|
ENVIS Technical Report 124, October 2017 |
CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS FOR TERTIARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER |
NUTRIENT AND METAL REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF DIFFERENT MACROPHYTES
Macrophyte |
Removal efficiency |
Reference |
Type of waste water/method |
N |
P |
COD/BOD |
Heavy metals |
Eichhornia crassipes
(Water hyacinth) |
65% (nitrate) |
65% (phosphate) |
75% |
|
Shahabaldin et al., 2013 |
Domestic wastewater/batch method |
50%(TN) |
50%(TP) |
50% |
|
Costa et al., 2014 |
Piggery waste with 20 days HRT |
21.78%-TN |
23.02%-TP |
64.44%-COD |
|
Jianbo Lu et al., 2008 |
Duck farm |
72%-N |
63%-P |
|
|
Tripathy et al., 2003 |
Dairy effluent |
|
|
|
Cr (95%) |
Mahmood et al., 2005 |
Textile wastewater |
|
|
|
Hg-119ng /g
Cd-3992µg/g
Cu-314 µg/g
Cr-2.31mg/g
Ni-1.68 mg/g
|
Molisani et al., 2006
KK Mishra et al., 2007
Hu et al., 2007
Verma et al., 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Cr-2.36 mg/g |
Ankur Gupta and Chandrajit Balomajumder, 2015 |
photosynthesis chamber under controlled condition |
2161 mg N/m2/day or
7887 kg N/ha/yr |
542 mg P/m2/day or
1978 kg P/ha/yr |
|
|
K.R Reddy and J.C.Tucker, 1983 |
microcosm
aquaculture system |
Summer-1278 mg N/m2/day
Winter-254 mg N/m2/day |
Summer-243 mg P/m2/day
Winter-49 mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
|
|
|
Zinc-95% (3.542 mg/g)
Chromium-84% (2.412 mg/g) |
Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2009 |
1.0,5.0,10.0 & 20.0 mg/l metal solutions , 11 days incubation period |
|
|
|
Cd-81%
Cr-85%
Cu-95%
Zn-92%
Fe-85.7% |
Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008 |
15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals |
|
|
|
|
Cr-65%
Cu-65% |
Lissy et al., 2011 |
Wastewater from simulated wetland |
Eichhornia crassipes |
1980 kg/ha/year |
320 kg/ha/year |
|
(kg/ha/year )
Ca-750
Mg-790
Na-260
K-3190
Fe-19
Mn-300
Zn-4
Cu-1 |
FAO |
|
Pistia stratiotes |
Summer-985 mg N/m2/day=9.85kg/ha/day
Winter-258 mg N/m2/day |
Summer-218 mg P/m2/day
Winter-72 mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
|
|
|
Hg-0.57mg/g
Cr-2.5mg/g
Cd-2.13mg/g
Ni-1.95mg/g |
Mishra et al., 2009
Verma et al., 2008 |
Coal mining effluent |
|
|
|
Cd-78%
Cr-81%
Cu-96%
Zn-90%
Fe-87% |
Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008 |
15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals |
|
Summer-292mg N/m2/day
Winter-70 mg N/m2/day |
Summer-87mg P/m2/day
Winter-18 mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
retention ponds |
Lemna minor |
|
|
|
Ti-221 µg/g
Cu-400 µg/g
Pb-8.62 mg/g |
Babic et al., 2009
Boule et al., 2009
Uysal and Taner 2009 |
|
194.9 ± 18.9 g TN/m2/yr |
10.4 ± 1.7 g TP/m2/yr |
3869 ± 352g COD/m2/yr |
|
Umesh et al., 2015 |
Manure slurry from dairy farm, surface flow wetland |
Summer-292mg N/m2/day=2.92kg/ha/day
Winter-70mg N/m2/day |
Summer-87mg P/m2/day
Winter-18 mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
Lemna japonica |
0.4g/m2/day |
0.1g/m2/day |
|
|
|
|
Lemna gibba |
|
|
|
Ur-897 µg/g
As-1022 µg/g |
Mkandawire et al., 2004 |
|
Spirodela polyrhiza |
Summer-151mg N/m2/day
Winter-135mg N/m2/day |
Summer-34mg P/m2/day
Winter-34 mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
|
|
|
Cd-63%
Cr-83%
Cu-91%
Zn-90%
Fe-83.5% |
Virendra Kumar Mishra and B.D. Tripathi, 2008 |
15 days lab experiment at three different concentrations (1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg /1) of metals |
