Rejuvenation & Sustainable Management Of Gokarna Temple Pond - Kotiteertha

Ramachandra T.V1,2,3, Durga Madhab Mahapatra1,2, Subash Chandran M D1, Sincy V1, Asulabha K S1, Rao G R1, Vishnu D. Mukri1, Akhil C A1
¹ Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES]
² Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra)
3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP]
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India
Author for correspondence: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in

l

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Kotiteertha or temple pond with daily sacraments constitute the vital ecosystem linking the culture with the society in India. The sharp increase of devotees performing rituals within and around the temple premises in the last decade, and lack of regular maintenance of temple pond has led to the eutrophication. Disposal of ritual constituents’ rich in organic matters beyond the bioremediation potential has led to the enrichment of nutrients, evident from the enhanced primary productivity with rampant growth and spread of macrophytes and filamentous algae. This has posed serious threat to the sustenance of pond ecosystem. In this context, ecological investigations were carried out the Gokarna temple pond -  Kotiteertha,  located at Gokarna village, Kumta taluk, Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka in response to the requests from progressive youth of Gokarna temple town. The investigation included the assessment of physical and chemical parameters with the biotic components (spread and distribution of aquatic plants and algae). The results reveal of higher nutrient levels, signifying more cultural pressure due to (i) disposal of organic materials (flowers, rice balls, linseed, banana, curd, ghee, etc.)  after performing rituals, (ii) bathing of large number of devotees, (iii) washing of cloth with detergents, (iv) disposal of solid waste and (iv) washing of utensils, etc. The algal diversity analyses show the proliferation of filamentous cyanophycean members and minimal suspended algae. Higher biomass growth, productivity and spread of aquatic plants Vallisneria spiralis, Nymphae nouchali, followed by Certophyllum demersum and Blyxa species highlight of nutrient enrichment. The overgrowth of such species triggers internal nutrient loading leading to further enrichment and subsequent deterioration of water quality. Therefore following action plans are recommended to regain the sanctity of the pond and to ensure pristine water in the surrounding wells.

Pollution Indicator
Cause
Solutions
1. Profuse growth of macrophytes
Nutrient (Carbon and Nitrogen) enrichment due to
i. The disposal of pooja materials (including rice balls – pinda, flowers, ghee, linseed, etc.) after performing rituals of paying homages to departed souls in a family

 

 

ii. Enrichment of nutrients (Phosphorous) – due to Bathing (soap, etc.)

 

 

 

iii. washing of cloth  with detergents – introduces phosphorous into the ponds, which help in algal growth

 

iv. non-maintenance of the pond

 

 

v. Transport of silt and seasonal water flow into the pond

 

 

vi. Maintaining minimum water flow to the pond and also maintaining groundwater table in the region.

 

 

Restrictions on the disposal of organic matter (flowers, rice balls –pinda, grains, etc.) after rituals of pithru karma. Alternate arrangements for disposal of organic wastes (flower, rice balls) and an arrangements to transfer to goshala (cattleshed). This could provide nourishment and also serving to milking cattle could be the best option of offering to the lord.

As this pond is also used in the temple, restrictions on the use of pond for bathing by the community visiting the temple.  Appropriate signage to this effect, would help in controlling the pollutants entering the pond.

Only the head priest performing pooja to the deities at Gokarna be allowed to take bath (without synthetic soap)

Ban on washing of cloth and utensils in the pond
Regular partial removal of water plants (kalé) twice a year: at least before (a) Ganesha / vinayaka Chaturthi (b) Shivaratri – water plants to be removed by uprooting (about 60% - not complete removal)
  • Removal of silt once in two years on Mahalaya amavasya (newmoon day)

 

Management of watershed – arrest deforestation.

Planting of natives species in the catchment /watershed.

This could be implemented by introducing the mandatory plant native sapling by the devotees performing rituals (with a nominal fee to cover the sapling cost)
Celebration of the World Environment Day on June 5th, every year through large scale afforestation programme involving  NSS volunteers, devotees visiting the temple (on June 5th), students (from nearby schools and gurukula) and local NGO’s

2. Presence of bad odour

Enrichment of nutrients especially carbon and nitrogen.

Carbon and nitrogen gets into the pond with the prevailing practice of  the disposal of pooja materials (flower, banana, linseed, grains, curd, milk, ghee, cloth, etc.) and rice balls (pinda).

Due to bioremediation, organisms in the pond uses the organic inputs. However, the excess quantity over threshold creates pollution of the water body, evident from bad odour, excess growth of algae and water plants (macrophytes).

