
Moist deciduous 3540 0 0 1379 2034807 42455 0 119981 70035 18330 2046 2292573 11.24 3.00 88.76 97.00
Ever green to semi 1760 11243 176465 8075 46198 4667018 0 5471 7768 9179 776 4933953 5.41 2.16 94.59 97.84
Scrub 666 0 0 403 0 10230 514664 20064 8208 3199 257 557691 7.72 1.84 92.28 98.16
Acacia 784 0 0 229 0 0 0 591806 13134 1083 349 607385 2.56 25.67 97.44 74.33
Teak 806 0 0 40 0 0 0 30096 180830 259 2200 214231 15.59 40.82 84.41 59.18
Coco nut 655 2297 80580 870 16645 50383 9649 3422 3662 106897 233 275293 61.17 26.25 38.83 73.75
Dry deciduous 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 3199 2354 2 24165 29875 19.11 29.93 80.89 70.07
Column Sum 223380 302670 1990844 206509 2097650 4770086 524327 796228 305582 144940 34486 11396702  
Overall accuracy 92.22 Kappa 0.90

M
A
P
2

MAP 1 2009
Category Built-up Water Crop land Open land Moist deciduous Ever green to semi Scrub Acacia Teak Coco nut Dry deciduous Row sum % Commission % Omission PA UA
Built-up 347785 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 347785 0.00 0.80 100.00 99.20
Water 0 311622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311622 0.00 0.22 100.00 99.78
Crop land 0 38 1574483 136 22127 0 0 12718 3273 0 0 1612775 2.37 1.85 97.63 98.15
Open land 0 0 0 414479 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 414479 0.00 0.93 100.00 99.07
Moist deciduous 0 80 5405 513 1740979 0 0 149651 43013 3 0 1939644 10.24 5.83 89.76 94.17
Ever green to semi 0 113 2008 1296 55625 3614057 8302 15406 0 20216 0 3717023 2.77 1.50 97.23 98.50
Scrub 0 48 742 58 9181 0 451649 4292 1502 2 0 467474 3.39 1.80 96.61 98.20
Acacia 2818 412 21495 1892 20903 54889 0 1194683 706659 0 0 2003751 40.38 13.22 59.62 86.78
Teak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00
Coco nut 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 523448 0 523448 0.00 3.72 100.00 96.28
Dry deciduous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109679 109679 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00
Column Sum 350603 312313 1604133 418374 1848815 3668946 459951 1376750 754447 543669 109679 11447680  
Overall accuracy 89.83 Kappa 0.88

LST computed at landscape level for both Landsat TM and ETM thermal bands as explained earlier. The minimum and maximum temperature from Landsat TM data and ETM+ data are given in table 5. The corresponding temperatures for all data were converted to degree Celsius. Figure 5 shows the LST map of Uttara Kannada from 1989, 1999 and 2009.  Variability can be attributed to diverse landscape and higher values in recent year to the decline of forests and other human induced activities.  The higher temperature can be seen especially in plains due to higher proportion of barren land and in coastal region due to intensified built-up activities. The rise in temperature can be attributed to the regions of higher deforestation and industries. The hilly regions are still maintaining moderate surface temperatures due to the presence of good vegetation cover. The region’s temperature has increased from 32.7oC to 41oC; which is comparable with ground data. The same phenomenon is observed with the mean average temperature of per decade data of NASA NEO (http://neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Search.html).

Table 5: LST details

Year Min (oC) Max (oC)
1989 14 32.7
1999 16 37.56
2009 17 41


Figure 5: LST from 1989 to 2009

The study is done based on agro-climatic zones - 3 zones; coast, Sahyadri and plains with different levels of land cover. Figure 6 & table 6 for the coastal region shows an increase in temperature from 31oc to 41oc due to rise in built-up areas and industrialization. The Asia’s largest novel base, Kaiga nuclear project and a major industrial estate are situated in this region. The activities associated with these are the major drivers of regional temperature. It is evident from this study; the built-up and area under agriculture is increased at the loss of evergreen forest.


