Richard Gendron, director
CERCLE
_________________________________________________________________
C Centre | Centre for C
E d'etudes et | interdisciplinary I
R de recherche interdisciplinaires | research and studies on R
C sur les communications, | environ. communications, C
L la legislation et | legislation and L
E l'education environnementales | education E
2489, chemin Lemire, Fleurimont (Quebec) J1E 4C2 Canada
tel.: (819) 564-8604
Internet: cercle@web.apc.org fax.: (819) 564-4025
_________________________________________________________________
* * -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-* *
Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments
* * -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-* *
The distinction between indigenous and Western/scientific
knowledge can present problems for those who believe in the
significance of indigenous knowledge for development. This
article examines some of the contradictions and ironies
involved in accenting the importance of indigenous knowledge,
with a view to eliciting a dialogue on the subject. The last
part of the article tentatively explores a number of possible
ways out of the dilemma.
Introduction
In the decades since the Second World War, the rhetoric of
development has gone through several stages--from its focus on
economic growth, to growth with equity, to basic needs, to
participatory development, to sustainable development. (Bates,
1988; Black, 1993; Hobart, 1993; Watts, 1993). Today indigenous
knowledge is seen as pivotal above all in discussions on
sustainable resource use and balanced development (Brokensha et
al., 1980; Compton, 1989; Gupta, 1992; Niamir, 1990; Warren,
1990). This orientation is in stark contrast to the views of
many earlier theorists, who saw traditional knowledge and
institutions as obstacles to development.
The focus on indigenous knowledge clearly heralds a long
overdue move. It represents a shift away from the preoccupation
with the centralized, technically oriented solutions of past
decades, which failed to improve the prospects of most of the
world's peasants and small farmers. By highlighting the
possible contribution to be made by the knowledge which is in
the hands of the marginalized poor, current literature focuses
both attention and resources on those who most need them.
Recognizing the validity of many of the arguments employed by
the theorists of indigenous knowledge, this article attempts to
generate a debate on the concept of indigenous knowledge by
suggesting that there are certain contradictions and conceptual
weaknesses in most of the writings on indigenous knowledge.
BACK TO
*********************************************************************