References

1. AFNOR (2000) Norme Française NFT 90-354. Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD), 63p.
2. Antoine S E and Benson-Evans K (1982), “The effect of current velocity on the rate of growth of benthic algal communities”. International review of Hydrobiology., 67, pp. 575–583.
3. Archibald R E M (1983), “The diatoms of the Sundays and Great Fish Rivers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa”. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, 1. J Cramer. Vaduz, Germany.
4. Barbour M T, Stribling J B and Karr J R (1995), “Multimetric approach for establishing biocriteria and measuring biological condition”. In: Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Davis W S and Simon T P (Eds.). Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 63-77.
5. Bate G C, Adams J B and Van Der Molen J S (2002), “Diatomsas Indicators of water quality In South African river systems”. WRC Report No 814/1/02. Water Research Commission, Pretoria.
6. Battarbee R W (1986), Diatom Analysis.  In: Handbook of Holocene Paleoecology and Paleohydrology, Berglund B E (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester. Great Britain, pp. 527-570.
7. Biggs B J, Stevenson R J and Lowe R L (1998), “A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton”. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 143, pp. 21–56.
8. Butcher R W (1932), “Studies in the ecology of rivers. II. The microflora of rivers with special reference to the algae on the river bed”. Annals of Botany, 46, pp. 813–861.
9. Carpenter K D and Waite I R (2000), “Relations of habitat-specific algal assemblages to land use and water chemistry in the Willamette Basin, Oregon”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64, pp. 247–257.
10. Carrick H J, Lowe R L and Rotenberry J T (1988), “Functional associations of benthic algae along experimentally manipulated nutrient-gradients: Relationships with algal community diversity”. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, pp. 117–128.
11. Cattaneo A and Amireault M C (1992), “How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton?” Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 11, pp. 244–256.
12. Cattaneo A, Couillard Y, Wunsam S and Courcelle M (2004), “Diatom taxonomic and morphological changes as indicators of metal pollution and recovery in Lac Dufault (Québec, Canada)”. Journal of Paleolimnology, 32, pp. 163–175.
13. CEMAGREF. (1982), “Etude des méthodes biologiques d’appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux”. Rapport Q.E. Lyon-A.F. Bassin Rhône-Mediterrannée-Corse, pp. 218.
14. CEMAGREF. (1987) L’ Esturgeonne doit pas disparaÎtre. Division Amenénagements Littoraux et Aquaculture (ALA) du CEMAGREF en collaboration aven ÍAGEDRA, 21.
15. CEN., EN 14407 (2004) Water quality – Guidance standard for the identification and enumeration of benthic diatom samples from rivers, and their Interpretation. Comité Européen de Normalisation.European Standard.
16. CEN., EN 13946: (2003). Water quality – Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pre-treatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Geneva, 14.
17. Chessman B C, Growns I, Curreys J and Plunket-Cole N (1999), “Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers”. Freshwater Biology, 41, pp. 317-331.
18. Coring E (1993),“Zum Indikationswert benthischer Diatomeengesellschaften In basenarmen Fliesgewässern”. Reihe Biologie, Verlag Shaker, Aachen, pp. 165.
19. Coste M (1987), “Etude des méthods biologique quantitatives d’appréciation de la qualité des eaux”. Rapport Division Qualité des Eaux Lyon. Agence de l’Eau Rhône, 28.
20. Coste M and Ayphasshorho H (1991), “Etude de la quality des eaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie a l'aide des communautés de diatomées benthiques (Application des indices diatomiques)”. Rapport Cemagref Bordeaux -Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, 227.
21. Coste M, Bosca C and Dauta A (1991), Use of algae for monitoring rivers in France. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Whitton B A, Rott E and Friedrich G (Eds.). Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck. pp. 75-88.
22. Cox E J (1984), “Observations on some benthic diatoms from North German lakes: The effect of substratum and light regime”. Verhandlung Internationale VereIngung de Limnologi,e 22, pp. 924–928.
23. De la Rey P A, Taylor J C, Laas A, van Rensburg L and Vosloo A (2004), “Determining the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality: A comparison with SASS 5”. Water S A., 30, pp. 325–332.
