Finally, at the most detailed scale of analysis,
IRS 1B LISS 2 data of March 1993 was purchased for a single
landscape of 27.5 sq. km from Siddapur taluk of Karnataka (400 - 600
m altitude, 14°16’- 14°19’N latitude and 74°52’- 74°54’E longitude).
Supervised and unsupervised classification of this imagery mapped
the landscape into seven ecotope types. 246 quadrats of 10 by 10 m
were distributed in the landscape, and used to record the tree layer
species distributed in these seven ecotope types. Within these,
sub-quadrats of 5 by 5 m and 1 by 1 m were used to record the
angiosperm species (excluding grasses, which could not be accurately
identified in the field) present in the shrub and herb layers
respectively.
Analysis of species composition of quadrats
belonging to various ecotope types determined that ecotope types as
identified by supervised classification differ significantly in
their species composition. However due to increased
misclassification, ecotope types identified by unsupervised
classification did not differ significantly in their species
composition.
DiscussionThis case study of the
Western Ghats - West Coast moist forest region of India thus
demonstrates the applicability of a multi-scale methodology
employing satellite-based classification as well as field surveys,
using a nested hierarchy of classification of ecological entities,
for assessing species diversity. This study establishes the linkages
between these seemingly disparate scales of analysis. Classification
at the scale of the Western Ghats delineates ecomosaic types, which
differ significantly from each other in their composition and
configuration of their constituent ecotope types, as determined by
classification at a finer scale. In turn, these ecotope types differ
significantly in their species composition, as determined from field
sampling.
Based on this, a strategy for biodiversity
assessment and monitoring at regular intervals of time can be
outlined for the Western Ghats and western coast of India. Ecomosaic
level classification produces a map of 205 patches belonging to
eleven ecomosaic types. For each ecomosaic type, the identification
of 5-10 landscapes is proposed, located in different patches. This
set of 50-100 landscapes, of the order of 25-50 km
2, can
be mapped to the ecotope level, using four band IRS LISS 2 or LISS 3
imagery. At a still lower scale, within each landscape, quadrats of
10 by 10 m may be used to sample plant distributions on ground. A
schematic outline of the methodology proposed, encompassing a range
of different scales of observation, and a combination of remotely
sensed data and field information, is depicted in Figure 1.
Fig
1: Proposed scheme of biodiversity investigations at diferent
scales. Modified with permission from Current Science 75(3): 264-271
In the present classification of twelve landscapes, a
total of twenty-three ecotope types were encountered. For the entire
Western Ghats however, one may expect to find about 30-40 ecotope
types, since in this study a few regions of the Ghats such as the
high altitude shola-grasslands, were not investigated. For these
30-40 ecotope types, field sampling of various organisms, including
but not restricted to plants, butterflies and birds, can be used to
establish the set of species that are found associated with specific
ecotope types. Within these landscapes, one must also investigate
the extent to which latitude, longitude, topography and climatic
factors influence the variation in species composition that is
unexplained by ecotope distribution - for which purpose GIS will
prove very useful.
Regular monitoring of this set of
landscapes, at 2-3 year intervals, along with repeated field
inventories, will enable us to monitor changes in biodiversity.
Mapping logical Sciences over the past five years with the Western
Ghats Biodiversity Network, a network of college teachers and
students who have aided us in this investigation, we believe such a
scheme to be practically feasible, in a decentralized fashion.
Previous large scale studies which use remote sensing for
biodiversity assessment have been mainly carried out in the
relatively species poor and homogeneous temperate ecosystems. This
exercise is a first of its kind to be carried out at this scale in
the tropics, explicitly investigating the linkages between
information collected at such widely different spatial scales,
combining remote sensing with field based species inventories. The
scheme suggested here may be used as a basis to organize other
programmes for assessment of biodiversity, elsewhere in the tropics
too.