AQUATIC
HOTSPOT
Shrigeri |
||
|
||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION |
Name of the Hotspot |
Shrigeri Fish Sanctuary |
Focal species |
Mahseer Tor khudree (Sykes) |
Coordinating Team |
Prof.Madhav Gadgil and team |
Investigating Team Experience / Expertise |
H.N. Chandrashekharaiah, M.F. Rahman , K. Shyam Bhat and Dr. G.V. Kowtal |
Dates of data collection |
14.12.2003 to 31.12.2003 |
Process of data collection |
Field studies, enquiries, interviews and reference work |
Sources of information |
Manager, Shri. Shringeri Matha, Shringeri. Dr. C.K. Murthy, Joint Director of Fisheries, Bangalore Sri.T. Venkateshappa, Dy. Director of Fisheries, Shimoga. Sri. Bheemappa, Asst. Inspector/ Supervisor of Fisheries and Sri. Cheluvaiah, Fisherman. |
Number of man-days consumed in data collection |
15 man-days |
SETTING |
Location |
The tank is located in Magadi village of Gadag District. |
Area (in ha ) |
50 ha |
Location |
Shringeri is a piligrimage centre located on the banks of Tunga river. |
Area (in ha or sq km) |
2 ha |
Latitude / Longitude |
Lat 13 o 25' 05”, Long 75 o 20'14” |
Village/Town/Taluk/District |
Shringeri, Shringeri, Shringeri, Chikamagalur. |
Maps (Kind of map and the scale) |
Enclosed |
Mode of access (Distance from Railway / Bus stations) |
Shringeri is located at a distance of 100 km from District H.Q Chikamagalur and 334 km from Bangalore. Nearest Railway station is Kadur on Bangalore Hubli Railway line. |
Facilities to stay closest to the Hotspot |
Inspection Bungalow of PWD, Rest Houses of Shri. Shrigeri Matha and Private Hotels. |
Tariff for stay for : visiting the Sanctuary |
Nil |
Controlling authorities |
Manager, Shri. Shringeri Matha and Department of Fisheries. |
Classes of landscape |
Temple town located adjacent to perennial Tunga river and surrounded by Narasimha Vana. |
Water bodies |
Shringeri Fish Sanctuary is situated in Tunga river bounded on one side by Sringeri and on the other side by Menase village. The sanctuary has a water spread area of about 2 ha. |
Human population |
1689 (1981) –Sringeri and 1200 (1981) – Menase |
Presence of Scheduled Tribes or Nomadic tribes population |
Not collected |
Live stock |
Cattle, Buffaloes, Goats, Poultry etc., |
Irrigation status and Major crops |
Area, paddy and coconut. |
Significant forest produce |
Nil |
Co-operative society and their transactions |
Nil |
Significant Fresh water fish production |
Fishing is prohibited in the sanctuary and in the up stream and down stream of the river upto a particular boundary / area and as such fish production is ‘Nil'. |
Disposal of fishing rights (Leasing, auctioning and licensing). | However, lincenses are issued by the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Koppa for fishing outside the sanctuary limits. Fishermen from neighbouring areas come to catch fish by using cast - and gillnets besides angling and trapping. |
Number and type of fishing craft and gears | Coracles are used for fishing and they carry gill nets, castnets, scoop, nets, hooks and traps. |
Nearest fish landing centre | No specific fish landing centre exists as fish catch is scanty and scattered. |
Mining and quarring | Mining activities are not done but, beyond sanctuary area, sand quarring is done for local construction work. |
Source and extent of air and water pollution | No point pollution except sewerage of the township is noticed. Pesticides used by agriculturists is washed into the river. No industry exists near the Sanctuary. |
Prevalence of Human diseases | Nil |
Prevalence of Livestock diseases |
Nil |
Educational institutions |
Pre-primary - Primary - Secondary - Higher Secondary PU College – |
Co-operative societies |
There are no Fishermen Co-operative Society. |
Youth Clubs |
One Youth Club is functioning. |
Ladies Clubs |
Mahila Mandal is functioning |
Active NGOS |
Shringeri Mutt. |
THREATS AND SUPPORTIVE RESTORATION ACTIVITIES |
Name of individual / institutions / agency | Activity with a positive influence on core area | Activity with a negative influence on core area | Activity with a positive influence on zone of influence | Activity with a negative influence on zone of influence | |
Local inviduals |
Sri. Gourishankar Administrator Sharada Peetha |
Provide protection for fishes in the sanctuary |
Nil |
Create awareness for protection of fish and prevent pollution |
Nil |
Government Agencies |
Fisheries Department, Forest Department, Govt of Karnataka . |
Development and protection of sanctuary Protection of forest area and wild life |
Nil |
Stocking of fish seed in the river as a developmental measure. |
Nil |
Outside |
Devotees of Shringeri Matha migrant fishermen |
Feeding of fishes / fishing |
Nil |
Nil |
Polluting of the sanctuary through disposal of garbage. |
Any others – Town Municipality |
President |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Release of sewarage and dumping of garbage. |
LIST OF KNOWLEDGE INDIVIDUALS |
Name |
Age |
Sex |
Community |
Address |
Sri. Gouri Shankar |
50 |
Male |
Brahim |
Administrator of the Shrigeri Matha |
Sri. Dakshina Murthy |
50 |
Male |
Brahim |
Asst. Administrator (Peshkar) |
HABITATS |
a) | Preparation of sketch map of the landscape | Maps of Shringeri and Menase villages enclosed. |
b) | Description of habitat types | |
1. |
Habitat type |
Areas adjoining the Sanctuary consists of Forest and small townships. The natural landscape is mainly made up of hilly, semi- evergreen forest with marginal land under cultivation (Areca , coconut and Paddy). |
2. |
Local name |
Shringeri Matsya Dhama (Fish Sanctuary) |
3. |
Approximate Total Area |
2 ha |
4. |
Special significance of the habitat type |
The fish sanctuary area of the river is unpolluted and supports dense population of Mahseers of different age groups. |
5. |
Management regimes |
This Sanctuary is managed by the Shringeri Matha Authorities. They keep watch and ward and maintain cleanliness. The area has not yet been declared as ‘Fish Sanctuary' by the Government of Karnataka. |
6. |
Goods and Services provided by the habitat |
The river water supports several species of fish which attracts devotees and the water is used for domestic purposes. |
7. | Bads and Disservices provided by the habitat | Nil |
8. |
Significant ecological processes influenced by the habitat |
The water pool below the bridge serves as a congregation enter for large fish and the smaller ones congregate near the bathing ghat. |
9. |
Significant man-induced processes in the influenced by the habitat. |
Devotees coming to Shringeri, also visits the large fish congregating spot adjacent to the temple complex and feed the fishes. |
10. |
Interacting individuals and institutions (local) |
Temple authorities have put up sign boards to educate the people visiting the sanctuary and local vendors sell feed for the fish. |
11. |
Activities Conservation efforts |
The fish are fed by Shri. Shringeri Matha Authorities and the pilgrims and are protected by the watch and ward of the Shringeri Matha |
12. |
Inin Interacting individuals (Internal) |
Pilgrims |
13. |
App Activities |
Fish feeding is done by the pilgrims as also by temple authorities. |
(c) History of important habitat patches over 10-15/45-50 years. | ||
1 |
Type and name of habitat patch |
Shringeri Matsya Dhama |
2 |
Change in : Area Vegetation strata |
Nil No marked change |
3. |
Aquatic habitat change Catchment area Aquatic fauna Aquatic flora |
Nil No significant change No significant change |
4. |
Significant ecological processes influencing the habitat patch |
There is no significant change in water area and fish population for the last 50 years. |
5. |
Significant man- induced processes influencing the habitat patch |
Improvement in religious activities, communications, health and educational facilities has been attracting more people to this area. |
6. |
Productivity of Goods and Services |
Number of visitors have increased facilities for boarding and lodging had also increased. |
7. |
Extent of Bads and Disservices |
The drainage water from the township and pesticides laden wastes from agricultural lands enters the river causing pollution. |
8. |
Reasons for ongoing changes |
Increase flow in human population and utilization of land. |
9. |
Gainers |
Agriculturists, visitors and migrants. |
10. |
Losers |
Nil |
11. |
Desired changes/Desired future |
Pollution- free water in adequate quantity. |
12. |
Desired management system |
Department of Fisheries, Forest, Department, Municipality and Temple Authorities should constitute a team for developing the sanctuary. |
13. |
Suggested component for a feasible management plan for that habitat |
The team should aim at improving the habitat and fish population. |
LIFE SCAPE |
i. PLANKTON | |
PHYTOPLANKTON | |
Myxophyceae: Eudorina | |
Chlorophyceae: Spirogyra Zygnema | |
Bacillariophyceae: Synedra, Fragillaria, Cosmarium | |
ZOOPLANKTON | |
Cladocera: Daphnia | |
i)BENTHOS | |
a)Insects | |
Order: Hemiptera | |
Family: GERRIDAE | |
1. Gerris spinolae Leth. & Sev. | |
Family: NOTONECTIDAE | |
2. Notonecta glauca Linnaeus | |
Family: NEPIDAE | |
3. Laccotrephes maculata Fabricius. | |
Family: CORIXIDAE | |
4. Corixa hieroglyphica Duf | |
5. Micronecta merope Dist. | |
Order: Coleoptera | |
Family: DYTISCIDAE | |
6. dytiscus limbatus Fabricius | |
b)Molluscs | |
Class: Gastropoda | |
Subclass: Prosobranchia | |
Order: Mesogastropoda | |
Family: THIARIDAE | |
Subfamily: Thiarinae s.str | |
Genus: Thiara Roding | |
Sub genus: Melanoides Olivier | |
7. Thiara (Melanoides) tuberculata(Muller) | |
Class: Bivalvia | |
Subclass: Paleoheterodonta | |
Order: Unionida | |
Family: UNIONIDAE | |
Sub family: Unioninae | |
Genus: Lamellidens Simpson | |
8. Lamellidens corianus Lea | |
9. Lamellidens marginalis (Lamarck) | |
Fish | |
Order: Cypriniformes | |
Family: CYPRINIDAE | |
Subfamily: Danioninae (=Rasborinae) | |
Tribe: Oxygasterini | |
Genus: Salmostoma Swainson | |
10. Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes) | |
Genus: Barilius Hamitlon-Buchanan | |
11. Barilius canarensis (Jerdon) | |
Tribe: Danionini | |
Genus: Rasbora Bleeker | |
12. Rasbora daniconius(Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
Sub family: Cyprininae | |
Tribe: Cyprinini | |
Subtribe: Tores | |
Genus: Tor Gray | |
13. Tor khudree (Sykes) | |
Tribe: Systomini | |
Subtribe: Systomi | |
Genus: Puntius Hamilton-Buchanan | |
14. Puntius guganio (Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
15. Puntius ticto (Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
Family: BALITORIDAE | |
SubFamily: Nemacheilinae | |
Genus: Nemacheilus Bleeker | |
16. Nemacheilus anguilla Annandale | |
Amphibia | |
Phylum: Chordata | |
Class: Amphibia | |
Order: Salentia | |
Sub-Order: Phaneroglossa | |
Family: RANIDAE | |
18. Rana spp (Tadpoles) | |
19. Rana cynophlyctes Schneider | |
iii Aquatic Weeds | No aquatic weeds were observed. |
iv. Fish species | ||||
Scientific name |
Common English name |
Kannada name |
||
Order |
: |
Anguilliformes |
||
Suborder |
: |
Anguilloidei |
||
Family |
: |
ANGUILLIDAE |
||
Genus |
: |
Anguilla Shrank |
||
1 |
Anguilla bengalensis bengalensis (Gray & Hardw.) |
Indian Long-fin Ee1 |
Malaga |
|
Order |
: |
Cypriniformes |
||
Family |
: |
CYPRINIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Danioninae (=Rasborinae) |
||
Tribe |
: |
Oxygasterini |
||
Genus |
: |
Salmostoma Swainson |
||
2 |
Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes) |
Silver-razor belly minnow |
Sampaj |
|
3 |
Salmostoma novacula (Valenciennes) |
Novacula razor-belly minnow |
Chalake |
|
Genus |
: |
Barilius Hamilton-Buchanan |
||
4 |
Barilius barna(Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Barna Baril |
Bilchi |
|
5 |
Barilius bendelisis(Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Hamilton's Baril |
Agasa gitti |
|
6 |
Barilius canarensis (Jerdon) |
Jerdon's Baril |
Bilchi. |
|
Tribe |
: |
Danionini |
||
Genus |
: |
Esomus Swainson |
||
7 |
Esomus danricus (Hamilton Buchanan) |
Flying barb |
Meese Pakke |
|
Genus |
: |
Danio Hamilton –Buchanan |
||
8 |
Danio aequipinnatus (McClelland) |
Gaint Danio |
Arshina Patte |
|
Genus |
: |
Rasbora Bleeker |
||
9 |
Rasbora daniconius(Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Black-line Rasbora |
Saslu |
|
Genus |
: |
Amblypharyngodon Bleeker |
||
10 |
Amblypharyngodon mola(Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Mola carplet |
Enapu Pakke |
|
Sub Family |
: |
Cyprininae |
||
Tribe |
: |
Cyprinini |
||
Subtribe |
: |
Tores |
||
Genus |
: |
Tor Gray |
||
11 |
Tor khudree (Sykes) |
Deccan Mahseer |
Bili meenu |
|
Tribe |
: |
Systomini |
||
Subtribe |
: |
Osteobramae |
||
Genus |
: |
Rohtee Sykes |
||
12 |
Rohtee ogilbii Sykes |
Vatani Rohtee |
Sipri |
|
Subtribe |
: |
Systomi |
||
Genus |
: |
Oreichthys H.M. Sumith |
||
13 |
Oreichthys cosuatis (Hamilton -Buchanan) |
Cosuatis barb |
Khavli |
|
Genus |
: |
Puntius Hamilton –Buchanan |
||
14 |
Puntius amphibius (Valenciennes) |
Scarlet –banded barb |
Gende |
|
15 |
Puntius guganio (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Glass barb |
Pakke |
|
16 |
Puntius pulchellus (Day) |
Pulchellus |
Haragi |
|
17 |
Puntius sophore (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Spot-fin Swampy barb |
Gud- Pakke |
|
18 |
Puntius ticto (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Ticto barb |
Bud-pakke |
|
Genus |
: |
Gonoproktopterus Bleeker |
||
19 |
Gonoproktopterus kolus (Sykes) |
Kolus |
Kolasa |
|
Tribe |
: |
Labeonini |
||
Subtribe |
: |
Labeones |
||
Genus |
: |
Labeo Cuvier |
||
20 |
Labeo calbasu (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Calbasu |
Kage |
|
Subfamily |
: |
Oreininae |
||
Genus |
: |
Garra Hamilton-Buchanan |
||
21 |
Garra bicornuta Rao |
Tunga Garra |
Mukarti |
|
22 |
Garra gotyla stenohynchus (Jerdon) |
Nilgiri Garra |
Kallu Korava |
|
Family |
: |
BALITORIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Nemacheilinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Nemacheilus Bleeker |
||
23 |
Nemacheilus anguilla Annandale |
Nemacheilus |
Murangi |
|
Genus |
: |
Oreonectes Gunther |
||
24 |
Oreonectes (Oreonectes) evazardi (Day) |
Nemacheilus |
Murangi |
|
Subfamily |
: |
Cobitinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Lepidocephalus Bleeker |
||
25 |
Lepidocephalus thermalis (Valenciennes) |
Nemacheilus |
Murangi |
|
Order |
: |
Siluriformes |
||
Family |
: |
BAGRIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Bagrinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Mystus Sc opoli |
||
26 |
Mystus cavasius (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Gangetic Mystus |
Girlu |
|
Genus |
: |
Aorichthys Wu |
||
27 |
Aorichthys seenghala (Sykes) |
Giant river catfish |
Bili Suragi |
|
Family |
: |
SILURIDAE |
||
Genus |
: |
Ompok Lacepede |
||
28 |
Ompok bimaculatus (Bloch) |
Butterfish |
Godle |
|
Genus |
: |
Wallago Bleeker |
||
29 |
Wallago attu (Schenider) |
Freshwater Shark |
Bale |
|
Order |
: |
Beloniformes |
||
Suborder |
: |
Belanoidei (=Exocoetoidei) |
||
Family |
: |
BELONIDAE |
||
Genus |
: |
Xenontolan Regan |
||
31 |
Xenontodon cancila (Hamilton –Buchanan) |
Freshwater Garfish |
Konti |
|
Order |
: |
Cyprinodontiformes |
||
Family |
: |
APLOCHEILIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Aplocheilinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Aplocheilus McClelland |
||
32 |
Aplocheilus lineatus (Valenciennes) |
Killifish |
Moogu malli |
|
Order |
: |
Synbranchiformes |
||
Suborder |
: |
Mastacembeloidei |
||
Family |
: |
MASTACEMBELIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Mastacembelinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Mastacembelus Scopoli |
||
32 |
Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede) |
Spiny Eel |
Havu meenu |
|
Order |
: |
Perciformes |
||
Suborder |
: |
Percoidei |
||
Family |
: |
CHANDIDAE (=AMBASSIDAE) |
||
Genus |
: |
Parambassis Bleeker |
||
33 |
Parambassis ranga (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Glassfish |
Bachinke |
|
Suborder |
: |
Gobioidei |
||
Family |
: |
GOBIIDAE |
||
Subfamily |
: |
Gobbinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Glossgobius Gill |
||
34 |
Glossogobius giuris giuris (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Tank Goby |
Bhangi sidda |
|
Suborder |
: |
Anabantoidei |
||
Family |
: |
BELONTIDAE |
||
Sub family |
: |
Macropodinae |
||
Genus |
: |
Pseudosphromenus Lacepede |
||
35 |
Pseudosphromenus cupanus (Valenciennes) |
Paradise fish |
Champarke |
|
Suborder |
: |
Channoidei |
||
Family |
: |
CHANNIDAE |
||
Genus |
: |
Channa Scopoli |
||
36 |
Channa marulius (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Giant Snake-head |
Avulu |
|
37 |
Channa orientalis (Schneider ) |
Asiatic Snake-head |
Mottu |
|
38 |
Channa punctatus (Bloch) |
Spotted Snake-head |
Korava |
v Crustacea | |
Class: Crustacea | |
Subclass: Malacostraca | |
Order: Decapoda | |
Family: PALAEMONIDAE | |
1. Macrobrachium spp | |
Family: POTAMONIDAE | |
2. Paratelphusa spp | |
3. Paratelphusa spp | |
4. Paratelphusa spp | |
Vi Amphibia | |
Phylum: Chordata | |
Class: Amphibia | |
Order: Salentia | |
Sub-Order: Phaneroglossa | |
Family: RANIDAE | |
1. Rana spp | |
2. Rana cynophlyctes Schneider | |
Vii Reptilia | |
Order: Testudinata | |
Family: EMYDIDAE | |
1. Geomyda spp | |
Family: TRIONYCHIDAE | |
2. Lissemys punctata (Bonnaterra) | |
Order: Squamata | |
Family: COLUBRIDAE | |
Subfamily: Homalopsinae | |
3. Enhydris enhydris (Schneider) | |
4. Natrix piscator (Linnaeus) | |
viii AVES | |
Family: PHALACROCORACIDAE | |
1. Phalacrocorax fuscicollis | |
2. Anhinga rufa | |
Family: ARDEIDAE | |
3. Ardeola grayii | |
4. Ardea alba | |
IX AQUATIC MAMMALS | |
Family: LUTRINAE | |
1. Aonyx cinerea nirnai (Pocock) | |
2. Lutra spp. |
(b) Additionalinformation on species of significance:
Most common local name of the species (Language) |
Indicated |
Scientific name of the species |
Indicated |
Habitat favoured |
Running water and free from pollution (Riverine). |
Value to local community |
This fish is sacred to devotees and hence is not caught. |
Major uses/ill effects |
This fish is of great tourists attraction. It is a reknowned game –fish. The fish helps in maintenance of clean water body. |
Value of global relevance |
Tor khudree has been classified as endangered threatened species by Zoological Survey of India and National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources. Hence conservation and developmental measures are to be adopted for its proliferation. |
(C) History of magnificant species / variety
Most common name of the species |
Mahseer |
Scientific name |
Tor khudree (Sykes) |
Most common local name of species |
Bilimeenu |
Existing management authority |
Authorities of Sri. Sringeri Matha. |
Fish beeding season |
Post-monsoon |
Fishing methods (Types of nets used ) |
Gillnete and cash nets |
Current level of abundance |
Tor khudree accounts for about 50% of the fish population |
Trend in abundance in last 10-15 / 40-50 years |
No significant change. |
Significant ecological processes influencing the species |
Heavy S.W monsoon create fast flow in the river, ideally suited to the existing fish species. |
Significant man-induced processes influencing the species |
River water is clear for most part of the year. Protection and feeding by pilgrims and locals has helped in their propagation. |
Reasons for the ongoing change |
Increase in human population and pilgrims to the Hot spot. |
Gainers : Internal External : |
Local people are visitors |
Losers : Internal / External |
None |
Desired changes / desired future |
Periodic cleaning of sanctuary area from extraneous accumulated matter. |
Desired Management System |
Active role by the Government organizations in protecting fish and their management. |
Suggested component for a feasible management plan for the species |
Demarcations of the Hotspot boundary and declaration of the area as Fish sanctuary. |
MANAGEMENT |
(a), (b), (c) & (d)
The Temple Authorities, desire that the area be declared as ‘Fish sanctuary' and to give additional protection. The investigators feel that demarcation and declaration of the area as a ‘sanctuary' should be speedily done and development measures should be adopted on scientific basis by the Department of Fisheries.
e. Cultural, religious , recreational, scenic, tourist significance of the Hotspot:
Mahseer or Bilimeenu has been considered as a sacred fish and protected since several centuries and this fish is not consumed by local population. In view of the importance of Sharada Temple and Shankaracharya Matha and fish congregation, people from allover the Country visit the place.
f. Ecological evaluation of the Hotspot :
Shringeri Fish sanctuary is to be protected and further developed in view of the already habituated Mahseer fish population.
g. Suggested follow-up investigations : Intensive studies on location of breeding grounds of this fish are to be urgently undertaken.
f. Any other suggested follow up : Periodic check of water quality and fish population is desirable.