Azolla |
Summer-108mg N/m2/day
Winter-48mg N/m2/day |
Summer-33mg P/m2/day
Winter-10mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
|
|
|
Hg-0.44 mg/g |
Mishra et al., 2009 |
Coal mining effluent |
|
|
|
Hg-70.8-578mg/kg
Cr-91.1-356 mg/kg |
R. Bennicelli et al, 2004 |
Aquarium with nutrient medium |
Azolla pinnata |
|
|
|
Fe-92.7%
Zn-83%
Cu-59.1%
Mn-65.1%
Co-95.0%
Cd-90%
Ni-73.1% |
Elsharawy et al., 2004 |
Mixture of waste water |
Salvinia |
Summer-406mg N/m2/day
Winter-96mg N/m2/day |
Summer-105mg P/m2/day
Winter-32mg P/m2/day |
|
|
K. R. REDDY AND W. F. DE BUSK , 1985 |
microcosm retention ponds |
Typha aungustifolia |
48-54 g/m2 |
|
|
|
Maltais-Landry et al., 2009 |
Mesocosm with daily total N loading rates 1.16 g/m2 |
|
|
|
Cr-20210 µg/g
Zn-16325 µg/g |
Firdaus-e-Bareen and Khilji, 2008 |
|
922 kg N/ha |
114 kgP/ha |
|
|
Abdeslam Ennabili et al., 1998 |
Field study: Coastal wetlands (freshwater or brackish systems) were studied in three river mouth areas in the Tingitan Peninsula |
|
|
|
|
Cr-66.2 %
Cu-68.3 %
Zn-99.3%
Ni-76.4% |
Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012 |
Wetland microcosms |
|
|
|
|
Cr-66.2 %
Cu-68.3 %
Zn-99.3%
Ni-76.4% |
Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012 |
Wetland microcosms |
Typha latifolia |
N-2630 kg/ha/year |
P-400 kg/ha/year |
|
kg/ha/year )
Ca-1710
Mg-310
Na-730
K-4570
Fe-23
Mn-79
Zn-6
Cu-7 |
FAO |
|
Combination of Water hyacinth,
duckweed and blue-green
algae |
>90%(nitrate) |
>90% (phosphate) |
BOD-97% |
20-100% |
Sinha et al., 2000 |
Sewage water |
Cyperus alternifolius |
|
|
|
Cr-68.4%
Cu-72.7%
Zn-93.17%
Ni-83.6% |
Yadav A.K. et.al, 2012 |
Wetland microcosms |
Ipomea aquatica |
TN-75.5% |
TP-41.5% |
BOD-88.5%
COD-84.5% |
|
Hu et.al, 2008 |
horizontal-flow, Deep Flow Technique |
Alternanthera philoxeroides |
1780 kg/ha/year |
200 kg/ha/year |
|
(kg/ha/year )
Ca-320
Mg-320
Na-230
K-3220
Fe-45
Mn-27
Zn-6
Cu-1 |
FAO |
|
HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION OF DIFFERENT MACROPHYTES
MACROPHYTE
SPECIES |
HEAVY METALS (mg/kg) |
REFERENCE |
Cd |
Cr |
Pb |
Zn |
Cu |
As |
Mn |
Hg |
Ni |
Potamogeton |
Root |
1.57 |
|
12 |
512 |
47.8 |
5.85 |
|
|
|
Edward A. Martinez and Chemanji Shu-Nyamboli, 2011 |
Shoot |
0.46 |
|
1.1 |
116 |
11.5 |
0.79 |
|
|
|
Alternanthera philoxeroides |
Whole plant |
28.17±1.56 |
|
107.75±14.21 |
271.63±45.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007 |
underground |
96.66±10.82 |
|
477.94±41.61 |
597.82±79.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
aboveground |
20.56±1.17 |
|
66.62±5.74 |
235.39±36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alternanthera philoxeroides |
Shoots |
|
|
74 ±1.2 |
473 ± 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
H. Deng et al., 2006 |
Roots |
|
|
165 ±16 |
444 ±16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Root |
|
|
|
|
1.02-2.33 |
|
|
|
0.93-10.89 |
Gopeshwor Singh and Abhik Gupta,2015 |
Shoot |
|
|
|
|
0.48-7.26 |
|
|
|
0.38-4.32 |
Leaf |
19.46±3.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nimisha and Abhik Gupta, 2015 |
Stem |
71.78±18.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Root |
13.35±3.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternanthera Philoxeroides |
Whole plant |
4.5 |
63.7 |
65.6 |
39.6 |
12.6 |
|
224.4 |
|
38.2 |
Aboud S. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012 |
Polygonum hydropiper |
Whole plant |
19.65 ± 1.88 |
|
90.42 ± 7.00 |