Figure 6: LST with respect to Coastal region

Table 6: Coastal zone variations of LST

Year Min (oC) Max (oC)
1989 16.49 31.34
1999 22.01 38.81
2009 22.95 42.45

Figure 7 & table 7 illustrates the role of vegetation in moderating the local temperature. Sahyadri region of the district maintain moderate rise in temperature, while plain regionswith the enhanced deforestation activities show escalation in temperature. The rise in temperature can be observed due to the increase in crop lands and plantation of exotic species. Table 7 shows increase of temperature from 29oC to 37oC.


Figure 7: LST with respect to Sahyadri region

Table 7:  Sahyadri region LST variations

Year Min (oC) Max (oC)
1989 16 29
1999 24 36
2009 26 37.2

Plains in eastern and north-western parts Uttara Kannada district comprises of extensively planted teak regions and scrub type at the border of Dharwad district. It is observed that the plains are more prone to anthropogenic activities due to the proximity to urban centers. The loss of evergreen forest cover shows deforestation pattern influence on LST (figure 8), evident from steady rise in temperature from 36 to 42oC (table 8).


Figure 8: LST with respect to plains

Table 8:  LST of plains

Year Min (oC) Max (oC)
1989 16 36
1999 25 41.2
2009 16 42

The time series analysis of air temperature is produced based on monthly average of five year time period interval from 1981-2012. The temperaturesare compiled from weather data of NOAA meteorological stations measurements in and around the study region. This four-decade period functions as a baseline for the analysis. It can be inferred from the generalised curve (figure 9) that the development of the temperature averages runs in irregular rhythm of upand downswings. A trend-like increase in air temperature overlies thecyclic fluctuations of 5 year annual temperature averages sincethe post 2000s. The most significant rise in air temperaturescommenced in 1995-2000, post 2001 the substantial raise in air temperature is observed. The monthly average temperature from 1981-2012 also clarifies this micro level change. The situation of cyclic and trend-like developments has resulted in the fact that the warming has notoccurred steadily, but it is an abrupt rise due to land use changes. As outlook, theresults obtained for the trend analysis have to be putin a general framework by applying the method to long-term correlationsof temperature trendsin order to substantiate these findings.


Figure 9: Ambient air temperature as recorded by weather stations from 1981to2012

Table 9: Long term temperature trends

Month 1981-1985 1986 - 1990 1991 - 1995 1996 - 2000 2001 - 2005 2006 - 2010 2011 - 2012 Average
January 26.3 25.9 26.18 26.14 25.97 26.41 25.90 26.1
February 24.7 25.1 26.97 24.78 25.73 26.36 26.42 25.7
March 28.6 27.1 30.14 25.32 27.34 27.95 28.95 27.9
April 29.3 29.6 31.67 30.00 29.04 29.52 29.20 29.8
May 29.3 30.4 29.68 30.56 29.49 29.73 30.03 29.9
June 27.0 27.7 27.42 28.23 27.18 27.06 27.07 27.4
July 25.3 26.5 25.07 30.56 29.49 29.73 30.03 28.1
August 25.6 26.1 25.42 28.52 26.03 26.27 26.24 26.3
September 27.0 27.1 26.88 28.60 26.08 26.52 26.71 27.0
October 26.6 27.4 27.29 28.90 26.73 27.42 28.06 27.5
November 27.3 28.2 29.70 24.95 27.51 27.63 27.74 27.6
December 27.3 26.8 27.34 25.38 26.55 27.17 27.50 26.9

Forests in the central Western Ghats are experiencing the transition due to many developmental projects including timber, mining, power generation, etc. This has resulted in the decline of primeval evergreen forest cover from 57.65% (1989) to 39.78% (2009), which has changed LST affecting local ecology.

BACK  «  TOP  »  NEXT
Citation : Bharath S, Rajan KS, Ramachandra TV (2013) Land Surface Temperature Responses to Land Use Land Cover Dynamics. Geoinfor Geostat: An Overview 1:4. doi:10.4172/2327-4581.1000112
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503 [extn - 107],      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail
Loading...