24. Dell’Uomo A (1996), Assessment of water quality of an Appanine river as a pilot study for diatom-based monitoring of Italian water courses. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Whitton B A and Rott E (Eds.). Innsbruck, Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck. pp. 64–72.
25. Denys L (1991), “A check-list of the diatoms in the Holocene deposits of the Western Belgian coastal plain with a survey of their apparent ecological requirements. I. Introduction, ecological code and complete list”. Belgische Geologische Dienst, Professional Paper No 246, pp. 41.
26. Descy J P (1979), “A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms”. Nova Hedwigia, 64, pp. 305-323.
27. Descy J P and Coste M (1991), “A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms”. Verhandlung Internationale VereIngung de Limnologi,e, 24, pp. 2112-2116.
28. DIATOMS for ASSESSING RIVER ECOLOGICAL STATUS (DARES), Sampling protocol. Version 1. 2004, http://craticula.ncl.ac.uk/dares/methods.htm accessed on 11.00 hrs 05 February 2009.
29. Dixit S S, Smol, J P, Kingston J C and Charles D F (1992), “Diatoms: powerful indicators of environmental change”. Environmental Science and Technology, 26 (1), pp. 23-33.
30. Elber F, Hürlimann J and Niederberger K (1992), “Beurteilung der Gewässergüte und der Ökomorphologie In der Aare”. Aquaplus, Wollerau.
31. Eloranta P (1990), Periphytic diatoms in the acidification project lakes. In: Acidification in Finland, Springer, Kauppi P, Anttila P and Kenttämies K (Eds.). Berlin, pp. 985–994.
32. Eloranta P and Andersson K (1998), “Diatom indices in water quality monitoring of some South-Finnish rivers”. Verhandlung Internationale VereIngung de Limnologi,e 26, pp. 1213-1215.
33. Eloranta P and Kwandrans J (1996), Testing the use of diatoms and macroalgae for river monitoring in Finland. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II. Universität Innsbruck   Whitton B A and Rott E (Eds.). Innsbruck, pp. 119–124.
34. Eloranta P and Soininen J (2002), “Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatom communities”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14, pp. 1–7.
35. Flemming W D (1954), “Naphrax: a synthetic mounting medium of high refractive index. New and improved methods of preparation”. Journal of the Royal Micrcoscopical Society, 74, pp. 42–44.
36. Fore L and Grafe C (2002), “Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (U.S.A.)”. Freshwater Biology, 47, pp. 2015–2037.
37. Gandhi H P (1998), Freshwater Diatoms of central Gujarat – With a Review and Some others. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun.
38. Gasse F (1986), “East African diatoms. Taxonomy, ecological distribution”. J Cramer, Berlin, Germany.
39. Gold C,  Agnès Feurtet-Mazel , Coste M and Boudou A (2002), “Field transfer of periphytic diatom communities to assess short-term structural effects of metals (Cd,Zn) in rivers”. Water Research, 36, pp. 3654–3664.
40. Goldsmith B (1997), “A rationale for the use of artificial substrates to enhance diatom-based monitoring of eutrophication in lowland rivers”. Working Paper No.14, Environmental Change Research Centre, University College, London, pp. 8.
41. Gomez N (1999), “Epipelic diatom from the Matanza-Riachuelo river (Argentina), a highly polluted basin from the Pampean plain: biotic indices and multivariate analysis”. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 2, pp. 301–309.
42. Gómez N and Licursi M (2001), “The Pampean Diatom Index (IDP) for assessment of rivers and streams in Argentina”, Aquatic Ecology, 5, pp. 173–181.
43. Guasch H and Sabater S (1995), “Seasonal variations in photosynthesis-irradiance responses by biofilms in Mediterranean streams”. Journal of Phycology, 31, pp. 727–735.
44. Guasch H,Muñoz I, Rosés N and Sabater S (1997), “Changes in atrazine toxicity throughout succession of stream periphyton communities”. Journal of applied Phycology, 9, pp. 137–146.