246.28 ± 27.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007 |
underground |
92.51 ± 4.86 |
|
410.90 ± 56.84 |
753.10 ± 77.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
aboveground |
11.55 ± 1.28 |
|
54.81 ± 4.46 |
189.96 ± 26.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cyperus difformis |
Whole plant |
13.52 ± 0.90 |
|
84.04 ± 5.28 |
153.85 ± 5.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007 |
underground |
10.67±0.67 |
|
59.80 ± 1.93 |
129.67 ± 8.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
aboveground |
14.24 ± 1.29 |
|
90.10 ± 6.12 |
159.89 ± 7.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cyperus rotundus |
Whole plant |
5.5 |
64.3 |
50.6 |
46 |
15.8 |
|
310.0 |
|
41.2 |
Aboud S. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012 |
Phragmites communis |
Whole plant |
4.98 ± 3.40 |
|
4.89 ± 1.71 |
47.31 ± 1.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jianguo Liu et.al, 2007 |
underground |
2.52 ± 0.26 |
|
9.59 ± 0.27 |
62.95 ± 0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
aboveground |
5.60 ± 4.26 |
|
3.71 ± 2.20 |
43.40 ± 2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phragmites australis |
Root |
1.13± 0.08 |
6.97 ± 0.19 |
16.54± 0.97 |
104.10± 9.28 |
14.98 ± 0.93 |
|
475.80± 11.91 |
5.22 ± 0.38 |
9.12 ± 0.20 |
G. Bonanno and R. Lo Giudice, 2010 |
Rhizome |
1.00± 0.08 |
1.52 ±0.06 |
15.30± 0.93 |
32.67 ± 2.36 |
4.33± 0.32 |
|
37.51± 2.82 |
3.19 ± 0.26 |
1.67± 0.14 |
Stem |
0.68± 0.06 |
0.40± 0.04 |
9.87± 0.80 |
10.04 ± 0.87 |
2.31± 0.2 |
|
27.92 ± 2.34 |
1.05 ±0.12 |
0.48 ± 0.08 |
leaf |
1.05± 0.10 |
0.69 ± 0.04 |
13.20 ± 0.74 |
28.40 ±1.72 |
4.13± 0.19 |
|
308.30± 11.47 |
1.73 ±0.23 |
1.69 ± 0.15 |
Shoot |
|
|
|
11.88-30.9 |
1.98-19.62 |
|
|
|
|
Tanja R. Maksimovic et.al, 2014 |
|
Whole plant |
3.21 |
|
42.4 |
843.2 |
129.21 |
|
|
|
151.6 |
Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013 |
Cyperus alternifolius |
Lateral roots |
0.3 |
|
74 |
4570 |
15600 |
|
4850 |
|
|
S. cheng et.al, 2002 |
leaves |
8.4 |
|
1.2 |
77.3 |
7.1 |
|
68.9 |
|
|
Typha latifolia |
Root |
<0.5-1.6 |
6.55-61.3 |
|
45.7-175 |
22.8-53.8 |
|
4961-20000 |
|
8.33-45.3 |
Zohra Ben Salem et.al, 2014 |
Rhizome |
<0.5 |
1-1.92 |
|
9.68-26.59 |
1.81-6.28 |
|
334-1210 |
|
<1-4.12 |
Stem |
<0.5 |
<1-3.78 |
|
7.85-41.48 |
<1-4.77 |
|
467-1460 |
|
<1-2.14 |
Leaves |
<0.5 |
<1 |
|
<1-1.9 |
<1-7.46 |
|
55.4-2800 |
|
<1-1.03 |
Typha angustata |
Whole plant |
0.46 |
|
8.28 |
169.48 |
31.55 |
|
|
|
28.86 |
J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006 |
Shoot |
|
|
|
9.51-19.76 |
2.69-8.28 |
|
|
|
|
Tanja R. Maksimovic et.al, 2014 |
Typha sp |
Shoot |
0.01 |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Severine Ladislas et.al, 2012 |
Root |
0.09 |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
Whole plant |
1.38 |
|
23.87 |
862.4 |
153.2 |
|
|
|
91.55 |
Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013 |
Eichhornia crassipes |
Shoot |
|
0.7-1.14 |
|
|
4.79-6.99 |
|
|
|
|
A. Klumpp et al., 2002 |
Root |
|
2.93-12.57 |
|
|
9.18-21.1 |
|
|
|
|
Eichhornia crassipes |
Whole plant |
1.8 |
|
37.26 |
1677 |
53.8 |
|
|
|
125.3 |
Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013 |
Whole plant |
|
|
4.47-9.81 |
235.25-709.07 |
16.32-1617.21 |
|
|
|
4.81-28.83 |
Abida Begum et.al ,2010 |
Whole plant |
5.1 |
75.4 |
80.5 |
36.6 |
10.1 |
|
216.6 |
|
41.3 |
Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012 |
Whole plant |
0.72-21.53 |
1.2-160.85 |
