Sustainability of Livelihood Resources in Central West Coast, Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka, India

T. V. Ramachandra, M.D. Subash Chandran, N.V. Joshi r, Boominathan
Centre for Sustainable Technologies,Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning,
Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India

Introduction

The Molluscs are soft bodied invertebrates with or without an external protective shell. They inhabit usually water bodies, marine, estuarine, as well as fresh water; many are also terrestrial, often associated with moist shaded lands. If the body of the Molluscan taxa is enclosed by a pair of shells hinged in the middle it can be classified under the Class Bivalvia. Bivalves, which include clams and oysters contribute to the livelihoods of many people in India. The first Mollusc appeared at the end of the Pre-Cambrian period, approximately 550 million years ago (Sturm et al., 2006). It is the second largest phylum in the invertebrates comprising more than 100,000 species worldwide of which, 5070 species are present in India (Venkataraman and Wafar, 2005). Molluscs have been exploited worldwide for food, ornamentation, pearls, lime, and medicine (Nayar and Rao, 1985). Geologic evidence from South Africa indicates that systematic human exploitation of marine resources had started about 70,000 to 60,000 years ago (Volman, 1978).

Of the 5070 species of molluscs recorded from India, very few of them, especially of the bivalves, are exploited for food and other economic purposes. Three clam genera, Meretrix, Paphia and Villorita, and some oysters are used as food and sustain the livelihoods scores of people in the estuarine villages of the Karnataka (Rao and Rao, 1985; Rao et al., 1989; Boominathan et al., 2008). Even these few edible bivalves are threatened in recent times due to shell and sand mining, over-exploitation, and salinity changes brought about in the estuaries due to constant releases of fresh water from hydroelectric projects upstream in the rivers. Earlier study in Kali estuary (Boominathan et al., 2012) revealed that the edible estuarine bivalves lost about 15 km of their occupational territory, pushed more westwards towards the Arabian Sea, due to water releases from upstream dams. This necessitated similar studies in all the estuaries of Uttara Kannada, which are getting subjected to ever increasing human pressures. The present study covered the situation of the edible bivalves, their diversity and its distribution, in Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Sharavathi estuarine areas.

Figure 1.1: Estuaries of Uttara Kannada District viz. Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Sharavathi.

Uttara Kannada Estuaries

The Uttara Kannada District has four major estuaries viz. Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Sharavathi (Figure 1.1). The Kali estuary is located in the northern most part of the district, the Bedthi or Gangavali about 32 km south from Kali river-mouth, the Aghanashini or Tadri estuary, about 10 km south of Gangavali, and the Sharavathi estuary is about 24 km south of the Aghanashini estuarine mouth

Kali Estuary: The Kalinadi originates near the village Diggi in the Joida taluk of Uttara Kannada, and has many tributaries. It is also known as Karihole and as Dagi in its upper reaches. Its total length is 184 km and meets the sea, three km north of Karwar. It has four major dams with hydroelectric power stations viz. Supa, Nagjhari power house, Kodashalli, and Kadra (Figure 1.2).
Gangavali Estuary:The Bedthi or Gangavali river originates at two places; one is near Someswara temple, south of Dharwad and another is near Hubli, both join near Kalghatgi. The total length of the river is 161 km, and it has no dam or hydroelectric power station. It joins the Arabian Sea at Gangavali near Ankola. The estuarine part starts near the village Gundbale (about 15 km interior) and the area of the estuary is 640 ha (Gazetteer 1984; Rao et al. 1989).
Aghanashini Estuary: The Aghanashini or Tadri (total length 121 km) river rises at Manjguni near Sirsi. It has two sources, the Bakurhole rising in a pond at Manjguni about 25 km west of Sirsi and the Donihalla whose source is close to Sirsi. These streams meet near Mutthalli about 16 km south of Sirsi. At Uppinapattana the river meets the tide and it winds south-west and then north-west together about 13 km to Mirjan. From Mirjan it runs parallel to the coast for about 13 km and meets the Arabian Sea at Aghanashini or Tadri. This river has no dam or hydroelectric power station in it (Gazetteer, 1984).
Sharavathi Estuary: Sharavathi originates at Ambutirtha in Tirthahalli taluk of Shimoga district and flows for 128 km to join the Arabian Sea near Honnavar. Traditionally the estuarine portion extended from the river mouth to the village of Gersoppa, about 27 km interior, towards the base of the Western Ghats. The total area of the estuarine portion was stated to be 1600 ha (Gazetteer, 1984; Rao et al., 1989). This river has two major dams with hydroelectric power stations, first one built at Linganamakki in Shimoga district and the second dam at Gersoppa (www.karnatakapower.com). These dams have caused substantial changes in the estuarine characteristics, primarily by reducing its salinity (Figure 1.3).

