INDIA
MAKES A MARK, YET NEEDS NEW CONSERVATION DIRECTIONS BACK HOME!
Over 100 Indian participants
at the recently concluded 5th World Parks Congress (8-17th September,
Durban), made a major impact in taking the world of wildlife conservation
towards new directions…and now need to translate these new directions
back home. On the occasion of Wildlife Week, we would urge central and
state governments to:
1.. Provide
a much greater thrust towards involving adivasi and local communities
in wildlife protected areas,
2.. Recognise
the diverse conservation initiatives taken by such communities themselves,
traditionally or in recent times.
3.. Ensure that
protected areas and community conserved areas are free of destructive
industrial and commercial pressures, including mining, dams, and industries.
The World Parks Congress
(WPC), organised by the World Conservation Union (IUCN), was the biggest
ever gathering on wildlife conservation. It brought together over 3000
professionals and practitioners from over 100 countries. Named "Benefits
Beyond Boundaries", the WPC focused on how protected areas should
be managed within the larger landscape and how they should much more centrally
involve local communities.
An exciting feature of the
WPC was that over 200 representatives of indigenous peoples, adivasis,
nomadic peoples, and other local communities were themselves present to
recount their experiences. Such a large presence is unique in the history
of conservation conferences. There were about 10 such representatives
from India.
Indian officials, community
members, NGOs, and other experts made several presentations and contributed
actively to the WPC discussions.
One of the major topics of discussion at this Congress was the relationship
of local people with the areas set aside for conservation of wild
biodiversity (legally called Protected Areas). Discussions on this issue
were coordinated by a team of Indians who are part of an international
network looking at Indigenous/Local Communities, Equity, and Protected
Areas
(also called TILCEPA). TILCEPA is an expert group set up by IUCN, and
is coordinated by Kalpavriksh, Pune.
One unique outcome of the Congress was the recognition of Community Conserved
Areas, i.e. initiatives of protecting natural ecosystems and species by
indigenous, tribal and local communities. To demonstrate the success of
conservation by or/and with the local communities many examples were presented
from across the World. India was represented by community
members from Maharashtra, Uttaranchal, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Sikkim,
who also presented case studies of how their communities are successfully
conserving biodiversity. Forest officials made presentations on ecodevelopment
initiatives involving communities.
The WPC resulted in the following outputs:
1.. Durban Accord and Action Plan: A statement on the outcomes of the
discussions, and actions to be taken in next ten years.
2.. Message to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (Signatory
countries under CBD are meeting early next year to discuss issues of
protected areas in the 7th Conference of Parties). CBD is an International
agreement that binds all nations to take appropriate actions to protect
the biological diversity in their respective countries.
3.. 33 Recommendations on diverse topics including governance of protected
areas, capacity-building of managers of protected areas, mining in ecologically
sensitive areas, poverty and protected areas, financing conservation initiatives,
evaluating management effectiveness of protected area management, and
so on.
In order to translate the outcomes of the Congress into action in India
and ensure the future of wildlife and local communities, we would urge
that the central and state governments follow up on the following key
recommendations from the Parks Congress:
1.. Recognising that biodiversity conservation has a much longer history
than government declared protected areas; in particular that traditional
ecosystem management systems of adivasi, nomadic, and other local communities
have helped to conserve biodiversity on land and in seas.
2.. Recognising Community Conserved Areas (CCA) as a legitimate and effective
means of conservation. CCAs are areas of bio-diversity significance being
conserved by tribals, nomadic communities, and other local people. These
include village irrigation tanks and watersheds, marine and fisheries
reserves, sacred forests, grasslands and ponds, etc. CCAs conserve critical
biodiversity elements, fill in geographic gaps in conservation coverage,
and provide cultural, livelihood, and ecological security to millions
of people.
3.. Moving towards more participatory systems of management of existing
government-designated protected areas (where currently numerous conflicts
exist between the residing people and management authorities). This would
mean involvement of local people fully and equitably in decisions related
to protected areas and their management.
4.. Ensuring that conservation efforts in the country are not at the expense
of legitimate rights and sense of responsibility of local people. Where
such rights have been impacted then ensuring that compensations are paid.
5.. Recognising that biologically rich areas are also rich in cultural
diversity. Many sites of cultural importance such as sacred mountains
and forests, are currently under threat and need to be protected along
with the cultural practices of conservation.
6.. More equitably distributing the costs and benefits of establishment
and management of protected areas, through securing local livelihoods
and revenues, reducing property and life damage by wildlife, and encouraging
ecologically and culturally sensitive tourism that is controlled by communities.
This could also become an effective means of reducing poverty and malnutrition
currently facing many tribal and rural communities.
7.. Specially focusing on the needs of unprivileged sections, including
nomadic communities, adivasis, landless, and marginal
farmers/fisherfolk/pastoralists. In particular women and youth within
these.
8.. Promoting positive linkages between sustainable agriculture and biodiversity
conservation, especially building on traditional biodiverse farming, pastoralism,
and fisheries, that help to maintain and conserve nature:
9.. Understanding and facilitating ecosystem and community-based approaches
to livelihood security and sustainable development, as an alternative
to the destructive path of development that is dominant today.
For further details, contact:
Ashish Kothari, ashishkothari@nda.vsnl.net.in; Neema Pathak, natrails@vsnl.com;
Manisha Sheth-Gutman, shethgutman@satyam.net.in; Tasneem Balasinorwala,
tilcepa@vsnl.net.
Kalpavriksh - Environment
Action Group
Apt. 5 Shree Datta Krupa
908 Deccan Gymkhana
Pune 411004, India
Tel: 91-20-5675450
Tel/fax: 91-20-5654239
|