22.0-98.5 |
27.4-58.3 |
BDL-20.95 |
|
100.5-306.8 |
|
26.0-65.32 |
Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2009 |
Pistia stratiotes |
Whole plant |
|
1.43-3.14 |
|
|
5.15-12.69 |
|
|
|
|
A. Klumpp et al., 2002 |
Shoot |
0.07-0.87 |
|
2.27-14 |
27.03-120.97 |
4.83-7.5 |
|
471.77-984.7 |
|
0.92-1.54 |
T.m.Galal and E.A. Farahat, 2015 |
Root |
0.83-2.6 |
|
10.7-21.67 |
55.67-434.67 |
14.57-30.77 |
|
6529.53-14503.53 |
|
12.62-14.94 |
Ceratophyllum demersum |
Whole plant |
4.46 |
53.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. VahdatiRaad and H. Khara, 2012 |
Whole plant |
2.35 |
|
208.71 |
1172.8 |
96.3 |
|
|
|
48.09 |
Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013 |
Ipomea aquatica |
Whole plant |
0.21 |
|
2.67 |
639.04 |
7.41 |
|
|
|
7.95 |
J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006 |
Ipomea sp |
Stem |
59.01 |
775.62 |
|
141.42 |
126.01 |
|
182 |
|
|
Gupta S et.al, 2008 |
Root |
48.2 |
364.13 |
|
149.7 |
118.39 |
|
196.83 |
|
|
leaves |
54.08 |
434.79 |
|
129.03 |
97.07 |
|
204.13 |
|
|
Ipomea carnea |
Whole plant |
4.2 |
65.3 |
51.8 |
48.4 |
10.5 |
|
240.1 |
|
41.1 |
Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012 |
Hydrilla verticillata |
Whole plant |
0.44 |
|
6.2 |
155.18 |
21.8 |
|
|
|
20.09 |
J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006 |
Whole plant |
|
|
6.85-131.84 |
9.05-745.35 |
18.55-1756.52 |
|
|
|
8.93-30.31 |
Abida Begum et.al , 2010 |
Nelumbo nucifera |
Whole plant |
0.59 |
|
5.28 |
221.03 |
23.2 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006 |
Whole plant |
|
|
5.58-10.55 |
246.75-743 |
17.65-1732.35 |
|
|
|
5.64-29.4 |
Abida Begum et.al , 2010 |
Azolla caroliniana |
Whole plant |
259 |
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rakhshaee et al., 2006 |
Lemna gibba |
Whole plant |
1.34 |
|
104 |
531.5 |
36.4 |
|
|
|
25.23 |
Kamel Abdalla Kamel, 2013 |
Polygonum glabrum |
Whole plant |
3.7 |
64.4 |
72.4 |
56.7 |
7.8 |
|
302 |
|
47.5 |
Aboud s. Jumbe and N. Nandini, 2012 |
Vallisneria spiralis |
Whole plant |
1.28 |
|
9.2 |
239.17 |
66.26 |
|
|
|
28.75 |
J.I. Nirmal Kumar et al., 2006 |
Botanical glossary
Sl.No
|
Botanical term |
Description |
1 |
Auricle |
Ear like appendage |
2 |
Bract |
a modified leaf or scale, typically small, with a flower or flower cluster in its axis |
3 |
Campanulate |
Bell shaped |
4 |
Capsule |
A dry dehiscent fruit that opens along 2 or more valves or teeth to release 2 or more seeds |
5 |
Caudate |
Long narrowly tipped |
6 |
Cauline |
Located at the base of a plant or stem; especially arising directly from the root or rootstock or a root-like stem. |
7 |
Ciliate |
Hairy |
8 |
Cleistogamous |
type of automatic self-pollination of certain plants that can propagate by using non-opening, self-pollinating flowers |
9 |
Cordate |
Heart shaped |
10 |
Corm |
A rounded underground storage organ present in plants consisting of a swollen stem base covered with scale leaves. |
11 |
Crenate |
having a round-toothed or scalloped edge |
12 |
Culm |
stem of any type of plant, specifically refers to the above-ground or aerial stems of grasses and sedges |
13 |
Cuneate |
Wedge shaped |
14 |
Decussate |
Intersected or crossed in the form of an X |
15 |
Dimorphic |
occurring in or representing two distinct forms |
16 |
Dioecious |
having the male and female reproductive organs in separate individuals |
17 |
Disseminules |
a part of a plant that serves to propagate it, such as a seed or a fruit |
18 |