Figure 1.2: Kali River with Dams.
Source: www.karnatakapower.com [accessed on 10 February 2012]

Figure 1.3: Sharavathi River with dams
Source: www.karnatakapower.com [accessed on 10 February 2012]

 

Livelihood Resources - Edible Bivalves of Uttara Kannada Estuaries

            There are six edible clams, viz. Anadara granosa, Meretrix casta, Meretrix meretrix, Paphia malabarica, Polymesoda erosa, Villorita cyprinoides and some oysters present in all the estuaries of Uttara Kannada district (table 1), except in Sharavathi estuary where only one clam Polymesoda erosa occurs today and the oysters can be seen on rocks close to the river mouth with higher salinity. Among these edible bivalves the genus Meretrix, Paphia, and Villorita, and oysters contributes to the livelihoods of many peoples (Rao and Rao, 1985; Rao et al., 1989; Boominathan et al., 2008).

Table 1: Edible Bivales of Uttara Kannada estuaries. P = Present, A = Absent.

Species

Kali

Aghanashini

Sharavathi

Gangavali

Anadara granosa

P

P

A

P

Meretrix casta

P

P

A

P

Meretrix meretrix

P

P

A

P

Paphia malabarica

P

P

A

P

Polymesoda erosa

P

P

P

P

Villorita cyprinoides

P

P

A

P

Oysters

P

P

P

P

Anadara granosa is present in all the estuaries except, Sharavathi. The distribution of A. granosa is restricted to one kilometer range from river-mouth in Kali, Gangavali, and Aghanashini (Table 2.1). It prefers soft intertidal muds bordering mangrove swamp forest (Pathansali, 1966) and salinity range of 13.69 – 34.40 ppt (Narasimham, 1988). Hence, A. granosa occurs only at the river-mouth where the salinity is usually high. This species was previously reported from Kali (Boominathan et al., 2012), Aghanashini (Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012), and Venkatapur (Rao and Rao, 1985) estuaries of Uttara Kannada District. Meretrix casta is distributed in Aghanashini and Gangavali (without any dams) estuaries from the river-mouth to six km interior. Compared to this, M. casta is distributed in Kali (with dam) only for three km range from the river-mouth (table 2.2) and its distribution area is now reduced due to the influx of fresh water releases from the hydroelectric projects at upstream. M. casta is a euryhaline species (adapted to a wide range of salinity) (Rao et al., 1989) with a greater degree of physiological adaptation in the salinity range of 25.00 to 56.00 ppt (Durve, 1963). M. casta is distributed only up to three kilometer distance from river-mouth as the salinity of Kali estuary is very low. Whereas in Sharavathi estuary M. casta is absent, probably because of extremely low salinity due to dam water releases. M. casta was reported earlier by various authors from Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, Sharavathi, and Venkatapur estuaries (Alagarswami and Narasimham, 1973; Harkantra, 1975a, 1975b; Rao and Rao, 1985; Rao et al., 1989; Bhat, 2003; Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012).  Whereas the distribution of Meretrix meretrix in the undammed Aghanashini and Gangavali estuaries range from river-mouth to three kms inside, in Kali (with dams) M.

meretrix has only a one km range from river-mouth (table 2.3). M. meretrix prefers high salinity (Rao et al., 1989) and hence its presence closer to the river mouth can be justified. In the Sharavathi estuary M. meretrix was present earlier (Alagarswami and Narasimham, 1973; Rao and Rao, 1985), but seems to have vanished today, due to the decline in salinity caused by release of fresh water from hydroelectric projects. M. meretrix is present to this day in all the other estuaries (Alagarswami and Narasimham, 1973; Rao and Rao, 1985; Rao et al., 1989; Bhat, 2003; Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012).  Paphia malabarica occurs closer to the river mouths (Rao et al., 1989) with salinities of 20 to 30 ppt (Mohan and Velayudhan, 1998). It occurs to this day in the high salinity regions of Kali, Gangavali, and Aghanashini estuaries (table 2.4). However, in Sharavathi estuary P. malabarica was not reported earlier nor it occurs currently. The species occurs in all the other estuaries viz. Kali Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Venkatapur (Alagarswami and Narasimham, 1973; Harkantra, 1975a; Rao and Rao, 1985; Rao et al., 1989; Bhat, 2003; Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012).

