http://www.iisc.ernet.in/
Empirical patterns of the influence of Spatial Resolution of Remote Sensing Data on Landscape Metrics
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
Bharath H. Aithal 1,2                Bharath Settur 1                Durgappa Sanna D.2                 Ramachandra T V 1,2,3,*
1 Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Center for Ecological Sciences [CES], 2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra), 3 Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India
*Corresponding author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in

References

  1. M. Herold, H. Couclelis, and K.. C. Clarke. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(14), 2005, 369-399.
  2. W. Acevedo, T. W. Foresman, and J. T. Buchanan,. Origins and philosophy of building a temporal database to examine human transformation processes. Proceedings, ASPRS/ACSM annual convention and exhibition, Baltimore, MD, 1996, April 22–24.
  3. X. Li, S, H. He, R. Bu, Q. Wen, Yu. Chang, Y. Hu, Y. Li. The Adequacy of different landscape metrics for various landscape patterns. Pattern Recognition, 38, 2005, 2626-2638.
  4. B.J. Goodwin, Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? Landscape Ecology. 18 (7), 2003, 687–699.
  5. K.C. Seto, M. Fragkias. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 20, 2005, 871–888
  6. A. Botequilha, Leitao., Jack, Ahern.  Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 2002.65-93.
  7. M. Herold, N.C. Goldstein, K.C. Clarke. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing Environment, 86, 2003, 286–302. 
  8. R.S. De Groot. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape Urban Planning., 75 (3–4), 2006, 175–186.
  9. L. Benini, V. Bandini, D. Marazza, A. Contin. Assessment of land use changes through an indicator-based approach: a case study from the Lamone River basin in Northern Italy. Ecological Indicators, 10, 2010, 4–14.
  10.  A. Lausch, F.Herzog. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability, Ecological Indicators, 2(1), 2002, 3-15.
  11.  Heinz Center. Landscape Pattern Indicators for the Nation: A Report from the Heinz Center’s Landscape Pattern Task Group, Washington, DC, 2008. (The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment). http://www.heinzctr.org/Major_Reports.html.
  12.  B.C. Meyer,  R. Grabaum. MULBO. Model framework for multicriteria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial land use decisions. Landscape Res., 33(2), 2008, 155–179.
  13.  L.M. Valenzuela, F. Aguilera, J.A. Soria, E. Molero. Designing and assessing of development scenarios for metropolitan patterns, M. Paegelow, M.T. Camacho (Editors), Modelling Environmental Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlín, 2008, 337–362.
  14.  I. Sante, A. M. Garcia, D. Miranda, R.Crescente. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc. Urban Plann., 96, 2010, 108–122.
  15.  P. Isabel, C. Mario, Pereira, S. Luis,. Remote sensing based indicators of changes in a mountain rural landscape of Northeast Portugal. Applied Geography, 31(3), 2011, 871-880.
  16. M.G. Turner, R.H. Gardner, R.V. O'Neill. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process, Springer, New York, 2001.
  17.  T.V. De Voorde, W. Jacquet,  F. Canters. Mapping form and function in urban areas: An approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data, Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(3), 2011, 143-155.
  18. E. Uuemaa,  M. Antrop, J. Roosaare,  R. Marja, and Ü. Mander. Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3(1), 2009, lrlr-2009-1.
  19. H.S. He, B. DeZonia, D.J. Mladenoff. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes, Landscape Ecol. 15 (7),  2000, 591–601.
  20. J. Peng,  Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Wu,  W. Li, Y. Li. Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial, Ecological Indicators, 10(2). 2010, 217-223.
  21. H. Li, J. Wu. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landsc. Ecol., 19, 2004, 389–399.
  22. J.A. Wiens. Spatial scaling in ecology, Functional Ecology, 3(4), 1989, 385–397.
  23. D.J.B. Baldwin, K. Weaver, F. Schnekenburger, A.H. Perera.. Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landcapes: Implications for their use in natural disturbances emulation, Landscape Ecology, 19(3), 2004, 255–271.
  24. R.C. Corry. Characterizing fine-scale patterns of alternative agricultural landscapes with landscape pattern indices, Landscape Ecology, 20(5), 2005, 591–608.
  25. O. Bastian, R. Kronert, Z. Lipsky. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol., 21 (3), 2006, 359–374.
  26. G. Castilla, K. Larkin, J. Linke, G. Hay. The impact of thematic resolution on the patch-mosaic model of natural landscapes, Landscape Ecology, 24(1), 2009, 15–23.
  27. J.F. Mas, Y. Gao, J.A.N. Pacheco. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to classification approaches, Forest Ecology and Management, 259(7), 2010, 1215–1224.
  28. S. Saura,  J. Martínez-Millán. Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method, Landscape Ecol. 15(7), 2000, 661–678.
  29. M.G. Turner, R.H. Gardner, and R.V. O’Neill. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process, New York; Berlin (Springer), 2nd edn, 2003.
  30. T. V. Ramachandra, U. Kumar,  Wetlands of Greater Bangalore,  India: Automatic Delineation  through  Pattern  Classifiers.  Electronic Green  Journal,  Issue 26, Spring 2008 .
  31. T.V. Ramachandra, A.H. Bharath and  D.S. Durgappa. Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis, Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 2012,329-343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.005.
  32. K. McGarigal and B. J. Marks. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351, 1995.
Citation : Bharath H. Aithal, Bharath Settur, Durgappa Sanna D., and Ramachandra. T.V., 2012. Empirical patterns of the influence of Spatial Resolution of Remote Sensing Data on Landscape Metrics., International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), Vol. 2, Issue 3, May-Jun 2012, pp.767-775.
* Corresponding Author :
  Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : 91-80-23600985 / 22932506 / 22933099,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail    |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |    CES    |    CST    |    CiSTUP    |    IISc    |    E-mail