45. Hakansson S (1993), “Numerical methods for the inference of pH variations in mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes in southern Sweden ― a progress report”. Diatom Research, 8 (2), pp. 349-370.
46. Hanna G D (1930), “The dates of publication of Tempère and Peragallo’s Diatomées du monde entire”, Edition 2. Journal of Palaeontology, 4, pp. 296–297.
47. Hanna G D (1949), “A synthetic resin which has unusual properties”. Journal of the Royal Micrcoscopical Society, 69, pp. 25–28.
48. Hartley B (1996), “An Atlas of British Diatoms”. Biopress Ltd., Bristol.
49. Hasle G R (1978), Some specific preparations: diatoms. In: Phytoplankton Manual. Sournia A (Ed.). UNESCO, Paris.
50. Hill B H R, Herlihy A T, Kaufmann P R, Stevenson R J, McCormick F H and Johnson C B (2000), “Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity”. Journal of North American Benthological Society, 19, pp. 50-67.
51. Hofmann G (1994),“Aufwuchs-Diatomeen In Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie”. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 30. J.Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart, pp. 241.
52. Hürlimann J and Schanz F (1993),“The effects of artificial ammonium enhancement on riverine periphytic diatom communities”. Aquatic Sciences, 55, pp. 40–64.
53. Hürlimann J, Elber F and Niederberger K (1999),Use of algae for monitoring rivers: an overview of the current situation and recent developments in Switzerland. In: Use of Algae for MonitorIng Rivers III, Prygiel J, Whitton B A and  Bukowska J (Eds.). Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, pp. 39-56.
54. Iserentant R and Blancke D (1986), A transplantation experiment in running water to measure the response rate of diatoms to changes in water quality. In: Proc. 8th Int. Diatom Symposium (Paris 1984) Ricard, M., (Ed.). Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, pp. 347–354.
55. Johansen J R and Sray J C (1998), “Microcostatus gen. nov., a new aerophilic diatom genus based on Navicula krasskei Hustedt”. Diatom Research, 13, pp. 93–101.
56. John J (2000), “A guide to diatoms as Indicators of urban stream health”. National River Health Program. Urban Sub Program, Report No.7, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Cooperation LWRRDC Occasional Paper, 14/99.
57. Karr J R (1993), Measuring biological integrity: lessons from streams. In: Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. Woodley S, Kay J and Francis G (Eds.). St. Lucie Press., pp. 83-104.
58. Karr J R, Allan J D and Benke A C (2000), River conservation in the United States and Canada. In: Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy, Practice. Boon P J, Davies B R and Petts G E (Eds.). J. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 3-39.
59. Karthick B, Mahesh M K and Ramachandra T V (2009), “Community Structure of Epilithic Diatom Community in River Bedthi, Karnataka and its implication in Water Quality Monitoring”. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Plant Biodiversity and Bioprospecting, University of Mysore. India, pp. 104.
60. Karthick B, Mahesh M K and Ramachandra T V, “Seasonal persistence and stability of diatom communities in tropical streams: Relationships between population persistence and abundance” (Under preparation).
61. Kawecka B (1985), “Ecological characteristics of sessile algal communities in the Olczyski stream (Tatra Mts, Poland) with special consideration of light and temperature”. Acta Hydrobiol., 27, pp. 299–310.
62. Kawecka B (1986), “The effect of light deficiency on communities of sessile algae in the Olczyski stream (Tatra Mts, Poland)”. Acta Hydrobiol., 28, pp. 379–386.
63. Kellogg B and Kellogg D E (2002), “Non-marIne and littoral diatoms from Antarctic and subantarctic regions: distribution and updated taxonomy”. In: Diatom Monographs Vol. 1. Witkowski A (Ed.). ARG Gantner Varlag Kommanditgesellschaft, Ruggell, Germany.
64. Kelly M G (1999), Progress towards quality assurance of benthic diatoms and phytoplankton analysis in the UK. In: Use of algae for monitorIng rivers III. Prygiel J, Whitton B A and Burkowska J (Eds.). Agence de l’Eau Artois- Picardie, Douai, France, pp. 208–216.
65. Kelly M G and Whitton B A (1998), “Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers”. Hydrobiologia, 384, pp. 55–67.
66. Kelly M G , Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch  H, Hürlimann  J, Jarlman A, Kawecka B, Kwandrans J, Laugaste R, Lindstrøm E A, Leitao M, Marvan P, Padisák J, Pipp E, Prygiel J, Rott E, Sabater S, van Dam H and Vizinet J (1998), “Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10, pp. 215–224.
67. Kelly M G and Whitton B A (1995), “The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7, pp. 433-444.
68. Kolbe R W (1948),“Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen von diatomeenmembranen”. Arkiv für Botanik, 33, pp. 1–21.
69. Kolkwitz R and  Marsson M (1908),“Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien”. Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaften, 26, pp. 505–519.
70. Krammer K (2002), “Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of European Waters and Comparable Habitats”. Vol. 3. ARG Gantner Varlag Kommanditgesellschaft, Ruggell, Germany.
71. Krammer K and Lange-Bertalot H (1986-1991), Bacillariophyceae. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2, Ettl, H., Gerloff J, Heynig H and Mollenhauer D (Eds.). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp. 1–4.
72. Krammer K and Lange-Bertalot H (2000), Bacillariophyceae. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Ettl, Gerloff H, Heynig J H and Mollenhauer D (Eds.). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin.
73. Kutka F J and Richards C (1996),“Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality”, Journal of  North American Benthological Society, 15, pp. 469–480.
74. Kwandrans J et al., (1998), “Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10, pp. 193–201.
75. Lane C M, Taffs K H and Corfield J L (2003), “A comparison of diatom community structure on natural and artificial substrata”. Hydrobiologia, 493, pp. 65–79.
76. Lane C R, Kelly C R, Susanna D and Mark T B (2009), “Benthic diatom composition in isolated forested wetlands subject to drying: Implications for monitoring and assessment”. Ecological Indicators, 9(6), pp. 1121-1128
77. Lange-Bertalot H (1978), “Diatomeen-Differentialarten anstelle von Leitformen: ein geeigneteres Kriterium der Gewässerbelastung. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement, 51, pp. 393–427
78. Lange-Bertalot H (1979), “Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation”. Nova Hedwigia, 64, pp. 285–304.
79. Lange-Bertalot H (2001), “Diatoms of Europe. Diatoms of European Waters and Comparable Habitats”. Vol. 2. ARG Gantner Varlag Kommanditgesellschaft, Ruggell, Germany.
80. Lay J A and Ward A K (1987), “Algal community dynamics in two streams associated with different geological regions in the southeastern United States”. Arch. Hydrobiol., 108, pp. 305–324.
81. Leclercq L and Maquet B (1987), “Deux noveaux metrics diatomique et the qualite chimique des eaux courantes. Comparison avec differents metrics existants”. Cahiers de Biologie MarIne, 28, pp. 303-310.
82. Lecointe C, Coste M and Prygiel J (1993), “OMNIDIA software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management”. Hydrobiologia, 269–270, pp. 509–513.
83. Lecointe C, Coste M and Prygiel J (2003), Omnidia 3.2. Diatom Index Software Including Diatom Database with Taxonomic Names, References and Codes of 11645 Diatom Taxa.
84. Leland H V and Porter S D (2000), “Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation with to geology and land use”. Freshwater Biology, 44, pp. 279–301.
85. Lenoir A and Coste M (1994), “Estimation de la Qualité des Eaux du Bassin Rhin-Meuse à l’aide des Communautés de Diatomées Benthiques”. Rapport Cemagref de Bordeaux, mars 1994. Agence de l’Eau Rhin-Meuse, Moulins-les-Metz, France, pp. 169.
86. Lenoir A and Coste M (1996), Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French National Water Board network. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers II Whitton B A and Rott E (Eds.). Institut für Botanik. Universität Innsbruck. pp. 29–43.
87. Lindstrøm E A and Traaen T S (1984),“ Influence of current velocity on periphyton distribution and succession in a Norwegian soft water river”. Verhandlung Internationale VereIngung de Limnologi,e 22, pp. 1965–1972.