Distichous |
Arranged in two opposite rows |
19 |
Drupelet |
one of the individual parts of an aggregate fruit |
20 |
Elliptic |
relating to or having the form of an ellipse |
21 |
Ensiform |
shaped like a sword blade; long and narrow with sharp edges and a pointed tip |
22 |
Fimbriate |
fringed |
23 |
Fronds |
the leaf or leaf-like part of a palm, fern, or similar plant |
24 |
Fusiform |
Spindle shaped, rod shaped gradually narrowing from the middle towards end |
25 |
Glabrous |
Without hairs |
26 |
Glumes |
bract (leaf-like structure) below a spikelet in the inflorescence |
27 |
Heterosporous |
production of spores of two different sizes and sexes by the sporophytes |
28 |
Inconspicous |
not clearly visible |
29 |
Inflorescence |
Main flowering twig |
30 |
Lanceolate |
shaped like a lance head; of a narrow oval shape tapering to a point at each end |
31 |
Megaprothalli |
The development stage of megaspore |
32 |
Megaspore |
plant spores that develop into female gametophytes |
33 |
Microspore |
plant spores that develop into male gametophytes |
34 |
Monoecious |
having both the male and female reproductive organs in the same individual |
35 |
Orbicular |
Circular and flat |
36 |
Pedicel |
a small stalk bearing an individual flower in an inflorescence |
37 |
Peduncle |
the stalk bearing a flower or fruit, or the main stalk of an inflorescence |
38 |
Pendulous |
Hanging |
39 |
Perennial |
A plant that lives for several years |
40 |
Petaloid |
Petal like |
41 |
Pilose |
Covered with soft, weak, thin and clearly separated hairs |
42 |
Polygamous |
Bisexual and unisexual flowers in same plant |
43 |
Prostrate |
growing closely along the ground |
44 |
Serrate |
Closely small toothed |
45 |
Serrulate |
Finely serrate |
46 |
Sessile |
Without stalk |
47 |
Sinuate |
having a wavy or sinuous margin; with alternate rounded notches and lobes |
48 |
Solitary |
single |
49 |
Spathe |
Large bract ensheathing an inflorescence |
50 |
Spadix |
a spike of minute flowers closely arranged round a fleshy axis and typically enclosed in a spathe |
51 |
Spikelet |
The basic unit of a grass flower, consisting of two glumes or outer bracts at the base and one or more florets above. |
52 |
Spirodistichous |
arranged alternately in two opposite vertical rows |
53 |
Sporocarp |
Specialised type of structure found in some ferns whose primary function is the production and release of spores |
54 |
Staminodes |
a sterile or abortive stamen |
55 |
Stipule |
A small leaf-like appendage to a leaf, typically borne in pairs at the base of the leaf stalk |
56 |
Stolon |
A creeping horizontal plant stem or runner that takes root at points along its length to form new plants |
57 |
Stoloniferous |
Plants with stolons |
58 |
Translucent |
Semi- transparent |
59 |
Trioecious |
having male, female, and hermaphrodite flowers in three different plants |
60 |
Umbel |
An inflorescence which consists of a number of short flower stalks (called pedicels) which spread from a common point, somewhat like umbrella ribs |
61 |
Undulating |
Wavy |
Source: Rao G R, Vishnu D. Mukri, Subash Chandran M D, Ramachandra T V, 2017. Forest Trees of Central Western Ghats – Field Manual, ENVIS Technical Report 121, Sahyadri Conservation Series 67, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
REFERENCES
- Annelise Gerber, Carina J Cillers, Carin Van Ginkel and Rene Glen (2004). Easy Identification of Aquatic Plants, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria.
