https://www.iisc.ac.in/
Valuation of Aghanashini Estuarine Ecosystem Goods and Services
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
1Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES],
3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
*Corresponding author:
tvr@iisc.ac.in, emram.ces@courses.iisc.ac.in

Study Area and Methods

The Uttara Kannada district lies at 7409' to 75010' E and 13055' to 15031' N extending over an area of 10,291 sq.km in the mid-western part of Karnataka state, India (figure 3). It is surrounded by Belgaum district and Goa territory in the north, Dharwad in the east, Shimoga and parts of Daskshina Kannada in the south and the Arabian Sea to the west. Uttara Kannada district is one of the northernmost districts in Karnataka State (Ramachandra, et al. 2018a; 2018b; 2018c). The district consists of a narrow strip of the coastline with a spatial extent of 3300 sq.km, which is relatively flat and starts sloping gently upwards towards the east (Deepthi et al. 2017), comprising five taluks namely Karwar, Ankola, Kumta, Honnavar and Bhatkal (Ramachandra et al., 2018d; 2018e).

Fig. 3. Aghanashini estuary, Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India 🡪

Aghanashini Estuary - Aghanashini River running its course of about 121 km, winding through gorges flanked with evergreen forests and valleys lush with spice gardens and rice fields, the river widens into an estuary covering about 4801 ha before its confluence with the Arabian Sea in the west coast between the villages Aghanashini in the south and Tadadi in the north, lies between 14.391° to 14.585° N and 74.304° to 74.516° E of Kumta taluk (Deepthi et al. 2017) in the Uttara Kannada district of central west coast in the Karnataka State of India (Fig. 3). Villages (about 21) along the estuarine banks mainly are traditionally dependent on agriculture and fisheries.

2.2 Methods: The secondary data was obtained from various sources for assessing the resource availability and consumption scenarios in the five estuaries. Field survey were carried out regarding the fish resources, sand mining and salt production in the estuaries. This involved actual measurements (quantifications) and discussions with the local people. The secondary data regarding the ecological functions of the estuaries was collected from Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) centres of Cochin and Karwar; Department of Marine Biology, Karnataka University, Karwar; Cochin University of Science and Technology, Biodiversity portal (Sahyadri 2018). The socio-economic data related to the coastal taluks including the villages around the estuaries were obtained from 2001 Census Report, Govt. of India; District Administrative Reports, Govt. of Karnataka. The data regarding the production of Gazani paddy and Coconut in the estuarine region was obtained from Karnataka State Horticulture Department. The direct and indirect values obtained from the estuaries were calculated.

Market valuation technique was employed for valuing the goods and services having direct market prices such as fishing, gazani (salt tolerant) paddy cultivation, timber and fodder obtained from the mangrove vegetation, aquaculture, sand and lime shell mining, navigation, ferry services and port activities. The market price values were assigned to these goods based on the interaction with the locals residing in that region. The gross revenues obtained from these resources were obtained as per the equation 1.

Net benefit from the fisheries = Total fish production in the estuary (tons) x Price per ton

Net income from mining/agriculture products = Σ (P Q) ……1

Where, P = price of the product; Q = quantity of the product

Besides providing the direct use value goods, the estuaries also provide various other important benefits such as climate regulation, shoreline stabilization, natural hazard mitigation, habitat and refugia for various organisms, nutrient circulation, recreation and aesthetic benefits, etc. CVM (Contingent Valuation Method) was adapted to survey indirect values obtained from an ecosystem which is based on the people’s Willingness to Pay (WTP) for it. For the current valuation study, the values for the indirect ecosystem services were adapted from the published literatures (Ramachandra et al. 2017a; Bann 2003; Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; UNEP 2013; NEP/GEF 2007; TEEB 2011). The values were converted into Indian Rupees (INR) and are given in Table.1.

Table 1: Economic values assigned to different indirect ecosystem services

Function

Country/

Region

Technique used

Unit

(rs/hectare)

References

Regulating services

Erosion control

Gujarat

Damage cost avoided

137606

Hirway and Goswami 2007; Prakash et al. 2010

Flood control

Srilanka

Replacement cost

158249.67

Barbier et al. 2011; Gunawardena and Rowan 2004; Sathirathai and Barbier 2001.

