Wind Energy Weekly Vol.15, #697, May 1996
*********************************************************************
The following is the electronic edition of WIND ENERGY WEEKLY,
Vol. 15, #697, 13 May 1996, published by the American Wind
Energy Association. The full text of the WEEKLY is available
in hardcopy form for $595/year and is recommended for those with
a serious commercial interest in wind (the electronic edition
contains only excerpts). A monthly hardcopy publication, the
WINDLETTER, more suitable for those interested in residential
wind systems is included with a $50/year individual membership in
the Association. AWEA's goal is to promote wind energy as a
clean and environmentally superior source of electricity. Anyone
sharing this goal is invited to become a member--please help!.
For more information on the Association, contact AWEA, 122 C
Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20001, USA, phone (202)
383-2500, fax (202) 383-2505, email windmail@mcimail.com. Or
visit our World Wide Web site at http://www.econet.org/awea
ENERGY POLICY
Agency support can boost U.S. in world markets, says AWEA
AWEA backs FERC rule, addresses implementation
TRADE NEWS
Wind is a money-maker for Texas Land Office
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES CAN
ASSIST U.S. ABROAD, SAYS AWEA
On April 23, AWEA's director of government relations Karl
Gawell testified before the House Subcommittee on Foreign
Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs, urging the
Subcommittee to support the wind industry through funding and
guidance for the U.S. Agency for International Development
(USAID) and the U.S. Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank).
Gawell recommended the Subcommittee ensure that U.S. wind
companies retain a leadership position in the booming
international wind market by continuing to provide strong
guidance to USAID to integrate renewable energy into its diverse
portfolio of activities; and giving the Ex-Im Bank "the budget
and latitude it needs to continue its recent, but vital, work to
help the U.S. wind industry overseas."
While citing the tremendous growth the world wind market has
experienced over the last year, Gawell pointed out that the U.S.
has begun to lose its footing. Other governments have instituted
policy to support technology and market development, but "The
U.S., on the other hand, has had inconsistent support on
technology development, driven largely by partisan battles," he
said.
Gawell went on to stress the crucial part USAID and the Ex-
Im Bank play in maintaining U.S. competitiveness and illustrated
the cost-effectiveness of providing low cost "tied aid" credits
for wind projects overseas. (The term tied aid refers to the
practice of granting financial aid to a developing country on the
condition that the funds be used to purchase equipment made in
the donor country.) Providing such credits results in no net cost
to taxpayers, and much of the tax revenue generated is collected
within the first year or two of the loan, he concluded.
The small turbine market is also growing rapidly, said
Gawell. However, he pointed out' "[T]hese markets are heavily
driven by bilateral aid and multilateral lending made necessary
because huge subsidies are poured into other solutions such as
grid extension or diesel electrification, even when wind or other
small-scale renewables represent the lowest-cost economic
solution." USAID's renewables program is vital to ensure that the
U.S. is competitive in the growing worldwide small turbine
market, he said.
"The Ex-Im Bank should be lauded for its recent approval of
the first tied aid match for the wind industry, but it is a few
million dollars in an over $1 billion annual market mat is
heavily influenced by tied aid," said Gawell. "The Ex-Im Bank
cannot do it alone. USAID must help . . . "
MAURO SEES WIND AS INCOME
PRODUCER FOR WEST TEXAS
Wind energy can be a major producer of funding for education
in the state of Texas, Commissioner Gary Mauro of the Texas
General Land Office (GLO) told members of the National Wind
Coordinating Committee April 30 in Austin, Texas.
The GLO, Mauro said, is "responsible for managing 20 million
acres of land, with 18,000 oil and gas wells and $2.5 billion in
royalties. We're landlords--I like to think enlightened--but
basically landlords."
The GLO recently collected its first monthly royalty check,
for $29,000, from Lower Colorado River Authority's (LCRA) 35-MW
wind power plant in West Texas developed by Kenetech. "We'll sit
back for 35 years and collect checks from that wind plant--it's
much more lucrative than anything else in west Texas--and in the
end, I expect the school fund will get about $3 million over the
life of the facility," said Mauro.
Land values in that part of the state have increased since
the wind plant was built, he added. "Land values have gone up by
something like $5 an acre, which doesn't sound like much, but
land out there is only worth around $50 an acre, so you're
talking about an increase of 10%, which is pretty substantial.