- Arias, C.A., Brix, H., (2005). Initial experience from a compact vertical flow constructed wetland treating single household wastewater. In: Vymazal, J. (Ed.), Natural and Constructed Wetlands: Nutrients, Metals and Management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 52–64.
- Arvind Kumar (2015). Freshwater Plankton and Macrophytes of India, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi.
- Biswas K and Calder C.C (1954). Handbook of common water and marsh plants of India and Burma, Second edition, Government of India Press, Culcatta.
- Christopher D. K. Cook (1996). Aquatic and Wetland Plants of India- Oxford University Press New Delhi.
- Calvert G., Liessmann L. (2014). Wetland Plants of the Townsville–Burdekin Flood Plain. Lower Burdekin Landcare Association Inc., Ayr.
- Cooper P., Smith M. and Maynard H., (1996). The Design and Performance of a Nitrifiying Vertical Flow Reed Bed Treatment System; Water Science and Technology; Vol: 35 (5).
- Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C., and LaRoe, E.T. (1979). Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, 103 pp. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
- Cronk, J. K., & Fennessy, M. S. (2001). Wetland plants: Biology and Ecology. CRC press.
- Denny P. (1997); Implementation of Constructed Wetlands in Developing countries; Water science and technology; Vol: 35; Oxford.
- Encyclopedia of life: eol.org
- EPA, (2000); Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters; National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio.
- Faulkner, S.P., Richardson, C.J., (1989). Physical and chemical characteristics of freshwater wetland soils. In: Hammer, D.A. (Ed.), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, pp. 41–72.
- Global invasive species database: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/.
- Greenway M., Woolley A. (1999);Constructed wetlands in Queensland: Performance Efficiency and Nutrient Bioaccumulation; Ecological Engineering, Vol.: 12, Pg.: 39-55
- Handbook of utilization of aquatic plants, FAO, http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6862e/X6862E11.htm
- Holm et al (1997). World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. John Wiley, New York.
- Julien, M. H. and M. W. Griffiths (eds.). (1998). Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds, 4th ed. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
- Julien M.H., Bourne, A.S. and V.H.K. Low. (1992). Growth of the weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Martius) Grisebach, (alligator weed) in aquatic and terrestrial habitats in Australia. Journal of Aquatic Botany (1992) 7: 102-108.
- Kadlec, R.H., Wallace, S., (2008); Treatment Wetlands. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Kadlec R. H., Knight R. L. (1996); Treatment Wetlands, Florida, America; CRC press.
- Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L., Vymazal, J., Brix, H., Cooper, P. F., Haberl, R., (2000). Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control: Processes, Performance, Design and Operation, IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 8, London.
- Oosterhout, Elissa (2007). Weeds of National Significance: Alligator weed Control Manual. NSW Department of Primary Industries.
- Ramachandra, T. V., Mahapatra, D. M., Sudarshan P. B Asulabha, K. S., Sincy, V., and Bharath, H. A., (2014). Integrated Wetlands Ecosystem: Sustainable Model to Mitigate Water Crisis in Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 76, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012.
- Ramachandra, T.V., Mahapatra, D.M., Vinay, S., Sincy, V., Asulabha, K.S., Bhat, S.P., Aithal, B.H., 2017. Bellandur and varthur Lakes Rejuvination Blueprint, ENVIS Technical Report 116, Environment Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
- Ramaswamy, S.V., & Razi, B.A. (1973). Flora of Bangalore District. Mysore University Press.
- Raja Chakraborty, Biplab De, N. Devanna, and Saikat Sen (2013). Antitussive, expectorant activity of Marsilea minuta L., an Indian vegetable, Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research. 4(1): 61–64.
- Reed S. C., Middlebrooks E. J., Crites R. W., (1988). Natural system for Waste Management; McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
- Sven Erik Jorgensen (2009). Applications of Ecological engineering, Academic Press.
- UN-HABITAT, (2008). Constructed Wetlands Manual, UN-HABITAT Water for Asian Cities Programme Nepal, Kathmandu.
- Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 380 (1–3), 48–65.
