1Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES],
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
2 Centre for Sustainable Technologies [CST], Indian Institute of Science.
3Centre for Infrastructure, Sustainable Transport and Urban Planning [CiSTUP],
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012.
*Corresponding author:
trv@iisc.ac.in
Conclusion
Domestic sector is the major consumer of energy and contribute large extent to the total energy use in a city.
Understanding the spatial pattern of domestic energy consumption is necessary for an appropriate policy measures
towards low carbon city. The current analysis includes understanding of neighborhood and community of household,
energy consumption pattern and corresponding carbon dioxide emission due to different inside household activities.
Present study provides understanding of the trends in CO2 emission in the urban household sector of
different wards of Greater Bangalore. This study illustrates that different segments of population have very
different energy consumption depending their socio-economic characteristics. The survey reveals a typical household
family size, family income and the extent of adoption of renewable energy devices (Solar water heaters, etc.) play
an important role in the energy consumption at households.
Energy used for cooking purposes in domestic sector includes electricity, fuel wood, LPG, etc. LPG is being used for
cooking in the majority (78.75%, 1549) households. The spatial analysis of annual per capita electricity consumption
reveals that about 700 samples use annual per capita electricity in the range 100-400 kWh and about 226 households
use annual per capita electricity in the range 400-600 kWh. Zone wise analysis of annual electricity consumption
shows the variation from 917.21- 754.05 (N E) to 1764.03-1362.29 (S). Similar trends are observed in per capita
annual electricity consumption, which varies 230.91-210.84 (NE) to 412.30 -297.75 (S). Ward-wise total electricity
(domestic and other sectors) consumption synthesis reveals that about 40 wards have annual per capita electricity
consumption of 500 kWh, 23 wards have consumption of 500-1000 kWh. Majority of wards (84) are in the range of
1000-2000 kWh/person/year, 31 wards have the consumption of 2000-4000 kWh/person/year. A very high consumption of
more than 4000 kWh/person/year is in 24 wards of South East Bangalore, mainly due to IT and BT industries and large
scale high raise apartments.LPG is a dominant fuel used in the domestic sectors. Majority of households (1499,
76.2%) consumes one cylinder (of 14kg LPG) per month while 219 samples require 2 cylinders.LPG consumption varies
from 181.46-57.94 (W) to 208.75- 97.50 (SE). Per capita annual LPG consumption varies 42.33-20.02 (E) to
54.02-34.76 (SE). Pertaining to the link between energy consumption with the social factors, negative correlation
between household size and energy consumption per capita is observed in the sample analysis. A proportional increase
of the per capita energy consumption with income (r= 0.983), suggests that economic level of a household is an
important factor in domestic energy consumption. The spatial distribution of annual per capita energy consumption
shows that 767 households consume < 2 GJ/year while 888 households consuming 2-4 GJ/year. The energy consumption
ranges from 0.129 GJ/year to 12.39 GJ/year with the average of 2.9-1.4 GJ/year and this is comparable to earlier
reports. Emission from most of the wards (66 wards) is 10 to 15 Gg/year, while wards in peri-urban areas emit less
than 10 Gg/year. Wards located at city center emit more than 25 Gg/year with maximum of 46.56 Gg/Year (Sarvagna
Nagar) and minimum of 3.66 Gg/Year (Konena Agrahara ward). Extrapolation of these, show that total carbon dioxide
from all wards of Greater Bangalore accounts to 3350 Gg/Year. The study illustrate that domestic sector contributes
significantly to GHG emissions in the city. The findings emphasise the need to improve the end use energy efficiency
to conserve household energy to mitigate emissions and focus on renewable sources of energy while formulating the
sustainable energy policies.
Acknowledgement
I am grateful to the Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) for its financial support
(ARCP2011-07CMY-Han) to this research and thank BESCOM for providing zone-wise electricity data.