Storm protection

Srilanka

Replacement cost

45000

Kathiresan and Narayanasamy 2005; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Nutrient retention

Orissa

Replacement cost

11034.5

Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza, and Folke 1997; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Disturbance regulation

Global

Benefit transfer

25515

Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Waste treatment

Global

Benefit transfer

301320

Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997

Nutrient cycling

Global

Benefit transfer

949500

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Carbon sequestration

Ashtamudi estuary, Kerala

Damage cost avoided

9110.2

Anoop et al. 2008; Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Gas regulation

Global

Benefit transfer

9600

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; Fischlin et al. 2007

Climate regulation

Global

Benefit transfer

4800

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; Fischlin et al. 2007

Oxygen provision

Global

Benefit transfer

5280

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; Fischlin et al. 2007

water regulation

Global

Benefit transfer

209088

Barbier et al. 2011; Fischlin et al. 2007

water supply

Global

Benefit transfer

145920

Barbier et al. 2011; Fischlin et al. 2007

Ground water recharging

Global

Benefit transfer

192000

de Groot and Vander Meer 2010; Fischlin et al. 2007; Barbier et al. 2011; Hassan et al. 2005; MEA 2005

Natural hazard mitigation

Global

Benefit transfer

9600

Ramachandra et al. 2002; Ramachandra and Rajinikanth 2003; UNEP 2013; UNEP/GEF 2007

Supporting functions (Sahyadri, 2018)

Habitat/refugia

Global

Benefit transfer

5895

Costanza, d’Arge, de Groot, 1997; Costanza, Folke, 1997; de Groot, Vander Meer, 2010

Breeding ground and Nursery

Thailand

Benefit transfer

5271.3

Costanza, d’Arge, de Groot, 1997; Costanza, Folke, 1997; de Groot, Vander Meer, 2010

Biodiversity

Global

Benefit transfer

216000

Costanza, d’Arge, de Groot, 1997; Costanza, Folke, 1997; de Groot, Vander Meer, 2010

Information Functions (Sahyadri, 2018)

Recreation

Global

Benefit transfer

17145

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; de Groot and Vander Meer 2010

Cultural and artistic

Global

Benefit transfer

1305

Bann 2003; Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; UNEP 2013; NEP/GEF 2007; TEEB 2011

Aesthetic

Global

Benefit transfer

100

Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke, 1997

Science and Education

Kenya

Research funds

34660.35

Bann 2003; Barbier et al. 2011; Costanza et al. 1997; Costanza and Folke 1997; UNEP 2013; NEP/GEF 2007; TEEB 2011

The direct, indirect and recreational benefits of the estuaries were aggregated to obtain the Total Economic Values (TEV). These economic values can be considered as underestimates as the natural ecosystems are much more worth in terms of the benefits they provide. The valuation of natural resources is useful for policy formulations and decision making.

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

CONCLUSION

Ecological systems goods and services play a fundamental role in supporting life and sustaining the economy. Valuation of the ecosystem goods and services has become critical to formulate prudent policies for the sustenance of natural resources. The present study provides an account of the resource potential of Aghanashini estuary of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka state, India. Aghanashini estuary is the highly productive ecosystem evident form the total economic valuation of estuarine ecosystem with the total value of 24.03 billion Rs/year and the annual productivity of 5 million Rs/hectare/year. Provisioning service makes up the 23% of the total value. Information service share is about 2%, while regulating and supporting services are respectively 37% and 39%.

This highlights that estuaries of Uttara Kannada have been sustaining the economy of the district in a significant manner with the job potential and people’s livelihood. Decline in the environmental quality of these ecosystems necessitates the concerted effort to conserve the estuary in a sustainable manner with the active participation of native people. This also emphasizes the need for green GDP (Gross domestic product) with the accounting of ecosystem goods and services to ensure the sustainability of natural resources (water, energy, land, etc.).

Citation :Ramachandra T.V, Rakhi. K. Raj1 and Bharath H. Aithal, 2019. Valuation of Aghanashini Estuarine Ecosystem Goods and Services, J Biodiversity, 10(1,2): 45-58 (2019), DOI: 10.31901/24566543.2019/10.1-2.093
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503-extn 107,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail :tvr@iisc.ac.in emram.ces@courses.iisc.ac.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail   |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail