Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 18:50:24 GMT From: Netfaune@videotron.ca Subject: Visit / Visiter :"Le Carrefour Quebecois Environnement Faune" Pour tous les amateurs de faune, visitez le Carrefour Quebecois Environnement Faune. Ce site web se veut la porte d'entree pour tous ceux et celles qui s'interressent directement ou indirectement a la faune et a ses differents intervenants. http://www.alphacom.net/cqef N'hesitez pas a laisser vos commentaires ou suggestions via la carte de visite du site. ------------------------------------------------------- For all french users who love nature and wildlife, come visit "Le Carrefour Quebecois Environnement Faune" This web site is the gateway for all the people who are interrested directly or indirectly in wildlife and in all of its intervening partys of Quebec. http://www.alphacom.net/cqef Don't hesitate to leave us your comments or suggestions via our visit card. ---------------------------------- Mario Hebert Net.Faune Consultant Carrefour Quebecois de l'Environnement Faune Http://www.alphacom.net/cqef Email.: cqef@videotron.ca *** * . * | | "* * | < *** * | | * / * | | * ( * / \"' ** * * ****** "'' ------------------------------ From: WirtAtmar@aol.com Subject: Engineering Risk Management To add just a few examples (which are often more explanatory than simple string of words) to the proper definition of paradigm, there are a great number of web sites that use the word "paradigm" somewhere in their text. But not all of them use it correctly, nor are they all correct in their assertions. One example of an incorrect assertion is: http://capita.wustl.edu/ME567_Informatics/concepts/paradigm.html in which the author claims that Thomas Kuhn coined the word "paradigm." This seems to be a common misperception. But in fact, the word -- in its modern usage -- was at least 1500 years old by the time that Kuhn was born, and perhaps a 1000 years older than that. Julius Ceaser almost certainly knew the word, and probably used it once and a while, probably little altered in meaning from the way that we use it now. A second site, http://w3.adb.gu.se/~a95jonas/psi/paradigm.html seems to be claiming the same thought. However the text is in Swedish -- and my Swedish often fails me (thus my apologies to the author if I have misrepresented him). The concept of a paradigm as a model is far more commonly used in engineering and business than it is in science. An excellent example of an archetypical, specific change in paradigm of a mechanical device can be found at: http://www.nanothinc.com/NanoWorld/Perspectives/Warren/microjet/compressor.ht ml Similarly, a modelled methodology (another form of paradigm) for engineering risk management can be seen at: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/technology/risk/Risk_Overview/sld008.html One of the most thoughtful dissertations on questioning the common methodologies (paradigms) of a community that I found is at: http://www.bible.org/wtj/w283_f.htm Finally, a very appropriate and concise definition of a paradigm is given in: http://hoshi.cic.sfu.ca/~guay/Paradigm/DefParadigm.html a simple web page devoted to a discussion of how to author a web page and the cultural paradigm shift that a world linked by the web is perhaps ushering. Wirt Atmar atmar@aics-research.com atmar@fmnh.org wirtatmar@aol.com