Restrictions on the disposal of organic matter (flowers, rice balls –pinda, grains, etc.). Alternate arrangements for disposal of organic wastes (flower, rice balls) and an arrangements to transfer to goshala (cattleshed). This could provide nourishment and also serving to milking cattle could be the best option of offering to the lord.

Implement bio-manipulation (Labeo rohita and Catla catla– surface phytoplankton feeders,  Rohu – Column zooplankton feeder, Gambusia and Guppies – larvivorous fishes for mosquito control,
bottom dwellers – common carp, scavenging fish – Labeo fimbriatus).

3. Algal bloom
  • Organic and inorganic inputs

 

  • Lack of aeration

 

 

  •  Inadequate predators – organisms that feed on algae , such as fishes, etc.

Restrictions on the disposal of organic matter (flowers, rice balls –pinda, grains, etc.).

Introduce ducks (at least four pairs to begin with) , which will aid in aeration and control of water plants, algae, etc..

Implement bio-manipulation (Labeo rohita and Catla catla– surface phytoplankton feeders,  Rohu – Column zooplankton feeder, Gambusia and Guppies – larvivorous fishes for mosquito control,
bottom dwellers – common carp, scavenging fish – Labeo fimbriatus).

4. Health problems (of people using water), turbidity in water and bad odour.

Presence of Escherichia coli  - indicates faecal contamination. This may be due to leakages from the nearby septic tanks (toilets) / community drains or use of pond after defecation.

Plug cracks and other defects in the pond embankments.

Restriction on the use of pond by all except the temple head priest who performs rituals at the temple.

5. Un-aesthetic waste litters

Disposal of solid waste and plastic. No provision to dispose the waste at designated site with proper bins (collection containers)

Awareness among general public to dispose solid waste at the designated sites / locations.
Provision of colour bins (to dispose wastes separately)
Regular collection, treatment and disposal of organic fractions of solid wastes by the municipality
Ban on the use of plastic in Gokarna – Temple town. Penalty to shop-keepers roadside hawkers selling plastic pouches or providing provisions in plastic pouchesetc.

6. Irrational littering, dumping of debris, pollution of holy pond.

Lack of personal and community hygiene.
Lack of awareness among the public about cleanliness or SWACHHATA

Environmental education among all.
Deployment of NSS volunteers and Local NGO’s in raising the awareness among the public

7. Silt deposition in the pond and accumulation of heavy metals (in the silt).

Idol submersion during festival (Ganesha, etc.).

Environment friendly Ganesha festival celebration in the temple or use of silver Ganesha / Pancha hola idols and worhip at home.
Complete ban on immersion of idols (painted, plaster of paris idols, etc.) in the pond.

8. Dumps of large quantity of rice balls and ritual materials in the shallow region of the pond.

Lack of awareness among priests and also lack of suitable alternate arrangements

Awareness among priests about the need for environment friendly option of disposal of organic materials of the ritual (as contaminating the pond water would also contaminate the nearby groundwater sources – bore well, open wells, etc.).
Alternate sustainable option for the disposal of organic materials (rice balls, flowers, etc.) and transfer to the temple cattle shed / Goshala.

9. Pollution of water body

Lack of ‘sense of belonging’ among the local residents

 

 

 

 

No management or poor management by the municipality / Panchayath.

Environmental awareness among the local residents about the need to protect water bodies (at least keeping the next generation in mind)
Regular water quality monitoring by involving school and college students (co-ordinated by the regional centre of the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board)
Setting up eco-clubs in the education institutions (as per the provisions available with the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board) in the local education institutions (schools and colleges)
Provision of wetlands at the entry of the pond (which will remove the contaminants entering the pond) during run-off
Regular maintenance of the pond (through cost effective ecological methods) involving local NGO’s, NSS volunteers, students from schools and colleges - Mandatory Shramdhan  for removal of silt as well as partial removal of water plants (kalé) 

  • Regular partial removal of water plants (kalé) twice a year: at least before (a) Ganesha / vinayaka Chaturthi (b) Shivaratri – water plants to be removed by uprooting (about 60% - not complete removal)
  • Removal of silt once in two years on Mahalaya amavasya (new moon day).
10. Littering and spitting

Lack of cultural ethos

Ensure cultural heritage  through awareness programmes
‘HERITAGE TOWN’  status considering the cultural heritage of the region.

  1. INTRODUCTION

Wetlands (ponds, lakes, tanks, etc.) constitute the most productive ecosystems with a wide array of goods and services. These ecosystems serve as life support systems; serve as habitat for a variety of organisms including migratory birds for food and shelter. They aid in bioremediation and hence aptly known as ‘kidneys of the landscape’. Major services include flood control, wastewater treatment, arresting sediment load, drinking water, protein production, and more importantly recharging of aquifers apart from aiding as sinks and climate stabilizers. The wetlands also function as wild fauna sanctuary, with public access. These ecosystems are valuable for education and scientific endeavours due to rich biodiversity.
Harvesting of rainwater through wetlands (ponds, constructed tanks and lakes) is being practiced in India since the time immemorial. These  man-made  ponds  have  been  used  as  an  alternate  source  of  drinking  water and  have been employed  for  domestic and irrigation purposes  (Arya et al., 2011; Gupta  et  al, 2011; Mahapatra et al., 2011a; Mehta, 2013; Ramachandra, 2001; Ramachandra and Rajinikanth, 2005). Temple ponds also referred as kunds/pushkarni/tirtha are created in enclosures of the temple premises to meet the water requirement for rituals in the temple. Efforts to maintain the sanctity of these water bodies were in practice by regular maintenance and also by restricting the use of water for anthropogenic purposes (such as community bathing, washing of cloth, etc.). These ponds in the temple vicinity serves myriads of benefits (groundwater recharge, providing uncontaminated water for rituals, etc.) while maintaining a good microclimate in the locality. These ponds not only act as perennial source of water for temple rituals but also maintains a good water balance in the region (Arya et al, 2011) and conserve the aesthetics of the locality. Sacred forests (with native flora) in the watershed of historic temple ponds ensures water availability during all seasons. Earlier studies in Uttara Kannada and Shimoga districts highlight that forests and water are intrinsically intertwined as forested watersheds have significantly helpful in infiltration of rainfall. The nature of vegetation in the catchment plays vital role in the ground water recharge, runoff and soil moisture conditions, soil erosion and soil quality (Ramachandra et al., 2012; Ray et al., 2014). Historically, the overall forest disturbance in the Western Ghats increased in spatial extent as well as in intensity, during the post World war era, with the emphasis on industrialization and economic development. Forest based industries coupled with large scale hydroelectric projects and conversions of forest land for agriculture have contributed significantly in the decline of primeval forests.

Land use and land cover changes with the unplanned developmental activities in the district coupled with growing demand of land for agriculture and horticulture in the district have further accelerated deforestation. Decline in native forest cover in the watersheds of rivers, lakes and ponds has resulted in the conversion of perennial to seasonal water bodies. This necessitates measures to safeguard the water resources within the auspices of holy places and temples (Mahananda et al, 2010). As the water from these water bodies are meant to be used for rituals, there are ample chances to revive the water quality through community’s active participation in rejuvenation as well as regular maintenance and management.
Gokarna in Uttara Kannada, being one of the pious destination (for pilgrims from various parts of the country) for performing rituals and pay homage to the departed soul/s. These rituals are performed (rituals of pithru karma - Pitrupurusha shraddh) throughout the year closer to the heritage temple pond - Kotiteertha. Subsequently, ritual offerings (comprising of rice balls, flowers, leafs, paddy, banana, linseed, etc.) are disposed in the temple pond. Sustained disposal of large quantity of organic constituents of the ritual offerings (by about 200-250 pilgrim families daily) has enriched the pond with nutrients (C and N). Increased pilgrims and consequent human activities have resulted in deteriorating water quality in the pond comparable to the earlier reports on temple ponds (Pal et al., 2012; Chaurasia and Pandey 2007; Gupta et al, 2011). Also, bathing (with soap) and washing (cloth with detergents) has further enriched the system with nutrients (N and P). Earlier studies in the pond ecosystem have also reported organic enrichment due to bathing (Chaturvedi and Kumar, 2011), and ritual debris (such as flowers, rice, fruits, leafs, coconut shells, saturated and unsaturated fats and occasionally cloth pieces, etc.). This is amplified with the unscientific waste disposal practices, sanitary liquid wastes (Raju et al., 2011) with the lifestyle changes of the residents and pilgrims (use of plastics, etc.) in the immediate vicinity.
Investigations of physico-chemical with biological parameters provide vital insights to the nutrient enrichment and also the trophic status (Ramachandra et al., 2001; 2003; 2005; 2007; 2009; 2015; Sharma et al, 2009; Mahapatra et al., 2011a,b,c; 2013). However, the influence of meteorological conditions and catchment integrity (Arya  et al, 2011) also influences the water quality. Investigations of abundance and the distribution of biota aid in assessing the agents of water quality deterioration (Mahapatra et al., 2011). In this context,  investigations were carried out  by collecting water and biotic samples from the temple pond, to assess

  1. water quality (physical and chemical parameters) of the temple pond
  2. assessment of the nutrient status,
  3. the extent and distribution of aquatic macrophytes in the pond
  4. analyse the algal communities  through sampling at select locations
  5. suggest appropriate measures to safeguard the water quality of the lake
  1. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  2. 2.1 Study area

Gokarna temple pond - Kotiteertha is located in Gokarna of Kumta taluk, in Uttara Kannada, Karnataka spans at 14ᵒ32’27.55’ to 14ᵒ32’31.62” N and 74ᵒ19’10.60” to 74ᵒ19’17.85” E (Figure 1). Figures 2.1 and 2.2 show the inlet and outlet of the temple pond. Many locations in the shoreline of the pond are earmarked for conducting rituals of  pithru karma for paying homage to forefathers or pitrupurushas.

2
Figure 1. Kotiteertha pond
3 
Figure 2.1) Inflow to the pond(east)   and  2.2) Outflow from the pond
5
Figure 2.3 Temporal changes in surface cover of the temple pond from 2004-14

The pond (170m X 90m) has an area of ~1.53 hectares. The depth of the pond varies from ~5 m (at west) to 1.5 m (on eastern side). The estimated volume of the temple pond is >50,000 m3. The temple pond is surrounded by priest houses. The architecture of the temple pond highlight of historical design.  Such deeper pond were constructed to store rainwater for meeting the water demand throughout the year. Several locations were earmarked on the bank of the pond, for performing rituals of pithru karma - Pitrupurusha shraddh, paying homage to the departed ancestor souls. During the field investigations on 27th September, it was observed (i) large number of devotees taking bath, ii) washing cloth with detergents, iii) washing utensils and iv) disposing organic matter (flowers, rice balls –pinda, grains, etc.) after rituals of pithru karma in the pond. Estimates indicate on an average about 200-250 families perform rituals of pithru karma every day. This means about 750 to 1000 gms of rice and other organic matters are disposed in the pond. These constitutes are rich in C (crabon) and N (nitrogen) and sustained disposal has enriched the pond with nutrients evident from the growth of filamentous algae and macrophytes. Figure 2.3 depicts further substantiates the temporal changes during 2004 to 2014, with the earlier events of siltation, algal blooms (2004, 2010 and 2011) and progressive increase in macrophytes cover (2013 onwards).

5
Figure 2.4. Site visits and discussions with the temple priest communities

Field investigations were carried out on 27th September 2015 in response to the requests by the local community and the information of foul odour and the proliferation of macro algae and macrophytes. The filed investigations included (i) assessment of the present status of the pond (Figure 2.4 and 2.5), (ii) water sample collections from various locations (inlet and outlet) of the pond, (iii) collection of biotic components – macrophytes and algae, (iv) assessment of the spread and diversity of biotic components and (v) discussion with the local community to understand (a) causal factors of water quality changes and (b) the social perspective of the pond.

Water samples were collected from the pond at three representative locations based on depth and also extent of organic debris in the pond (Figure 2.5).

Hand held GPS was used for recording the geographical coordinates of sampling locations and also to map the boundary of the pond. Field investigations were carried out to find out the status of the pond and also the sources of contamination (if any). Water samples were collected in disinfected one litre sampling bottles. These bottles were thoroughly washed and rinsed with deionised water. Grab sampling was followed at all points. On-site estimation parameters include pH (pH probe), water temperature (temperature probe), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (TDS probe), salinity (salinity probe), conductivity (conductivity probe), dissolved oxygen (iodometry), Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) and transparency (visual observations). The samples were then carried to the lab and were analysed for other parameters according to Standard protocol (APHA AWWA WEF, 2000). Water samples were analysed for turbidity (turbidometer), total alkalinity (titrimetry), total hardness, Ca, Mg (complexometric titration), Na, K (flame photometer), chlorides (argentometric method), nitrates (phenol disulphonic acid method), phosphates (stannous chloride method), chemical oxygen demand (dichromate oxidation with open reflux) and BOD (5-d BOD).

5
Figure 2.5: Sampling locations a)-b) Site-01; c)-d) Site-02; e)-f) Site-03 and g)-h) On-site analysis of physic-chemical parameters at the sampling locations

Aquatic plants were collected from 11 different places apart from the three water sampling locations. These plants were identified based on morphological keys and published literature on flora (Cook, 1996). An aerial view of the pond using photographic camera at select elevated locations aided in assessing the extent of aquatic plant cover and their relative abundance. Samples were collected from the areas closer to the embankments (Figure 2.6.a) and specimen were transferred in the sealed polybags for further identification and analysis (Figure 2.6.b).

5
Figure 2.6 a) Macrophyte collection and b) Macrophyte collected in sealed polybags
  1. Results and Discussions
Organic Materials & Washing Clothes 
Figure 3.1 a) organic materials (rice balls, etc.);  b) washing of utensils in the pond

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) determines the oxygen required for chemical oxidation of most organic matter and oxidisable inorganic substances with the help of strong chemical oxidant. In conjunction with the BOD, the COD test is helpful in indicating toxic conditions and the presence of biologically resistant organic substances (Sawyer and McCarty 1978). In this study the BOD values ranged from 4.07-8.13 ppm. BOD values were negatively correlated with EC values (r= -0.9; p<0.05). The COD values ranged from 12 to 24 ppm. The COD were relatively high at site 2. The ORP values indicate highly oxidising conditions in the temple pond. The physicochemical analysis of the select sampling sites is elucidated in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Physicochemical parameters of water samples from select sampling locations

Parameters \ Sampling Locations

Site-01
Site-02
Site-03
Sam-Label
867
868
869
Time
11:00
11:40
12:30
Latitude (ᵒN)
14.54156
14.54139
14.54119
Longitude (ᵒE)
74.31965
74.31973
74.32137
Altitude (meter above msl)
7
6
1
pH
5.9
5.8
6.1
Temp (ᵒC)
33
35.6
31.3
TDS (ppm)
38.5
41
38.8
Sal (ppm)
27.8
30.7
28.7
EC (mic.S/cm)
55.6
58
55.5
ORP (mV)
158
164
166
Turbidity (NTU)
3.45
4.81
1.69
DO (ppm)
2.70
5.00
11.3
BOD (mg/l)
8.13
4.07
8.13
COD (mg/l)
16
24
12
Alkalinity (mg/l)
68
76
64
Chloride (mg/l)
22.72
24.14
24.14
Total Hardness (mg/l)
22
24
22
Ca Hardness (mg/l)
3.74
4.81
4.81
Mg Hardness (mg/l)
4.44
4.66
4.18
Phosphate (mg/l)
0.211
0.243
0.41
Nitrate (mg/l)
0.23
0.146
0.217
Sodium (mg/l)
21.6
22.8
22.8
Potassium (mg/l)
3.2
4.8
4

During the site visit it was observed that ~70 % of the temple pond surface was covered by macrophytes and to minor extent filamentous algae. The extent and spread of macrophytes was higher in the shallower regions of the pond. Eleven macrophytes species (Table3.2) were recorded during the field investigation.

Table 3.2: Macrophytes of Gokarna temple pond

No.
Macrophytes
1
Valisneria spiralis
2
Nymphae nouchali
3
Nymphae pubescens
4
Ceratophylum demersum
5
Limnophylla heterophylla
6
Limnophylla aromatica
7
Rotala macranadra
8
Ceraptoteris thalictroides
9
Utricularia gibba
10
Blyxa aubertii
11
Nymphoides sp.

Macrophytes observed in the pond are i) submerged floating leaf type e.g. water lily etc., and ii) submerged e.g. Ceratophyllum, Blyxa, Valisneria. Macrophytes specimen were collected through opportunistic sampling from accessible parts of the pond. Most of the samples were collected either by hand or with the help of a wooden pole. Macrophytes near the shallow regions were trapped between filamentous cyanophycean members as Oscillatoria and Pseudoanabaena.

The proliferation of macrophytes in the ponds highlights of nutrient enrichment and internal recirculation of nutrients especially P from the dead and decaying plant matter, organic inputs of rituals and nutrient laden sediments. Deposition and decay of organic matter has contributed to the foul odour. Higher macrophyte density also indicates of increased primary productivity due to nutrient enrichment both from autochthonous and allochthonous sources, which  eventually leads to conversion of ponds into swamps and marshes. No emergent macrophytes were recorded during the site inspection.  Macrophytes recorded at sampling locations are