Misconception |
Fact |
Wood is not very relevant as an energy source |
In fact, wood supplies about 30% of total energy consumption in the RWEDP member countries. |
Woodfuels are phasing out |
No. In all RWEDP countries the consumption of wood and other biomass fuels is still increasing in absolute terms, even when their share in national energy consumption is decreasing. |
Woodfuel has little value |
The total value of woodfuels amounts to some US$30 billion per annum for the RWEDP countries together. |
Only poor and rural households use woodfuel |
Surveys have shown that in many towns and even in some metropolitan areas woodfuels are widely used by both low- and high-income groups. |
Woodfuel is a traditional commodity only |
Generally not. Modern applications use modern fuels, which largely complement traditional fuel use. |
Woodfuels are being substituted by modern fuels |
At present, modern technologies are increasingly being applied to woodfuel development. Many industrialised countries are deliberately increasing wood energy use, for environmental and socio-economic reasons. |
Most fuelwood originates from forest lands |
This conflicts with many survey results revealing that some 2/3 of all woodfuels originate from non-forest land. |
Woodfuel use is responsible for destroying the natural forests |
This assumption dates from the 1970s. Now, plenty of evidence is available to show that woodfuel use is not a major cause of deforestation. |
Fuelwood is collected for free |
Some is, but a lot is not! |
Woodfuels are a gift from nature |
Many people, particularly in Asia, treat fuelwood as a commodity which can be, and indeed partly is, produced and harvested like rice or wheat, though with a much longer gestation period. |
Woodfuel production is a marginal sub-sector |
Woodfuel businesses are the main source of income for about 10% of rural households, supplying about 40% of their cash earnings. Woodfuel use generates at least 20 times more local employment than energy from oil products (per unit of energy). |
Wood energy cannot be planned because of lack of data |
Indicative planning does not require a full set of data. This type of planning can support policy making. |
Burning wood adds more CO2 to the atmosphere than oil |
Sustainable re-growth of woodfuel captures the CO2 back from the atmosphere. The net effect on the global atmosphere is zero, unlike that of fossil fuels. |
With respect to renewable forms of energy, R&D should focus on solar, wind and hydro energy |
Wood energy is renewable. Of the various renewable sources of energy wood provides by far the largest share in the region! |