88. Lohman K E (1982), “A procedure for the microscopical study of diatomaceous sediments”. Nova Hedwigia, 39, pp. 267–283.
89. Lowe R L and Pan Y (1996), Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Stevenson R J, Bothwell M L and Lowe R L (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 705–739.
90. Maier M (1994),“Die jahreszeitliche Veränderung der Kieselalgengemeinschaft in zwei geologisch unterschiedlichen Fliessgewässern der Alpen und ihre Verteilung auf verschiedenen Substraten”.  Diatom Research, 9, pp. 121–131.
91. Maier M and Rott E (1988), The effect of local waste-water inflows on the structure of diatom assemblages in fast-flowing streams. In: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Simola H (Ed.). Koeltz Scientific Publishers, Koenigstein, pp. 553-561.
92. McBride T P (1988), “Preparing random distributions of diatom valves on microscope slides”. Limnological Oceanography, 33, pp. 1627–1629.
93. McCormick P V and O’Dell M B (1996), “Quantifying periphyton responses to phosphorus in the Florida Everglades: A synoptic-experimental approach”. Journal of North American Benthological Society, 15 (4), pp. 450–468.
94. Meller A (1985),“ Einschlußmittel mit hohem Brechungsindex für Diatomeen”. Mikrokosmos, 74, pp. 55–60.
95. Palmer C M (1969), “A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution”. Journal of Phycology, 5, pp. 78-82.
96. Pan Y, Stevenson R J, Hill B H and Herlihy A T (2000), “Landscape Classifications: Aquatic Biota and Bioassessments”. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19(3), pp. 518-540.
97. Pan Y, Stevenson R J, Hill B H, Herlihy A T  and Collins G B (1996), “Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment”, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15 (4), pp. 481–495.
98. PanY, Stevenson R J, Hill B H, Kaufmann P R and Herlihy A T (1999), “Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in Mid- Atlantic streams, USA”. Journal of Phycology, 35, pp. 460– 468.
99. Patrick R, Hohn M H and Wallace J H (1954), “A new method for determining the pattern of the diatom flora”. Not. Nat. (Phila.), 259, pp. 1–12.
100. Peterson C G and Stevenson J R (1990), “Post-spate development of epilithic algal communities in different current environments”. Canadian Journal of Botany, 68, pp. 2092–2102.
101. Porter S D, Cuffney T F, Gurtz M E and Meador M R (1993), “Methods for collecting algal samples as part of the National Water- Quality Assessment Program”. Open-File Report 93–409, U.S. Geological survey, Raleigh, NC, pp. 39.
102. Potapova M and Charles D F (2007), “Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States”. Ecological Indicators, 7, pp. 48-70.
103. Prasad B N and Misra P K (1992), Fresh water Algal Flora of Andaman and Nicobar Islands Vol II. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun.
104. Prygiel J (1991), Use of benthic diatoms in surveillance of the Artois-Picardie basin hydrobiological quality. In: Use of algae for monitoring rivers, Whitton B A, Rott E and Friedrich G (Eds.). Düsseldorf, E. Rott, Innsbruck, pp. 89–96.
105. Prygiel J and Coste M (1993), “The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices”. Hydrobiologia, 269/270, pp. 343–349
106. Prygiel J and Coste M (1999), Progress in the use of diatoms for monitoring rivers in France. In: Use of Algae for monitoring rivers, III, Prygiel J, Whitton B A and Bukowska J (Eds.). Agence de l’Eau Artois Picardie, Publisher location, pp. 165–179.
107. Prygiel J and Coste M (2000), Guide méthodologique pour la mise en oeuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées NF T 90–354. Agences de l’Eau-Cemagref de Bordeaux, mai 2000, 134 pages + Clés de déetrmination (89 planches) + cédérom françaisanglais (tax’IBD).