Table 2: Current distribution of bivalves in the Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Sharavathi estuaries. P = Present.
Table 2.1: Current distribution of Anadara granosa.

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.2: Current distribution of Meretrix casta.

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.3: Current distribution of Meretrix meretrix

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.4: Current distribution of Paphia malabarica.

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Polymesoda erosa prefers salinity of 7 to 22 ppt (Modassir, 2000) and is present in all four estuaries (table 2.5). Even though, it is present in Kali, Gangavali, Aghanashini, and Sharavathi estuaries, the population is high in Sharavathi estuary than the other estuaries and also it is the only species of edible clam present to this day. P. erosa was earlier reported by Ingole et al., (2002) from Sharavathi estuary where it is still present. Boominathan et al., (2012), for the first time, reported its occurrence in Kali and Aghanashini estuaries. Villorita cyprinoides associated with medium salinity conditions is known to withstand freshwater conditions (Nair et al., 1984; Rao et al., 1989; Boominathan et al., 2012). It was reported from Kali (Rao et al., 1989; Boominathan et al., 2012), Aghanashini (Rao et al., 1989; Bhat, 2003; Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012), and Venkatapur (Alagarswami and Narasimham, 1973) estuaries. Extremely low salinity of Sharavathi estuary might have caused its present elimination from here where according to elderly fisher-folks the species was present earlier. In Kali estuary, which has more salt water ingress, despite the dams, it is found in 6-12 km range. It occurs in 5-16 km zone in Gangavali, and 9-23 km zone in Aghanashini respectively (table 2.6).

Table 2.5: Current distribution of Polymesoda erosa

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

 

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.6: Current distribution of Villorita cyprinoides

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

 

 

 

 

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oysters are present in all the estuaries (table 2.7), usually it occurs in moderate to high salinity regions in the estuary. They were also previously reported from Kali (Rao, 1974; Boominathan et al., 2012), Gangavali (Rao, 1974), Aghanashini (Rao, 1974; Boominathan et al., 2008, 2012), Sharavathi (Rao, 1974; Rao and Rao, 1985), and Venkatapur (Rao and Rao, 1985) estuaries.

Table 2.7: Current distribution of oysters

~ Distance from river-mouth (km)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Kali (dammed)

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gangavali

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aghanashini

P

P

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharavathi (dammed)

 

P

P

P

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant outcome of the current study are:

  1. Six species of edible clam bivalves viz. Anadara granosa, Meretrix casta, M. meretrix, Paphia malabarica, Polymesoda erosa, Villorita cyprinoides, and oysters are present in the Uttara Kannada estuaries.
  2. According to historical data, five species of edible clam bivalves viz. Meretrix meretrix, M. casta, Anadara granosa, Polymesoda erosa, Villorita cyprinoides and oysters were present in the Sharavathi estuary. Out of them only P. erosa and oysters remain in the estuary; the rest are not traceable today.
  3. In Kali estuary, the edible bivalves were distributed for about 27 km from river-mouth in 1978 whereas now it is distributed only for about 12 km from river-mouth, and the population of Paphia malabarica has declined drastically.
  4. The major reason for the low bivalve diversity in Sharavathi estuary and reduced distribution zones in Kali estuary could be attributed to the construction of hydroelectric projects causing continuous release of fresh water into the estuary, after power generation, even during the summer months, resulting in very low salinity that is unable to sustain most bivalves.
  5. The collection of edible bivalves is a major activity of fisher-folks and even others which contributes to the livelihood of many estuarine villages, but faded away in Sharavathi due to the disappearance of bivalves.
  6. The hydroelectric projects have adverse impact on estuarine biodiversity, not only on bivalves but most of high salinity tolerant mangroves of Sharavathi also are not to be found, except in fringes very close to the river mouth.

 

Citation:
  1. T.V. Ramachandra, M.D. Subash Chandran, N.V. Joshi, and M. Boominathan, 2015.  Sustainability of livelihood resources in Central west coast, Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India, Chapter 15, Section V, In Traditional Environmental Knowledge and biodiversity, Pati R N, Shkla S, Chanza L (Eds.), Sarup Book Publishers Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, Pp. 397-415.
* Corresponding Author :
  Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : 91-80-23600985 / 22932506 / 22933099,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy