AQUATIC
HOTSPOT
Ramanathapura |
||
|
||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION |
Name of the Hotspot |
Ramanathapura Fish Sanctuary, Ramanathapura, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District. |
Focal species |
Mahseer – Tor kudhree (Sykes) |
Coordinating Team Experience / Expertise |
Dr. Madhav Gadgil and team |
Investigating Team |
S/Shri. H.N. Chandrashekharaiah, M.F. Rahman, K. Shama Bhat, Dr. G.V. Kowtal. |
Experience / Expertise |
The members of the team have adequate research and development experience in the field of fish and fisheries. |
Dates of data collection |
From 09.12. 2003 to 12.12.2003 |
Process of data collection |
Field visits and interviews. |
Sources of information |
Shri. Nagaraj, Senior Asst. Director of Fisheries. Shri. Ravindra, Asst. Director of Fisheries. Shri. Papanna, Asst. Director of Fisheries. Shri. Devaiah, Fisherman. Shri. Lakshmappa, Fisherman. Shri. Javaraiah, Fisherman. Shri. Thimma Shetty, Fisherman. |
Number of man-days consumed in data collection |
20 man- days |
SETTING |
Location |
Ramanathapura, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District. |
Area (in ha or Sqkm) ) |
5 ha |
Latitude / Longitude. |
Lat. 12 0 37', Long 76 0 5' |
Village / Town/ Taluk/District |
Ramanathapura, Ramanathapura, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District. |
Maps (kind of maps and the scale) |
Enclosed. |
Mode of access (Distance from Railway / Bus station) |
Located on the road leading from Hassan to Mysore at a distance of 50 Kms. Nearest railway station is Hole- narsipura on Hassan – Mysore route at a distance of 40 Kms. |
Facilities to stay closest to the ‘Hotspot' |
Inspection Bungalow at Konanoor, 3 Kms from ‘Hotspot', maintained by Irrigation Department and another Travellers Bungalow at Ramanathapura maintained by the Village Panchayat . A Five Star Motel is also there at Hassan. |
Tariff (if any) to be paid to visit the ‘Hot spot' |
Nil |
Controlling authorities |
Department of Fisheries. |
Class of landscape |
Riverine |
Water body |
Perennial River Cauvery |
Human population |
1600/- |
Presence of Scheduled Tribes or Nomadic Tribes population |
Nil |
Livestock |
Cattle, Buffalo, etc |
Irrigation status and major crops |
Paddy, Sugarcane, Coconut, Areca, Pulses, Maize, Bajra, Jowar, Tobacco and Mulberry, etc. |
Significant forest produce |
Nil |
Co-operative Societies and transactions |
Fishermen Cooperative Society, Konanoor, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan Dist. having membership strength of 150. |
Significant freshwater fish production |
The fish catch comprises of major carps, medium carps, cat fishes, air - breathing fishes, weed fishes and prawns . |
Disposal of fishing rights (Leasing /Auctioning/ Licences ) |
Fishermen obtain licences for fishing in river Cauvery, out side the sanctuary area, from the Department of Fisheries |
Number and type of fishing crafts |
Coracles |
Nearest fish landing centre |
Ramanathapura, Konanoor. |
Availability of fish processing facilities |
None |
Mining and quarrying activities |
Sand quarrying is done in the adjacent Hotspot area. |
Sources and extent of air and water pollution |
Nil |
Prevalence of Human diseases |
Nil |
Prevalence of livestock diseases |
Nil |
Educational Institutions |
Primary School Upper Primary School Secondary School Higher Secondary school. |
Co-operative Society |
Fishermen Co-operative Society, Konanoor, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District. |
Youth clubs |
Ramanathapura Yuva Sangha, Ramanathapura, Arkalgud Taluk, Hassan District. |
Ladies clubs |
Nil |
Active NGO's |
None |
THREATS AND SUPPORTIVE RESTORATION ACTIVITIES |
Name of individual / institutions/agency |
Activity with a positive influence on core area |
Activity with a negative influence on core area |
Activity with a positive influence on zone of influence |