"Texas," Mauro said, "is land. If you think about renewable
energy--solar and wind--as a way to provide rents and income for
landowners, it will get you a whole new set of allies that you
haven't had in the past. We want to be involved with renewable
energy. Those who question this position are near-sighted--it's
going to grow exponentially in future decades."
Mauro spoke as a member of a panel describing Texas's
experience to date with wind power. Utility members of the panel
were also upbeat in describing their wind and renewable energy
activities.
LCRA's Tom Foreman acknowledged that a number of turbines in
the plant were damaged by winds January 17. Winds at the site
during the January storm were clocked at more than 160 mph. But,
Foreman added, 98 of the 112 machines were "back on line fairly
quickly." The project, he said, "has been pumping about 25 to 35
MW all winter long."
Foreman also noted that the wind plant had gone up quickly:
"We signed (a power purchase agreement] in March [[1995]. In
June, they were putting the towers up. Some turbines were
completed in July, and by August 31, we had 25 MW in operation."
Availability of the units was 85% in the first month and has
ranged between 93% and 97% since (not including the machines
damaged by the windstorm). Added Foreman, "All of us have seen
accounts that the 33-meter machine is no good. Well, they've had
some problems, but not severe. The units (in our wind plant] have
been doing fairly well."
Ward Marshall of Central and South West Corp. (CSW), which
owns a wind plant near Fort Davis, Texas, consisting of 12 Zond
Corp. Z-40 turbines, said the project has been a "tremendously
valuable" learning experience for the utility. "This project is
all about information dissemination," he said. "We want to share
what we find out with other utilities, so that they know the true
story about wind and how it can work. We're doing a lot of
evaluation on how the turbines perform." The CSW wind plant,
Marshall said, experienced 117 mph winds during the January 17
storm, but suffered no damage (see Wind Energy Weekly #684,
February 12, 1996).
The area around the Fort Davis plant has "some golden
eagles," Marshall said, and observers have noticed a change in
their behavior. "The number of birds going through the site has
dropped dramatically [since it began operating]," he said. Golden
eagles have died in collisions with wind turbines in California's
Altamont Pass, but Marshall said the Fort Davis facility has
larger turbines with slower-moving blades and "we're guessing
that the machines are more visible and noticeable to the birds."
AWEA URGES FERC TO CONSIDER RENEWABLES
IN DRAFTING NEW TRANSMISSION RULE
On April 29, AWEA Executive Director Randall Swisher
responded to the issuance of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (FERC) open transmission access rule (see WIND
ENERGY WEEKLY #695, April 29), saying AWEA is "broadly
supportive" of the direction taken in the rule, but urging the
Commission to ensure that transmission pricing and operational
issues are implemented in a manner that recognizes the unique
aspects of renewables.
"Defining the terms and conditions under which access is to
be made available will determine the extent to which renewable
energy resources are hindered or facilitated in the emerging
competitive market," said Swisher. "To avoid discrimination
against renewables, it must be ensured that policies relating to
transmission pricing and system operation do not impede wind
energy because of its characteristics such as intermittence and
distance from load centers."
Swisher said competitive markets will not necessarily damage
the environment if renewables gain an adequate market share, and
suggested the renewables portfolio standard (RPS) as a way to
advance renewables in competitive markets. The RPS is a market-
oriented approach which would require sellers of power within a
given jurisdiction to procure a minimum percentage of their power
from renewables.
Swisher praised the Commission's reinforcement of state
authority to shape resource portfolios, but noted that
competitive markets are likely to restrict the ability of states
to take aggressive action to encourage diversity. "Thus, FERC's
decision makes it more imperative for Congress to act on federal
restructuring legislation to establish the minimum federal
standards necessary for competitive electric markets to adopt
market-oriented renewables requirements, such as the RPS," he
said.
Industry consensus seems to be in favor of open transmission
access, but many of the details, including the transmission
pricing issue raised by AWEA, will be the subject of much
discussion. For example, while renewables advocates support a
single transmission access fee, a coalition of energy providers,
municipal utilities, and public interest groups has formed to
oppose such "postage stamp" rates. The Coalition for Comparable
Transmission (CCT) proposes that access fees be charged for each
transmission system used--an approach that has been termed "rate
pancaking." This type of distance-based transmission pricing
system could hinder renewables because of their distance from
load centers. "This is a crucial issue for FERC to address,"
said Swisher. "If transmission rates are pancaked, renewables
will be unfairly disadvantages and regional markets for
electricity will be undermined."
BACK TO
*********************************************************************