PROCEEDINGS OF 1995 CANADIAN MERCURY NETWORK WORKSHOP
MERCURY IN ONTARIO: AN INVENTORY OF SOURCES, USES, AND RELEASES
S. Sang and B. Lourie
Pollution Probe, 12 Madison Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2S1
Mercury is a serious environmental problem for several reasons. Among these are mercury's ability to persist in the environment for a long period of time and its ability to bioaccumulate in aquatic food chains to the point that consumption of fish is hazardous to birds, mammals, and humans. Mercury is a neurotoxin which affects the central nervous system and can cause brain damage in young children and fetuses. Mercury has been identified as a candidate for ban or phase-out in the Great Lakes basin by Canadian federal and provincial governments as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA) and the International Joint Commission. Mercury is released into the environment from natural and anthropogenic (human made) sources. In the United States atmospheric deposition of mercury from human activities, is the major source of mercury in lakes, soil, and vegetation. In Ontario, major sources of atmospheric mercury include the burning of fossil fuels, municipal waste incinerators, and probably landfill gases and contaminated soils. Municipal sewage treatment plants and direct industrial discharges are major sources of mercury loadings to Ontario water bodies. The total amount of anthropogenic mercury entering the environment from Ontario sources is at least 5,138 kg per year. This figure can be broken down into atmospheric emissions and discharges to water. The estimated total atmospheric mercury emissions from all sources in Ontario is 2,503 kg per year. An estimated 2,635 kg of mercury are released into water bodies through industrial and municipal sources. Major sources of mercury and the percentage of their contribution to total mercury released into the environment is summarized in Table I. Mercury is used directly as an added component in many consumer goods. A wide range of household products used daily contain mercury; certain batteries, fluorescent lamps, thermometers, and electrical switches are the most common products. The amount of mercury used in certain products has declined significantly over the past decade, most notably in paints and batteries and fluorescent lamps. For example the use of mercury in paints and alkaline batteries have declined to zero. Fluorescent lamp manufacturer have also gone through significant processes in order to enhance the lamps energy efficiency and to reduce the mercury content. These actions have two significant environmental benefits i) reduction in mercury contents of the lamps will reduce the risk of mercury directly entering the environment in large quantities during disposal of the spent lamps, and ii) increase energy efficiency reduces the amount of energy use, which in turn reduces mercury emissions from fossil fuel generating plants. Significant quantities of mercury are still used in many products we purchase. Mercury is still a major component of dental amalgam, used for dental restoration. Each year, an estimated 400 kg of mercury finds its way into the teeth of people living in Ontario or is disposed down the drains to municipal wastewater treatment plants. Despite the switch to non-mercury alternatives by some dentists, there has been little effort among the dental community to actively promote the alternatives, or to make people aware of the possibility of mercury vapour rising from the amalgam in the mouth. In addition to the deliberate use of mercury, a large amount of mercury enters the environment incidentally as a by-product of the services and products we purchase. For example, as a result of our electricity consumption in Ontario, large amounts of mercury are emitted from the coal-fired generating stations. Mercury is regulated both federally and provincially. The Ontario Environmental Protection Act (EPA) set limits on concentrations of mercury in air at the point of impingement, as well as in ambient air. The Ministry of Environment and Energy has a set of guidelines to limit mercury concentrations in water and in fish tissue while, similarly, Health Canada has set guidelines to limit the amount of mercury in fish tissue. Regulations are also in place restricting the use of mercury in children's toys and furniture. Given mercury's known toxicity and the fact that virtually every jurisdiction in the Great Lakes basin is seeking to eliminate or greatly reduce mercury use, it is clear that a detail phase-out or sunset strategy is required. Mercury phase-out and reduction strategies should be based on three methods: pollution prevention, incentive-based controls, and government regulations. Mercury elimination and reduction efforts through pollution prevention can be achieved by: eliminating or reducing mercury in products, switching to alternative products, and reducing mercury emissions associated with energy production.
Table 1. Total Mercury Release to the Great Lakes Basin and Percentage Contributed by Each Source.
Emission SourceMercury Emission to the Atomosphere (kg/year)Percent of Total Release Associated with Energy Production
Coal, Fossil Fuel Power Station
Coal, Coke Making Processes
Coal, other uses
Oil
426
306
30
274
8
6
1
5 Subtotal of Mercury Emission resulting
from Energy Production103620 Incidental Release Resulting from
Industrial Activities
Metal Mining
Cement Production
Lime Manufacturing
Carbon Black Manufacturing
284
300
6
Municipal Solid Waste Incineration
Discard of batteries(Mercury Oxide)
Fluorescent Lamps
Pigments
Switches
Sewage Sludge Incineration
Dental Practices
Hospitals
Hazardous Waste Incineration
Biomedical Waste Incineration
Cremation
Landfill gas
Fungicides volatilization
Contaminated Soil
2
1 Subtotal of Mercury Emission Resulting
from Intentional Use of Mercury88617 Total Mercury Emission from all
Sources
in Ontario2,50349 Mercury Sources in WaterMercury Loading
kg/yearPercent of Total Release Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants
(STPs)
Metal Mining Sector
Discharges to the Areas of Concern (STPs,
Run-off, and Overflows)
Inorganic Chemical Sector
Iron and Steel Sector
Organic Chemical Sector
Others1587
553
297
98
56
44
1530
11
6
2
1
1