AQUATIC
HOTSPOT
Hariharapura |
||
|
||
BACKGROUND INFORMATION |
Name of the Hotspot | Jammatige Hariharapura |
Focal species | Mahseer-Tor khudree(Sykes) |
Coordinating Team | Prof. Madhav Gadgil and team |
Investigating Team | H.N. Chandrashekharaiah, M.F.Rahman, K.Sham Bhat and Dr.G.V.Kowtal |
Dates of data collection | 14.12.2003 - 31.12.2003 |
Process of data collection | Field study, reference work and interaction with local people. |
Sources of information | Dr.C.K.Murthy, Joint Director of Fisheries,Bangalore. Sri.T.Venkateshappa, Dy Director of Fisheries,Shimoga. Sri.Mallikarjunaiah,Asst Director of Fisheries, Chikmagalur. Sri. Phaniraj Bhat Jammatige, Agrahar. Sri. Balakrishna Jammatige Agrahara. Sri.Suresh, Jammatige Agrahara. |
Number of man-days consumed in data collection | 12 man-days |
SETTING |
Location | Jammatige Agrahara, Hariharapura |
Area (in ha or sq km) | 0.5 ha |
Latitude / Longitude / Altitude | Lat. :13o33' Long.: 75o22m |
Village / Town / Taluk / District | Jammatige, Hariharapura and Addada Village, Hariharapura, Taluk, Koppa, Chikamagalur District. |
Maps (kind of map and the scale) | Enclosed |
Modes of Access | (Distance from Railway station/Bus station) 10 km from Taluk Head Quarters at Koppas 70 Km from District Head Quarters at Chikmagalur, Nearest Railway Station, Shimoga / Kadur. |
Facilities to stay closest to the hotspot | I.B. and hotels at Koppa and Hariharapura Matha. |
Tariff ( if any) to be paid to visit the hotspot | Nil |
Controlling authorities | 1) Sri Neelkanteshwara Temple Seva Samithi, Hariharapura. 2) Asst Director of Fisheries, Koppa. |
Classes of Landscape | Lower ranges of Western Ghat on Tunga River bounded on the Western side by Sri. Neelakanteswar Temple and Addada Village on the Eastern side. |
Water bodies | Tunga River is the main water body. |
Human Population | 1981- 2294 Hariharapura 1092 Addada Presence of Scheduled tribes or Nomadic tribes population 1991 |
Live stock | Cattle |
Irrigation status and Major crops | Areca, Coffee, Paddy are the major produce. |
Significant forest produce | Timber |
Quantities recorded at the Range or Divisional Forest offices | Not applicable |
Cooperative Societies and their transactions | Not applicable |
Significant fresh water fish productions | Major, minor carps and catfishes |
Disposal of fishing rights (Leasing /Auctioning / Licence) | Licence for fishing in river stretched issued by Asst. Director of Fisheries, Koppa. |
Significant estuarine and marine fish /shell fish productions | Not applicable. |
Number and types of fishing crafts/gears | Coracles, floats, gillnets, castnets, traps and hooks. |
Nearest fish landing centres and disposal system | Koppa, Local sales |
Availability of fish processing facilities | Nil. |
Mining and quarring activities in the | Nil area. |
Sources and extent of air and water pollution | Pesticides washings from agricultural land and coffee curing units are not significant. |
Prevalence of human diseases | Malaria |
Prevalence of livestock diseases | Not Applicable |
Educational Institutions | Not Applicable |
Co-operative Societies | Not Applicable |
Youth Clubs | Not Applicable |
Ladies Club | Not Applicable |
Active NGO's | Not Applicable |
THREATS AND SUPPORTIVE RESTORATION ACTIVITIES |
Name of individual / institutions / agency |
Activity with a positive influence on core area |
Activity with a negative influence on core area |
Activity with a positive influence on zone of influence |
Activity with a negative influence on zone of influence |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Local individuals |
Sri Phaniraj Bhat Sri. Balakrishna Sri. Suresh |
Protection and feeding of fishes of the sanctuary |
Nil |
Ceate awareness amongst villagers towards fish consenation |
Nil |
Local Institution |
Sri. Nilakanteswara Temple Seva Samiti |
Do |
Nil |
DO |
NIL |
Outside Individuals |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Outside Institution |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Government Agencies |
Asst. Director of Fisheries, Koppa |
Fish Protection and Development |
Nil |
Create awareness amongst villagers about fish conservation |
NA |
Industrial, mining companies etc., |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Any other agencies |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
LIST OF KNOWLEDGE INDIVIDUALS |
Name |
Age |
Sex |
Community |
Address |
Sri Phaniraj Bhat |
50-60 |
Male |
Brahmin |
Jammatige 08265-574133 |
Sri. Balakrishna |
40-50 |
Male |
Brahmin |
Agrahara 574462 |
Sri. Suresh |
25-30 |
Male |
Brahmin |
Hariharapura 574134 |
Sri. Krishnadevaru Bhat – Archaka |
NA |
Male |
Brahmin |
Taluk Koppa |
Sri. Sheshadri Bhat – Archaka |
NA |
Male |
Brahmin |
Chikamagalur |
HABITATS |
(a)Preparation of sketchmap of the landscape | |
1. For zone of influence (upper) | Enclosed |
2. For zone of influence (lower) | Enclosed |
(b)Description of Habitat types | |
1. Habitat type | Semi-evergreen forest with riparian vegetation and cultivated lands. |
2. Local name (if any) | Agrahara |
3. Approximate total area (ha) | 0.5 ha |
4. Special significance of the habitat type(if any) | The river water is clean and unpolluted and supports a good population of Mahseer Tor khudree, and Puntius pulchellus. |
5. Management regimes | The temple authorities attend to feeding the fish mainly by raw rice and cooked rice. |
6. Goods and services provided by the habitat | River water is used for agricultural and domestic purposes and supports aquatic life. |
7. Bads and Disservices provided by the habitat | Nil |
8. Significant ecological processes influenced by habitat type | The water pool at the foot steps of temple provides protection for the fish. |
9. Significant man-induced processes influenced by the habitat | The fish congregation has attracted the attention of the temple authorities and piligrims resulting in the construction of steps leading to the pool and feeding of fish. |
10. Interacting individuals and institutions (Local) | Temple authorities guide the visitors / piligrims to the pool and narrate the history of the Mahseer fish and the sacred temple. |
11. Activities | After performing pooja in Sri. Nilakanteswara temple the fishes are fed daily by the Archakas, visitors and pilgrims. |
12. Interacting individuals and institutions(External) | Temple authorities interacting with the pilgrims and public. |
13. Activities | Protection and feeding of fish and providing information to visitors. |
(c) History of important habitat patches over 10-15/40-50 years | |
1. Type and name of the habitat patch | Jammatige Agrahara on Tunga River |
2. Change in:-i)Area | No significant change |
ii)Vegetation strata | No significant change |
3. Aquatic habitat change in :- | |
i) Catchment area | No significant change |
ii) Aquatic fauna | No significant change |
iii) Aquatic flora | No significant change |
4. Significant ecological processes influencing the habital patch | No significant change in water area and fish population. |
5. Significant man-induced processes influencing the habitat patch | The Sanctuary is very near to Mangalore - Solapur highway (NH 13) and has brought in large number of visitors and as well as improvement in lodging and boarding facilities. |
6. Productivity of Goods and Services | lose to Hariharapura Sanctuary another fish congregation at a distance of 1 Km downsteam has come up and bears the name "Abhiram Matsya Dhama and is maintained by Sri. Laxmi Narayana Matha, Haripura. |
7. Extent of Bads and Disservices | Not significant |
8. Reasons for ongoing changes | Increase in number of pilgrims visitors is mainly due to increased transport and lodging facilities (nearness to NH 13) and demarcation established of a new Fish Sanctuary at Sri. Laxmi Narayana Matha. |
9. Gainers | Local residents and visitors |
10. Losers | None |
11. Desired changes / Desired future | Added protection to fish and feeding of fish. |
12. Desired management system | Temple authorities Forest and Fisheries Department personnel should jointly frame programmes for the development of Sanctuary. |
13. Suggested component for a feasible management plan for the habitat patch | The Fisheries and Forest Departments should provide financial incentives for development of the sanctuary and riparian vegetation. |
LIFE SCAPE |
i.PLANKTON | |
PHYTOPLANKTON | |
Chlorophyceae: Ulothrix | |
Bacillariophyceae: Fragillaria | |
ZOOPLANKTON | |
Protozoa: Amoeba | |
Copapoda: Nauplius Cyclops | |
Miscellaneous: Insect remains | |
ii BENTHOS | |
INSECTS | |
Order: Hemiptera | |
Family: GERRIDAE | |
1. Gerris spinolae Leth, & Sev. | |
Family: CORIXIDAE | |
2. Micronecta merope Dist | |
Order: Coleoptera | |
Family: DYTISCIDAE | |
3. Dytiscus limbatus Fabricius | |
MOLLUSES | |
Class: Gastropoda | |
Subclass: Prosobranchia | |
Order: Mesogastropoda | |
Family: VIVIPARIDAE | |
Subfamily: Bellamyinae | |
Genus: Bellamya Jousseaune | |
4. Bellamya bengalensis (Lamarck) | |
Family: THIARIDAE | |
Subfamily: Thiarinae S.Str. | |
Genus: Thiara Roding | |
5. Thiara (Melanoides) tuberculata (Muller) | |
Class: Bivalvia | |
Subclass: Paleoheterodonta | |
Order: Unionida | |
Family: UNIONIDAE | |
Subfamily: Unioninae | |
Genus: Lamellidens Simpson | |
6. Lamellidens corianus Lea | |
7. Lamellidens marginalis (Lamarck) | |
FISH | |
Order: Cypriniformes | |
Family: CYPRINIDAE | |
Subfamily: Danioninae (= Rasborinae) | |
Tribe: Oxygasterini | |
Genus: Salmostoma Swainson | |
8. Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes) | |
Tribe: Danionini | |
Genus: Rasbora Bleeker | |
9. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
Subfamily: Cyprininae | |
Tribe: Cyprinini | |
Subtribe: Tores | |
Genus: Tor Gray | |
10. Tor khudree (Sykes) | |
Tribe: Systomini | |
Subtribe: Systomi | |
Genus: Puntius (Hamilton- Buchanan) | |
11. Puntius ticto (Hamilton-Buchanan) | |
Family: BALITORIDAE | |
Subfamily: Nemacheilinae | |
Genus: Nemacheilus Bleeker | |
12. Nemacheilus anguilla Annandale | |
AMPHIBIA | |
Phylum: Chordata | |
Class: Amphibia | |
Order: Salentia | |
Suborder: Phaneroglossa | |
Family: RANIDAE | |
13. Rana cynophlyctes Schneider | |
iii. AQUATIC WEEDS | Not Observed |
iv. FISH SPECIES | ||
Scientific Name |
Common Name |
Kannada Name |
Order : Cypriniformes Family : CYPRINIDAE Subfamily : Danioninae (= Rasborinae) Tribe : Oxygasterini Genus : Salmostoma Swainson 1 Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes) |
Silver razor – belly minnow |
Sampaj |
Genus : Barilius (Hamilton-Buchanan) 2. Barilius bendelisis (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Hamilton's Bari |
Agasa-gitti |
Tribe : Danionini Genus : Esomus Swainson 3. Esomus danricus (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Flying barb |
Meese Pakke |
Genus : Denio (Hamilton-Buchanan) 4. Danio aequipinnatus (McClelland) |
Giant Danio |
Arshina Patte |
Genus : Rasbora Bleeker 5. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Black-line Rasbora |
Saslu |
Genus : Amblypharyngodon Bleeker 6. Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Mola carplet |
Enapu pakke |
Subfamily : Cyprininae Tribe : Cyprinini Subtribe : Tores Genus : Tor Gray 7. Tor Khudree (sykes) |
Deccan Mahseer |
Bili-meenu |
Tribe : Systomini Subtribe : Systomi Genus : Puntius (Hamilton-Buchanan) 8. Puntius amphibius (Valenciennes) 9 Puntius fasciatus fasciatus (Day) 10 Puntius pulchellus (Day) 11. Puntius sophore (Hamilton- (Buchanan) 12 Puntius ticto (Hamilton – Buchanan) |
Scarlet - banded barb Melan barb Pulchellus Spot – fin swampy barb Ticto barb |
Gende Pakke Haragi Gud pakke Bud pakke |
Tribe : Labeonini Subtribe : Labeones Genus : Labeo Cuvier 13 Labeoo calbasu (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Calbasu |
Kage |
Subfamily : Oreininae Genus : Garra (Hamilton-Buchanan) 14 Garra gotyla stenorhynchus (Jerdon) |
Niligiri Garra |
Kallu Korava |
Family : BALITORIDAE Subfamily : Nemacheilinae Genus : Nemacheilus Bleekar 15 Nemacheilus anguilla Annandale |
Nemacheilus |
Murangi |
Order : Siluriformes Family : BAGRIDAE Subfamily : Bagrinae Genus : Mystus Scopoli 16 Mystus cavasius (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Gangetic Mystus |
Girlu |
Family : CLARIIDAE Genus : Clarias Scopoli 17 Clarias batrachus Linnaeus |
Magur |
Ane menu |
Order : Cyprinodontoformes Family : APLOCHEILIDAE Subfamily : Aplocheilinae Genus : Aplocheilus McClelland 18 Aplocheilus lineatus (Valenciennes) |
Killi fish |
Moogu malli |
Order : Synbranchiformes Suborder : Mastacembeloidei Family : MASTACEMBELIDAE Subfamily : Mastacembelinae Genus : Mastacembelus Scopoli 19 Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede) |
Spiny Eel |
Havu-meenu |
Order : Perciformes Suborder : Percoidei Family : CHANDIADE(=AMBASSIDAE) Genus : Parambasis Bleeker 20 Parambassis ranga (Hamilton- Buchanan) |
Glass fish |
Bachinke |
Suborder : Gobioidei Family : GOBIIDAE Subfamily : Gobiinae Genus : Glossogobius Gill 21 Glossogobius giuris giuris (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Tank Gody |
Bhangi sidda |
Suborder : Anabantoidei Family : BELONTIDAE Subfamily : Macropodinae Genus : Pseudosphromenus Lacapede 22 Pseudosphromenus cupanus (Valenciennes) |
Paradise fish |
Champarke |
Subfamily : Channoidei Family : CHANNIDAE Genus : Channa Scopoli 23 Channa marulius (Hamilton-Buchanan) |
Giant snake-head |
Avulu |
24 Channa striatus (Bloch) |
Stripped Snake-head |
Kuchchu |
V.CRUSTACEA | |
Class: Crustacea | |
Subclass: Malacostraca | |
Order: Decapoda | |
Family: PALAEMONIDAE | |
1. Macrobrachium spp. | |
Family: POTAMONIDAE | |
1. Paratelphusa spp. | |
2. Paratelphusa spp. | |
Vii.AMPHIBIA | |
Phylum: Chordata | |
Class: Amphibia | |
Order: Salentia | |
Suborder: Phaneroglossa | |
Family: RANIDAE | |
1. Rana spp. | |
2. Rana cynophlyctes Schneider | |
vii.REPTILIA | |
Order: Testundinata | |
Family: EMHYDIDAE | |
1. Geomyda spp. | |
Family: TRIONYCHIDAE | |
2. Lissemys punctata (Bonnatera) | |
Order: Squamata | |
Family: COLUBRIDAE | |
Subfamily: Homalopsinae | |
3. Natrix piscator (Linnaeus) | |
viii.AVES | |
Family: PHALACROCORACIDAE | |
1. Phalacrocorax fuscicollis | |
2. Anhinga rufa | |
Family" ARDEIDAE 3. Ardeola grayii 4. Ardea alba ix. AQUATIC MAMMAL Family: LUTRINAE 1. Aonyx cinerea nirnai (Pocock) |
(b) Additionalinformation on species of significance:
Most common local name of the species (Language) | Indicated |
Scientific name of the species | Indicated |
Habitat favoured | Clean running water free from pollutants. |
Value to local community | This fish has a religious status for the local community and as such it is not consumed as food but is fed, protected and worshipped. |
Major uses / ill effects | The fish congregation attracts tourists and as well helps in keeping the water clean. |
Value of global reference(as rare, threatened orendangered) | National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources and Zoological Survey of India have classified Mahseer Tor khudree as endangered fish. Hence conservative and development measures are to be adopted. |
(C) History of magnificant species / variety
Most common name of the species | Mahseer |
Scientific name | Tor khudree |
Most common local name of the species | Bili meenu |
Existing management authority | Temple authorities of Sri. Neelakanteshwara and Sri. Laxmi Narayan Temple. |
Fish breeding season | Post -mansoon months (September-December) |
Fishing methods (Types of nets used) | Gill nets, cashnets, angling with the help of coracle and boats. |
Current level of abundance | Fishes of medium and smaller size (younger age group (2-3 years) are in abundance. |
Trend in abundance in last 10-15 / 40-50 years | Trend in abundance not significant |
Significant ecological processes influencing the species | Decrease in water level and flow may affect fish population. |
Significant man-induced processes influencing the species | Construction of barrage anicuts in the upstream and excessive use of water would reduce water volume and abundance of fish. Fish poisoning and dynamiting would lead to reduced fish population. |
Reasons for the on going change | Increase in human population and agricultural activities are the main reasons for the change in fish population level. |
Gainers : Internal / External | Residents and visitors |
Losers : Internal / External | Fish and its habitat and lovers of nature |
Desired changes / Desired future | Increase in fish population, including larger age groups. |
Desired management system | Joint management effort by Department of Fisheries and Temple authorities for development of the sanctuary. |
Suggested component for a feasible / management plan for the species | Demarcation of the Sanctuary area and declaration by the Government that the notified area is fully protected sanctuary. Conservation and development measures may be formulated for the fish species. |
MANAGEMENT |
a)Perpectives of others | |
1.Desired response options of different members of local or outside communities / institutions / government agencies / industrial or mining undertaking etc., | Local people of Agrahara are keen in protecting and developing the Sanctuary. Visitors and pilgrims desire better communication facilities. Response from Government agency like Fisheries Department is encouraging. |
2. Significance of management issues and response options | Protection, feeding and propagation of fish are the most significant issues. These find agreement with local authorities, visitors and as well with concerned government departments. |
3. Management issues pertaining to Habitat and /or Species / Variety | Significance of management issues mainly pertain to habitat improvement and propagation of Mahseer. |
4. Customary / Administrative | Presently, the fish are party protected and fed by local people and government administrative help is lacking. |
5. Since how long the arrangements have been in practice | These arrangements are in practice since long time. |
6. Changes, if any, in management pattern over last 10-15 / 40-50 years | Nil. |
7. Desired changes / desired future | A joint management committee of local people fisheries department may be formed. They should take up protection of fish, seeding of fish and development of the sanctuary. |
8. Desired management system | The system should evolve measures for demarcation of the sanctuary, protection and feeding of fish and prevent fish poisoning and dynamiting of the sanctuary. |
(b) Perspective of the investigators | Protection and feeding are prerequisites for development of the sanctuary. A developmental plan may be drawn for improvement of the sanctuary. |
(c) Desired and feasible pattern of management that should be promoted in the opinion of the investigators | The management should be financed by the Government for carrying out the improvement of the approach road and steps leading to the sanctuary. Grant in aid for feeding the fishes in lean period. provide watch and ward during vulnerable period like drought and festivals. |
d) Suggested strategy for promoting this desired patterns of management and the communication needs for the purpose | Communication facilities are to be improved and above suggested management pattern may be followed. |
e. Cultural religious, recreational, scenic, tourist significance of the Hotspot | Jammatige Agrahara Sanctuary is of religious importance as it is situated below Sri. Neelakantheswara Temple. The temple authorities feed the fish daily. Pilgrims and visitors also partake in feeding the fish with rice. The fishes are worshipped as sacred and are not killed by local people. Fish congregation attracts piligrims and visitors. The river supports rich fish population and water is free flowing and unpolluted. |
f. Ecological evaluation of the Hotspot | This sanctuary supports the population of the endangered Mahseer fish and the habitat is congenial for the development of Mahseer population. |
g. Suggested follow up investigations | Mahseer congregation is noticed about 1 Km downstream of river Tunga at Sri. Laxminarayana Matha, Hariharapura. The local Youth Club and temple authorities feed and protect the fish. This spot is named Abhiram Matsyadhama Hariharapura. Hence, while declaring Jammatige Agrahara Hotspot as fish sanctuary, this place should also be included in the sanctuary, limits of Agrahara. |
h. Any other suggested follow up | Periodical study of the habitat and fish population should be undertaken and records may be published. |