Activity with a negative influence on zone of influence |
|
Local individuals |
Poaching |
||||
Local institutions |
i) Village Panchayat ii) Youth Club |
Protecting the sanctuary by preventing poaching |
|||
Outside individuals |
|||||
Outside institutions |
Society for Advancement of Aquaculture |
Providing technical guidance improve the sanctuary and to protect it |
|||
Government agencies |
Ecology and Environment Department, Department of Fisheries |
Providing required assistance. |
LIST OF KNOWLEDGE INDIVIDUALS |
Name |
Age group |
Sex |
Community |
Address of Expertise |
Sri. Narasimha Murthy V.P. Member |
55 |
Male |
Brahmin |
V.P. Member |
Sri. Vijaya Kumar |
35 |
Male |
Youth Club Leader |
|
Sri. Nagaraj |
48 |
Male |
Sr. Asst Director of Fisheries, Hassan. |
|
Sri. Ravindra |
56 |
Male |
Assistant Director of Fisheries, Hassan. |
|
Sri. Papanna |
48 |
Male |
Assistant, Director of Fisheries, Hasan |
|
Sri. Devaiah |
65 |
Male |
Fisherman Konanoor. |
|
Sri. Lakshmappa |
60 |
Male |
Fisherman Konanoor. |
|
Sri. Javaraiah |
65 |
Male |
Fisherman Konanoor. |
|
Sri. Thimma shetty |
60 |
Male |
Fisherman Konanoor. |
HABITATS |
1 |
Preparation of the sketch map of the landscape a. For zone of influence b. For zone of influence |
Enclosed Enclosed |
2. |
Description of Habitat types Habitat type Local name (if any) |
Riverine Vanhi-pushkarni |
3. |
Approximate total area (ha) |
5 ha |
4. |
Special significance of the habitat type (if any) |
Tor khudree one of the endangered fishes are found in the area. People feed the fishes and worship them. |
5. |
Management regimes |
Department of Fisheries. |
6. |
Goods and services provided by the habitat |
Protected area. The fishes when feed with cooked rice, biscuits, groundnuts, congregate in large In huge numbers and it is a big attraction to the public pilgrims. |
7 |
Bads and disservices provided by the habitat |
Nil |
8 |
Significant ecological processes influenced by the habitat type |
During monsoon, the river floods the area and during summer, there shall be very low water level as a result of which distress conditions prevails for the fishes in the sanctuary. |
9. |
Significant man induced processes influenced by the habitat. |
Village Panchayat, Local Youth Club and Society for Advancement of Aqua culture have created awareness among general public about the importance of protecting the sanctuary. The Rameshwara temple at Ramanathapura has a very great influence as majority of pilgrims visits the Hotspot also and offer food, in the form of groundnut, biscuits, puffed and cooked rice, coconut oil cake etc., |
10 |
Interacting individuals and institutions (Local) |
The Village Panchayat,Ramanathapura Yuva Vahini Sangha. |
11. |
Activities |
The Youth Club is protecting the fishes by organized watch and ward and feed the fishes when there are no pilgrims. |
12 |
Interacting individuals and institution (External) |
Department of Fisheries, Society for Advancement of Aquaculture. |
13. |
Activities |
Boundaries fixing, Board indicating “Fishing is prohibited. Board detailed with names of fishes recorded in the sanctuary. |
1 |
Type and name of the habitat patch |
Riverine Vanhi-Pushkarni, Ramanathapura Fish Sanctuary. |
2 i) ii) |
Change in Area Vegetation strata |
The construction of Harangi dam has reduced flow of water in the river and in summery months, it reaches a very low level. The depth is reduced due to siltation and also on account of accumulation of debris. Sparse vegetation has been observed |
3. i) ii) |
Aquatic habitat change in Catchment area Aquatic fauna |
Marginal change Not significant |
iii |
Aquatic flora |
Significant with reduced vegetation patch near about the Hotspot area. |
4. |
Significant ecological processes influencing the habitat patch. |
Nil |
5. |
Significant man-induced processes influencing the habitat patch |
