PROCEEDINGS OF 1995 CANADIAN MERCURY NETWORK WORKSHOP
MERCURY IN ONTARIO: AN INVENTORY OF SOURCES, USES, AND RELEASES
S. Sang and B. Lourie
Pollution Probe, 12 Madison Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2S1
Mercury is a serious environmental problem for several reasons.
Among these are mercury's ability to persist in the environment for
a long period of time and its ability to bioaccumulate in aquatic
food chains to the point that consumption of fish is hazardous to
birds, mammals, and humans. Mercury is a neurotoxin which affects
the central nervous system and can cause brain damage in young
children and fetuses.
Mercury has been identified as a candidate for ban or phase-out in
the Great Lakes basin by Canadian federal and provincial governments
as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(U.S.EPA) and the International Joint Commission.
Mercury is released into the environment from natural and
anthropogenic (human made) sources. In the United States atmospheric
deposition of mercury from human activities, is the major source of
mercury in lakes, soil, and vegetation. In Ontario, major sources of
atmospheric mercury include the burning of fossil fuels, municipal
waste incinerators, and probably landfill gases and contaminated
soils. Municipal sewage treatment plants and direct industrial
discharges are major sources of mercury loadings to Ontario water
bodies. The total amount of anthropogenic mercury entering the
environment from Ontario sources is at least 5,138 kg per year. This
figure can be broken down into atmospheric emissions and discharges
to water. The estimated total atmospheric mercury emissions from all
sources in Ontario is 2,503 kg per year. An estimated 2,635 kg of
mercury are released into water bodies through industrial and
municipal sources. Major sources of mercury and the percentage of
their contribution to total mercury released into the environment is
summarized in Table I.
Mercury is used directly as an added component in many consumer
goods. A wide range of household products used daily contain
mercury; certain batteries, fluorescent lamps, thermometers, and
electrical switches are the most common products. The amount of
mercury used in certain products has declined significantly over the
past decade, most notably in paints and batteries and fluorescent
lamps. For example the use of mercury in paints and alkaline
batteries have declined to zero. Fluorescent lamp manufacturer have
also gone through significant processes in order to enhance the
lamps energy efficiency and to reduce the mercury content. These
actions have two significant environmental benefits i) reduction in
mercury contents of the lamps will reduce the risk of mercury
directly entering the environment in large quantities during
disposal of the spent lamps, and ii) increase energy efficiency
reduces the amount of energy use, which in turn reduces mercury
emissions from fossil fuel generating plants.
Significant quantities of mercury are still used in many products we
purchase. Mercury is still a major component of dental amalgam, used
for dental restoration. Each year, an estimated 400 kg of mercury
finds its way into the teeth of people living in Ontario or is
disposed down the drains to municipal wastewater treatment plants.
Despite the switch to non-mercury alternatives by some dentists,
there has been little effort among the dental community to actively
promote the alternatives, or to make people aware of the possibility
of mercury vapour rising from the amalgam in the mouth.
In addition to the deliberate use of mercury, a large amount of
mercury enters the environment incidentally as a by-product of the
services and products we purchase. For example, as a result of our
electricity consumption in Ontario, large amounts of mercury are
emitted from the coal-fired generating stations.
Mercury is regulated both federally and provincially. The Ontario
Environmental Protection Act (EPA) set limits on concentrations of
mercury in air at the point of impingement, as well as in ambient
air. The Ministry of Environment and Energy has a set of guidelines
to limit mercury concentrations in water and in fish tissue while,
similarly, Health Canada has set guidelines to limit the amount of
mercury in fish tissue. Regulations are also in place restricting
the use of mercury in children's toys and furniture.
Given mercury's known toxicity and the fact that virtually every
jurisdiction in the Great Lakes basin is seeking to eliminate or
greatly reduce mercury use, it is clear that a detail phase-out or
sunset strategy is required. Mercury phase-out and reduction
strategies should be based on three methods: pollution prevention,
incentive-based controls, and government regulations. Mercury
elimination and reduction efforts through pollution prevention can
be achieved by: eliminating or reducing mercury in products,
switching to alternative products, and reducing mercury emissions
associated with energy production.
Table 1. Total Mercury Release to the Great Lakes Basin and Percentage Contributed by Each Source.
Emission SourceMercury Emission to the Atomosphere (kg/year)Percent of Total Release Associated with Energy Production
Coal, Fossil Fuel Power Station
Coal, Coke Making Processes
Coal, other uses
Oil
426
306
30
274
8
6
1
5 Subtotal of Mercury Emission resulting
from Energy Production103620 Incidental Release Resulting from
Industrial Activities
Metal Mining
Cement Production
Lime Manufacturing
Carbon Black Manufacturing
284
300
6
Municipal Solid Waste Incineration
Discard of batteries(Mercury Oxide)
Fluorescent Lamps
Pigments
Switches
Sewage Sludge Incineration
Dental Practices
Hospitals
Hazardous Waste Incineration
Biomedical Waste Incineration
Cremation
Landfill gas
Fungicides volatilization
Contaminated Soil
2
1 Subtotal of Mercury Emission Resulting
from Intentional Use of Mercury88617 Total Mercury Emission from all
Sources
in Ontario2,50349 Mercury Sources in WaterMercury Loading
kg/yearPercent of Total Release Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants
(STPs)
Metal Mining Sector
Discharges to the Areas of Concern (STPs,
Run-off, and Overflows)
Inorganic Chemical Sector
Iron and Steel Sector
Organic Chemical Sector
Others1587
553
297
98
56
44
1530
11
6
2
1
1