- Vymazal J., Brix H., Cooper P., Haberl R., Perfler R., Laber J. (1998). Removal Mechanism and Types of Constructed Wetlands; Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater treatments in Europe; Backhuys publishers; 17-66.
- Wetland plants of Queensland: A field guide: https://books.google.co.in.
- Wu S., Wallace S., Brix H., Kuschk P., Kirui W. K., Masi F., DongR. (2015). Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: Challenges, operational strategies and overall performance; Environmental Pollution 201 107-120.
- Zhang D-Q, Jinadasa K.B.S.N., Gersberg R. M., Liu Y., Tan S. K., Ng W. J (2015). Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in tropical and subtropical regions (2000–2013); Journal of Environmental Sciences 30: 30 – 46.
Related Publications (of Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES TE 15)
- Ramachandra T.V., Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Sudarshan P. Bhat, Asulabha K.S., Sincy Varghese, Bharath H. Aithal, 2014. Integrated Wetlands Ecosystem: Sustainable Model to Mitigate Water Crisis in Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 76, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Vinay S and Bharath H.Aithal, 2015. Detrimental landuse changes in Agara-Belllandur wetland, ENVIS Technical Report 95, CES, IISc, Bangalore, India
- Ramachandra T V, Asulabha K S, Sincy V, Vinay S, Bharath H.Aithal, Sudarshan P. Bhat, and Durga M. Mahapatra, 2015. Pathetic status of wetlands in Bangalore: Epitome of inefficient and uncoordinated Governance, ENVIS Technical Report 93, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Asulabha K S, Sincy V, Sudarshan Bhat and Bharath H.Aithal, 2015. Wetlands: Treasure of Bangalore, ENVIS Technical Report 101, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, IISc, Bangalore, India
- Ramachandra T V, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Asulabha K S, Sincy Varghese, 2017. Foaming or Algal Bloom in Water bodies of India: Remedial Measures - Restrict Phosphate (P) based Detergents, ENVIS Technical Report 108, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Sincy Varghese, Bharath H. Aithal, 2016. Water situation in Bengaluru, ENVIS Technical Report 114, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Vinay S, Sincy V, Asulabha K S, Sudarshan Bhat, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Bellandur and Varthur Lakes Rejuvenation Blueprint, ENVIS Technical Report 116, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Asulabha K S, Sincy V, Sudarshan Bhat, Durga Madhab Mahapatra, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Rejuvenation Blueprint for lakes in Vrishabhavathi valley, ENVIS Technical Report 122, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath H. Aithal,and Durgappa, D. S., Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis, Int. J Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2012,18,329-343,.
- Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H. Aithal and Sreejith, K., GHG footprint of major cities in India, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44,473–495
- Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H. Aithal, Vinay, S., et al., Trees of Bengaluru, ENVIS Technical Report 75, ENVIS, Centre for Ecological Sciences, IISc, Bangalore, 2014. 75p.
- Ramachandra T.V., Bharath H. Aithal, 2016. Bangalore’s Reality: towards unlivable status with unplanned urban trajectory, Current Science (Guest Editorial), 110(12):2207-2208, 25th June 2016.
- Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Frequent Floods in Bangalore: Causes and Remedial Measures, ENVIS Technical Report 123, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Sudarshan Bhat, Mahesh M K and Ramachandra T V, 2017. Macrophytes of Bangalore Wetlands, ENVIS Technical Report 126, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
- Ramachandra T V, Vinay S, Bharath H. Aithal, 2017. Koramangala Floods: Causes, ENVIS Technical Report 131, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
|
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP), Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
E-mail : tvr@iisc.ac.in
Tel: 91-080-22933099/23600985,
Fax: 91-080-23601428/23600085
Web: http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy
Sudarshan P. Bhat Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
E-mail: sudarshanb@iisc.ac.in
Vinay S.Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
E-mail: svinay@iisc.ac.in
Citation:Ramachandra T V, Sudarshan Bhat and Vinay S, 2017. Constructed Wetlands for Tertiary treatment of Wastewater, ENVIS Technical Report 124, Energy & Wetlands Research Group, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
Contact Address : |
|
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group,
Centre for Ecological Sciences, TE 15, New Biology Building, Third Floor, E Wing, [Near D Gate], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, INDIA.
Tel : 91-80-22933099 / 22933503-extn 107
Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail : tvr@iisc.ac.in, energy@ces.iisc.ernet.in,
Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy |
|