The whole area is declared as a protected zone H.H, the Maharaja of Mysore, under the ‘Provisions' of Section 5(1) of the Mysore Game and Fish Preservation Reg. 11 of 1901, declared it as ‘Fishing Prohibited Area.' |
6 |
Productivity of Goods and Services |
Domestic use, washing, Irrigation. |
7 |
Extent of Bads and Disservices |
Washing of vehicles, cloths, utensils, and flow of agricultural pesticides. |
8. |
Reasons for ongoing changes |
Failure of rainfall, reduced water flow. Siltation of pool. |
9. |
Gainers |
Pilgrims and Tourist |
10 |
Losers |
Nil |
11 |
Desired changes desired future |
The flow of water of the river when reduces, people resort to poaching in |
12. |
Desired management system |
the area and also in the upper and lower stretches of the protected zone. In |
13. |
Suggested component for a feasible management plan for the habitat patch |
view of this, there is marked decline in the number of large-sized fish in the sanctuary. Protection provided to the fishes in the area appears not adequate. Feeding of fishes also has come down. When the water level reduces in the river, certain body parts of the fishes gets exposed and are subjected to injury and disease which has proved fatal on many occasions. Since Tor kudree are very much on the decline and Neolissochilus hexagonolepis are in large numbers in the sanctuary; in the interest of protecting the endangered. Tor kh udree, it is necessary to replenish these from other areas of the river. To effectively manage the Vanhi Pushkarni – the fish sanctuary, it is essential to organizing a NGO for protecting the fishes in sanctuary. In addition to organizing feeding of fishes, the NGO will also arrange watch and ward during day and night. |
LIFE SCAPE |
i.PLANKTON: | |
Phytoplankton | |
Myxophyceae: Spirolina,Oscillatoria | |
Cholorophyceae : Spirogyra, Ulothrix, Pediastrum, Closterium, Mougeotia | |
Bacillariophyceae: Synedra, Asterionela, Cyclotella,Fragillaria | |
ZOOPLANKTON | |
Protozoa: Difflugia | |
Copepoda: Diatomus | |
Cyclops Rotofera: Diaphnosoma | |
Keratella Cladocera: Ceriodaphnia | |
Ostracoda: Cypris | |
II BENTHOS | |
Insects | |
Order: Ephemeroptera | |
Family: BAETIDAE | |
1. Cloeon spp | |
Order: Odonata | |
Suborder: Anisoptera | |
Family: LIBELLULIDAE | |
2. Urothemis signata (Rambur) | |
Order: Hemiptera | |
Family: GERRIDAE | |
3. Gerris spinolae let and Sev. | |
Family: NEPIDAE | |
4. Laccotrephes maculatus Fabricius | |
Family: BELOSTOMATIDAE | |
5. Diplonychus annulatum Fabricius | |
Family: Corixidae | |
6. Micronecta merope Dist | |
Order: Coleoptera | |
Family: DYTISCIDAE | |
7. Dytiscus limbatus Fabricius | |
MOLLUSES | |
Class: Gastropoda | |
Subclass: Prosobranchia | |
Order: Mesogastropoda | |
Family: VIVIPARIDAE | |
Subfamily: Bellamyinae | |
Genus: Bellamya Jousseaune | |
8. Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck) | |
Family: BYTHYNIIDAE | |
Subfamily: Bythyniinae s. str. | |
Genus: Gabbia Tryon | |
9. Gabbia stenothyroides (Dohrn.) | |
Family: THIARIDAE | |
Subfamily: Thiarinae s. str. | |
Genus: Thiara Rosding | |
Subgenus: Thiara s. str | |
10. Thiara (Thiara) scabra (Mueller) | |
Subgenus: Melanoides Olivier | |
11. Thiara (Melanoides) tuberculata (Mueller) | |
Subfamily: Melanatriinae | |
Genus: Sulcospira Troschel | |
12. Sulcospira huegeli (Philipi) | |
Subclass: Pulmonata | |
Order: Bassomatophora | |
Family: LYMNAEIDAE | |
Genus: Lymnaea Lamarck | |
Subgenus: Pseudosuccinea Baker | |
13. Lymnaea (Pseudosuccinea) acuminata Lamarck | |
14. Lymnaea (Pseudosuccinea) luteola Lamarck | |
Family: PLANORBIDAE | |
Subfamily: Bulininae | |
Genus: Indoplanorbis Annandale and Prashad | |
15. Indoplanorbis exustus (Deshayes) | |
Class: Bivalvia | |
Subclass: Heterodonta | |
Order: Veneroida | |
Family: CORBICULIDAE | |
Genus: Corbicula Megerle von Meuhfeld | |
16. Corbicula striatella Deshayes | |
Fish | |
Order: Cypriniformes | |
Family: CYPRINIDAE | |
Subfamily: Danioninae(=Rasborinae) | |
Tribe: Danionini | |
Genus: Rasbora Bleeker | |
17. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton -Buchanan) | |
Subfamily: Cyprininae | |
Trib: Systomini | |
Subtribe: Systomi | |
Genus: Puntius Hamilton- Buchanan | |
18. Puntius ticto (Hamilton- Buchanan) | |
Family: BALITORIDAE | |
Subfamily: Nemacheilinae | |
Genus: Schistura Mc Celland | |
19. Schistura denisoni denisoni (Day) | |
Order: Cyprinodontiformes | |
Family: APLOCHEILIDAE | |
Subfamily: Aplocheilinae | |
Genus: Aplocheilus Mc Clelland | |
20. Aplocheilus lineatus (Valenciennes) | |
Family: POECILIDAE | |
Subfamily: Poecilinae | |
Genus: Gambusia Poey | |
21. Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard) | |
Order: Perciformes | |
Suborder: Percoidei | |
Family: CHANDIDAE (= AMBASSIDAE) | |
Genus: Parambassis Bleeker | |
22. Parambasis ranga (Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
Crustacea | |
Class: Crustacea | |
Subclass: Malacostraca | |
Order: Decapoda | |
Family: PALAEMONIDAE | |
23. Macrobrachium spp. | |
iii AQUATIC WEEDS | |
Family: HYDROCHARITACEAE | |
Genus: Hydrilla | |
1. Hydrilla verticillata casp. | |
Genus: Vallisneria | |
2. Vallisneria spiralis Linnaeus | |
Family: NAIADACEAE | |
Genus: Aponogeton | |
3. Aponogeton monostachyon Linnaeus | |
4. Aponogeton crispum Thumb | |
Genus: Potamogeton | |
5. Potamogeton pectinatus Linnaeus | |
Family: CYPERACEAE | |
Genus: Cyperus | |
6. Cyperus distans Linnaeus | |
Family: CHARACEAE | |
Genus: Chara | |
7. Chara zeylanica Wild |
iv FISH SPECIES |
||
Scientific Name | Common English Name |
Kannada Name |
Order : Osteoglossiformes Suborder : Notopteroidei Family : NOTOPTERIDAE Genus : Notopterus Lacepede 1 Notopterus notopterus (Pallas) |
Grey Feather back |
Chappali |
Order : Cypriniformes Family : CYPRINIDAE Subfamily : Danioninae (=Rasborinae) Tribe : Oxygasterini Genus : Salmostoma Swainson 2. Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes) |
Silver razor belly minnow |
Sampaj |
Tribe : Danioni Genus : Danio (Hamilton – Buchanan) 3. Danio aequipinnatus (Mc Clelland) |
Giant Danio |
Arshina Patte |
Genus : Rasbora Bleeker 4. Rasbora caverii (Jerdon)
5. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Scissor-tail Rasbora Black-line Rasbora |
Saslu Saslu |
Subfamily : Cyprininae Tribe : Cyprinini Subtribe : Cyprini Genus : Cyprinus Linnaeus 6. Cyprinus carpio communis Linnaeus |
Common carp |
Samanya Gende |
Subtribe : Tores Genus : Tor Gray 7. Tor khudree (Sykes) |
Deccan Mahseer |
Bili meenu |
Genus : Neolissochilus Rainboth 8. Neolissochilus hexagonolepis (Mc Clelland) |
Katli Mahseer |
Bili menu |
Tribe : Systomini Subtribe : Systomi Genus : Puntius (Hamilton - Buchanan) 9. Puntius carnaticus (Jerdon) 10. Puntius chola (Hamilton-Buchanan) 11. Puntius sophore (Hamilton - Buchanan) 12. Puntius ticto (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Carnatic carp Swampy barb Spot-fin swampy barb Ticto barb |
Machalu Dodda karse Gud pakke Bud Pakke |
Tribe : Labeonini Subtribe : Labeones Genus : Labeo Cuvier 13. Labeo calbasu (Hamilton-Buchanan) 14. Labeo rohita (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Calbasu Rohu |
Kage Rohu |
Subfamily : Oreininae Genus : Garra (Hamilton -Buchanan) 15. Garra gotyla stenorhynchus (Jerdon ) |
Nilgiris Garra |
Kallu korava |
Family : BALITORIDAE Subfamily : Nemacheilinae Genus : Schistura Mc Clelland 16. Schistura denisoni denisoni (Day) 17. Schistura semiarmatus (Day) |
Nemacheilus Nemacheilus |
Murangi Murangi |
Genus : Mesonemacheilus Banarascu & Nalbant 18. Mesonemacheilus pulchellus (Day) |
Nemacheilus |
Murangi |
Order : Siluriformes Family : BAGRIDAE Subfamily : Bagrinae Genus : Mystus Scopoli 19. Mystus cavasius (Hamilton-Buchanan) 20. Mystus montanus (Jerdon) 21. Mystus punctatus (Jerdon) |
Gangetic Mystus Wynad Mystus Niligiris Mystus |
Girlu Girlu Kattalu |
Family : SILURIDAE Genus : Ompok Lacepede 22. Ompok bimaculatus (Bloch) |
Butter fish |
Godle |