108. Prygiel J, Carpentier P, Almeida S, Coste M, Druart J C, Ector L, Guillard D, Honoré M A, Iserentant R, Ledeganck P, Lalanne-Cassou C, Lesniak C, Mercier I, Moncaut P, Nazart M, Nouchet N, Peres F, Peeters V, Rimet F, Rumeau A, Sabater S, Straub F, Torrisi M, Tudesque L, Van der Vijver B, Vidal H, Vizinet J and Zydek N (2002), “Determination of the Diatom Index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercalibration exercise”. Journal of applied Phycology, 14, pp. 27–39.
109. Prygiel J, Lévêque L and Iserentant R (1996), “Un nouvel indice diatomique pratique pour l’évaluation de la qualité des eaux en réseau de surveillance”. Rev. Sci. Eau., 1, pp. 97-113.
110. Reavie E D and Smol J P (1997), “Diatom-based model to infer past littoral habitat characteristics in the St. Lawrence River”. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 23(3), pp. 339-348.
111. Reid M A, Tibby J C, Penny D and Gell P A (1995), “The use of diatoms to assess past and present water quality”. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, pp. 57–64.
112. Reimann B (1960),“Bildung, Bau und Zusammenhang Bacillariophyceenschalen”. Nova Hedwigia, 2, pp. 349.
113. Renberg I and Hellberg T (1982), “The pH history of lakes in south-western Sweden, as calculated from the subfossil diatom flora of the sediments”. Ambio, 11, pp. 30–33.
114. Rolland T, Fayolle S, Cazaubon A and Pagnetti S (1997), “Methodical approach to distribution of epilithic and drifting algae communities in a French subalpine river: inferences on water quality assessment”. Aquatic Sciences, 59, pp. 57–73.
115. Rott E (1991), Methodological aspects and perspectives in the use of periphyton for monitoring and protecting rivers. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers, Whitton B A, Rott E and Friedrich G (Eds.). Institut fur Botanik, Univ. Innsbruck, pp. 9–16.
116. Rott E (1999), (Ed.), Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil \2: Trophieindikation sowie geochemische Präferenz; taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen, Wien: pp. 247.
117. Round F E (1991a), “Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 3, pp. 129-145.
118. Round F E (1991b), Use of diatoms for monitoring rivers. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Whitton B A, Rott E and Friedrich G (Eds.). Institut fur Botanik, Universitat, Innsbruck, pp. 25-32.
119. Round F E (1993), “A review and methods for the use of epilithic diatoms for detecting and monitoring changes in river water quality. Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials”. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, pp. 65.
120. Round F E, Crawford R M and Mann D G (1990), The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
121. Rumeau A and Coste M (1988), “Initiation à la systématique des diatomées d''eau douce pour l''utilisation pratique d''un indice diatomique générique”. Bull. Fr. Piscic., 309, pp. 1–69.
122. Salden N (1978),“Beiträge zur Ökologie der Diatomeen (Bacillariophyceae) des Sü wassers”. Decheniana Beih., 22, pp. 238.
123. Sarode P T and Kamat N D (1984), Freshwater diatoms of Maharashtra. Saikirpa Prakashan, Aurangabad-03, pp. 338.
124. Schiefele S and Schreiner C (1991), Use of diatoms for monitoring nutrient enrichment acidification and impact salts in rivers in Germany and Austria. In: Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Whitton B A, Rott E and Friedrich G (Eds.). Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck. pp. 103–110.
125. Schoeman F R (1973), A systematical and ecological study of the diatom flora of Lesotho with special reference to water quality. V&R Printers, Pretoria, South Africa.
126. Schoeman F R and Archibald R E M (1976-1980), “The Diatom Flora of Southern Africa”. National Institute for Water Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
127. Schoeman F R and Haworth E Y (1984), Diatom as indicator of pollution. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Diatoms Symposium, Ricard M (Ed.). Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, pp. 757–766.
128. Sládeček V (1986), “Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution”. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 14, pp. 555-566.
129. Snoeijs P and Simenstad P (1995), “The use of algae In monitoring discharges of radionuclides – experiences from the 1992 and 1993 monitoring programmes at the Swedish nuclear power plants”. Swedish Radiation Protection Institute Report, 95–03, pp. 42.
130. Steinberg C and Schiefele S (1988), “Biological indication of trophy and pollution of running waters”. Zeitschrift für Wasser- und Abwasser-Forschung, 21, pp. 227-234.
131. Stevenson J R (1990), “Benthic algal community dynamics in a stream during and after a spate”. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 9, pp. 277–88.
132. Stevenson R (1997), “Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity”, Journal of North American Benthological Society, 16, pp. 248–262.
133. Stevenson R J (1996), An introduction to algal ecology in freshwater benthic habitats. In: Algal Ecology of Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Stevenson R J, Bothwell M L and Lowe R L (Eds.). Academic Press, Boston, pp. 3–30.
134. Stevenson R J and Bahls L (1999), Periphyton protocols EPA 841-B-99-002. In: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use In Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic MacroInvertebrates and Fish (second ed.), Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D and Stribling J B (Eds.). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water, Washington, D.C., pp. 326.
135. Stevenson R J and Pan Y (1999), Assessing ecological conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: The Diatoms: Applications to the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Stoermer, E. F. and Smol, J. P.  (Eds.).  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999, pp. 11-40.
136. Taylor J C (2003), “The importance of scanning electron microscopy in diatom ecological studies”. Proceeding Microscopy Society of South Africa, 33, pp. 55.
137. Taylor J C (2004), “The application of diatom-based pollution Indices in the Vaal catchment”. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom.
138. Taylor J C, Archibald C G M and Harding W R (2007), “A Methods Manual for the Collection, Preparation and Analysis of Diatom Samples”. WRC Report No TT 281/07. Water Research Commission, Pretoria. South Africa.
139. Taylor J C, Archibald C G M and Harding W R (2007a), “An illustrated guide to some common diatom species from South Africa”. WRC Report No TT 282/07. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa,
140. Taylor J C, de la Rey P A and van Rensburg L (2005), “Recommendations for the collection, preparation and enumeration of diatoms from riverine habitats for water quality monitoring in South Africa”. African Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 30, pp. 65–75.
141. Taylor J C, Prygiel J, Vosloo A, Pieter A, Rey D and Ransburg L V (2007b), “Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area”. Hydrobiologia, 592 (1), pp. 455–464.
142. Tilman D, Kilham S S and Kilham P (1982), “Phytoplankton community ecology: The role of limiting nutrients”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, pp. 349-372.
143. Van Dam H, Mertens A and Sinkeldam J (1994),“A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands”. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 28 (1), pp. 117-133.
144. Vizinet J (1995), “Impact d'une pollution chimiquement definie sur les populations de diatomees en rivière”. Mémoire de D.E.A., Univ. P. & M. Curie, 18 p. + ann.
145. Wan Maznah W O and Mansor M (2002), “Aquatic pollution assessment based on attached diatom communities in the Pinang River Basin, Malaysia”. Hydrobiologia, 487, pp. 229-241.
146. Watanabe T, Asai K and Houki A (1986), “Numerical estimation to organic pollution of flowing water by using epilithic diatom assemblage. Diatom assemblage Index (DAIpo)”, Science of the Total Environment, 55, pp. 209–218.
147. Welsh H (1964), “A method of cleaning diatoms and the preparation of permanent slides for ecological survey work”. Newsletter of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa, 1, pp. 39–47.
148. Wendker S (1992), “Influence of current velocity on diatoms of a small softwater stream”. Diatom Research, 7, pp. 387–396.
149. Whitton B A and Kelly M G (1995), “Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers”. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, pp. 45–56.
150. Winter J G and Duthie H C (2000), “Stream biomonitoring at an agricultural test site using benthic algae”, Canadian Journal of Botany, 78, pp. 1319–1325.
151. Wu J T (1999), “A generic index of diatom assemblages as bioindicator of pollution in the Keelung River of Taiwan”, Hydrobiologia, 397, pp. 79–87.
152. Wu J T and Kow L T (2002), “Applicability of a generic index for diatom assemblages to monitor pollution in the tropical River Tsanwun, Taiwan”. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14, pp. 63-69.
153. Zelinka M and Marwan P (1961), “Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer”. Arch. Hydrobiol., 57: pp. 159-174.