Genus : Wallago Bleeker 23. Wallago attu (Schneider) |
Fresh water Shark |
Balae |
Order : Cyprinodontiformes Family : APLOCHEILIDAE Subfamily : Aplocheilinae Genus : Aplocheilus Mc Clelland 24. Aplocheilus lineatus (Valenciennes) |
Killi fish |
Moogu malli |
Family : POECILIDAE Subfamily : Poecilinae Genus : Gambusia Poey 25. Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard) |
Gambusia |
Sollae-meenu |
Order : Synbranchiformes Suborder : Mastacembeloidei Family : MASTACEMBELIDAE Subfamily : Mastacembelinae Genus : Mastacembelus S copoli 26. Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede) |
Spiny Eel |
Havu menu |
Order : Perciformes Suborder : Percoidei Family : CHANDIDAE ( = AMBASSIDAE) Genus : C handa (Hamilton – Buchanan) 27. Chanda nama (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Elongate Glass Perchlet |
Bachinke |
Genus : Parambassis Bleeker 28. Parambassis ranga (Hamilton- Buchanan |
Glass fish |
Bachinke |
Suborder : Labroidei Family : CICHLIDAE Genus : Or eochromis Gunther 29. Or echromis mossambica (Peters) |
Tilapia |
Tilapia |
Suborder : Gobioidei Family : GOBIIDAE Subfamily : Gobiinae Genus : Glossgoobius Gill 30. Glossogobius giuris giuris (Hamilton – Buchanan) |
Tank Goby |
Bhangisidda |
Suborder : Anabantoidei Family : ANABANTIDAE Genus : Anabas Cuvier 31 Anabas testudineus (Bloch) |
Climbing Perch |
Koru meenu |
Suborder : Channoidei Family : CHANNIDAE Genus : Channa Scopoli 32. Chana marulius (Hamilton-Buchanan) 33. Channa striatus (Bloch) |
Gaint Snake head Stripped Snake -head |
Avulu Kuchchu |
v CRUSTACEA | |
Class: Crustaceae | |
Subclass: Malacostraca | |
Order: Decapoda | |
Family: PALAEMONIDAE | |
1. Macrobrachium spp | |
2. Caridina spp | |
Family: POTAMONIDAE | |
3. Paratelphusa spp | |
4. Paratelphusa spp | |
vi AMPHIBIA | |
Phylum: Chordata | |
Class: Amphibia | |
Order: Salentia | |
Suborder: Phaneroglossa | |
Family: RANIDAE | |
1. Rana cynophlyctes Schneider | |
vii REPTILIA | |
Order: Testudinate | |
Family: TRIONYCHIDAE | |
1. Lissemys punctata (Bonnaterra) | |
2. Lissemys punctata granosa (Schoepff) | |
Order: Squamata | |
Family: COLUBRIDAE | |
Subfamily: Homalopsinae | |
1. Natrix piscator (Linnaeus) | |
viii AVES | |
Family: PHALACROCORACIDAE | |
1. Phalacrocorax fuscicollis | |
2. Ahinga rufa | |
Family: ARDEIDAE | |
3. Ardeola grayii | |
4. Ardea alba | |
ix AQUATIC MAMMAL | |
Family: LUTRINAE | |
1. Aonyx cinerea nirnai (Pocock) |
(b) Additionalinformation on species of significance:
Most common local name of the species (Language) |
Indicated English / Kannada |
Scientific name of the species |
Indicated |
Habitat favoured |
Riverine |
Value to local community |
Religious significance |
Major uses / ill effects |
Since it is a place where threatened fish species are inhabitating, it is acting as a sanctuary for these fishes and also a place of attraction to the tourists pilgrims etc. |
Value of global relevance (as rare, threatened or endangered). |
Species of fishes are forced in to pool are endangered, therefore pool should be protected. |
(C) History of magnificant species / variety
Most common name of the species |
Indicated |
Scientific name |
Indicated |
Most common local name of variety |
Indicated |
Existing Management Authority |
Department of Fisheries Temple Authorities |
Fish breeding season |
Post monsoon |
Fishing methods |
Fishing prohibited in the Sanctuary area. |
Current level of abundance |
Moderate |
Trend in abundance in last 10 – 15 / 40 – 50 years. |
Larger sized fishes have declined and population wise too, they have reduced in numbers. Smaller-sized groups are seen in smaller numbers |
Significant ecological processes influencing the species / varieties |
Reduction of water level in river, siltation of pool etc. |
Significant man-induced processes influencing the species / varieties |
Poaching, dynamiting, poisoning has resulted in reduced population. |
Reasons for the ongoing change |
Construction of Harangi Dam, reduced, level of water, siltation. |
Gainers : Internal / External |
Local people, visitors |
Losers : Internal / External |
Nature |
Desired changes / Desired future |
NGO may be entrusted with the feeding watch and ward etc. Required financial assistant may be provided. |
Desired management system |
A committee may be constituted comprising of officials from concerned Government Department, Temple Trustees and NGOs. |
Suggested component for a feasible management plan for the species / varieties |
The Vanhi Pushkarni area may have to be adequately deepened to sustain normal fish life. Electrical lights, adjacent to Vanhi Pushkarni area, may be installed to prevent poaching of fishes during nights. To organize periodical desilting and cleaning of the area; people are to be educated about the importance of preserving the sanctity of Vanhi- Pushkarni and the fishes inhabiting. Breeding grounds of the fish of the sanctuary may be identified and protected. The present area of the sanctuary may be extended to 2, Km in both the up- and down streams stretches of the river as number of pools exists within where, fishes, during lean seasons, could take shelter. The NGO undertaking the responsibilities should be financially and physically helped. Department of Fisheries, which has a scheme for the “Improvement of Fish Sanctuaries in the State”, could provide suitable financial support to the NGO in this regard. |
MANAGEMENT |
a. 1. |
Perspective of others Desired response options of different members of local or outside communities / institutions / government agencies / industrial or mining undertaking etc. |
Public desire that there should be proper watch and ward prevent dynamiting fishermen should be prevented from fishing in the sanctuary. |
2. |
Significance of management issues and response options |
Protect the fishery, transplant Tor Khudree arrange feedings of fishes and watch and ward. |
3. |
Management issues pertaining to Habitat and / or Species / variety |
When the flow of water reduces water from Harangi reservoir may be released. Periodical cleaning and desilting of pool may be undertaken. Tor khudree and in less numbers compared to N. Aexagonalepis. Therefore transplantation of Tor khudree is necessary. |
4. |
Customary / Administrative |
Fisheries Department Temple Authorities. |
5. |
Since how long the arrangements have been in practice |
Since few years, Department of Fisheries has take more interest in protecting the area. |
6. |
Changes, if any, in management pattern over last 10- 15 / 40-50 years |
Nil |
7. |
Desired changes / Desired future |
As in 4 Habitat 11,12 and 13. |
8. |
Desired management system |
As detailed above |
b. |
Perspective of Investigators |
Possibility of artificial propagation of Tor khudree at Harangi may be explored, to transplant the finger lings produced in the farm in this Hotspot. |
c. |
Desired and feasible patter of management that should be promoted in the opinion of the investigators |
A Committee consisting of Revenue Department, Muzarai, Temple Authorities, Village Panchayat, Youth Club, Fisheries Department, and management of the sanctuary. |
d. |
Suggested strategy for promoting this desired patterns of management and the communication needs for the purpose |
As above |
e. |
Cultural, religious, recreational, scenic, tourist, significance of the hotspot |
When the sanctuary is developed and with publicity, it forms a tourist place as also a spot to pursue academic and research activities. |
f. |
Ecological evaluation of the hotspot |
Moderately managed. |
g. |
Suggested follow up investigations |
Periodical monitoring of the fish composition in the sanctuary area. |
H |
Any other suggested follow up |
Govt should arranged desilting of pool and organize watch and ward. Provide assistance to NGO to undertake certain responsibilities. Organized awareness lamps. |